Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (222)
- Constitutional Law (115)
- Criminal Law (98)
- Legislation (59)
- State and Local Government Law (54)
-
- Legal Profession (48)
- Jurisprudence (46)
- Criminal Procedure (45)
- Jurisdiction (40)
- Civil Procedure (37)
- Legal Biography (34)
- Litigation (32)
- Law and Politics (30)
- International Law (28)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (26)
- Administrative Law (25)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (24)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (20)
- Evidence (20)
- Law and Society (19)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (19)
- Family Law (18)
- Juvenile Law (18)
- Legal History (16)
- Legal Education (15)
- Civil Law (14)
- President/Executive Department (14)
- Supreme Court of the United States (13)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (78)
- U.S. Supreme Court (43)
- Indiana Cases (41)
- Judges (40)
- Courts (37)
-
- Indiana Docket (32)
- Case Notes (31)
- Jurisdiction (29)
- United States Supreme Court (27)
- Book Review (25)
- Indiana (25)
- Jury (24)
- Constitutional law (23)
- Federal courts (23)
- Judicial review (21)
- Capital punishment (18)
- Constitution (16)
- Wiley B. Rutledge (16)
- Criminal procedure (15)
- Death Penalty (15)
- Judicial independence (15)
- Psychology (15)
- Juries (14)
- Federal Courts (13)
- Federal government (13)
- Federal jurisdiction (12)
- Indiana Courts (12)
- Indiana Supreme Court (12)
- Judicial appointments (12)
- Justice Wiley Rutledge (12)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Indiana Law Journal (553)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (264)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (15)
- Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog) (9)
- Books & Book Chapters by Maurer Faculty (7)
-
- Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality (6)
- Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design (5)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (4)
- Austen Parrish (2014-2022) (2)
- Maurer Theses and Dissertations (2)
- Addison Harris Lecture (1)
- Charles Hepburn (1918-1925) (1)
- Enoch George Hogate (1906-1918; 1918-1924 Dean Emeritus) (1)
- Historic Documents (1)
- IUSTITIA (1)
- Sheldon Plager (1977-1984) (1)
- William Harvey (1966-1971) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 330 of 874
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Protecting Our Mentally Ill: A Critique Of The Role Of Indiana State Courts In Protecting Involuntarily Committed Mental Patients' Right To Refuse Medication, Michael Leonard Goff Jr.
Protecting Our Mentally Ill: A Critique Of The Role Of Indiana State Courts In Protecting Involuntarily Committed Mental Patients' Right To Refuse Medication, Michael Leonard Goff Jr.
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Can We Talk?: Removing Counterproductive Ethical Restraints Upon Ex Parte Communication Between Attorneys And Adverse Expert Witnesses, Stephen D. Easton
Can We Talk?: Removing Counterproductive Ethical Restraints Upon Ex Parte Communication Between Attorneys And Adverse Expert Witnesses, Stephen D. Easton
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Making The Case For Megan's Law: A Study In Legislative Rhetoric, Daniel M. Filler
Making The Case For Megan's Law: A Study In Legislative Rhetoric, Daniel M. Filler
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Jurisdiction Of The Community Courts Reconsidered, Paul Craig
The Jurisdiction Of The Community Courts Reconsidered, Paul Craig
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Public Interest Litigation In A Comparative Context, Jayanth K. Krishnan
Public Interest Litigation In A Comparative Context, Jayanth K. Krishnan
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Patent Law In The Age Of The Invisible Supreme Court, Mark D. Janis
Patent Law In The Age Of The Invisible Supreme Court, Mark D. Janis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article examines the permanence of the U.S. Supreme Court's retreat to the peripheries of patent law after the creation of the Federal Circuit, and explores the roles that the Supreme Court might imagine for itself in contemporary patent law. For discussion purposes, the article describes two hypothetical models for Supreme Court decisionmaking in patent cases: an aggressive interventionist model and an extreme non-interventionist model. After considering the shortcomings of both models, the article proposes an intermediate, managerial model. The managerial model rejects the proposition that the Court should intervene in patent cases to correct perceived substantive errors in Federal …
Equity And The Article I Court: Is The Tax Court's Exercise Of Equitable Powers Constitutional?, Leandra Lederman
Equity And The Article I Court: Is The Tax Court's Exercise Of Equitable Powers Constitutional?, Leandra Lederman
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Article I courts are the other federal courts, infrequently studied despite their important role in the judiciary. This article focuses on the United States Tax Court, an Article I court that hears approximately 95 percent of litigated federal tax cases. The article argues that the Tax Court's current tendency to apply equitable doctrines when necessary to avoid harsh outcomes dictated by statute lacks constitutional authority. First, the article examines the role of Article I courts in the federal judicial system and under the Constitution. Next, it considers the historical and modern meanings of equity and equitable powers in the context …
Challenges To Racial Redistricting In The New Millennium: Hunt V. Cromartie As A Case Study, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Challenges To Racial Redistricting In The New Millennium: Hunt V. Cromartie As A Case Study, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Publicly Financed Judicial Elections: An Overview, Charles G. Geyh
Publicly Financed Judicial Elections: An Overview, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Is Payne Defensible?: The Constitutionality Of Admitting Victim-Impact Evidence At Capital Sentencing Hearings, Joshua D. Greenberg
Is Payne Defensible?: The Constitutionality Of Admitting Victim-Impact Evidence At Capital Sentencing Hearings, Joshua D. Greenberg
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Statutory Interpretation And Mr. Justice Rutledge, Nathaniel L. Nathanson
Statutory Interpretation And Mr. Justice Rutledge, Nathaniel L. Nathanson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Citing Of Law Reviews By The Supreme Court:1971-1999, Louis J. Sirico Jr.
The Citing Of Law Reviews By The Supreme Court:1971-1999, Louis J. Sirico Jr.
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Failure Of The Integrated Enterprise Test: Why Courts Need To Find New Answers To The Multiple-Employer Puzzle In Federal Discrimination Cases, Mark Crandley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
"The Mis-Characterization Of The Negro": A Race Critique Of The Prior Conviction Impeachment Rule, Montrè D. Carodine
"The Mis-Characterization Of The Negro": A Race Critique Of The Prior Conviction Impeachment Rule, Montrè D. Carodine
Indiana Law Journal
The election of Barack Obama as the nation's first Black President was a watershed moment with respect to race relations in the United States. Obama's election removed what to many seemed a nearly insurmountable racial barrier. Yet as he transitions into his historic role and his family becomes the first Black occupants of the White House, scores of Blacks are housed in jails and prisons across the country. The mass incarceration of Blacks, among other serious issues, demonstrates that race still matters in the United States. As then-presidential candidate Obama acknowledged in the speech that many viewed to be pivotal …
Now V. Scheidler, Round Two, Craig M. Bradley
Now V. Scheidler, Round Two, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Substance And Procedure In Capital Cases: Why Federal Habeas Courts Should Review The Merits Of Every Death Sentence, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Substance And Procedure In Capital Cases: Why Federal Habeas Courts Should Review The Merits Of Every Death Sentence, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Reconciling The Juridical Links Doctrine With The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure And Article Iii, William D. Henderson
Reconciling The Juridical Links Doctrine With The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure And Article Iii, William D. Henderson
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Over the past three decades, the juridical link and concerted action exceptions have evolved from dicta in the Ninth Circuit's decision in La Mar to an amorphous and undertheorized body of case law that has dangerously merged procedural and jurisdictional issues. Drawing on the principles of class action jurisprudence set forth by the Supreme Court in Amchem and Ortiz, lower courts should consider the issues of class certification and Rule 20(a) joinder before turning to the issue of standing under Article III. Under this approach, courts would not be able to reconcile much of the juridical links case law with …
On Courts Herding Cats: Contending With The "Written Description" Requirement (And Other Unruly Patent Disclosure Doctrines), Mark D. Janis
On Courts Herding Cats: Contending With The "Written Description" Requirement (And Other Unruly Patent Disclosure Doctrines), Mark D. Janis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Judicial Intervention In A Twenty-First Century Republic: Shuffling Deck Chairs On The Titanic?, Kristofor J. Hammond
Judicial Intervention In A Twenty-First Century Republic: Shuffling Deck Chairs On The Titanic?, Kristofor J. Hammond
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of The Character Evidence Prohibition: Foundations Of The Rule Against Trial By Character, David P. Leonard
In Defense Of The Character Evidence Prohibition: Foundations Of The Rule Against Trial By Character, David P. Leonard
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Balancing The Scales: The 1996 Telecommunications Act And Eleventh Amendment Immunity, Cynthia L. Bauerly
Balancing The Scales: The 1996 Telecommunications Act And Eleventh Amendment Immunity, Cynthia L. Bauerly
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 explicitly created a role for federal courts in the interconnection process. However, parties' ability to seek federal review of interconnection agreements is no longer as straightforward as the language of the Act implies. The Supreme Court's unnecessarily novel and narrow reading of Eleventh Amendment immunity in Seminole Tribe v. Florida renders unenforceable the federal review provisions of the Act against state regulatory commissions. While some interconnection agreements may find their way into federal court, for example, where a party seeking to interconnect sues an incumbent provider instead of the state commission, enforcement of a federal …
Thou Shalt Not Sue The Church: Denying Court Access To Ministerial Employees, Shawna Meyer Eikenberry
Thou Shalt Not Sue The Church: Denying Court Access To Ministerial Employees, Shawna Meyer Eikenberry
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Ultra Vires And The Foundations Of Judicial Review, Paul Craig
Ultra Vires And The Foundations Of Judicial Review, Paul Craig
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Book Review. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall And The Supreme Court, 1936-1961, Kevin D. Brown
Book Review. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall And The Supreme Court, 1936-1961, Kevin D. Brown
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Judicial Reliance On Regulatory Interpretations In Sec No-Action Letters: Current Problems And A Proposed Framework, Donna M. Nagy
Judicial Reliance On Regulatory Interpretations In Sec No-Action Letters: Current Problems And A Proposed Framework, Donna M. Nagy
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Judicial descriptions of SEC no-action letters have run the gamut from law, to orders, to rulings, to informal opinions, to prosecutorial decisions. This judicial failure to characterize no-action letters consistently is symptomatic of a more fundamental problem: many courts treat informal regulatory interpretations in no-action letters as interchangeable with formal and official regulatory interpretations that the full Commission has promulgated. Consequently, courts often defer automatically to the regulatory interpretations in no-action letters. In other words, many courts accept no-action letter authority as definitive interpretations of the federal securities statutes and SEC rules and regulations without independently analyzing the particular regulatory …
The Phoenix And The Perils Of The Second Best: Why Heightened Appellate Deference To Tax Court Decisions Is Undesirable, Steve R. Johnson
The Phoenix And The Perils Of The Second Best: Why Heightened Appellate Deference To Tax Court Decisions Is Undesirable, Steve R. Johnson
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In our judicial structure, both courts of general jurisdiction and specialized courts are empowered to adjudicate federal income tax controversies. A proper relationship among those courts has proved difficult to forge and maintain. Absent an enduring intellectual and political consensus, institutional arrangements have been subject to recurring question and challenge.
The Independence Of The Judicial Branch In The New Republic, Charles G. Geyh, Emily Field Van Tassel
The Independence Of The Judicial Branch In The New Republic, Charles G. Geyh, Emily Field Van Tassel
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Civil Liberty And The Civil War: The Indianapolis Treason Trials, William Rehnquist
Civil Liberty And The Civil War: The Indianapolis Treason Trials, William Rehnquist
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Uniform Commercial Code Meets The Seventh Amendment: The Demise Of Jury Trials Under Article 5?, Margaret L. Moses
The Uniform Commercial Code Meets The Seventh Amendment: The Demise Of Jury Trials Under Article 5?, Margaret L. Moses
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.