Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (347)
- University of Michigan Law School (316)
- Seattle University School of Law (213)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (206)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
-
- William & Mary Law School (80)
- Notre Dame Law School (69)
- University of Colorado Law School (35)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (34)
- Cleveland State University (31)
- St. Mary's University (30)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (29)
- American University Washington College of Law (26)
- Brooklyn Law School (24)
- Fordham Law School (24)
- Emory University School of Law (23)
- UIC School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (22)
- University of Georgia School of Law (22)
- Georgetown University Law Center (21)
- Boston University School of Law (20)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (16)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (15)
- Roger Williams University (15)
- Pepperdine University (14)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (14)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (13)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (12)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (12)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (11)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (337)
- Supreme Court (257)
- Constitution (188)
- Federal (120)
- State (98)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (90)
- New York (82)
- Courts (81)
- Congress (76)
- Federal courts (66)
- Defendant (63)
- Due process (60)
- Judicial review (58)
- Court of Appeals (57)
- 1990) (55)
- Discrimination (55)
- Sixth Amendment (49)
- First Amendment (48)
- § 6 (47)
- Appellate Division (46)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (40)
- Court (39)
- Federalism (38)
- Law reform (37)
- SCOTUS (37)
- 1991) (36)
- Constitutional law (36)
- Police (36)
- Judges (35)
- Separation of powers (34)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (330)
- Seattle University Law Review (212)
- Touro Law Review (198)
- Articles (163)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
-
- Michigan Law Review (93)
- Court Briefs (60)
- Faculty Scholarship (53)
- Faculty Publications (47)
- Publications (35)
- Northwestern University Law Review (30)
- Faculty Articles (29)
- Scholarly Articles (22)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (20)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (18)
- William & Mary Law Review (18)
- Cleveland State Law Review (17)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (17)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- UIC Law Review (15)
- American University Law Review (14)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (14)
- Pepperdine Law Review (13)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (13)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (11)
- Law Student Publications (11)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (11)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (11)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (11)
- All Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1681 - 1710 of 2046
Full-Text Articles in Courts
How To Think About The Federal Commerce Power And Incidentally Rewrite United States V. Lopez, Donald H. Regan
How To Think About The Federal Commerce Power And Incidentally Rewrite United States V. Lopez, Donald H. Regan
Articles
Almost sixty years after the "revolution" of 1937, we still do not have an adequate theory of the commerce power. The Court was right to abandon the theory of dual federalism epitomized by Carter v. Carter Coal Co.;' and it has got the right results in the major cases decided since then. But our post-1937 theory, whether before or after Lopez, is a mess. On the one hand, we have a collection of doctrinal rules that, if we take them seriously, allow Congress to do anything it wants under the commerce power. On the other hand, we continue to pay …
A Modest Proposal For A Political Court, Thomas W. Merrill
A Modest Proposal For A Political Court, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
I offer a modest proposal. You can decide for yourself whether it is offered in the spirit of Jonathan Swift, or whether I mean it to be taken seriously.
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The rule of Frye v. United States was seventy years old, and had long dominated American law on the question of how well established a scientific principle must be for it to provide the basis for expert testimony. Even after the passage of the Federal Rules of Evidence, several of the federal circuits, as well as various states, purported to adhere to Frye's "general acceptance" standard. But now, unanimously, briefly, and with no apparent angst, the United States Supreme Court has held in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that the Frye rule is incompatible with the Federal Rules.
Unitariness And Independence: Solicitor General Control Over Independent Agency Litigation, Neal Devins
Unitariness And Independence: Solicitor General Control Over Independent Agency Litigation, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
With a few exceptions, the Solicitor General controls all aspects of independent agency litigation before the Supreme Court. Solicitor General control of Supreme Court litigation creates a tension between independent agency freedom and the Solicitor General's authority. On the one hand, Solicitor General control provides the United States with a unitary voice before the Supreme Court, and provides the Court with a trustworthy litigator to explicate the government's position. On the other hand, such control may undermine the autonomy of independent agency decision making. In this Article, the author argues for a hybrid model of independent agency litigation in the …
Taxation Of Punitive Damages Obtained In A Personal Injury Claim, Douglas A. Kahn
Taxation Of Punitive Damages Obtained In A Personal Injury Claim, Douglas A. Kahn
Articles
The author explains that in recent court opinions and commentaries concerning whether punitive damages are taxable, considerable weight has been given to a negative inference that appears to lurk in a 1989 amendment to the relevant code provision, section 104(a)(2). To the contrary, he argues, the legislative history of that amendment and the form that the bill had when it was reported out of the Conference Committee establish beyond doubt that no such inference is warranted.
Brecht V. Abrahamson: Harmful Error In Habeas Corpus Law, James S. Liebman, Randy Hertz
Brecht V. Abrahamson: Harmful Error In Habeas Corpus Law, James S. Liebman, Randy Hertz
Faculty Scholarship
For the past two and one-half decades, the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts have applied the same rule for assessing the harmlessness of constitutional error in habeas corpus proceedings as they have applied on direct appeal of both state and federal convictions. Under that rule, which applied to all constitutional errors except those deemed per se prejudicial or per se reversible, the state could avoid reversal upon a finding of error only by proving that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The Supreme Court adopted this stringent standard in Chapman v. California to fulfill the federal …
In Re Holtzman: Free Speech Or Professional Misconduct?, David W. Wright
In Re Holtzman: Free Speech Or Professional Misconduct?, David W. Wright
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Note To Our Readers, The Editors
Constitutional Posture Of Canine Sniffs, Lina Shahin
Constitutional Posture Of Canine Sniffs, Lina Shahin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.