Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Courts Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

All Faculty Scholarship

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year

Articles 121 - 125 of 125

Full-Text Articles in Courts

Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges And The Roles Of The Jury, Nancy S. Marder Feb 1995

Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges And The Roles Of The Jury, Nancy S. Marder

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Federalism And Supremacy: Control Of State Judicial Decision-Making, Margaret G. Stewart Mar 1992

Federalism And Supremacy: Control Of State Judicial Decision-Making, Margaret G. Stewart

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Defining “Co-Party” Within Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 13(G): Are Cross-Claims Between Original Defendants And Third-Party Defendants Allowable?, John Bessler Apr 1991

Defining “Co-Party” Within Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 13(G): Are Cross-Claims Between Original Defendants And Third-Party Defendants Allowable?, John Bessler

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Gender Dynamics And Jury Deliberations (Student Note), Nancy S. Marder Feb 1987

Gender Dynamics And Jury Deliberations (Student Note), Nancy S. Marder

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Cable Television's New Legal Universe: Early Judicial Response To The Cable Act, Michael I. Meyerson Jan 1987

Cable Television's New Legal Universe: Early Judicial Response To The Cable Act, Michael I. Meyerson

All Faculty Scholarship

On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that day, the first major law regulation cable television, the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984,was signed into law.

Early judicial attempts to interpret the Cable Act revealed the difficulties judges had with understanding the new legal regimen. A common thread running through these varied cases, if any, was the courts' apparent lack of appreciation of the Act's complexity. Many, though not all, decisions appear to misread congressional language and misinterpret congressional intent. The first part of this Article will discuss this problem …