Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- University of Michigan Law School (186)
- University of Colorado Law School (116)
- University of Georgia School of Law (58)
- Duke Law (44)
-
- Pepperdine University (44)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (39)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (37)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (35)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (30)
- Brigham Young University Law School (26)
- UIC School of Law (26)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (26)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (22)
- American University Washington College of Law (18)
- Cornell University Law School (17)
- Brooklyn Law School (16)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (16)
- Notre Dame Law School (15)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (15)
- William & Mary Law School (15)
- BLR (14)
- New York Law School (12)
- Florida International University College of Law (11)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (11)
- Cleveland State University (10)
- Roger Williams University (10)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (10)
- Fordham Law School (9)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (9)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (207)
- Courts (114)
- Federal courts (76)
- Federalism (48)
- Congress (42)
-
- Supreme Court (39)
- Civil procedure (35)
- Constitutional law (35)
- Separation of powers (33)
- Constitution (32)
- United States (31)
- Federal Courts (30)
- State courts (26)
- United States Supreme Court (26)
- Colorado (24)
- Judges (24)
- Judicial review (23)
- Standing (23)
- Legislation (22)
- Litigation (22)
- BLM (21)
- Due process (21)
- Law (21)
- U.S. Forest Service (21)
- Federal government (20)
- Arbitration (19)
- International law (19)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Personal jurisdiction (19)
- Article III (18)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (209)
- Michigan Law Review (135)
- Faculty Scholarship (70)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (44)
- Touro Law Review (35)
-
- Articles (33)
- Faculty Publications (29)
- Publications (29)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- Pepperdine Law Review (26)
- Scholarly Works (25)
- UIC Law Review (25)
- Northwestern University Law Review (22)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- BYU Law Review (19)
- Indiana Law Journal (17)
- The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13) (16)
- Cardozo Law Review (14)
- ExpressO (14)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (14)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (13)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (12)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (12)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (11)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (10)
- Faculty Articles (9)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (9)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (9)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 841 - 870 of 1299
Full-Text Articles in Courts
The Stateless Corporation Finds A Home: Alienage Jurisdiction And Dependent Overseas Territories - J.P. Morgan Chase Bank V. Traffic Stream (Bvi) Infrastructure Limited, Michael Cornell Dypski
The Stateless Corporation Finds A Home: Alienage Jurisdiction And Dependent Overseas Territories - J.P. Morgan Chase Bank V. Traffic Stream (Bvi) Infrastructure Limited, Michael Cornell Dypski
San Diego International Law Journal
The purpose of this Article is to discuss the evolution of the alienage jurisdiction statute and the status of overseas dependent territories in light of the recent Supreme Court decision. Part I of this Article will provide a brief historical background of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and its purpose. Part II will discuss the concepts of the state and statelessness, as well as the role of dependent territories in international affairs. Part III will discuss and analyze the various federal decisions seemingly at loggerheads with each other on the issue of federal jurisdiction over dependent territories. Finally, Part IV will …
Formalism, Pragmatism, And The Conservative Critique Of The Eleventh Amendment, Michael E. Solimine
Formalism, Pragmatism, And The Conservative Critique Of The Eleventh Amendment, Michael E. Solimine
Michigan Law Review
For many years the Second Amendment to the constitution was construed by most authorities to grant a communal right to bear arms, through state militias and the like. Some years ago Sanford Levinson labeled this interpretation "embarrassing" to liberal scholars. That characterization was deserved, Levinson argued, since liberal academics had been eager to defend expansive interpretations of other rights-granting provisions of the Constitution. But they failed to do so when it came to language in the Second Amendment, which could be plausibly construed to grant an individual right to bear arms. The failure might be attributed, in part, to the …
Arising Under Jurisdiction And Uniformity In Patent Law, Christopher A. Cotropia
Arising Under Jurisdiction And Uniformity In Patent Law, Christopher A. Cotropia
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The law governing the Federal Circuit's appellate jurisdiction was brought into question in Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Circulation Systems, Inc. The Federal Circuit's appellate jurisdiction over Vornado's appeal rested solely on Vornado's counterclaim alleging patent infringement by Holmes. Holmes's complaint sought a declaratory judgment of no trade dress infringement and did not include any patent law claims. While the Federal Circuit found appellate jurisdiction over Vornado's appeal based on the counterclaim of patent infringement, the Supreme Court disagreed. The Court focused on the language in 35 U.S.C. § 1338(a), which defines the Federal Circuit's appellate jurisdiction by the statute's …
Intervening In The Case (Or Controversy): Article Iii Standing, Rule 24 Intervention, And The Conflict In The Federal Courts, Tyler R. Stradling, Doyle S. Byers
Intervening In The Case (Or Controversy): Article Iii Standing, Rule 24 Intervention, And The Conflict In The Federal Courts, Tyler R. Stradling, Doyle S. Byers
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Into The Abyss: How Party Autonomy Supports Overreaching Through The Exercise Of Unequal Bargaining Power, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 421 (2003), Pamela Edwards
Into The Abyss: How Party Autonomy Supports Overreaching Through The Exercise Of Unequal Bargaining Power, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 421 (2003), Pamela Edwards
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Twenty-Eighth Amendment: Why The Constitution Should Be Amended To Grant Congress The Power To Legislate In Furtherance Of The General Welfare, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2003), Casey L. Westover
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Seventh Circuit Decisions: Class Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 837 (2003), Iain D. Johnston
Survey Of Seventh Circuit Decisions: Class Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 837 (2003), Iain D. Johnston
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forum Selection Clauses In Diversity Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (2003), Kendra Johnson Panek
Forum Selection Clauses In Diversity Actions, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (2003), Kendra Johnson Panek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Cleveland State Law Review
This article focuses on the rules for determining finality and appealability of judgments under section 2505.02 and Ohio R. Civ. P. 54(B). To that end, this article addresses not only the various categories of "final orders" but also the procedural mechanisms by which interlocutory appeals are taken from judgments on one part of a case while the rest of the case remains pending. The objective of this article is two-fold. First and foremost, it provides a resource and guide to appellate practitioners and trial court judges for understanding the "final order rule" and for navigating its various provisions in the …
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judging Global Justice: Assessing The International Criminal Court, Diane Orentlicher
Judging Global Justice: Assessing The International Criminal Court, Diane Orentlicher
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Towards Tribal Sovereignty And Judicial Efficiency: Ordering The Defenses Of Tribal Sovereign Immunity And Exhaustion Of Tribal Remedies, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Towards Tribal Sovereignty And Judicial Efficiency: Ordering The Defenses Of Tribal Sovereign Immunity And Exhaustion Of Tribal Remedies, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Michigan Law Review
In 1985, the Narragansett Indian Tribe ("Tribe") created the Narragansett Indian Wetuornuck Housing Authority ("Authority"). The Authority, which acts on the Tribe's behalf in its housing development and operations, entered into a contract with the Ninigret Development Corporation for the construction of a low-income housing development. After construction began, disputes developed over how to proceed with the construction. When conciliation efforts failed, the Authority cancelled the contract. The Narragansett Tribal Council, the governing body of the Tribe, followed the forum selection clause in the contract and notified the disputants that it would hold a hearing to resolve the dispute. Ninigret …
Suspecting The States: Supreme Court Review Of State-Court State-Law Judgments, Laura S. Fitzgerald
Suspecting The States: Supreme Court Review Of State-Court State-Law Judgments, Laura S. Fitzgerald
Michigan Law Review
At the Supreme Court these days, it is unfashionable to second-guess states' fealty to federal law without real proof that they are ignoring it. As the Court declared in Alden v. Maine: "We are unwilling to assume the States will refuse to honor the Constitution or obey the binding laws of the United States. The good faith of the States thus provides an important assurance that 'this Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land.'" Accordingly, without proof that a state has "systematic[ally]" …
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Judicial Minimalism And The National Dialogue On Immigration: The Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine In Zadvydas V. Davis, Sanford G. Hooper
Judicial Minimalism And The National Dialogue On Immigration: The Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine In Zadvydas V. Davis, Sanford G. Hooper
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Practitioner's Guide To Arkansas's New Judicial Article, Larry Brady, J.D. Gingerich
A Practitioner's Guide To Arkansas's New Judicial Article, Larry Brady, J.D. Gingerich
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Draft Hague Convention On Jurisdiction And Enforcement Of Judgments And The Internet-A New Jurisdictional Framework, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 223 (2002), Kristen Hudson Clayton
The Draft Hague Convention On Jurisdiction And Enforcement Of Judgments And The Internet-A New Jurisdictional Framework, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 223 (2002), Kristen Hudson Clayton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In The United States: The Need For Federal Legislation, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 229 (2003), Violeta I. Balan
Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In The United States: The Need For Federal Legislation, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 229 (2003), Violeta I. Balan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
U.S. Announces Intent Not To Ratify International Criminal Court Treaty, Curtis A. Bradley
U.S. Announces Intent Not To Ratify International Criminal Court Treaty, Curtis A. Bradley
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Community Of Courts: Toward A System Of International Criminal Law Enforcement, William W. Burke-White
A Community Of Courts: Toward A System Of International Criminal Law Enforcement, William W. Burke-White
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article argues that, for political reasons, the future of international criminal law enforcement will largely be at the domestic level. It anticipates the emergence of a community of courts-domestic, semi-internationalized, and supranational. A decentralized system of international criminal law enforcement may give pause for concern: How can such a system be regulated? How can uniformity and effectiveness be assured? It is the claim of this Article that, in a world in which information is power, the relationships between these courts-the exchange of information, ideas, and personnel-brings order and regularity to the system. These interdependent relationships are defined by the …
Revisiting Erie, Guaranty Trust, And Gasperini: The Role Of Jewish Social History In Fashioning Modern American Federalism, Daniel R. Gordon
Revisiting Erie, Guaranty Trust, And Gasperini: The Role Of Jewish Social History In Fashioning Modern American Federalism, Daniel R. Gordon
Seattle University Law Review
This article explores the connection between traditional Jewish localism and the creation of modern American federalism that flows from the Erie doctrine. First, the riddle of Gasperiniis explored. Next, the federalist philosophies of Justices Brandeis and Frankfurter in Erie and Guaranty Trust are discussed. Finally, the article analyzes how Justices Brandeis, Frankfurter, and Ginsburg, as twentieth century American Jews, embody the traditional Jewish minority experience that, at least in part, was informed by anti-Semitism.
Municipal Gone District: Jurisdiction In New Court Of First Resort, Vic Fleming
Municipal Gone District: Jurisdiction In New Court Of First Resort, Vic Fleming
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreign Relations And Federal Questions: Resolving The Judicial Split On Federal Court Jurisdiction, Erin E. Terrell
Foreign Relations And Federal Questions: Resolving The Judicial Split On Federal Court Jurisdiction, Erin E. Terrell
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The federal circuit courts have disagreed concerning a fundamental issue of federal court jurisdiction: whether cases that may implicate or involve the "foreign relations" of the United States, but do not otherwise raise a more traditional "federal question" under federal law, may be removed from state courts to federal courts. This Note examines the cases that have created the split, and proposes two potential resolutions to it, one judicial and the other legislative.
The Supreme Court's Plenary Docket, Margaret Meriwether Cordray, Richard Cordray
The Supreme Court's Plenary Docket, Margaret Meriwether Cordray, Richard Cordray
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Which Of The Preparatory Commission's Latest Proposals For The Definition Of The Crime Of Aggression And The Exercise Of Jurisdiction Should Be Adopted Into The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court?, Rachel Peirce
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
In The Wake Of Crosby V. National Foreign Trade Council: The Impact Upon Selective Purchasing Legislation Throughout The United States, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 827 (2001), Ako Miyaki-Murphy
In The Wake Of Crosby V. National Foreign Trade Council: The Impact Upon Selective Purchasing Legislation Throughout The United States, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 827 (2001), Ako Miyaki-Murphy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Jurisdiction Of The Community Courts Reconsidered, Paul Craig
The Jurisdiction Of The Community Courts Reconsidered, Paul Craig
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Juridical And Jurisdictional Disconnects, Mark A. Drumbl
Juridical And Jurisdictional Disconnects, Mark A. Drumbl
Scholarly Articles
Although extraterritorial trials for human rights abusers certainly achieve some justice, this Article posits -- through a case-study of post-genocide Rwanda -- that the effects of such trials are circumscribed by the fact they may have little meaning among perpetrators and victims in post-conflict societies. This limited meaning particularly attaches to trials conducted extraterritorially through international tribunals as well as trials conducted in foreign national courts through the exercise of what loosely is called "universal jurisdiction." This circumscribed meaning results in these trials' having limited deterrence effects, although they may go some way to satisfying the deontological need to punish …
The Doctrine Of Non-Inquiry And The Preservation Of Human Rights:-Is There Room For Reconciliation?, Michael S. Topiel
The Doctrine Of Non-Inquiry And The Preservation Of Human Rights:-Is There Room For Reconciliation?, Michael S. Topiel
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The note explores the tension between individual human rights under international law and state interests in combating cross-border crime, focusing on the doctrine of noninquiry in extradition cases. It argues that while the Convention Against Torture imposes obligations to prevent extradition to situations of torture, the doctrine of noninquiry—where courts avoid scrutinizing the requesting state’s justice system—remains crucial for maintaining separation of powers and diplomatic relations. The analysis highlights the balancing act between protecting human rights and ensuring international cooperation in law enforcement.
Federal Common Law, Cooperative Federalism, And The Enforcement Of The Telecom Act, Philip J. Weiser
Federal Common Law, Cooperative Federalism, And The Enforcement Of The Telecom Act, Philip J. Weiser
Publications
Congress increasingly has enacted cooperative federalism programs to achieve complex regulatory policy objectives. Such programs combine the authority of federal regulators, state regulators, and federal courts in creative and often pathmarking ways, but the failure of these actors to appreciate fully their respective roles threatens to undermine cooperative federalism's effectiveness. In this Article, Professor Philip Weiser develops a coherent vision of how federal courts should enforce cooperative federalism regulatory programs. In particular, he relates the rise and purpose of cooperative federalism to the federal courts' increased reluctance to make federal common law under the Erie doctrine and their greater deference …