Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Courts Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1976

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 931 - 960 of 981

Full-Text Articles in Courts

Roger Lewis Blackburn V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1078 Jan 1976

Roger Lewis Blackburn V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1078

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Frank Wiley V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0909 Jan 1976

Frank Wiley V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0909

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Kentucky Utilities Company V. George B. Buchanan And Reba Buchanan, His Wife, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0921 Jan 1976

Kentucky Utilities Company V. George B. Buchanan And Reba Buchanan, His Wife, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0921

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


James York And Joe York V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0933 Jan 1976

James York And Joe York V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0933

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Teddy Gerald Hyden V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1080 Jan 1976

Teddy Gerald Hyden V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1080

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Louis Anthony Brenner V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1085 Jan 1976

Louis Anthony Brenner V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1085

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Plezz H. Mears V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1095 Jan 1976

Plezz H. Mears V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1095

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


John Davis V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0911 Jan 1976

John Davis V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0911

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1035 Jan 1976

Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Appellant's Brief 1975-Sc-1035

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Jerome Ward V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0775 Jan 1976

Jerome Ward V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0775

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Linda Susan Highsmith (Cummings) V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0976 Jan 1976

Linda Susan Highsmith (Cummings) V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0976

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Michael Thomas Hager V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0860 Jan 1976

Michael Thomas Hager V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0860

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Michael Thomas Hager V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0860 Jan 1976

Michael Thomas Hager V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1975-Sc-0860

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Jones (Samuel Thomas) V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0897 Jan 1976

Jones (Samuel Thomas) V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0897

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Charles Louis Griffin V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0899 Jan 1976

Charles Louis Griffin V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0899

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Frazier Thomas Beard V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0935 Jan 1976

Frazier Thomas Beard V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0935

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Kenny Earl Gardner V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0992 Jan 1976

Kenny Earl Gardner V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1975-Sc-0992

1970-1979

No abstract provided.


Volume 43 1975-1976 Jan 1976

Volume 43 1975-1976

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Consent And The Roots Of Judicial Authority: The Constitutional Writings Of Archibald Cox (Book Review), Thomas D. Rowe Jr. Jan 1976

Consent And The Roots Of Judicial Authority: The Constitutional Writings Of Archibald Cox (Book Review), Thomas D. Rowe Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

Reviewing A. Cox, The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government


An Intermediate National Appellate Court: Solution Or Diversion, Stephen C. White Jan 1976

An Intermediate National Appellate Court: Solution Or Diversion, Stephen C. White

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane Jan 1976

Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Conspiracy And Federal Jurisdiction: From Crimmins To Feola, Mark Berger Jan 1976

Conspiracy And Federal Jurisdiction: From Crimmins To Feola, Mark Berger

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


A Giant Step Backwards: Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. V. Wilderness Society' And Its Effect On Public Interest Litigation Jan 1976

A Giant Step Backwards: Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. V. Wilderness Society' And Its Effect On Public Interest Litigation

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Equal Protection And Criminal Sentencing: Legal And Policy Considerations, Mark Berger Jan 1976

Equal Protection And Criminal Sentencing: Legal And Policy Considerations, Mark Berger

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.


Some Observations On The Disposition Of Ccw Cases In Detroit, Michigan Law Review Jan 1976

Some Observations On The Disposition Of Ccw Cases In Detroit, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Part I of this Note details the disposition of cases alleging violations of the Michigan CCW statute that were brought in the Detroit recorder's court during 1973. Although the statute is only part of the current scheme of gun control in Michigan, it is the principal weapon available to the police and prosecutor in the preventive battle against the illegal use of firearms. To give meaning to the dispositional statistics and to aid in perceiving the over-all judicial attitude toward CCW cases, the statistical results of the study are compared with statistics on the disposition of cases involving felonies similar …


Substantive Validity Challenges Under The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code: The Practitioner And The New Procedures, Benjamin N. Henszey, Benjamin Novak Jan 1976

Substantive Validity Challenges Under The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code: The Practitioner And The New Procedures, Benjamin N. Henszey, Benjamin Novak

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments, Various Editors Jan 1976

Recent Developments, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


The Emerging Right Of Legal Assistance For The Indigent In Civil Proceedings, Jeffrey M. Mandell Jan 1976

The Emerging Right Of Legal Assistance For The Indigent In Civil Proceedings, Jeffrey M. Mandell

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

After the Supreme Court declared in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigents have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in criminal cases, attention turned to the possibility that a similar right could be found for civil litigants. Although there is no explicit constitutional guarantee of counsel for the civil litigant, the due process clause, which protects property rights as well as personal freedoms, arguably mandates that there be a right to professional representation of all citizens in all courts. The inability of most laymen to effectively present even a rudimentary case on their own behalf indicates that without counsel a meaningful …


Sex Discrimination: Social Security Benefits, Neil B. Cohen, Catherine A. Broderick, Charles H. Klein Jan 1976

Sex Discrimination: Social Security Benefits, Neil B. Cohen, Catherine A. Broderick, Charles H. Klein

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Remittitur Practice In The Federal Courts, Irene D. Johnson Jan 1976

Remittitur Practice In The Federal Courts, Irene D. Johnson

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

The first section of this Note examines and evaluates the mechanics of remittitur procedure in the federal courts. The second section focuses on the major unresolved issue of remittitur procedure: whether a plaintiff who elects to remit is entitled to appellate review of the remittitur order. The final section of the Note evaluate remitting-plaintiff appeal procedures and suggest some ways in which federal remittitur procedure might be made more efficient and more responsive to policy objectives.