Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (53)
- Constitutional Law (46)
- Jurisprudence (36)
- Criminal Law (34)
- International Law (33)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (31)
- Legislation (20)
- Litigation (19)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (19)
- Human Rights Law (18)
- Criminal Procedure (17)
- Civil Procedure (16)
- State and Local Government Law (16)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (15)
- Evidence (15)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (14)
- Jurisdiction (13)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
- Intellectual Property Law (11)
- Law and Politics (11)
- Legal History (11)
- Administrative Law (10)
- Family Law (10)
- Legal Studies (9)
- First Amendment (8)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Military, War, and Peace (8)
- Business Organizations Law (7)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (30)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (24)
- UIC School of Law (18)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (16)
- University of Richmond (13)
-
- William & Mary Law School (10)
- New York Law School (9)
- Cornell University Law School (8)
- Duke Law (8)
- Brigham Young University Law School (7)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (4)
- Pace University (4)
- St. John's University School of Law (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- University of Missouri School of Law (4)
- Washington University in St. Louis (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (24)
- Courts (13)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Federal courts (10)
- Judicial review (8)
-
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Law (6)
- Sixth Amendment (6)
- Decision making (5)
- Precedent (5)
- Trials (5)
- Children (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Due process (4)
- Judges (4)
- Judicial independence (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Law reform (4)
- Parents (4)
- Statutory interpretation (4)
- Voting Rights Act (4)
- Abortion (3)
- Canada (3)
- Civil procedure (3)
- Confrontation Clause (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Constitutional interpretation (3)
- Death (3)
- Diversity (3)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (25)
- Articles (18)
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- UIC Law Review (12)
- University of Richmond Law Review (10)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (9)
- Michigan Law Review (9)
- All Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (8)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (6)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (6)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Publications (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (5)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- NYLS Law Review (4)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (4)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (3)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Working Papers (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3)
- Articles & Book Chapters (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 276
Full-Text Articles in Courts
"Trap"Ing Roe In Indiana And A Common-Ground Alternative, Dawn E. Johnsen
"Trap"Ing Roe In Indiana And A Common-Ground Alternative, Dawn E. Johnsen
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Public discourse over abortion overwhelmingly focuses on whether the Supreme Court will overrule Roe v. Wade and states will again ban abortion. But at least since 1992, when the Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed Roe's "central holding," certain moderate- sounding abortion restrictions - sometimes framed as reasonable compromise regulations - have posed a greater threat to women's reproductive health and liberty. This Essay examines one increasingly popular form of restriction: laws that regulate providers of abortion services in the name of advancing women's health, without actual health justification. Little-noted efforts to enact such restrictions in Indiana, during the …
Midwestern Juvenile Drug Courts: Analysis & Recommendations, Nicole A. Kozdron
Midwestern Juvenile Drug Courts: Analysis & Recommendations, Nicole A. Kozdron
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Michigan Supreme Court, Stare Decisis, And Overruling The Overrulings, Robert A. Sedler
The Michigan Supreme Court, Stare Decisis, And Overruling The Overrulings, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Case For A Constitutional Definition Of Hearsay: Requiring Confrontation Of Testimonial, Nonassertive Conduct And Statements Admitted To Explain An Unchallenged Investigation, The, James L. Kainen, Carrie A. Tendler
Case For A Constitutional Definition Of Hearsay: Requiring Confrontation Of Testimonial, Nonassertive Conduct And Statements Admitted To Explain An Unchallenged Investigation, The, James L. Kainen, Carrie A. Tendler
Faculty Scholarship
Crawford v. Washington’s historical approach to the confrontation clause establishes that testimonial hearsay inadmissible without confrontation at the founding is similarly inadmissible today, despite whether it fits a subsequently developed hearsay exception. Consequently, the requirement of confrontation depends upon whether an out-of-court statement is hearsay, testimonial, and, if so, whether it was nonetheless admissible without confrontation at the founding. A substantial literature has developed about whether hearsay statements are testimonial or were, like dying declarations, otherwise admissible at the founding. In contrast, this article focuses on the first question – whether statements are hearsay – which scholars have thus far …
Future Of Appellate Sentencing Review: Booker In The States, The Symposium: Criminal Appeals: Sentencing Appeals, John F. Pfaff
Future Of Appellate Sentencing Review: Booker In The States, The Symposium: Criminal Appeals: Sentencing Appeals, John F. Pfaff
Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, I look at the theoretical implications of the United States Supreme Court‘s recent contradictory sentencing cases, and I then examine how they are playing out in practice at the state level. Though Booker purports to follow, not repudiate, Blakely, its view of the role of appellate courts is wholly inconsistent with Blakely‘s view. Many states have sidestepped this contradiction by simply following Blakely and ignoring the option laid out in Booker. But at least three states have chosen to pass through the door opened by Booker. Their experiences allow us to examine the implications of Booker and …
A Response To The Sounds Of Silence, Andrew King-Ries
A Response To The Sounds Of Silence, Andrew King-Ries
Faculty Law Review Articles
In his article, The Sound of Silence: Holding Batterers Accountable for Silencing Their Victims, Tom Lininger attempts to "facilitate the effective prosecution of domestic violence cases, particularly domestic homicide, while complying with the new requirements announced [for forfeiture by wrongdoing] by the Supreme Court in Giles [v. California]."' In doing so, Lininger tackles a wide array of topics, including analyzing the "theoretical underpinnings" of forfeiture by wrongdoing; explicating the Giles decision, criticizing Justice Scalia's originalist approach for its "selective historical research . . . conflation of evidentiary and constitutional forfeiture theories, and . . . vacillation between objective and subjective …
Complementarity In Crisis: Uganda, Alternative Justice, And The International Criminal Court, Alexander K.A. Greenawalt
Complementarity In Crisis: Uganda, Alternative Justice, And The International Criminal Court, Alexander K.A. Greenawalt
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
In this Article, I take up a focused analysis of the Uganda prosecutions, considering both the interpretive dilemmas facing the Court and the efforts of Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo to address them. Part I provides a summary of events leading to the LRA arrest warrants and the recent peace negotiations. Part II turns to the text of the Rome Statute, with a focus on Article 19's framework for complementary jurisdiction and the Article 53 dictate that “interests of justice” may trump the admissibility of investigations and cases that otherwise meet all relevant statutory criteria. Although the ICC is structured to give …
Giles V. California: A Personal Reflection, Richard D. Friedman
Giles V. California: A Personal Reflection, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this Essay, Professor Friedman places Giles v. California in the context of the recent transformation of the law governing the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. He contends that a robust doctrine of forfeiture is an integral part of a sound conception of the confrontation right. One reason this is so is that cases fitting within the traditional hearsay exception for dying declarations can be explained as instances of forfeiture. This explanation leads to a simple structure of confrontation law, qualified by the principle that the confrontation right may be waived or forfeited but not subject to genuine exceptions. …
Queer Lockdown: Coming To Terms With The Ongoing Criminalization Of Lgbtq Communities, Ann Cammett
Queer Lockdown: Coming To Terms With The Ongoing Criminalization Of Lgbtq Communities, Ann Cammett
Scholarly Works
The criminal justice system exacts a toll on some Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) communities. The experience of living in poverty and the concomitant exposure to a variety of governmental systems puts all poor, but especially LGBTQ low-income people of color, at risk of incarceration. What typically goes unexamined are the myriad ways that LGBTQ people are drawn into and experience the carceral system because of sexual identities and expression. This negative effect surfaces at every conceivable level: the marginalization and subsequent criminalization of queer youth; anti-gay bias in the judicial system; the rerouting of domestic violence cases …
A Call For The End Of The Doctrine Of Realignment, Jacob S. Sherkow
A Call For The End Of The Doctrine Of Realignment, Jacob S. Sherkow
Articles & Chapters
In Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 1941, the Supreme Court established the doctrine of realignment, requiring federal courts to examine the issues in dispute and realign each party as plaintiff or defendant if necessary. Due to the complete diversity requirement, realignment gave the federal courts the ability to both create and destroy diversity jurisdiction. Since 1941, the federal courts have struggled to interpret the central holding in Indianapolis, and have created several competing "tests" for realignment. This confusion has made the doctrine of realignment unworkable. Realignment-along with each of the present tests-encourages jurisdictional abuses by forcing the federal courts to …
Sharing Stories: Narrative Lawyering In Bench Trials, Paul Holland
Sharing Stories: Narrative Lawyering In Bench Trials, Paul Holland
Faculty Articles
Narrative lawyering theorists have demonstrated the ways in which the dynamics of stories affect the way lawyers deliver and jurors receive messages within trial. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the distinctive ways in which stories are developed in bench trials. Examining three roughly contemporaneous bench trials, this Article illuminates how this trial format requires lawyers to be both performers and audience, alternating roles frequently, sometimes within the span of a breath or a gesture. The availability of feedback to the lawyer and the possibility of direct intervention by the fact-finder produce a stark contrast to what lawyers …
Wrestling With Punishment: The Role Of The Bc Court Of Appeal In The Law Of Sentencing, Benjamin Berger, Gerry Ferguson
Wrestling With Punishment: The Role Of The Bc Court Of Appeal In The Law Of Sentencing, Benjamin Berger, Gerry Ferguson
Articles & Book Chapters
This article, one in a collection of articles on the history and jurisprudential contributions of the British Columbia Court of Appeal on the occasion of its 100th anniversary, looks at the role and the work of the court in the area of sentencing since the court was first given jurisdiction to hear sentence appeals in 1921. In the three broad periods that we canvass, we draw out the sometimes surprising, often unique, and frequently provocative ways in which the BCCA has, over its history, wrestled with the practice of criminal punishment and, with it, the basic assumptions of our system …
Montana's Unique Writ Of Supervisory Control, Larry Howell
Montana's Unique Writ Of Supervisory Control, Larry Howell
Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings
This article explores the history of the Montana Supreme Court's unique writ of supervisory control, which dates back to the infamous War of the Copper Kings in Butte, Montana. The article also examines the steps the Court has taken to clarify the law of supervisory control in Rule 14(3) of the new Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, which went into effect in October 2007, and expressly states for the first time the circumstances under which the writ will issue.
Unmasking Judicial Extremism, Carl W. Tobias
Unmasking Judicial Extremism, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Review of Cass R. Sunstein, Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts Are Wrong for America (2005)
Gonzales, Casey And The Viability Rule, Randy Beck
Gonzales, Casey And The Viability Rule, Randy Beck
Scholarly Works
Gonzales v. Carhart upheld a federal ban on intact D&E abortions. The dissenters in Gonzales accused the majority of ignoring the rule that a state may only prohibit abortion of a viable fetus, one capable of life outside the womb. The continuing discord over the viability rule highlights an issue that remains unsettled 34 years after Roe: Why may a state protect the life of a fetus after it reaches viability, but not before? Professor John Hart Ely long ago noted Roe's failure to justify the viability rule, observing that the Court's defense seems to mistake a definition for a …
Notice Otherwise Given: Will In Absentia Trials At The Special Tribunal For Lebanon Violate Human Rights?, Chris Jenks
Notice Otherwise Given: Will In Absentia Trials At The Special Tribunal For Lebanon Violate Human Rights?, Chris Jenks
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
On March 1, 2009, the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) commenced operations in the Netherlands. The mandate of the STL is to try those allegedly responsible for the 2005 bombing in Beirut which killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. A collaborative effort between Lebanon and the United Nations, the STL is to be of “international character based on the highest standards of justice.” However, the STL’s in absentia trial provisions are based on a far different, and lower, standard. This article posits that the STL’s in absentia trial provisions violate human rights norms, indeed the U.N. expressly rejected such …
Techno-Jury: Techniques In Verbal And Visual Persuasion, Gregory J. Morse
Techno-Jury: Techniques In Verbal And Visual Persuasion, Gregory J. Morse
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Thoughts On The Lawyer’S E-Volving Duties In Discovery, Steven S. Gensler
Some Thoughts On The Lawyer’S E-Volving Duties In Discovery, Steven S. Gensler
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Appealing Outcomes: A Study For The Overturn Rate Of Canada's Appellate Courts, Michael H. Lubetsky, Joshua A. Krane
Appealing Outcomes: A Study For The Overturn Rate Of Canada's Appellate Courts, Michael H. Lubetsky, Joshua A. Krane
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
This commentary discusses the rate at which Canada's appellate courts are overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada. By deconstructing the overturn rate, the authors identify and compare various factors that affect the rate at which appeals are pursued, considered, and allowed. The data reveal that decisions from the British Columbia, Quebec, and Newfoundland & Labrador courts of appeal are overturned more often than those from their counterparts. Conversely, the Ontario and Saskatchewan courts of appeal exhibit overturn rates below the national average. The analysis suggests that the underlying drivers giving rise to the unusually high or low overturn rates, …
Business, The Environment, And The Roberts Court: A Preliminary Assessment, Jonathan H. Adler
Business, The Environment, And The Roberts Court: A Preliminary Assessment, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
The Roberts Court has developed a reputation for being a "pro-business" court. This article, prepared for the 29 Santa Clara Law Review symposium on "Big Business and the Roberts Court," seeks to offer a preliminary assessment of this claim with reference to the Roberts Court's decisions in environmental cases. Reviewing the environmental law decisions of the Roberts Court to date reveals no evidence of a "pro-business" bias. This does not disprove the claim that the Roberts Court is pro-business, but it may suggest the need to refine conventional descriptions of the Roberts Court. The lack of a pro-business orientation in …
A Theory Of Wto Adjudication: From Empirical Analysis To Biased Rule Development, Juscelino F. Colares
A Theory Of Wto Adjudication: From Empirical Analysis To Biased Rule Development, Juscelino F. Colares
Faculty Publications
The positive theory of litigation predicts that, under certain conditions, plaintiffs and defendants achieve an unremarkable and roughly equivalent share of litigation success. This Article, grounded in an empirical analysis of WTO adjudication from 1995 through 27, reveals a high disparity between Complainant and Respondent success rates: Complainants win roughly ninety percent of the disputes. This disparity transcends case type, party identity, income level, and other litigant-specific characteristics. After analyzing and discarding standard empirical and theoretical alternative explanations for the systematic disparity in success rates, this study demonstrates, through an examination of patterns in WTO adjudicators' notorious decisions, that biased …
Scientific Avoidance: Toward More Principled Judicial Review Of Legislative Science, Emily H. Meazell
Scientific Avoidance: Toward More Principled Judicial Review Of Legislative Science, Emily H. Meazell
Indiana Law Journal
Courts increasingly confront legislative enactments made in light of scientific uncertainty. Even so, the degree of deference appropriate to this type of judicial review is a moving target, seemingly determined on an ad hoc, unprincipled basis. On one hand, the decision of how to legislate in light of scientific uncertainty is quintessentially one of policy, suggesting that the highest degree of deference is appropriate. But certain classes of cases, and certain types of scientific questions, seem singularly inappropriate for extreme judicial deference. While significant scholarly attention has focused on the comparative institutional competence of courts and legislatures with respect to …
Estate Of Pew V. Cardarelli, Rachel Bell
Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund V. Dynex Capital Inc., Erica E. Bonnett
Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund V. Dynex Capital Inc., Erica E. Bonnett
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Leveto, Jennifer Steward
Judicial Independence, Harry Tepker
Celebrating Thurgood Marshall: The Prophetic Dissenter, Susan Low Bloch
Celebrating Thurgood Marshall: The Prophetic Dissenter, Susan Low Bloch
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Thurgood Marshall was born 100 years ago into a country substantially divided along color lines. Marshall could not attend the University of Maryland School of Law because he was a Negro; he had trouble locating bathrooms that were not for “whites only.” Today, by contrast, we celebrate his life and accomplishments. Broadway has a play called Thurgood devoted to him; Baltimore/Washington International Airport is now BWI Thurgood Marshall Airport; even the University of Maryland renamed its law library in his honor. How did we come this far? How far do we still have to go? This article will consider what …
Bull’S-Eye View Of Cooperation In Discovery, Steven S. Gensler
Bull’S-Eye View Of Cooperation In Discovery, Steven S. Gensler
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Understanding The Paradoxical Case Of The Voting Rights Act, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Understanding The Paradoxical Case Of The Voting Rights Act, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This is an article about the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and its curious handling by the U.S. Supreme Court. When the Court examines the constitutionality of the Act, for example, it blindly defers to the work of Congress, unwilling to subject the statute to any meaningful scrutiny. In contrast, this posture of deference for questions of constitutional law differs greatly from the Court’s posture when interpreting the language of the statute. This is an area where the Court defers to no one, even when the text of the statute or the clear intent of Congress demands a different outcome. …