Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (219)
- University of Michigan Law School (215)
- University of Colorado Law School (176)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
- UIC School of Law (88)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (59)
- Brooklyn Law School (40)
- Pepperdine University (37)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (32)
- Georgetown University Law Center (31)
- University of Georgia School of Law (24)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (24)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (22)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (21)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (20)
- University of Richmond (18)
- BLR (17)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (15)
- Notre Dame Law School (14)
- Roger Williams University (14)
- American University Washington College of Law (10)
- St. Mary's University (10)
- St. John's University School of Law (8)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- Duke Law (7)
- University of Missouri School of Law (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (6)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- Keyword
-
- Congress (110)
- Judicial review (76)
- Legislation (74)
- Statutory interpretation (74)
- United States Supreme Court (70)
-
- Courts (69)
- Supreme Court (62)
- United States (60)
- Constitution (50)
- Federal courts (47)
- Law reform (46)
- California (33)
- Colorado (32)
- Law (32)
- Litigation (30)
- Separation of powers (30)
- Clean Water Act (27)
- Jurisdiction (26)
- Jurisprudence (26)
- Judges (25)
- Public lands (25)
- BLM (24)
- FLPMA (24)
- State courts (24)
- Discrimination (23)
- Regulation (22)
- Constitutional law (21)
- Federalism (20)
- History (20)
- Administrative law (19)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (216)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (87)
- Michigan Law Review (85)
- Articles (68)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (42)
- Faculty Scholarship (33)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (28)
- Pepperdine Law Review (24)
- Publications (24)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (23)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (23)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Faculty Publications (21)
- Scholarly Works (21)
- Touro Law Review (21)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (21)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Cardozo Law Review (17)
- Fordham Law Review (17)
- Northwestern University Law Review (17)
- ExpressO (16)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (16)
- The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13) (16)
- University of Richmond Law Review (16)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (15)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (14)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (11)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1381 - 1410 of 1454
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Direct Judicial Review And The Doctrine Of Ripeness In Administrative Law, Joseph Vining
Direct Judicial Review And The Doctrine Of Ripeness In Administrative Law, Joseph Vining
Articles
There has been recent interest in rationalizing and codifying the opportunities for judicial review of federal administrative determinations outside an enforcement context or special proceedings designated by statute. Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner culminated the development of a strong judicial presumption in favor of such review, founded in general considerations and justified by the broad language of the Administrative Procedure Act (AP A or Act). Since the petitioners in Abbott had theoretical rights to later review of the agency position in enforcement proceedings, the Court called the procedure "pre-enforcement" review. But similar opportunities for immediate and direct review of agency positions …
Title I - Special Grand Jury, Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
Title I - Special Grand Jury, Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Title I establishes special grand juries to sit in major population areas and other areas designated by the Attorney General. These grand juries are protected from arbitrary dismissal by the district court before completion of their work. They can sit for extended periods (a maximum of thirty-six months), and are authorized to issue reports concerning (a) noncriminal misconduct of appointed government officials or employees involving organized criminal activity; and (b) organized crime conditions within the district. When reports are issued concerning governmental misconduct, individuals named are given notice, afforded the opportunity to present evidence, file an answer, and obtain judicial …
Nonstatutory Review Of Federal Administrative Action: The Need For Statutory Reform Of Sovereign Immunity, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, And Parties Defendant, Roger C. Cramton
Nonstatutory Review Of Federal Administrative Action: The Need For Statutory Reform Of Sovereign Immunity, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, And Parties Defendant, Roger C. Cramton
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this Article is to generate support for three legislative proposals that will rectify the problems exemplified by the Gnotta case and hosts of other cases: (1) The elimination of the doctrine of sovereign immunity as a barrier to judicial review of federal administrative action; (2) a modest expansion of the subject matter jurisdiction of United States district courts to accommodate such review and, in addition, to provide a remedy against the United States for the resolution of property disputes; and (3) the total elimination of the remaining technicalities concerning the identification, naming, capacity, and joinder of parties …
The Consumer Class Action, Arthur H. Travers Jr., Jonathan M. Landers
The Consumer Class Action, Arthur H. Travers Jr., Jonathan M. Landers
Publications
No abstract provided.
Indiana's Need For Legislative Surgery: A Jurisdictional Transplant, Gregory A. Hartzler
Indiana's Need For Legislative Surgery: A Jurisdictional Transplant, Gregory A. Hartzler
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fraudulent Conveyances In The Conflict Of Laws: Easy Cases May Make Bad Law, Albert A. Ehrenzweig, Peter K. Westen
Fraudulent Conveyances In The Conflict Of Laws: Easy Cases May Make Bad Law, Albert A. Ehrenzweig, Peter K. Westen
Michigan Law Review
It has been said that hard cases often make bad law. The recent decision by the New York Court of Appeals in James v. Powell suggests that easy cases, too, may make bad law-especially where a scholarly judge ventures beyond the demands of the case before him.
Statute Of Frauds--The Doctrine Of Equitable Estoppel And The Statute Of Frauds, Michigan Law Review
Statute Of Frauds--The Doctrine Of Equitable Estoppel And The Statute Of Frauds, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In 1677 the English Parliament enacted the first Statute of Frauds to prevent "many fraudulent practices, which are commonly endeavored to be upheld by perjury and subornation of perjury." The trial system then existing in England was forced to depend upon unreliable juries, and relied upon few rules of evidence besides the rule treating parties to an action as incompetent witnesses. Thus, in passing the Statute, Parliament sought to minimize the abuses possible under the trial system by providing that virtually no important contract would be enforceable unless reduced to writing.
Separation Of Powers: The Phenomenon Of Legislative Courts, Edwin H. Greenebaum, W. Willard Wirtz
Separation Of Powers: The Phenomenon Of Legislative Courts, Edwin H. Greenebaum, W. Willard Wirtz
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Congress Versus Court: The Legislative Arsenal, Malcolm J. Gross
Congress Versus Court: The Legislative Arsenal, Malcolm J. Gross
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Joseph O'Meara
Introduction, Joseph O'Meara
Journal Articles
A symposium was held on February 29, 1964, devoted to the constitutional amendments proposed by the Council of State Governments. Very briefly these amendments would (1) vest power to amend the Constitution in State legislatures; (2) set up a "Court of the Union," composed of the chief justice of the supreme court of each of the 50 states, which would have authority to review "any judgment of the Supreme Court relating to the rights reserved to the states or to the people by this Constitution"; (3) take from the federal courts all jurisdiction over the apportionment of representation in State …
Territorial Courts And Law: Unifying Factors In The Development Of American Legal Institutions-Pt.1-Establishment Of A Standardized Judicial System, William Wirt Blume, Elizabeth Gaspar Brown
Territorial Courts And Law: Unifying Factors In The Development Of American Legal Institutions-Pt.1-Establishment Of A Standardized Judicial System, William Wirt Blume, Elizabeth Gaspar Brown
Michigan Law Review
The United States first became a sovereign nation when individual states of the Confederation ceded to the states collectively their several interests in the lands west of the Appalachians which lay east of the Mississippi, north of Spanish Florida, and south of the Great Lakes. This area had been relinquished by Great Britain by the Treaty of 1783 and, with the exception of Kentucky, now became the property of the United States. It was the first area over which the states as a group had complete sovereignty, subject only to the claims of the various Indian tribes. Colonies fresh from …
Congressional Repair Of The Erie Derailment, Leonard V. Quigley
Congressional Repair Of The Erie Derailment, Leonard V. Quigley
Michigan Law Review
It is the thesis of this article that such legislative review and repair is required today on the part of the federal legislature in regard to the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts. Such reconsideration is particularly appropriate where, as in the analogous commerce clause area, the subject matter has been committed specifically to the Congress by the Constitution.
No-Strike Clauses In The Federal Courts, Frank H. Stewart
No-Strike Clauses In The Federal Courts, Frank H. Stewart
Michigan Law Review
One consideration will support several promises. A promisor may extract more than one promise in return for his single undertaking to do - or not to do. It depends upon his bargaining power. His single undertaking may be so valuable that several promises are necessary to induce him to act, or not to act. He is privileged to hold out for the best deal. The law does not examine his motives or reduce his demands. And from this arises the common- law principle that one consideration may support several promises.
Administrative Law - Administrative Procedure Act- Status Of Tax Court, James Cripe
Administrative Law - Administrative Procedure Act- Status Of Tax Court, James Cripe
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner instituted this action before the Tax Court for a review of rulings by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determining deficiencies in the payment of his income taxes. The Tax Court held that it was not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act and had no means whatever of bringing before it the entire record, so called, that was before the Commissioner. On appeal, held, affirmed. Judicial review of the "whole record" mentioned in section 10 (e) of the Administrative Procedure Act envisages, in the case of adjudication, a review of the record made in cases governed by sections 5, …
"Federal Question" Jurisdiction -- A Snare And A Delusion, Ernest J. London
"Federal Question" Jurisdiction -- A Snare And A Delusion, Ernest J. London
Michigan Law Review
Poorly defined criteria in the area of jurisdiction are especially wasteful, generating as they often do expensive and protracted litigation over threshold issues, rather than promoting the speedy determination of lawsuits on their merits. One of the most perplexing exercises in American law practice is the effort to define with certainty the original jurisdiction of the lower federal courts in matters where there is no diversity of citizenship. Although this general head of federal jurisdiction has persistently and pervasively been characterized as "federal question" jurisdiction, it is doubtful whether there is, in fact, original jurisdiction in the lower federal courts …
Jury - Pre-Trial Selection - Suggested Improvements, Edward B. Stulberg
Jury - Pre-Trial Selection - Suggested Improvements, Edward B. Stulberg
Michigan Law Review
Over the course of the past twenty years, the desirability of trial by jury has been a subject of constant debate. In contrast, the matter of jury selection has been given little direct attention. Yet it is obvious that if consideration is given to improvements in selection procedure aimed primarily at raising the calibre of the jury panel, disappointment in the judicial process due to the general ineptness of jurors can be decreased. It is true that the fate of a litigant often is entirely within the discretion of the jury. This is not necessarily a reason for the abandonment …
The Union Of Law And Equity, Charles W. Joiner, Ray A. Geddes
The Union Of Law And Equity, Charles W. Joiner, Ray A. Geddes
Michigan Law Review
This paper was prepared for the guidance of a Committee on Michigan Procedural Revision jointly created by the Michigan Legislature, the Supreme Court of Michigan, and the Michigan State Bar to recommend revision of Michigan statutes and rules. Toe need for the joinder of law and equity procedure was thought to be so fundamental that this paper was prepared as a basic study for the committee. In it an attempt is made to bring to the attention of the Michigan lawyers, judges, and legislators an analysis of the Michigan Constitution, statutes, and cases and the experience of other states that …
Rules Of Practice And Procedure: A Study Of Judicial Rule Making, Charles W. Joiner, Oscar J. Miller
Rules Of Practice And Procedure: A Study Of Judicial Rule Making, Charles W. Joiner, Oscar J. Miller
Michigan Law Review
The rule-making power of the courts in the United States is is brought into focus wherever procedural reform is undertaken. As more and more states have undertaken rev1s1on of judicial procedures, the power and authority of courts to promulgate rules of practice and the definition of the scope of such rules have claimed increasingly the attention of legal writers. This trend can be attributed in part to a growing realization that statutes governing practice and procedure in courts, enacted by legislatures meeting every year or two, have failed to achieve that minimum standard in the administration of justice necessary to …
The Statute Of Limitations In Antitrust Litigation, Carl H. Fulda, Howard C. Klemme
The Statute Of Limitations In Antitrust Litigation, Carl H. Fulda, Howard C. Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Statute Of Limitations In Antitrust Litigation Ii, Carl H. Fulda, Howard C. Klemme
The Statute Of Limitations In Antitrust Litigation Ii, Carl H. Fulda, Howard C. Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Uniform Code Of Military Justice-New Rights And A Means To Enforce Them, John F. Spindler
The Uniform Code Of Military Justice-New Rights And A Means To Enforce Them, John F. Spindler
Michigan Law Review
The Uniform Code of Military Justice, designed to govern the entire military establishment of the United States, was enacted May 5, 1950, replacing the three separate systems of law theretofore applied to the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Pressure for a uniform code was a reflection of the great surge toward unification of the Armed Services which followed World War II. The new Code, however, is not just a revision and consolidation of the prior systems of military law. World War II, with its great increase in the size of the Armed Services and in the percentage of the population …
Legislation-Statutes In Pari Materia-Administrative Board Rulings, Robert B. Krueger
Legislation-Statutes In Pari Materia-Administrative Board Rulings, Robert B. Krueger
Michigan Law Review
Lane's application for an annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act to the lower adjudicative branches of the Railroad Retirement Board was denied. Lane, by claiming that a "grievance" had been created by the railroad's insistence that he had voluntarily resigned from its service in 1933, then brought the matter before the National Railroad Adjustment Board, which found that Lane had been an "employee" of the railroad from 1905 to 1937. When Lane's case was subsequently heard before the Retirement Board, the findings of the lower adjudicative branches of the Board were affirmed and the Board held that it was not …
Federal Procedure-Jurisdiction-Determination Of Amount In Controversy In Class Actions Under Federal Rule 23, James W. Callison
Federal Procedure-Jurisdiction-Determination Of Amount In Controversy In Class Actions Under Federal Rule 23, James W. Callison
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff owned 50 shares of common stock valued at $950. She brought an action in behalf of herself and all other stockholders to enjoin a sale of unissued stock by the corporation to its president, claiming a violation of her preemptive right. The district court ruled on the merits. On appeal, held, the plaintiff's interest was but a small fraction of the $3,000 required to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Although the action was representative, the claims of other stockholders in a like situation could not be cumulated. Ames v. Mengel Co., (2d Cir. 1951) 190 …
Legislative Favoritism Before The Court, Daniel J. Dykstra
Legislative Favoritism Before The Court, Daniel J. Dykstra
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Legislative Status Of An Unconstitutional Statute, Earl T. Crawford
The Legislative Status Of An Unconstitutional Statute, Earl T. Crawford
Michigan Law Review
Once a statute has been found to violate some constitutional provision, a legislature is faced with a difficult problem of how to change the statute so as to effect the desired policy and still not violate constitutional principles. The general nature of this problem is suggested by such inquiries as these: Will the subsequent overruling of a previous judicial decision declaring a statute unconstitutional require any legislative action to put the statute into effect? Can a statute, which has been held violative of the constitution, be amended by corrective or curative legislation without complete re-enactment if the statute as amended …
Congressional Silence: A Tool Of Judicial Supremacy, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Congressional Silence: A Tool Of Judicial Supremacy, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Balance Sheet Of Law And Religion, Frank E. Horack Jr.
The Balance Sheet Of Law And Religion, Frank E. Horack Jr.
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Problems In Probate Law: Including A Model Probate Code, Lewis M. Simes, Paul E. Basye
Problems In Probate Law: Including A Model Probate Code, Lewis M. Simes, Paul E. Basye
Michigan Legal Studies Series
The publication of the Model Probate Code, together with related monographs and appendix notes, serves a dual purpose. It is the report of a committee of the Probate Division of the American Bar Association. It is also the product of a research project carried on by the University of Michigan Law School. Mr. R. G. Patton, in his "Presentation of the Report of the Committee on Model Probate Code," printed elsewhere in this volume, has provided an appropriate preface for this publication in its first aspect.
The Proposed Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, James J. Robinson
The Proposed Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, James J. Robinson
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Doctrine Of Judicial Review And Its Relation To A Declared Purpose Or Policy Of A Statute, Theodore S. Cox
The Doctrine Of Judicial Review And Its Relation To A Declared Purpose Or Policy Of A Statute, Theodore S. Cox
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.