Courts Commons^™

The Paternalistic Ideology Of Erisa And Unforgiving Courts: Restoring Balance Through A Grand Bargain, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

No abstract provided.

Patent Claim Construction: It's Not A Pure Matter Of Law, So Why Isn't The Federal Circuit Giving The District Courts The Deference They Deserve?, Lauren Maida

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

International Advocate For Peace Award Acceptance Speech, Amira Dotan

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The Ninth International Peace Award Recipient

Nonconsensual + Nonbinding = Nonsensical? Reconsidering Court-Connected Arbitration Programs, Amy J. Schmitz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Policymakers have adopted programs mandating parties to submit their disputes to court-connected arbitration hoping to garner efficiency benefits commonly associated with contractual Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) arbitration. Mandatory nonbinding arbitration, however, is ill-equipped for this task because it lacks the consensual core and finality of FAA arbitration. Instead, it often adds an inefficient layer to the litigation process and may harm those least able to protect themselves from coerced settlements or burdens of protracted litigation.

Class Action Arbitration, William H. Baker

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Class action arbitrations are a relatively recent phenomenon in the United States, but the number of such arbitrations is expanding at a rapid rate. As of August 2008, the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") has administered 246 class action arbitrations and Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS"), another major U.S. arbitral institution, has also administered a substantial number of class arbitrations.

Business Courts And The Future Of Arbitration, Christopher R. Drahozal

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article examines the extent to which competition from business courts is likely to impact the future of arbitration. Part II provides a brief overview of the growth of business courts in recent years. Part III sets out a structural comparison of arbitration with business courts, highlighting the similarities and differences between the two. Part IV provides empirical evidence on the relationship between the availability of business courts and the use of arbitration clauses. Overall, the evidence provides little indication that parties are switching from arbitration to business courts. The evidence is far from definitive, however, and highlights the need …

State Regulation Of Arbitration Proceedings: Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards By State Courts, Stephen K. Huber

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The thesis of this Article can be stated simply and concisely: States possess the power to adopt standards for the conduct of arbitration proceedings and review of arbitration awards that are significantly different from federal law standards. The major objective of this Article is to explore the most important possibilities for reform of arbitration law and practice at the state level. State law standards will be of increasing importance in the reformation of arbitration practice. This Article focuses on the standards of review of arbitration awards employed by state courts, because the power to vacate an arbitration award is the …

Judges Gone Wild: Why Breaking The Mediation Confidentiality Privilege For Acting In "Bad Faith" Should Be Reevaluated In Court-Ordered Mandatory Mediation, Samara Zimmerman

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note focuses on the reasons why a good faith requirement or a bad faith exception for breaking mediation confidentiality is objectionable and offers an alternative for the Florida court system that, if implemented, could mitigate such disadvantages. I will discuss "the intersection between [a] court-ordered mediation, the confidentiality of which is mandated by law ... and the power of a court to control proceedings," and persons who appear before it by sanctioning conduct that taking place in mediation. Part II of this Note will begin by providing a background to the Doe v. Francis civil case. It will highlight …

Rwandan Genocide: Taking Notes From The Holocaust Reparations Movement, Yael Weitz

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the failure to provide adequate reparations to rape victims of the Rwandan genocide, drawing parallels with the Holocaust reparations movement. It argues that while international law has advanced in recognizing rape as a grave crime, the existing mechanisms, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), have failed to deliver reparations. The International Criminal Court (ICC) is proposed as a potential solution, despite jurisdictional limitations, through cooperation with the ICTR to address the urgent needs of Rwandan rape victims.

Super Bowl Hero To Bank Account Zero, Scott Hollander

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Crossing The Fair Use Line: The Demise And Revival Of The Harry Potter Lexicon And Its Implications For The Fair Use Doctrine In The Real World And On The Internet, Shira Siskind

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Bound By Injustice: Challenging The Use Of Shackles On Incarcerated Pregnant Women, Dana Sussman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The use of shackles to restrain a pregnant woman during the birthing process is a barbaric practice that needlessly inflicts excruciating pain and humiliation. It is widely condemned by members of the international community, including leading medical and public health associations. Although human rights advocates have effected significant policy change in the past ten years to eliminate the use of shackles on women in labor, it remains routine practice in many American prisons and jails. Reproductive rights advocates should consider this a reproductive justice issue and build on the gains of the human rights community to bring legal claims challenging …

Plenary Session Panel: The Sixth John A. Speziale Alternative Dispute Resolution Symposium, Lela P. Love

Articles

No abstract provided.

Punishing Aggressors In U.S. Courts: Will The Act Of State Doctrine Bar National Prosecution Of The Crime Of Aggression?, Gergana Halpern

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note examines the intersection of the Act of State Doctrine and the prosecution of the crime of aggression in U.S. courts, arguing that while the doctrine does not legally preclude such prosecutions, practical considerations such as political sensitivity and the need for international legitimacy suggest that U.S. courts should await international consensus before proceeding. The analysis highlights the complexities of balancing legal principles with diplomatic realities.

Is Judicial Review Compatible With Democracy?, Scott M. Noveck

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that judicial review can be compatible with democracy, particularly when democracy is viewed instrumentally as a means to achieve just outcomes rather than solely as a procedural ideal. It critiques Jeremy Waldron's procedural objections to judicial review and supports Ronald Dworkin's result-driven approach, emphasizing that non-majoritarian institutions like the judiciary can enhance democratic legitimacy by ensuring equal respect and protecting against flawed majoritarian processes.

Improving Asylum-Seeker Credibility Determinations: Introducing Appropriate Dispute Resolution Techniques Into The Process, Daniel Forman

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note argues that incorporating Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) techniques into asylum adjudications can enhance the fairness and accuracy of credibility determinations. It proposes a two-step process, including preliminary fact-finding and early neutral evaluation, to address challenges such as cultural differences, trauma, and adversarial dynamics.

Substantial Evidence In The Law Of International Trade: Meaningful Judicial Review Of Antidumping Actions Or Perpetuation Of The Yo-Yo Effect?, Bryan A. Edens

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note argues that the Court of International Trade (CIT) should have the authority to remand agency decisions with specific instructions to reach a judicially determined outcome, particularly in cases involving international trade disputes. This expanded role for the CIT is necessary to prevent unchecked executive discretion, address the inefficiencies of the "yoyo effect" (repeated remands between courts and agencies), and ensure the rule of law in international trade. The note critiques the current deferential standard of review and advocates for a more substantive and less formalistic approach to judicial review, particularly under the substantial evidence standard.

Redefining The Question: Applying A Hierarchical Structure To The Mens Rea Requirement For Section 875(C), Karen Rosenfield

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

"The Public Gaze And The Prying Eye:" The South And The Privacy Doctrine In Nineteenth-Century Wife Abuse Cases, Jerome Nadelhaft

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Introduction, Rachel Kalman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

The Never Ending Seizure Order: How Courts Have Granted Immortality To Congress's Mayfly, Steven N. Baker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

It's Just Not Cricket: Is The Principle Of Reciprocity Being Honored In The U.S.-U.K. Extradition Treaty?, Richard Goldberger

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Kav Laoved V. National Labour Court, Eliezer Rivlin, Dorit Beinisch, Edmond E. Levy, Asher Grunis, Miriam Naor, Edna Arbel, Esther Hayut, Salim Joubran, Ayala Procaccia

Translated Opinions

Facts: Palestinian workers filed claims in the Labour Courts against their Israeli employers with regard to their employment in the Israeli enclaves in Judaea and Samaria. These claims gave rise to the question whether these employment relationships were governed by Israeli law or by the local law of Judaea and Samaria, which is Jordanian law, the significance of this question being that Israeli law grants workers more rights and protection than Jordanian law.

The National Labour Court held on appeal that in the absence of any stipulation on this issue in the employment contracts, these employment relationships were governed by …

Recalibrating Depravity In A Feingold Regime: Why New York Courts Should Maintain Register'S Approach To Depraved Indifference In Cases Of Murder By Abuse, Carrie L. Maylor

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Full And Fair Hearing: The Role Of The Alj In Assisting The Pro Se Litigant, Paris R. Baldacci

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Wait Is Over: Chevron As The Stealth Vermont Yankee Ii, Paul R. Verkuil

Articles

The article argues that the Chevron doctrine has effectively served as a means to moderate the hard-look review of agency rulemaking, rendering the anticipated Vermont Yankee II case unnecessary. It posits that Chevron's deference to agency interpretations of statutes has softened the impact of State Farm's stringent arbitrary-and-capricious review standard, aligning more closely with the judicial restraint envisioned by Vermont Yankee.

The Path To (And From?) Judicial Independence, Robert C. Power

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Creating An Adolescent Criminal Class: Juvenile Court Jurisdiction Over Status Offenders, Soma R. Kedia

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that status offenders, who commit non-criminal offenses such as truancy or running away, are unfairly treated similarly to juvenile delinquents in the court system. This treatment often leads to detention in the same facilities as delinquents, which can exacerbate behavioral issues and increase the likelihood of future criminal behavior. The author advocates for a distinct approach to handling status offenders, emphasizing the need for social services and alternative programs tailored to their specific needs rather than punitive measures.

Who Decides? A Critical Look At Procedural Discretion, Robert G. Bone

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Predatory Structured Finance, Christopher L. Peterson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.