Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (204)
- University of Colorado Law School (168)
- University of Michigan Law School (132)
- UIC School of Law (98)
- Pepperdine University (82)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (50)
- Brooklyn Law School (40)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (36)
- Cornell University Law School (34)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (34)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (32)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (26)
- Roger Williams University (25)
- BLR (24)
- Georgetown University Law Center (24)
- Notre Dame Law School (23)
- New York Law School (22)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (20)
- University of Georgia School of Law (20)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (18)
- University of Maine School of Law (17)
- Brigham Young University Law School (16)
- University of Richmond (16)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (12)
- William & Mary Law School (12)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (11)
- The University of Akron (10)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (124)
- Courts (80)
- Supreme Court (57)
- Federal courts (56)
- Trials (45)
-
- Congress (38)
- Judges (36)
- United States (36)
- California (35)
- Constitution (33)
- Evidence (31)
- Jurisdiction (31)
- Court (30)
- Colorado (29)
- Juries (29)
- Legislation (28)
- Civil procedure (27)
- Discovery (27)
- Arbitration (26)
- Constitutional law (25)
- Practice and Procedure (25)
- Due process (24)
- Federalism (24)
- Trial (24)
- Jurisprudence (23)
- BLM (22)
- Federal (21)
- Lawyers (21)
- Settlement (21)
- U.S. Forest Service (21)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (201)
- UIC Law Review (94)
- Michigan Law Review (52)
- Touro Law Review (49)
- Articles (46)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (41)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (32)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (32)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- Scholarly Articles (25)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (25)
- Northwestern University Law Review (24)
- ExpressO (23)
- Faculty Publications (23)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (23)
- Publications (22)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (22)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Scholarly Works (21)
- Indiana Law Journal (19)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (19)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (17)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (17)
- Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17) (17)
- Maine Law Review (16)
- The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13) (16)
- BYU Law Review (15)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Journal Articles (15)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1321 - 1350 of 1443
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Forcing Attorneys To Represent Indigent Civil Litigants: The Problems And Some Proposals, Greg Stevens
Forcing Attorneys To Represent Indigent Civil Litigants: The Problems And Some Proposals, Greg Stevens
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note argues that uncompensated court appointments represent an unsatisfactory means to provide counsel for indigents. Part I discusses the policy arguments for and against forced, uncompensated court appointments. Part I concludes that the arguments against these appointments outweigh the arguments in favor of them. Part II argues that they violate the Constitution's prohibitions against uncompensated takings and involuntary servitude. Part III offers a proposal that would provide effective representation for indigent civil litigants, while avoiding infringement of attorneys' constitutional rights.
Measuring The Costs Of Civil Justice, Edward Brunet
Measuring The Costs Of Civil Justice, Edward Brunet
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Costs of the Civil Justice System: Court Expenditures for Various Types of Civil Cases by J.S. Kakalik and R.L. Ross
Taking Bureaucracy Seriously, Henry Paul Monaghan
Taking Bureaucracy Seriously, Henry Paul Monaghan
Faculty Scholarship
The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform can be viewed as not one but two "books." "Book I" (pp. 1-192), which reflects Judge Posner's well-known commitment to the interplay of law and economics, adds to the literature on the explosive and unremitting growth of litigation in the inferior federal courts during the last quarter-century. Noting this situation with alarm, Judge Posner seeks to identify the dimensions of the "crisis," to evaluate some current proposals for reform, and to advance some of his own. “Book II” (pp. 192-340) is quite different. Considerably less reliant upon law and economics, it addresses the substance …
Abusive Pro Se Plaintiffs In The Federal Courts: Proposals For Judicial Control, Michael J. Mueller
Abusive Pro Se Plaintiffs In The Federal Courts: Proposals For Judicial Control, Michael J. Mueller
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note argues that a few courts have adopted lawful restraints and administrative procedures that, if uniformly adopted, would significantly improve protection of judicial resources while preserving access to the civil courts for legitimate claims. Part I identifies career plaintiffs and the burdens imposed on courts by excessive and abusive litigation. Part I also examines the source and scope of the right of access to the judicial process. Part II analyzes judicial responses to abuse in terms of their constitutionality and effectiveness at curbing such tactics. Part III advocates administrative procedures that would promote earlier identification of pro se career …
Wetlands Preservation And The Protection Of Endangered Species As Limits On Western Water Development, A. Dan Tarlock
Wetlands Preservation And The Protection Of Endangered Species As Limits On Western Water Development, A. Dan Tarlock
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
25 pages.
[Section] 404 Panel Discussion, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.
[Section] 404 Panel Discussion, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
5 pages.
Supplemental materials. Includes proposed bill language for Department of the Interior appropriations bill. Outline of key events and dates in the history of water law.
Panel: Section 404 Of The Clean Water Act And Section 7 Of The Endangered Species Act: Potential Impacts On Water Supplies [Supplemental Materials], Wendy C. Weiss
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
57 pages.
Supplemental materials. Includes text of Riverside Irrigation District v. Andrews, 568 F.Supp 563 and Opening Brief of Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellants in Riverside Irrigation District v. Andrews, Cases No. 83-2114, 83-2115, 83-2119, 83-2230, April 3, 1984.
Groundwater Control Programs Affecting Water Development, Arthur L. Littleworth
Groundwater Control Programs Affecting Water Development, Arthur L. Littleworth
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
19 pages.
Ferc, Purpa And The Federal Power Act, Lawrence J. Wolfe
Ferc, Purpa And The Federal Power Act, Lawrence J. Wolfe
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
62 pages.
Contains references.
The Case For A Legislative Solution To Indian Water Claims, James M. Bush
The Case For A Legislative Solution To Indian Water Claims, James M. Bush
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
57 pages.
Reserved Water Rights Of Indian Allotments, Richard B. Collins
Reserved Water Rights Of Indian Allotments, Richard B. Collins
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
10 pages.
Contains references.
Instream Flows As Reserved Rights On Federal Reservations After United States V. New Mexico, Hank Meshorer
Instream Flows As Reserved Rights On Federal Reservations After United States V. New Mexico, Hank Meshorer
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
10 pages.
Effects Of The Clean Water Act On Water Availability And Development, Paula C. Phillips
Effects Of The Clean Water Act On Water Availability And Development, Paula C. Phillips
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
12 pages.
Introduction To Reserved Water Rights, Ralph W. Johnson
Introduction To Reserved Water Rights, Ralph W. Johnson
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
16 pages.
Indian Water Rights In The Supreme Court: A Review And Preview, Louis F. Claiborne
Indian Water Rights In The Supreme Court: A Review And Preview, Louis F. Claiborne
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
12 pages.
Agenda: The Federal Impact On State Water Rights, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: The Federal Impact On State Water Rights, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
Conference organizers and/or speakers included University of Colorado School of Law professors James N. Corbridge, Jr., David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Richard B. Collins.
In general, water rights are a matter of state law. However, the availability and development of water are affected by important federal rights, policies and programs. In this conference, an outstanding group of private practitioners, government representatives and academics consider this important topic.
Developments In Federal Water Policies And Programs, Harold W. Furman Ii
Developments In Federal Water Policies And Programs, Harold W. Furman Ii
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
14 pages.
Role Of The State Courts In Adjudicating Indian Water Rights, Jon L. Kyl
Role Of The State Courts In Adjudicating Indian Water Rights, Jon L. Kyl
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
39 pages.
Negotiation As A Means Of Quantifying Indian Water Rights, Joseph R. Membrino
Negotiation As A Means Of Quantifying Indian Water Rights, Joseph R. Membrino
The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)
88 pages.
Contains attachments.
The Fee Awards Act Of 1976: Examining The Foundation For Legislative Reform Of Attorney's Fees Shifting, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 77 (1984), Randall R. Rader
The Fee Awards Act Of 1976: Examining The Foundation For Legislative Reform Of Attorney's Fees Shifting, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 77 (1984), Randall R. Rader
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Voir Dire: Questioning Prospective Jurors On Their Willingness To Follow The Law, James H. Gold
Voir Dire: Questioning Prospective Jurors On Their Willingness To Follow The Law, James H. Gold
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Attorney-Client Conflicts Of Interest And The Concept Of Non-Negotiable Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Emily M. Calhoun
Attorney-Client Conflicts Of Interest And The Concept Of Non-Negotiable Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Emily M. Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Scope Of Judicial Review Of Consent Decrees Under The Antitrust Procedures And Penalties Act Of 1974, Michigan Law Review
The Scope Of Judicial Review Of Consent Decrees Under The Antitrust Procedures And Penalties Act Of 1974, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In the wake of this uncertainty, this Note analyzes the proper scope of judicial review of consent decrees. The Note argues that to further the policies embodied in the APP A, courts should undertake intense review of proposed settlements before entering them as final judgments. Both the congressional intent in enacting the APP A and the public's interest in effective enforcement of the antitrust laws support intense judicial review. The Note then demonstrates that the deferential standard that some courts have applied is derived mainly from a case that is inapplicable to the review of consent decrees. Finally, the Note …
Notice To Class Members Under The Fair Labor Standards Act Representative Action Provision, Thomas Ashby
Notice To Class Members Under The Fair Labor Standards Act Representative Action Provision, Thomas Ashby
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Federal courts currently apply different standards concerning the permissibility of notice. Although the Ninth Circuit forbids notice and the Seventh Circuit grants plaintiffs a right to send notice, the Second Circuit permits notice only in appropriate cases. This Note advocates that plaintiffs in FLSA and ADEA actions should be allowed to notify potential class members in appropriate cases. Part I analyzes inherent court powers, statutes, legislative history, and federal policies relating to notice. It concludes that enactment of FLSA and ADEA remedies did not alter the inherent power of federal courts to permit or prohibit notice. On the contrary, only …
The Role Of Oral Argument At The U.S. Supreme Court-- A View From The Podium, Arthur R. Landever
The Role Of Oral Argument At The U.S. Supreme Court-- A View From The Podium, Arthur R. Landever
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This article has offered survey results of the attitudes of lawyers who have made oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court. Respondents generally approve of the current process, find the justices relatively well prepared, and the questions generally useful. At the same time, they express some uncertainty about whether the oral argument phase had any impact in their particular cases. By and large, they take as a given, the important function of oral argument as a supplement to the written brief.
Equity, Due Process And The Seventh Amendment: A Commentary On The Zenith Case, Patrick Devlin
Equity, Due Process And The Seventh Amendment: A Commentary On The Zenith Case, Patrick Devlin
Michigan Law Review
The seventh amendment to the United States Constitution requires that "[i]n Suits at common law . . . the right of trial by jury shall be preserved." What exactly is a suit at common law? When the amendment was enacted in 1791, there was no law that was common to all the states. In 1812 Supreme Court Justice Story, in a Circuit Court ruling, held that the common law alluded to was the common law of England, "the grand reservoir of all of our jurisprudence." This means that when today an American judge has to decide whether in any set …
Conceptual Overburden In The System's Operation?: Of Judges And Scholars, Jurisdiction And All That, James Dickson Phillips Jr.
Conceptual Overburden In The System's Operation?: Of Judges And Scholars, Jurisdiction And All That, James Dickson Phillips Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Federal Practice and Procedure, Volumes 13-19: Jurisdiction and Related Matters by Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller, and Edward H. Cooper
Economical Litigation: Kentucky's Answer To High Costs And Delay In Civil Litigation, C. Lynn Oliver
Economical Litigation: Kentucky's Answer To High Costs And Delay In Civil Litigation, C. Lynn Oliver
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reducing Court Costs And Delay: An Overview, Leonard S. Janofsky
Reducing Court Costs And Delay: An Overview, Leonard S. Janofsky
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The American legal system is unparalleled in its efforts to protect individual rights. A citizen's access to the legal system provides the basis for our government of laws. Yet, it must be recognized that serious problems confront the American system and persist despite a long history of efforts at reform by the organized bar, the judiciary, and other interested parties. Years of delay exist in many of the nation's busiest courts. The cost of maintaining or defending a suit has grown at an alarming rate. These infamous twin evils - delay and cost - do more than belie the standard …
An Appellate Court Dilemma And A Solution Through Subject Matter Organization, Daniel J. Meador
An Appellate Court Dilemma And A Solution Through Subject Matter Organization, Daniel J. Meador
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The recent litigation explosion presents a two-pronged dilemma for American appellate courts. If, on the one hand, the number of appellate judges is not expanded to keep abreast of growing case loads, there is a risk that courts will rely too heavily on professional staff, thereby watering down the decision-making process. If, on the other hand, the number of judges is proportionately increased with the growth in appellate litigation, the number of three-judge decisional units will also increase, thereby threatening predictability and uniformity in the law of the jurisdiction. This Article undertakes to explain that dilemma and to offer a …