Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (337)
- University of Colorado Law School (285)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (254)
- Seattle University School of Law (225)
- University of Michigan Law School (192)
-
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (65)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (53)
- St. Mary's University (41)
- Roger Williams University (35)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (33)
- Cleveland State University (25)
- Pepperdine University (25)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (21)
- University of Georgia School of Law (21)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (20)
- Brooklyn Law School (19)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (13)
- BLR (10)
- Duke Law (10)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- Georgetown University Law Center (10)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (10)
- University of Kentucky (9)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (9)
- Boston University School of Law (8)
- Columbia Law School (8)
- William & Mary Law School (8)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (7)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (171)
- Federal (164)
- State (143)
- Supreme Court (140)
- New York (129)
-
- State courts (98)
- Court of Appeals (75)
- Courts (75)
- Defendant (75)
- Appellate Division (73)
- United States (72)
- Colorado (68)
- Court (60)
- § 6 (58)
- 1990) (57)
- Due process (56)
- Congress (54)
- California (53)
- 1991) (51)
- Litigation (50)
- 1992) (48)
- § 1 (45)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (42)
- Constitutional law (37)
- Federalism (37)
- Jurisdiction (37)
- Michigan (37)
- Violated (37)
- Evidence (36)
- BLM (35)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (319)
- Touro Law Review (254)
- Seattle University Law Review (223)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Michigan Law Review (102)
-
- UIC Law Review (61)
- Articles (51)
- Publications (44)
- Indiana Law Journal (42)
- Faculty Scholarship (31)
- Northwestern University Law Review (29)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (24)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (21)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Pepperdine Law Review (19)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (19)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (19)
- Cleveland State Law Review (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (17)
- Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (16)
- The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13) (16)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (16)
- Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7) (14)
- Strategies in Western Water Law and Policy: Courts, Coercion and Collaboration (Summer Conference, June 8-11) (14)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (13)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (13)
- Publication Type
Articles 1201 - 1230 of 2042
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Expert Testimony Disclosure Under Federal Rule 26: A Proposed Amendment, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 117 (2007), Keith H. Beyler
Expert Testimony Disclosure Under Federal Rule 26: A Proposed Amendment, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 117 (2007), Keith H. Beyler
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fda Preamble: A Backdoor To Federalization Of Prescription Warning Labels?, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 161 (2007), Cristina Rodríguez
The Fda Preamble: A Backdoor To Federalization Of Prescription Warning Labels?, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 161 (2007), Cristina Rodríguez
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
If You Prompt Them, They Will Rule: The Warranty Of Habitability Meets New Court Information Systems, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (2007), Mary Marsh Zulack
If You Prompt Them, They Will Rule: The Warranty Of Habitability Meets New Court Information Systems, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (2007), Mary Marsh Zulack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Capital Defense Representation, Norman Lefstein
Capital Defense Representation, Norman Lefstein
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Toward A Model Death Penalty Code: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report.
Evidence-Based Practices And State Sentencing Policy: Ten Policy Initiatives To Reduce Recidivism, Roger K. Warren
Evidence-Based Practices And State Sentencing Policy: Ten Policy Initiatives To Reduce Recidivism, Roger K. Warren
Indiana Law Journal
Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators Annual Meeting July 29-August 2, 2006 Indianapolis, Indiana.
Nebraska Probation Revocation: A Primer (2007 Revision), Alan G. Gless
Nebraska Probation Revocation: A Primer (2007 Revision), Alan G. Gless
State of Nebraska Judicial Branch
The law of probation revocation developed rapidly over the eighteen years preceding this article’s 1989 appearance. While its development has slowed substantially since then, it continues to evolve. The overall field of Nebraska probation revocation remains essentially unchanged from the way it was in 1989 when this article first appeared. The case law has neither burgeoned dramatically nor altered the scenery in major ways, although, it has added a few refinements. But important procedural and substantive wrinkles have appeared through 2003 statutory amendments to the steps probation officers must take in responding to probationers’ violations of the conditions of their …
The Protection Of Religious Freedom Under The American Constitution, Robert A. Sedler
The Protection Of Religious Freedom Under The American Constitution, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
A Necessary And Proper Role For Federal Courts In Prison Reform: The Benjamin V. Malcolm Consentdecrees, Harold Baer Jr., Arminda Bepko
A Necessary And Proper Role For Federal Courts In Prison Reform: The Benjamin V. Malcolm Consentdecrees, Harold Baer Jr., Arminda Bepko
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Court Self-Preservation And Terri Schiavo, Jack M. Beermann
Federal Court Self-Preservation And Terri Schiavo, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
If the federal court in Florida had granted preliminary relief to allow itself more time to consider the constitutional claims that Terri Schiavo's parents brought on her behalf, and if, as expected, those claims were ultimately rejected, the federal court would have been placed in the unenviable position of having to be the institution that made the final decision to terminate Terri Schiavo's feeding and other treatment. Although I have no way of knowing whether this fact, which has not been noted in the commentary,' actually entered into the mind of any of the federal judges who considered the case, …
Issue 1: Annual Survey 2006 Table Of Contents
Issue 1: Annual Survey 2006 Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
The Conditional Effects Of Ideology And Institutional Structure On Judicial Voting In State Supreme Courts, Jeff L. Yates, Paul Brace, Brent Boyea
The Conditional Effects Of Ideology And Institutional Structure On Judicial Voting In State Supreme Courts, Jeff L. Yates, Paul Brace, Brent Boyea
ExpressO
Two enormously influential perspectives on courts offer fundamentally different predictions about court outcomes and the effects of judge ideology on those outcomes. Well-known to political scientists studying courts, the ideological voting (IV) literature argues that judge ideology is a strong predictor of court outcomes and that those outcomes should be proximate to the policy preferences of courts. Less known to political scientists but highly influential, the law and economics perspective (LE) focuses on settlement behavior of litigants who try to minimize costs and thus estimate likely outcomes in court, and settle simpler cases pre-trial. In this case selection process litigants …
Separation Of Powers And The Governor's Office In West Virginia: Advocating A More Deferential Approach To The Chief Executive From The Judiciary, Jason C. Pizatella
Separation Of Powers And The Governor's Office In West Virginia: Advocating A More Deferential Approach To The Chief Executive From The Judiciary, Jason C. Pizatella
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parental Consent And Notification Laws In The Abortion Context: Rejecting The "Maturity" Standard In Judicial Bypass Proceedings, Anna Bonny
ExpressO
The choice to become a parent, to give a baby up for adoption, or to terminate a pregnancy presents a life-altering decision for a minor. The majority of states require minors to engage their parents or legal guardians in their choice to obtain an abortion, but not in decisions to give their babies up for adoption or to become parents. Though the Supreme Court has held that parental consent and notification laws do not infringe on a minor's constitutional rights if judicial bypass options are available, the reality of these judicial proceedings demonstrates a biased and unworkable legal avenue. Even …
Our Sovereign Body: Narrating The Fiction Of Sovereign Immunity In The Supreme Court: Part I-A English Stories, Marc L. Roark
Our Sovereign Body: Narrating The Fiction Of Sovereign Immunity In The Supreme Court: Part I-A English Stories, Marc L. Roark
ExpressO
This is part I-A of a Book I am working towards on the narratives and fictions of sovereign immunity. The goal in this part is to look before the American republic and towards the background in which American Sovereignty came to be shaped by -- the feudal notion of the sovereign; the Lockean response, and the Blackstonean doctrine. The first part looks at the legal fictions surrounding the kingship, their sources and their effects. The Second part looks to the specific ways of treating the sovereign in law, namely viewing King as Property owner or patriarch, Trustee, and Constitution.
Our Sovereign Body: Narrating The Fiction Of Sovereign Immunity In The Supreme Court, Marc L. Roark
Our Sovereign Body: Narrating The Fiction Of Sovereign Immunity In The Supreme Court, Marc L. Roark
ExpressO
This is the introduction to a book I am preparing on the Normative and Narrative aspects of the U.S. Sovereign Immunity Doctrine. The introduction sets up the problem of a doctrine that is not exactly coherent with the national narrative.
Conflicts Between The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court And The Legislature: Campaign Finance Reform And Same-Sex Marriage, Mark C. Miller
Conflicts Between The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court And The Legislature: Campaign Finance Reform And Same-Sex Marriage, Mark C. Miller
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] "This article will examine recent interactions and dialogues between the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (“SJC” or “Supreme Judicial Court”) and the Massachusetts State Legislature. The interactions between courts and legislatures are often cordial, but sometimes these interactions are also highly conflictual. During the 1980s and 1990s, the relationship between the Massachusetts legislature and the Supreme Court was indeed mainly cooperative. Recently, however, in several high profile cases the Supreme Court has been willing to challenge directly the decisions of the legislature and vice versa. Among other controversies, the Court’s 2002 decision requiring that the state legislature fund the …
Contents: Allen Chair Symposium-State Of The Chesapeake Bay In The Twenty-First Century
Contents: Allen Chair Symposium-State Of The Chesapeake Bay In The Twenty-First Century
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Review Index, Volume Xl, 2005-2006
Law Review Index, Volume Xl, 2005-2006
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Worlds Collide: Federal Construction Of State Institutional Competence, Marcia L. Mccormick
When Worlds Collide: Federal Construction Of State Institutional Competence, Marcia L. Mccormick
ExpressO
The federal courts routinely encounter issues of state law. Often a state court will have already analyzed the law at issue, either in a separate case or in the very situation before the federal court. In every one of those cases, the federal courts must decide whether to defer to the state court analysis and, if so, how much. The federal courts will often defer, but many times have not done so, and they rarely explain the reasons for the departures they make. While this lack of transparency gives the federal courts the greatest amount of discretion and power, it …
“It’S The [Tort System], Stupid:” Consumer Deductibles; How To More Equitably Distribute The Risks Of Medical Malpractice And Adequately Compensate Victims Without Statutory Damage Caps., Bradford Luke Ledbetter
“It’S The [Tort System], Stupid:” Consumer Deductibles; How To More Equitably Distribute The Risks Of Medical Malpractice And Adequately Compensate Victims Without Statutory Damage Caps., Bradford Luke Ledbetter
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Mental Health Courts And Title Ii Of The Ada: Accessibility To State Court Systems For Individuals With Mental Disabilities And The Need For Diversion, S. Elizabeth Malloy
Mental Health Courts And Title Ii Of The Ada: Accessibility To State Court Systems For Individuals With Mental Disabilities And The Need For Diversion, S. Elizabeth Malloy
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Access to the judicial system, a fundamental right that has paramount importance in our society, can often present obstacles to people with disabilities in a variety of significant ways. Yet Title II mandates that state and local judicial facilities be accessible to individuals with disabilities. Recent shifts in paradigmatic approaches to special populations such as drug offenders and offenders with mental disabilities have lead to the creation of mental health courts specifically designed to address the needs of the persons with mental disabilities in order to avoid incarceration. Early outcomes in states like Ohio suggest mental health courts may better …
The History Of Slave Marriage In The United States, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 299 (2006), Darlene C. Goring
The History Of Slave Marriage In The United States, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 299 (2006), Darlene C. Goring
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Manson V. Brathwaite: The Supreme Court's Misunderstanding Of Eyewitness Identification, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 539 (2006), Ruth Yacona
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Adjudicated On The Merits?: Why The Aedpa Requires State Courts To Exhibit Their Reasoning, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 995 (2006), Ezra Spilke
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Courts, Congress, And Public Policy, Part Ii: The Impact Of The Reapportionment Revolution On Congress And State Legislatures, Jeffrey R. Lax, Mathew D. Mccubbins
Courts, Congress, And Public Policy, Part Ii: The Impact Of The Reapportionment Revolution On Congress And State Legislatures, Jeffrey R. Lax, Mathew D. Mccubbins
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Developing Trends With The Class Action Fairness Act Of 2005, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 115 (2006), Steven M. Puiszis
Developing Trends With The Class Action Fairness Act Of 2005, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 115 (2006), Steven M. Puiszis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
"If The Train Should Jump The Track.. .": Divergent Interpretations Of State And Federal Employment Discrimination Statutes, Alex B. Long
"If The Train Should Jump The Track.. .": Divergent Interpretations Of State And Federal Employment Discrimination Statutes, Alex B. Long
Georgia Law Review
As interpretational issues surrounding federal employment discrimination statutes have become more complex and controversial, there have arisen more opportunities for parallel state anti-discrimination law to jump the track" and take alternative courses. Not surprisingly, when dealing with their own parallel state statutes, a number of state appellate courts in recent years have chosen this course of action. Even where state and federal employment discrimination have not yet taken different paths, the potential for such divergent interpretations of state and federal anti-discrimination law has increased in recent years to the point where we may enter an era not unlike that of …