Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (31)
- Constitutional Law (27)
- Judges (26)
- State and Local Government Law (25)
- Criminal Law (14)
-
- Health Law and Policy (14)
- Fourteenth Amendment (12)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- Jurisdiction (10)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Law and Race (8)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Human Rights Law (7)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (6)
- Intellectual Property Law (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Litigation (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Consumer Protection Law (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Housing Law (4)
- Juvenile Law (4)
- Second Amendment (4)
- Contracts (3)
- Keyword
-
- Due process (8)
- Ohio (8)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Judges (5)
- Jurisdiction (5)
-
- Circuit courts (4)
- Congress (4)
- Courts (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Cleveland (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Discovery (3)
- Dobbs (3)
- Engagement (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (3)
- Housing rights (3)
- Judiciary (3)
- Ohio Supreme Court (3)
- Patent law (3)
- Settlement (3)
- Sixth Amendment (3)
- Socioeconomic rights (3)
- South African Constitutional Court (3)
- United States Claims Court (3)
- Abortion (2)
- Administrative law (2)
- Affirmative action (2)
- Agency review (2)
- Alternative dispute resolution (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 160 of 160
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Judicial Control Over Passport Policy, Leon Hurwitz
Judicial Control Over Passport Policy, Leon Hurwitz
Cleveland State Law Review
This paper is concerned with the judiciary's role in influencing both the procedure and substance of one particular aspect of foreign policy, namely, the passport policy of the State Department. That a decision regarding passports is a foreign policy decision has long been advanced by the President and Secretary of State. It is generally accepted that the issuance and regulation of passports is an integral part of the general conduct of American foreign relation
Role Of The Attorney In Juvenile Court, Julian Greenspun
Role Of The Attorney In Juvenile Court, Julian Greenspun
Cleveland State Law Review
An attorney once commented that the effect of Gault was to place him in his proper role, that of an advocate whose sole purpose was to defend constitutional rights, and that he did not have to be a social worker or psychologist. But the effect of Gault is to bring counsel into the Juvenile Court, which is a court with compassion. Thus, being a special court, it requires special skills, so that the client may not only receive due process, but if needed, will receive proper care.
Constitutional Rights In Juvenile Court, Joseph L. Rubin
Constitutional Rights In Juvenile Court, Joseph L. Rubin
Cleveland State Law Review
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the case of In Re Gault. Ten months and three weeks later, the Supreme Court reached a landmark decision on judicial handling of juvenile delinquency matters. On May 15, 1967, the court handed down a ruling that many of the constitutional procedural protections previously observed only in adult trials are also applicable to children in juvenile court proceedings. This decision portends a major change in the manner in which most of the nation's three thousand juvenile courts have been functioning. The significance of this …
New Rules Of The Supreme Court Of Ohio (An Analysis), Lee E. Skeel
New Rules Of The Supreme Court Of Ohio (An Analysis), Lee E. Skeel
Cleveland State Law Review
The Supreme Court of Ohio recently completed revision of its Rules of Practice. They became effective on July 1, 1964. Three subjects coming within the inherent power and within the constitutional and statutory jurisdiction of the Court are contained in the revision; that is, procedures for presenting cases in which the Court has original jurisdiction, cases which come within its appellate and revisory jurisdiction as provided in each case by the Constitution and Statutes of Ohio (Article IV, Sections 2 and 6), and admission to the practice of the law in Ohio and disciplinary procedures for members of the bar …
Trial Calendar Preference, Frank G. Homan
Trial Calendar Preference, Frank G. Homan
Cleveland State Law Review
Today's crowded court dockets and delays often prevent cases from being reached until years after the action is filed. However, under some circumstances it may be possible to obtain a trial more quickly by a motion for preference on the tria lcalendar One of the best ways to secure a prompt hearing is in those jurisdictions which maintain a short cause calendar. If it appears that a trial will occupy only a short time, such as one or two hours, it can be placed on the short cause calendar, and it will be heard more speedily than if it were …
Court Calendar Congestion Causes And Cures, Aaron Jacobson
Court Calendar Congestion Causes And Cures, Aaron Jacobson
Cleveland State Law Review
Attention focused on court calendar delay has reached its highest concentration in the history of the American judiciary. While delays are hardly new, lawyers today pale at the spectacle of jurisdictions laboring under multi-thousand case loads and delays measured in years.
Justice Delayed Is Injustice, Wendell A. Falsgraf
Justice Delayed Is Injustice, Wendell A. Falsgraf
Cleveland State Law Review
Recently, the Cleveland Bar Association created a committee of lawyers and laymen to study the problem of delays in our court system objectively and to make recommendations, both interim and permanent in character, aimed at reaching an eventual solution. Such a study must determine first what the extent of the delay in litigation is - the number of months elapsing between the filing of a case and its adjudication. Second, what the goal is - the number of months which properly should elapse. Third, why litigation is delayed beyond a reasonable time. Fourth, what can be done immediately and over …
Constitutional History Of Ohio Appellate Courts, Lee E. Skeel
Constitutional History Of Ohio Appellate Courts, Lee E. Skeel
Cleveland State Law Review
The right of appeal, using the word appeal in the broad sense now given it in the Appellate Procedure Act of Ohio, contemplates the removal of a case after judgment or final order, from a court of inferior jurisdiction to a court of higher jurisdiction, in the judicial process for retrial or review. Appeal, particularly on questions of law, is not the procedure intended to be depended on in the first instance to win a lawsuit. Appellate courts were provided in order to protect against trial court mistakes which result in substantial prejudice, or in the denial of justice to …
Pre-Trial In The Courts: An Opinion, Aaron Jacobson
Pre-Trial In The Courts: An Opinion, Aaron Jacobson
Cleveland State Law Review
No claim is made, it is true, that pre-trial is the panacea for what ail the courts. But in adopting it, there seems to have been a haste which has bypassed the usual introspective examination characteristic of our judiciary. A critical examination, as seen by this writer, would take the form of two broad questions: One- Is pre-trial, viewed in the overall perspective of the administration of justice, a healthy additive to the courts? Two- If so, is it an end in itself, or is it simply one of a number of modernizing influences, without all of which it remains …
Book Review, Carl G. Weygandt
Book Review, Carl G. Weygandt
Cleveland State Law Review
Reviewing Hon. Arthur Vanderbilt, Cases and Other Materials on Modern Procedure and Judicial Administration