Courts Commons^™

On The Relevance Of The Admissibility Of Scientific Evidence: Tort System Outcomes Are Principally Determined By Lawyers’ Rates Of Return, Lester Brickman

Cardozo Law Review

The attention generated by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reflects the perceived importance of the issue of the admissibility of scientific evidence in tort litigation. In products liability litigation, whether claimants prevail often depends upon expert testimony presented on the issue of causation. Unless a claimant is able to have the expert's testimony admitted, there will be little or no chance of prevailing. Thus, though it is disputed whether Daubert will extend or contract tort liability, it is undisputed that its importance lies in its impact on the scope of tort liability.

Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Epistemiology And Legal Process, Margaret G. Farrell

Cardozo Law Review

Justice Blackmun's majority opinion in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. acknowledges that law and science have different goals, but it fails to recognize the implications of those differences for legal process. Recent increases in the scientifically-based claims brought in the federal courts, and in the size and complexity of the litigation in which such claims are made, have raised the stakes in the debate. At the same time, scientific concepts of relativity, uncertainty, and multiple causation are at odds with simple, legal notions about fact-finding and cause and effect. This disparity between legal and scientific understandings over the admission …

Lev V. Tel-Aviv-Jaffa Rabbinical Court, Aharon Barak, Dov Levin, Shlomo Levin

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]

Petitioner 1 and Respondent 3 were in divorce proceedings. In the context of a suit for marital reconciliation filed by Respondent 3, he requested that Respondent 1 prevent Petitioner 1 from leaving the country. His request was granted. Petitioner 1 requested that the order be vacated because her trip was intended as a vacation with her eldest daughter as well as for conducting business …

The Ucc And Consignment: Making The Code Safe For Artists And Other "Little Fellows", Mark Marcone

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Film Labelling As A Cure For Colorization [And Other Alterations]: A Band-Aid For A Hatchet Job, David A. Honicky

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Federalist Society Roundtable Discussion, Timothy Dyk, Robert Bork, Nadine Strossen, John O. Mcginnis, Theodore B. Olson

Articles

This discussion took place at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on October 12, 1993.

Parallel Universes: Nepa Lessons For The New Property, Michael E. Herz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Judicial Opinions As Binding Law And As Explanations For Judgments, Thomas W. Merrill

Cardozo Law Review

To what extent does the executive branch have autonomous powers of legal interpretation? The issue is often broadly framed in terms of two disparate understandings of the allocation of interpretative power: "judicial supremacy" and "departmentalism." In this paper, I shall speak of two different understandings of judicial opinions: the idea that judicial opinions (or at least the "holdings" of opinions) are legally binding on actors in the executive branch, and the idea that opinions are, from the perspective of executive actors, merely explanations for judicial judgments. I adopt this locution because it focuses more precisely on the core of the …

Presidential Interpretation Of The Constitution, David A. Strauss

Cardozo Law Review

May the executive branch disagree with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution, and act in accordance with its own view? We tend to associate this question with a few great constitutional crises. Disputes between President Jackson and the Supreme Court over the Bank of the United States; between President Lincoln and the Court over slavery; and between President Franklin Roosevelt and the Court over New Deal legislation, all produced memorable statements by presidents claiming a broad power to act independently from the Court's decisions. The school desegregation controversy was between the Court and some state governments, not the President, …

Imposing Unified Executive Branch Statutory Interpretation, Michael Herz

Cardozo Law Review

Since the birth of the administrative state, the dominant legal debate about the fourth branch has concerned the powers of the other three to control it. In recent years, the particular focus has been on presidential oversight, in part as a result of the increasingly systematic efforts of every President since Richard Nixon to gain control of the federal bureaucracy. This enormous, and in general, illuminating literature has tended, I think, to overlook two aspects of the problem.

Constitutional Review By The Executive In Foreign Affairs And War Powers: A Consequence Of Rational Choice In The Separation Of Powers, John O. Mcginnis

Articles

No abstract provided.

Seqra’S Too Valuable To Trash: A Reply To Stewart Sterk, Philip Weinberg

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Districting: A Second Vantage Point, Alan Gartner

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federalism: An Architecture For Freedom, Siegfried Wiessner

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article presents federalism as a flexible and effective system for organizing power, emphasizing its relevance in promoting freedom and managing diversity. It argues that federalism, while often misunderstood, offers a viable framework for structuring governance in diverse and restructured communities, particularly in the context of the New Europe.

The Constitution Outside The Courts, Frederick A.O. Schwarz Jr.

Cardozo Law Review

The forty-fourth Cardozo Lecture, delivered in memory of Benjamin N. Cardozo at the House of the Association on December 5, 1991.

What Courts Do To Secured Creditors In Chapter 11 Cram Down, Jack Friedman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

German Constitutional Culture In Transition, Bernhard Schlink

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Date With Justice: Prostitution And The Decriminalization Debate, Margaret A. Baldwin

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article critiques the decriminalization of prostitution, arguing that it fails to address the systemic exploitation and violence faced by women in prostitution. The author contends that decriminalization would empower pimps, johns, and legal systems to further exploit women, as it legitimizes their power dynamics. The analysis emphasizes the need to prioritize the survival and empowerment of prostituted women over legal reforms that benefit their exploiters.

Constitutional Identity, George P. Fletcher

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comment, Agnes Heller

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Court’S Role In Interbranch Disputes Over Oversight Of Agency Rulemaking, John J. Gibbons

Cardozo Law Review

This paper is adapted from the Uri and Caroline Bauer Memorial Lecture delivered at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, on March 10, 1992.

Grand Jury Charges Delivered By Supreme Court Justices Riding Circuit During The 1790s, David J. Katz

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

John D. Appel, Leslie Berman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Why The “Look And Feel” Of Computer Software Should Not Receive Copyright Protection, Matthew J. Fortnow

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Choosing Between Normative And Descriptive Versions Of The Judicial Role, Michael E. Herz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Competition Among Municipalities As A Constraint On Land Use Exactions, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

The article examines the limitations of competition among municipalities in constraining the abuse of land use exactions and impact fees, arguing that while competition provides some checks, it is insufficient to prevent distortions in land markets. It critiques the Tiebout hypothesis, which assumes that intermunicipal competition leads to efficient allocation of public goods, and highlights how monopoly power in certain land uses undermines this theory. The analysis emphasizes the need for legal constraints to address the exploitation of landowners and ensure exactions align with the external costs of development.

The Asbestos Litigation Crisis: Is There A Need For An Administrative Alternative?, Lester Brickman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Principle Versus Politics: The Solicitor General's Office In Constitutional And Bureaucratic Theory, John O. Mcginnis

Articles

No abstract provided.

An Emerging Conception Of Fundamental Rights In Contemporary Russia, Mary Holland

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article explores the emergence of a new conception of fundamental rights in post-Soviet Russia, marking a significant shift from a totalitarian regime to a more democratic, rule-of-law-based system. This transformation is evident through the adoption of key legal documents: the Declaration of Rights and Freedoms, the Conception of Judicial Reform, and the Law on the Constitutional Court. These reforms reflect a rejection of the Soviet legal tradition, alignment with international human rights standards, and a re-emergence of pre-revolutionary Russian legal ideals. The article argues that these developments signify a fundamental change in the Russian legal framework, emphasizing individual rights …

Derrida, Law, Violence And The Paradox Of Justice, Michel Rosenfeld

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.