Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (446)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (220)
- Seattle University School of Law (218)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (126)
-
- New York Law School (113)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- Duke Law (86)
- Roger Williams University (86)
- UIC School of Law (82)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (82)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (68)
- Georgetown University Law Center (62)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (58)
- Fordham Law School (50)
- University of Maine School of Law (48)
- University of Georgia School of Law (47)
- William & Mary Law School (47)
- BLR (46)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (43)
- American University Washington College of Law (40)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (33)
- Cornell University Law School (32)
- Washington University in St. Louis (31)
- St. Mary's University (30)
- Brooklyn Law School (28)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (27)
- Cleveland State University (26)
- Pace University (24)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (392)
- Courts (250)
- Supreme Court (236)
- Constitution (110)
- Judge (98)
-
- Federal courts (86)
- Judiciary (86)
- Court (85)
- Federal (76)
- United States Supreme Court (69)
- Jurisprudence (59)
- Constitutional Law (57)
- Constitutional law (57)
- Justice (56)
- Judicial review (55)
- New York (54)
- Due process (53)
- Law (51)
- State (51)
- Jurisdiction (50)
- Litigation (50)
- Congress (49)
- Judicial selection (47)
- Judicial process (46)
- Politics (45)
- Roger J Miner (44)
- Diversity (40)
- Court of Appeals (39)
- Defendant (39)
- Supreme court (38)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (355)
- Seattle University Law Review (214)
- Faculty Scholarship (153)
- Touro Law Review (151)
- Indiana Law Journal (140)
-
- Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (65)
- UIC Law Review (59)
- Pepperdine Law Review (57)
- Michigan Law Review (56)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (53)
- Faculty Publications (48)
- Articles (46)
- Northwestern University Law Review (45)
- ExpressO (43)
- Maine Law Review (43)
- Scholarly Works (41)
- Cardozo Law Review (37)
- Nevada Law Journal (34)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (32)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (32)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (31)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (28)
- Committees (27)
- Fordham Law Review (27)
- Faculty Articles (25)
- Scholarly Articles (24)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (23)
- American University Law Review (22)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2881 - 2910 of 3112
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Independent Journey: The Life Of William O. Douglas By James F. Simon, Patrick L. Baude
Independent Journey: The Life Of William O. Douglas By James F. Simon, Patrick L. Baude
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Eight Cases And Section 251, James J. White
Eight Cases And Section 251, James J. White
Articles
[A] continuing sense of reliance and security that the promised performance will be forthcoming. . . is an important feature of the bargain-so states Comment 1 to section 2-609 of the Uniform Commercial Code. At common law, one party to a contract might suffer considerable and justifiable anxiety about the other party's willingness or ability to perform and yet have no legal basis for cancelling the contract or for procuring additional assurances from the other party. Section 251 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts is designed to provide a remedy for one party's reasonable fears that the other party to …
International Legal Standards Concerning The Independence Of Judges And Lawyers, Robert K. Goldman
International Legal Standards Concerning The Independence Of Judges And Lawyers, Robert K. Goldman
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Yusko To Attend Miner Dinner (Register Star), Register Star
Yusko To Attend Miner Dinner (Register Star), Register Star
News Articles
No abstract provided.
Teamster Leader Robilotto Loses Bid To Throw Out Some Charges (Knickerbocker News), John Runfola
Teamster Leader Robilotto Loses Bid To Throw Out Some Charges (Knickerbocker News), John Runfola
News Articles
No abstract provided.
2 Area Firms Told To Pay Back Wages (Knickerbocker News), Knickerbocker News
2 Area Firms Told To Pay Back Wages (Knickerbocker News), Knickerbocker News
News Articles
No abstract provided.
Miner Becomes U.S. Judge Today (Times Union), Times Union
Miner Becomes U.S. Judge Today (Times Union), Times Union
News Articles
No abstract provided.
Minnesota Rag, Terry Clayton Paulson
Minnesota Rag, Terry Clayton Paulson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Warren E. Burger And The Administration Of Justice, Edward A. Tamm, Paul C. Reardon
Warren E. Burger And The Administration Of Justice, Edward A. Tamm, Paul C. Reardon
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Page V. Rotterdam-Mohonasen Central School Distr., Et Al | Lyons V. Quandt | Realty Settlement Corp. V. Abele And Beck | Mechanical Technology, Inc. And Turbonetics, Inc. V. American Airlines, Freight System | Jordan V. Edward R. Hammock, Et Al, Roger J. Miner '56
1976-1981 State Reporter Decisions
No abstract provided.
Thoughts About Judging, Henry J. Friendly
Thoughts About Judging, Henry J. Friendly
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Judge by Patrick Devlin
On The Early History Of Lower Federal Courts, Judges And The Rule Of Law (Review Of Two Titles), Alfred S. Konefsky
On The Early History Of Lower Federal Courts, Judges And The Rule Of Law (Review Of Two Titles), Alfred S. Konefsky
Book Reviews
Review of Kermit L. Hall, The Politics of Justice: Lower Federal Judicial Selection and the Second Party System and Mary K. Bonsteel Tachau, Federal Courts in the Early Republic: Kentucky 1789-1816.
Jury Trial, Progress, And Democracy, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev. 679 (1981), Richard S. Kuhlman, George C. Pontikes, William J. Stevens
Jury Trial, Progress, And Democracy, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev. 679 (1981), Richard S. Kuhlman, George C. Pontikes, William J. Stevens
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Voir Dire In Kentucky: An Empirical Study Of Voir Dire In Kentucky Circuit Courts, William H. Fortune
Voir Dire In Kentucky: An Empirical Study Of Voir Dire In Kentucky Circuit Courts, William H. Fortune
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Voir dire is the stage of a jury trial at which prospective jurors are questioned under oath by court or counsel to determine their suitability as jurors in the case to be tried. Kentucky's high court has repeatedly recognized the importance of voir dire to the exercise of for-cause and peremptory challenges.
The trial judge's wide discretion in voir dire, however, necessarily makes a review of appellate decisions of minimal assistance in ascertaining what actually occurs during this important phase of a jury trial. Published opinions provide little guidance in this area; information about voir dire must come from a …
Justice Douglas And His Brethren: A Personal Recollection, William A. Reppy Jr.
Justice Douglas And His Brethren: A Personal Recollection, William A. Reppy Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
University of Richmond Law Review
The ever-expanding volume of appellate litigation in Virginia has engendered a crisis in appellate justice in this state which can be adequately addressed only by the creation of an intermediate appellate court. Not only is Virginia the most populous state without such an intermediate court, its highest court also has the largest caseload of any single state appellate court.
Matter Of Braunstein V Board Of Examiners | Cuunty Of Ulster V State Of Ny | New York State Office Of Parks & Recreation V Vantage Petroleum Corp., John T. Fitzpatrick
Matter Of Braunstein V Board Of Examiners | Cuunty Of Ulster V State Of Ny | New York State Office Of Parks & Recreation V Vantage Petroleum Corp., John T. Fitzpatrick
1976-1981 State Reporter Decisions
No abstract provided.
Estabrook V Estabrook | Tampone V Blum, John T. Fitzpatrick
Estabrook V Estabrook | Tampone V Blum, John T. Fitzpatrick
1976-1981 State Reporter Decisions
No abstract provided.
Discovery Problems In Civil Cases, Joseph L. Ebersole, Barlow Burke
Discovery Problems In Civil Cases, Joseph L. Ebersole, Barlow Burke
Federal Judicial Center Reports
This publication is a product of a study undertaken in furtherance of the Center's statutory mission to conduct and stimulate research and development on matters of judicial administration. The analyses, conclusions, and points of view are those of the authors. This work has been subjected to staff review within the Center, and publication signifies that it is regarded as responsible and valuable. It should be emphasized, however, that on matters of policy, the Center speaks only through its Board.
The Developing Role Of The Magistrate In The Federal Courts, Jack B. Streepy
The Developing Role Of The Magistrate In The Federal Courts, Jack B. Streepy
Cleveland State Law Review
Many practicing attorneys are unfamiliar with the role of the United States Magistrate in the federal judicial system. This article is intended to offer some insight into that role, both nationally and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
The Developing Role Of The Magistrate In The Federal Courts, Jack B. Streepy
The Developing Role Of The Magistrate In The Federal Courts, Jack B. Streepy
Cleveland State Law Review
Many practicing attorneys are unfamiliar with the role of the United States Magistrate in the federal judicial system. This article is intended to offer some insight into that role, both nationally and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Voir Dire In Kentucky: An Empirical Study Of Voir Dire In Kentucky Circuit Courts, William H. Fortune
Voir Dire In Kentucky: An Empirical Study Of Voir Dire In Kentucky Circuit Courts, William H. Fortune
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Race And Sentencing Equality In Kentucky, Robert L. Hurley
Race And Sentencing Equality In Kentucky, Robert L. Hurley
Masters Theses & Specialist Projects
Disparity in sentencing felons based on racial considerations has long has been considered a problem for civil libertarians and scholars alike. Examining data gathered in Kentucky, this thesis addresses this issue through the application of recently developed methodological techniques. Utilizing an index of sentencing equality, this study shows that while differences do exist in black and white offender offense characteristics, these differences do not account for the variations in sentences rendered in cases of white as opposed to black felons. This exploratory research reviews and critiques previous research and provides evidence which should prove useful in resolving the problem of …
Supreme Court Of Appeals Of West Virginia: A Statistical Analysis, John C. Parr, Karen L. Speidel
Supreme Court Of Appeals Of West Virginia: A Statistical Analysis, John C. Parr, Karen L. Speidel
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Should Federal Appellate Judges Help Select Their Colleagues?, Peter G. Fish
Should Federal Appellate Judges Help Select Their Colleagues?, Peter G. Fish
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Burger Court, The Commerce Clause, And The Problem Of Differential Treatment, Earl M. Maltz
The Burger Court, The Commerce Clause, And The Problem Of Differential Treatment, Earl M. Maltz
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Government By Judiciary: John Hart Ely's "Invitation", Raoul Berger
Government By Judiciary: John Hart Ely's "Invitation", Raoul Berger
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Personal View Of Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo: Recollections Of Four Cardozo Law Clerks, Joseph L. Rauh Jr., Melvin Siegel, Ambrose Doskow, Alan M. Stroock
A Personal View Of Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo: Recollections Of Four Cardozo Law Clerks, Joseph L. Rauh Jr., Melvin Siegel, Ambrose Doskow, Alan M. Stroock
Cardozo Law Review
A personal view of Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo and his approach to the law is perhaps best provided by those who worked under his direct tutelage. Four men who served as law clerks to the Justice during his six year term on the Supreme Court agreed to share their reflections on that experience in this commemorative volume. Joseph Rauh, the Justice's last law clerk, wrote first; his recollections were then circulated among the other three: Melvin Siegel, Ambrose Doskow and Alan M. Stroock. Their responses to Mr. Rauh's memories of the Justice and his judicial style present intriguing contrasts and …
Cardozo's Appointment To The Supreme Court, Andrew L. Kaufman
Cardozo's Appointment To The Supreme Court, Andrew L. Kaufman
Cardozo Law Review
Shortly before noon on February 15, 1932, Herbert Cone, confidential clerk to the New York Court of Appeals, went to the Albany train station to pick up Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo and to give him a message. He told Cardozo that Lawrence Richey, special secretary to President Hoover, had tried to reach him at his New York office earlier that morning and had asked that he call the President as soon as he reached Albany. Cardozo returned the President's call from his office at the Court of Appeals and received an offer of appointment as a Justice of the Supreme …
The Role Of Judges In Life/Death Decisions For The Neurologically Impaired, H. Richard Beresford
The Role Of Judges In Life/Death Decisions For The Neurologically Impaired, H. Richard Beresford
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The Massachusetts Supreme Court has recently ruled that decisions about withholding care from hopelessly ill, legally incapacitated patients must be made by judges. It clearly rejected the view that families and attending physicians should be empowered to make such decisions. In this respect, the ruling contrasts with that of the Quinlan case and highlights the issue of whether judges or physicians and families are better able to make medically and morally sound decisions respecting this class of patients.