Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Tennessee College of Law (818)
- Seattle University School of Law (209)
- Roger Williams University (114)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (47)
- University of Michigan Law School (43)
-
- UIC School of Law (27)
- Pepperdine University (26)
- St. Mary's University (23)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (23)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (23)
- University of Maine School of Law (22)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (21)
- New York Law School (19)
- University of Richmond (17)
- BLR (14)
- Brooklyn Law School (13)
- Marquette University Law School (13)
- University of Georgia School of Law (12)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (11)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (68)
- Courts (64)
- Court (58)
- Judge (56)
- Lawyers (46)
-
- Justice (45)
- Legal (40)
- Litigation (38)
- "Rhode Island" (35)
- Attorney (28)
- Criminal (27)
- Judiciary (27)
- Federal (25)
- Legal Profession (25)
- Community (23)
- Attorneys (22)
- Bowman (22)
- Diversity (22)
- Law (22)
- Public (22)
- Judicial (20)
- Providence (20)
- Trial (20)
- Women (20)
- Constitution (19)
- District (19)
- Students (19)
- Supreme Court (19)
- Alumni (18)
- Ethics (18)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Tennessee Law Review (818)
- Seattle University Law Review (206)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (73)
- UIC Law Review (23)
- Maine Law Review (22)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (21)
- Touro Law Review (21)
- Faculty Scholarship (20)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (20)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (20)
- Michigan Law Review (16)
- University of Richmond Law Review (16)
- Articles (15)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (15)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (15)
- ExpressO (14)
- Marquette Law Review (13)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (11)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (9)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (9)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- Brooklyn Law Review (7)
- Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog) (7)
- Law School Blogs (7)
- Publications (7)
- Book Chapters (6)
- Books (6)
- Faculty Articles (6)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1081 - 1110 of 1656
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Out-Of-State Attorney Fee Forfeiture, Lawrence A. Cunningham
Out-Of-State Attorney Fee Forfeiture, Lawrence A. Cunningham
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appealability, Under The Collateral Order Doctrine, Of Orders Denying Motions For Appointment Of Counsel In Federal Civil Litigation After Richardson-Merrell, Inc. V. Koller, Kevin G. Dumbach
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Lawyer's Role In The Independent Adoption Process: Parental Consent And Best Interests Of The Child, Diana Lafemina
The Lawyer's Role In The Independent Adoption Process: Parental Consent And Best Interests Of The Child, Diana Lafemina
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unconscionability - Real Property Lawyers Confront A New Problem, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1987), Robert Kratovil
Unconscionability - Real Property Lawyers Confront A New Problem, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1987), Robert Kratovil
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Don'ts Of Oral Argument, Roger J. Miner '56
The Don'ts Of Oral Argument, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Courts and Federal Practice
No abstract provided.
The Duty To Criticize The Courts (Ii), Roger J. Miner '56
The Duty To Criticize The Courts (Ii), Roger J. Miner '56
Judges
No abstract provided.
An Introduction To Trial Law, J. Alexander Tanford
An Introduction To Trial Law, J. Alexander Tanford
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The State Of New York's State Federal-Judicial Council, Hon. George C. Pratt
The State Of New York's State Federal-Judicial Council, Hon. George C. Pratt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Criticism, James Boyd White
Judicial Criticism, James Boyd White
Articles
Today I shall talk about the criticism of judicial opinions, especially of constitutional opinions. This may at first seem to have rather little to do with our larger topic, "The Constitution and Human Values," but I hope that by the end I will be seen to be talking about that subject too. In fact I hope to show that in what I call our "criticism" our "values" are defined and made actual in most important ways.
Forcing Attorneys To Represent Indigent Civil Litigants: The Problems And Some Proposals, Greg Stevens
Forcing Attorneys To Represent Indigent Civil Litigants: The Problems And Some Proposals, Greg Stevens
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note argues that uncompensated court appointments represent an unsatisfactory means to provide counsel for indigents. Part I discusses the policy arguments for and against forced, uncompensated court appointments. Part I concludes that the arguments against these appointments outweigh the arguments in favor of them. Part II argues that they violate the Constitution's prohibitions against uncompensated takings and involuntary servitude. Part III offers a proposal that would provide effective representation for indigent civil litigants, while avoiding infringement of attorneys' constitutional rights.
Money And Justice: Who Owns The Courts?, Michigan Law Review
Money And Justice: Who Owns The Courts?, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Money and Justice: Who Owns the Courts? by Lois G. Forer
The Quest For Silence: Faulkner's Lawyer In A Comparative Setting, Richard H. Weisberg
The Quest For Silence: Faulkner's Lawyer In A Comparative Setting, Richard H. Weisberg
Articles
The article explores William Faulkner's portrayal of Gavin Stevens, a fictional lawyer, highlighting his evolution as a character and his unique place within the tradition of literary lawyer figures. The analysis focuses on Gavin's development in The Town, where he learns the value of silence and observation, distinguishing him from other lawyers in literature who often remain static in their personal growth. The article situates Gavin within a broader literary context, comparing him to characters from works by authors like Dickens and Twain, and argues for his significance as a complex and sympathetic character.
Attorney-Client Conflicts Of Interest And The Concept Of Non-Negotiable Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Emily M. Calhoun
Attorney-Client Conflicts Of Interest And The Concept Of Non-Negotiable Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Emily M. Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
The War On Diversity, John W. Reed
The War On Diversity, John W. Reed
Other Publications
Over the past decade or more there have been strong pressures to abolish the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts. With the strong backing of the prestigious American Law Institute and many scholars, and with the support of the Chief Justice, Senator Kennedy, and others, specific proposals have been introduced in Congress, have been discussed at enormous length, and have passed one or the other House but not both. At the moment, therefore, we still have diversity jurisdiction, and it is safe to predict that abolition of diversity will not occur during the present session of Congress. Nevertheless, the long-term …
Review Of The New Deal Lawyers, By Peter H. Irons, William Michael Treanor
Review Of The New Deal Lawyers, By Peter H. Irons, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article reviews The New Deal Lawyers by Peter H. Irons (1982).
The government lawyers who helped shape and defend New Deal agencies have received little attention from scholars. Any oversight has now, however, been redressed. The New Deal Lawyers provides a detailed and careful study of the litigation process that preceded the New Deal's 1937 court triumphs. Peter Irons' book focuses on the activities of three key agencies and their general counsels: the National Recovery Administration (NRA) and Donald Richberg; the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) and Jerome Frank; and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Charles Fahy. Each …
Justice, Bureaucracy, And Legal Method, Jospeh Vining
Justice, Bureaucracy, And Legal Method, Jospeh Vining
Articles
In the real world justice denied is not justice. Talking from the beginning about access to justice, rather than simply justice, emphasizes in a salutary way this commonplace of citizen and client. Justice that is inaccessible, delayed, refused does not just sit there glowing like a grail, which those separated from it may contemplate and yearn for. It is only in imagining that justice is available to someone, and in imagining what it would be like to be that someone, that one can see the thing as justice at all. To put it in economic terms, justice is not a …
Discovery Problems In Civil Cases, Joseph L. Ebersole, Barlow Burke
Discovery Problems In Civil Cases, Joseph L. Ebersole, Barlow Burke
Federal Judicial Center Reports
This publication is a product of a study undertaken in furtherance of the Center's statutory mission to conduct and stimulate research and development on matters of judicial administration. The analyses, conclusions, and points of view are those of the authors. This work has been subjected to staff review within the Center, and publication signifies that it is regarded as responsible and valuable. It should be emphasized, however, that on matters of policy, the Center speaks only through its Board.
Should Oral Argument On Appeal Be Abolished Unless Requested By The Court?, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Should Oral Argument On Appeal Be Abolished Unless Requested By The Court?, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Powell Speeches
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Literature On Discovery From 1970 To The Present: Expressed Dissatisfactions And Proposed Reforms, Daniel Segal
Survey Of Literature On Discovery From 1970 To The Present: Expressed Dissatisfactions And Proposed Reforms, Daniel Segal
Federal Judicial Center Reports
Eight years have passed since the last major revision of the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. During those years, there has been a substantial amount of writing on the discovery rules. While much of it has been aimed at helping practitioners understand the rules, a large portion has been critical in nature, examining how well the rules are functioning, isolating their problem areas and making suggestions for reform. It was the purpose of the study on which this Report is based to survey and analyze that critical literature. The Report's first section sets out in detail …