Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (116)
- Constitutional Law (83)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (71)
- Litigation (65)
- Civil Procedure (48)
-
- Criminal Procedure (48)
- Jurisprudence (48)
- Criminal Law (44)
- Law and Society (39)
- Legislation (37)
- Jurisdiction (36)
- International Law (35)
- Other Law (33)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (33)
- Supreme Court of the United States (31)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (29)
- Civil Law (28)
- Legal History (28)
- Legal Profession (25)
- Legal Remedies (25)
- State and Local Government Law (21)
- Family Law (20)
- Administrative Law (16)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (16)
- First Amendment (16)
- Human Rights Law (16)
- Evidence (15)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (15)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (167)
- University of Michigan Law School (32)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- American University Washington College of Law (16)
- Brigham Young University Law School (15)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (15)
- Georgetown University Law Center (14)
- University of Georgia School of Law (12)
- Duke Law (11)
- University of Richmond (11)
- Singapore Management University (9)
- Boston University School of Law (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (8)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (8)
- University of Kentucky (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Missouri School of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (56)
- United States Supreme Court (36)
- Courts (30)
- California Supreme Court (26)
- Survey (26)
-
- Litigation (22)
- Dispute resolution (17)
- Arbitration (15)
- Jurisdiction (15)
- Judicial review (14)
- Civil Procedure (13)
- Constitutional law (13)
- Judges (13)
- Mediation (12)
- Constitution (11)
- Court (11)
- Federal courts (11)
- Sixth Amendment (11)
- United States (11)
- Criminal Procedure (10)
- Evidence (10)
- Federalism (10)
- Attorney (9)
- Judicial process (9)
- Law reform (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Trial (9)
- Custody (8)
- Dispute Resolution (8)
- Law (8)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (114)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (52)
- Faculty Scholarship (30)
- Nevada Law Journal (19)
- BYU Law Review (15)
-
- Faculty Publications (12)
- American University Law Review (11)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- Articles (10)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (9)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Faculty Working Papers (7)
- Kentucky Law Journal (7)
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- Law Faculty Publications (6)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
- American Indian Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (5)
- Georgia Law Review (5)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (4)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (4)
- Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (4)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (4)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 481 - 484 of 484
Full-Text Articles in Courts
(Dys)Functionality, Mark P. Mckenna
(Dys)Functionality, Mark P. Mckenna
Journal Articles
The functionality doctrine serves a unique role in trademark law: unlike virtually every other doctrine, functionality can trump consumer confusion (or so it seems, at least in mechanical-functionality cases). In this sense, functionality may be the only doctrine in trademark law that can truly be considered a defense. But despite its potential power, the functionality doctrine is quite inconsistently applied. This is true of mechanical functionality cases because courts differ over the extent to which the doctrine focuses on competitors’ right to copy unpatented features as opposed to their need to copy. And aesthetic functionality cases are even more scattered: …
Suing Courts, Frederic Bloom, Christopher Serkin
Suing Courts, Frederic Bloom, Christopher Serkin
Publications
This Article argues for a new and unexpected mechanism of judicial accountability: suing courts. Current models of court accountability focus almost entirely on correcting legal errors. A suit against the court would concentrate on something different--on providing transition relief, by way of legal remedy, to those bearing the heaviest burdens of desirable legal change. These suits may at first appear impossible. But suing courts is conceptually rational and mechanically reasonable, a tool that eases legal transitions while navigating the many hurdles modern doctrine puts in the way. This Article sets out the first complete account of how, where, and why …
Incitement To Riot In The Age Of Flash Mobs, Margot E. Kaminski
Incitement To Riot In The Age Of Flash Mobs, Margot E. Kaminski
Publications
As people increasingly use social media to organize both protests and robberies, government will try to regulate these calls to action. With an eye to this intensifying dynamic, this Article reviews First Amendment jurisprudence on incitement and applies it to existing statutes on incitement to riot at a common law, state, and federal level. The article suggests that First Amendment jurisprudence has a particularly tortuous relationship with regulating speech directed to crowds. It examines current crowd psychology to suggest which crowd behavior, if any, should as a matter of policy be subject to regulation. It concludes that many existing incitement-to-riot …
Constitutional Gaps In Bankruptcy, S. Todd Brown
Constitutional Gaps In Bankruptcy, S. Todd Brown
Journal Articles
Federal bankruptcy law incorporates a broad range of commercial and related matters that are otherwise left to the States under the Constitution, follows an efficiency-centered process model that may implicate due process, and relies upon a judicial structure that appears to be inconsistent with Article III. In spite of the crushing volume of bankruptcy cases and proceedings each year in which the resolution of one or more of these questions may be relevant, the Supreme Court has had few opportunities to tackle them directly. Indeed, after more than two centuries, the Court has provided precious few insights into the limits …