Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (446)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (220)
- Seattle University School of Law (218)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (127)
-
- New York Law School (113)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- Duke Law (86)
- Roger Williams University (86)
- UIC School of Law (82)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (82)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (68)
- Georgetown University Law Center (62)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (58)
- Fordham Law School (50)
- University of Maine School of Law (48)
- University of Georgia School of Law (47)
- William & Mary Law School (47)
- BLR (46)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (43)
- American University Washington College of Law (40)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (33)
- Cornell University Law School (32)
- Washington University in St. Louis (31)
- St. Mary's University (30)
- Brooklyn Law School (28)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (27)
- Cleveland State University (26)
- Pace University (24)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (391)
- Courts (250)
- Supreme Court (236)
- Constitution (110)
- Judge (98)
-
- Judiciary (87)
- Federal courts (86)
- Court (85)
- Federal (76)
- United States Supreme Court (69)
- Jurisprudence (59)
- Constitutional law (58)
- Constitutional Law (56)
- Justice (56)
- Judicial review (55)
- New York (54)
- Due process (53)
- Law (51)
- State (51)
- Congress (50)
- Jurisdiction (50)
- Litigation (50)
- Judicial selection (47)
- Judicial process (46)
- Politics (45)
- Roger J Miner (44)
- Diversity (40)
- Court of Appeals (39)
- Defendant (39)
- Supreme court (38)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (355)
- Seattle University Law Review (214)
- Faculty Scholarship (153)
- Touro Law Review (151)
- Indiana Law Journal (140)
-
- Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (65)
- UIC Law Review (59)
- Pepperdine Law Review (57)
- Michigan Law Review (56)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (53)
- Faculty Publications (48)
- Articles (47)
- Northwestern University Law Review (45)
- ExpressO (43)
- Maine Law Review (43)
- Scholarly Works (41)
- Cardozo Law Review (37)
- Nevada Law Journal (34)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (32)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (32)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (31)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (28)
- Committees (27)
- Fordham Law Review (27)
- Faculty Articles (25)
- Scholarly Articles (24)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (23)
- American University Law Review (22)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2491 - 2520 of 3114
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Thinking About Judgeships L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , A. Leo Levin, Michael E. Kunz
Thinking About Judgeships L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , A. Leo Levin, Michael E. Kunz
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judges And Legislators: Enhancing The Relationship L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Deanell Reece Tacha
Judges And Legislators: Enhancing The Relationship L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Deanell Reece Tacha
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judiciary Reform: Recent Improvements In Federal Judicial Administration L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Harlington Wood, Jr.
Judiciary Reform: Recent Improvements In Federal Judicial Administration L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Harlington Wood, Jr.
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Caseload In U.S. District Courts: More Than Meets The Eye L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , David L. Cook, Steven R. Schlesinger, Thomas J. Bak, William T. Rule
Criminal Caseload In U.S. District Courts: More Than Meets The Eye L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , David L. Cook, Steven R. Schlesinger, Thomas J. Bak, William T. Rule
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Study In Contrasts: The Ability Of The Federal Judiciary To Change Its Adjudicative And Administrative Structures, A L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade Of Innovation And Progress , Charles W. Nihan
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Increasing Balance On The Federal Bench, Carl W. Tobias
Increasing Balance On The Federal Bench, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
In President Bill Clinton's first year of service, he nominated unprecedented numbers and percentages of highly qualified women and minorities to the federal judiciary. The Clinton Administration correspondingly employed an effective process for choosing potential jurists that generated relatively little controversy.
Some wondered whether President Clinton could improve his first year judicial selection record during his second year in office, especially given the number of international conflicts and pressing domestic matters that faced the Administration. These complications threatened to deflect the Administration's attention from naming judges.
Now that the 103d Congress has adjourned and President Clinton has reached mid-term, the …
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Justice Stephen Breyer: Purveyor Of Common Sense In Many Forums, Jeffrey Lubbers
Justice Stephen Breyer: Purveyor Of Common Sense In Many Forums, Jeffrey Lubbers
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Articles
I grieve for my country to say that the administration of the criminal law in all the states in the Union (there may be one or two exceptions) is a disgrace to our civilization.
What's An Opinion For? (Special Issue: Judicial Opinion Writing), James Boyd White
What's An Opinion For? (Special Issue: Judicial Opinion Writing), James Boyd White
Articles
The question the papers in this Special Issue address is whether it matters how judicial opinions are written, and if so why. My hope here is to suggest a way of elaborating the question that may provide the reader with a useful point of departure for reading the more extensive papers that follow.
Letter To Rjm From John J.P. Howley, John P. Howley
Letter To Rjm From John J.P. Howley, John P. Howley
Memos and Letters: Law Clerks
No abstract provided.
Restrictions On Publication And Citation Of Judicial Opinions: A Reassessment, Robert J. Martineau
Restrictions On Publication And Citation Of Judicial Opinions: A Reassessment, Robert J. Martineau
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In response to the "crisis of volume," state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the opinions they write to those opinions which will: (1) establish a new. rule of law or expand, alter, or modify an existing rule; (2) involve a legal issue of continuing public interest; (3) criticize existing law; or (4) resolve a conflict of authority. All other opinions are limited to brief statements of the reasons for the decision, go unpublished, and generally carry a prohibition against their being cited as precedent. Recently, critics have alleged a number of faults with this practice, including the supposed …
After Daubert: Going Forward With Lessons From The Past, Marc S. Klein
After Daubert: Going Forward With Lessons From The Past, Marc S. Klein
Cardozo Law Review
Ground zero in the ongoing battle over scientific evidence in toxic tort cases has clearly shifted in light of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In that case, the Supreme Court settled at least two profound issues. One has immediate practical consequences, the other has important philosophical implications.
The Supreme Court’S View Of Science: Has Daubert Exorcised The Certainty Demon?, Bert Black
The Supreme Court’S View Of Science: Has Daubert Exorcised The Certainty Demon?, Bert Black
Cardozo Law Review
The Supreme Court's mandate in Daubert that experts who give testimony based on science must confine themselves to valid scientific knowledge seems tautologically obvious, and hardly an issue requiring the attention of the nation's nine highest judges. The debate that led to Daubert was generated, however, by opponents of judicial screening who argued that holding experts to scientific standards somehow imposes an undue burden of proof on plaintiffs, especially in toxic tort cases - and the Supreme Court's decision has not put the issue completely to rest. Science, according to this "relaxed standards" argument, demands certainty far beyond the law's …
A Bibliography For The United States Courts Of Appeals, Thomas E. Baker
A Bibliography For The United States Courts Of Appeals, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Under The Influence: Responses Of The New Jersey Supreme Court To Drunk Driving Cases--A Study Of Management Influence On Judicial Decisions, Martin L. Haines
Under The Influence: Responses Of The New Jersey Supreme Court To Drunk Driving Cases--A Study Of Management Influence On Judicial Decisions, Martin L. Haines
St. Thomas Law Review
This Article is not written in defense of drunk drivers - they have no defense. It is written in defense of due process, which the courts, by constitutional mandate, must provide to al defendants including drunk drivers. It is a mandate the New Jersey Supreme Court has ignored, thereby encouraging the appearance of an over-eagerness to convict. Too often, the court has curtailed the liberties of DWI defendants, speeding convictions, and therefore dispositions, to further the demands of efficiency.
A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken
A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Testimonial Dinner: Hon. Warren E. Zittell, Columbia County Judge, Roger J. Miner '56
Testimonial Dinner: Hon. Warren E. Zittell, Columbia County Judge, Roger J. Miner '56
Tributes & Testimonials
No abstract provided.
Memorial Service, Judge Justin J. Mahoney, Roger J. Miner '56
Memorial Service, Judge Justin J. Mahoney, Roger J. Miner '56
Judges
No abstract provided.
Remarks: St John's Law Review Alumni Dinner, Roger J. Miner '56
Remarks: St John's Law Review Alumni Dinner, Roger J. Miner '56
Law Review Addresses
No abstract provided.
Supervisory Power Of The New York Courts, Bennett L. Gershman
Supervisory Power Of The New York Courts, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article discusses the role of supervisory power in the judicial culture of New York. In order to place supervisory power in a context, Part II outlines the emergence and decline of supervisory power in the federal system. Part III then traces the origin of supervisory power in New York to Cardozo's dictum in Lemon. Part IV explains how supervisory power is an aspect of the much broader inherent judicial power, which finds expression in the familiar common law decision-making process. Part V discusses three principal areas in which supervisory power has been exercised by New York courts since Cardozo: …
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Typology Of Transjudicial Communication, Anne-Marie Slaughter
A Typology Of Transjudicial Communication, Anne-Marie Slaughter
University of Richmond Law Review
Courts are talking to one another all over the world. Mary Ann Glendon describes a "brisk international traffic in ideas about rights," conducted by judges. "In Europe generally," she adds, "and in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, national law is increasingly caught up in a process of cross-fertilization among legal systems."
Dear Judge Mikva, Carl W. Tobias
Dear Judge Mikva, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
I am writing to urge that you apply in the executive branch the considerable expertise which you attained and honed over a lifetime of service in the legislative and judicial branches of our tripartite system of government, to the critical task of federal judicial selection that uniquely partakes of those coordinate branches.