Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (188)
- Universitas Indonesia (122)
- University of Georgia School of Law (115)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (76)
- University of Michigan Law School (62)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (45)
- UIC School of Law (31)
- Notre Dame Law School (30)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (28)
- Duke Law (27)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (24)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (23)
- University of Colorado Law School (22)
- University of San Diego (21)
- BLR (20)
- Brooklyn Law School (19)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (18)
- Pace University (16)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (16)
- Florida International University College of Law (15)
- Georgetown University Law Center (15)
- Pepperdine University (15)
- University of Richmond (15)
- Brigham Young University Law School (14)
- University of Miami Law School (10)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (9)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (9)
- Columbia Law School (8)
- Singapore Management University (8)
- University of Baltimore Law (8)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (106)
- International law (74)
- International Criminal Court (69)
- International Law (63)
- International Court of Justice (53)
-
- Jurisdiction (46)
- Treaties (43)
- ICC (38)
- Human rights (32)
- Tribunals (32)
- ICJ (29)
- Law (28)
- International courts (27)
- Human Rights Law (26)
- Arbitration (22)
- Supreme Court (22)
- United Nations (21)
- War crimes (21)
- United States (20)
- Terrorism (19)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (18)
- Genocide (18)
- Rome Statute (18)
- European Court of Human Rights (17)
- Extradition (17)
- Judges (17)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (16)
- International criminal law (15)
- Human Rights (14)
- Jurisprudence (14)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (187)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (103)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (42)
- Faculty Scholarship (41)
-
- Faculty Publications (31)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (29)
- Scholarly Works (26)
- Articles (24)
- UIC Law Review (22)
- San Diego International Law Journal (21)
- ExpressO (20)
- Scholarly Articles (19)
- Cardozo Law Review (18)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (17)
- Faculty Working Papers (17)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (14)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (14)
- Journal Articles (14)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (14)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (13)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (13)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- All Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Human Rights Brief (10)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (9)
- Court Briefs (9)
- BYU Law Review (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (8)
- The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18) (8)
- Publication Type
Articles 1081 - 1110 of 1158
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Treaty-Based Rights And Remedies Of Individuals, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Treaty-Based Rights And Remedies Of Individuals, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Treaties are frequently described as contracts between nations. As instruments of international law, they establish obligations with which international law requires the parties to comply. In the United States, treaties also have the status of law in the domestic legal system. The Supremacy Clause declares treaties to be the "supreme Law of the Land" and instructs the courts to give them effect. The status of treaties as law in two distinct legal orders has given rise to unusual conceptual problems. In recent years, it has produced confusion among the courts regarding the enforceability of treaties in the courts by individuals. …
Proposals For Judicial Reform In Chile, Robert Vaughn
Proposals For Judicial Reform In Chile, Robert Vaughn
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This Article explores the implications of different proposals for reforms by emphasizing a perspective that relates the proposals to the performance of the judiciary during the military regime in Chile. Part I of this Article describes the role of the judiciary prior to the coup and discusses its response to the human rights abuses of the military regime. Part II presents the principal proposals for reform and discusses them against this historic background. Part III of this Article suggests that these proposals offer a more radical change in the role of the judiciary in Chile than an examination of the …
Agenda: The Law Of International Water Courses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses, University Of Colorado Boulder. School Of Law, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, American Bar Association. Section Of International Law And Practice. International Environmental Law Committee, American Society Of International Law. Panel On State Responsibility, United Nations. International Law Commission
Agenda: The Law Of International Water Courses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses, University Of Colorado Boulder. School Of Law, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, American Bar Association. Section Of International Law And Practice. International Environmental Law Committee, American Society Of International Law. Panel On State Responsibility, United Nations. International Law Commission
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
Colloquium organizers, committee members and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors Daniel Magraw, James N. Corbridge, Jr. and Lawrence J. MacDonnell (Director, Natural Resources Law Center).
The United Nations International Law Commission has drafted new rules on the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. University of Colorado Law Professor Daniel Magraw has organized a colloquium to review these draft rules on October 18, 1991, sponsored jointly by the Panel on State Responsibility of the American Society of International Law, the University of Colorado School of Law, and the International Environmental Law Committee of the ABA's Section of International …
Introduction And Overview On The International Law Commission’S Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses, Stephen Mccaffrey
Introduction And Overview On The International Law Commission’S Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses, Stephen Mccaffrey
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
15 pages.
Contains footnotes.
The International Law Commission’S Draft Articles On The Law Of International Watercourses: Principles And Planned Measures, Charles B. Bourne
The International Law Commission’S Draft Articles On The Law Of International Watercourses: Principles And Planned Measures, Charles B. Bourne
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
52 pages.
Contains 6 pages of footnotes.
Protection And Preservation In International Watercourses, C. O. Okidi
Protection And Preservation In International Watercourses, C. O. Okidi
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
56 pages.
Contains 11 pages of footnotes.
“General Principles” And “Planned Measures” Provisions In The International Law Commission Draft Articles On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses: A Mexican Point Of View, Alberto Szekely
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
18 pages.
The Law Of The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses: Draft Articles On Protection And Preservation; Harmful Conditions And Emergency Situations; And Protection Of Water Installations, Ved P. Nanda
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
52 pages.
Contains endnotes (pages 40-50).
Observations On The International Law Commission’S Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses (Articles 1-4), Robert D. Hayton
Observations On The International Law Commission’S Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses (Articles 1-4), Robert D. Hayton
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
14 pages.
Includes footnotes.
Observations On The International Law Commission’S Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses: “Management And Domestic Remedies", Sergei V. Vinogradov
Observations On The International Law Commission’S Draft Rules On The Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses: “Management And Domestic Remedies", Sergei V. Vinogradov
The Law of International Watercourses: The United Nations International Law Commission's Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (October 18)
46 pages.
Contains 11 pages of endnotes.
Enforcing United Nations Decisions In Domestic Courts, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Enforcing United Nations Decisions In Domestic Courts, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Finding Harmony Amidst Disagreement Over Extradition, Jurisdiction, The Role Of Human Rights, And Issues Of Extraterritoriality Under International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Finding Harmony Amidst Disagreement Over Extradition, Jurisdiction, The Role Of Human Rights, And Issues Of Extraterritoriality Under International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
This Article examines extradition and jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime, focusing on the relationship between jurisdiction and extradition in the broader context of human rights law. The authors challenge what they argue are chimerical, although strongly held beliefs in the incompatibility of European and United States criminal justice systems and extradition practices. They argue that cooperation in matters of international criminal law may be enhanced, while protection of human rights is promoted. The authors establish this possibility by breaking down the barriers to understanding that stem from the divergent European versus Anglo-American modes of analysis.
The authors first analyze the five …
International Law Principles Governing The Extraterritorial Application Of Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
International Law Principles Governing The Extraterritorial Application Of Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
In this piece Professor Blakesley provides remarks on the differences and similarities between Germany and the United States on international principles of jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime.
International Year In Review: Developments In International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
International Year In Review: Developments In International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
In this piece Professor Blakesley provides remarks on recent developments in International Criminal Law.
Mengele's Birthmark: The Nuremberg Code In United States Courts, George J. Annas
Mengele's Birthmark: The Nuremberg Code In United States Courts, George J. Annas
Faculty Scholarship
Experimentation on human beings is so difficult to justify that the attempt is seldom even made. Usually its justification is simply assumed, and vague notions of progress or national emergency are suggested as sufficient rationales. The United States, a society dedicated to both progress and human rights, has been profoundly ambivalent about human experimentation. On the one hand, we have consistently argued in our ethical codes that the rights and welfare of research subjects must be protected; on the other hand, we have consistently used perceived emergencies, both national and medical, as an excuse to jettison individual rights and welfare …
Does Title Vii Apply In Saudi Arabia? An Analysis Of Eeoc V. Arabian American Oil Co., Barbara J, Fick
Does Title Vii Apply In Saudi Arabia? An Analysis Of Eeoc V. Arabian American Oil Co., Barbara J, Fick
Journal Articles
This article previews the Supreme Court case EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244 (1991). The author expected the Court to decied whether Congress intended the mandates of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibiting employment discrimination to extend extraterritorially.
The European Court Of Justice: Last Hope For 1992, Eugene C. Austin
The European Court Of Justice: Last Hope For 1992, Eugene C. Austin
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Functional Approach To "General Principles Of International Law", M. Cherif Bassiouni
A Functional Approach To "General Principles Of International Law", M. Cherif Bassiouni
Michigan Journal of International Law
"General Principles of International Law" are among the sources of national and international law' which have long been recognized and applied in disputes between States.2 They were embodied in the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice ["PCIJ"], article 38 (I)(3), and in the Statute of the International Court of Justice ["ICJ"], article 38 (1)(c), under the terms "general principles of law recognized by civilized nations." As discussed below, both the PCIJ and ICJ have relied on this source.
Note, The United States, Israel And Their Extradition Dilemma, Sheryl A. Petkunas
Note, The United States, Israel And Their Extradition Dilemma, Sheryl A. Petkunas
Michigan Journal of International Law
Part I of this note will examine the different approaches taken by the Second, Seventh and Ninth Circuits in their application of the Treaty's political offense exception. Part II will discuss the conflict that may arise from Israel's application of a domestic law which contravenes the purpose of the Treaty. Part III will address both the need for the United States and Israel to reconcile problems in applying the political offense exception through renegotiation and the dilemma arising from the failure of the Israeli government and the Knesset to coordinate policy with regard to the extradition of nationals.
Major Contemporary Issues In Extradition Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Major Contemporary Issues In Extradition Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
In this piece Professor Blakesley provides remarks on high crimes in international law, and the ability to extradite state and high government officials for committing them.
"Normative Surrender" And The "Duty" To Appear Before The International Court Of Justice: A Reply, H. W.A. Thirlway
"Normative Surrender" And The "Duty" To Appear Before The International Court Of Justice: A Reply, H. W.A. Thirlway
Michigan Journal of International Law
A recent article in the Michigan Yearbook of International Legal Studies by Professor Jerome Elkind included a section, headed "Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice," which was addressed to the question whether States have a legal duty to appear before the International Court of Justice when cited as respondents in cases instituted by unilateral application. This question was dealt with by the present writer at some length in a recent book, and since Professor Elkind, who has also published a book on the subject, reaches a different conclusion, and refers critically to the views the author has expressed, some …
Transboundary Air Pollution: The Legal Framework, Mark S. Squillace
Transboundary Air Pollution: The Legal Framework, Mark S. Squillace
Air Quality Protection in the West (November 27-28)
12 pages (includes illustrations).
Contains footnotes.
Agenda: Air Quality Protection In The West, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Air Quality Protection In The West, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Air Quality Protection in the West (November 27-28)
Conference organizers, session moderators and/or speakers included University of Colorado School of Law professor Mark S. Squillace.
Visibility, acid rain, air toxics, and urban air pollution are the topics of an upcoming Center conference on air quality in the West. The conference will be held at the School of Law in Boulder on November 27-28, 1989. Presentations will describe the nature and scope of the issues, the existing legal framework and experience with its implementation, and proposed changes in the law. Emphasis will be placed on air quality issues in the West and efforts underway to address these problems. Special …
A Colorado River Basin Authority: Opportunity For Sharing River Basin Management And Resources, David H. Getches
A Colorado River Basin Authority: Opportunity For Sharing River Basin Management And Resources, David H. Getches
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
32 pages.
Contains references.
The Delaware River Basin: Courts, Compacts And Commissions, R. Timothy Weston
The Delaware River Basin: Courts, Compacts And Commissions, R. Timothy Weston
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
112 pages (includes illustrations and 1 map).
Contains references.
Interjurisdictional Relations Under Federal Water Quality Law: A Guide Through The Maze, Michael C. Blumm, Daniel Rohlf
Interjurisdictional Relations Under Federal Water Quality Law: A Guide Through The Maze, Michael C. Blumm, Daniel Rohlf
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
53 pages.
Contains references.
Allocating Groundwater Among Nations, States And Tribes, Ann Berkley Rodgers, Carolyn J. Abeita
Allocating Groundwater Among Nations, States And Tribes, Ann Berkley Rodgers, Carolyn J. Abeita
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
70 pages.
The Colorado River Compact: A Breeding Ground For International, National, And Interstate Controversies, John U. Carlson
The Colorado River Compact: A Breeding Ground For International, National, And Interstate Controversies, John U. Carlson
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
38 pages.
Contains references.
Agenda: Boundaries And Water: Allocation And Use Of A Shared Resource, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Boundaries And Water: Allocation And Use Of A Shared Resource, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7)
Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Charles F. Wilkinson.
Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource is the topic of the Center's annual summer program on water this June. Most of the major rivers in the western United States are shared between two or more states. Often tribal governments play an important role in water allocation and use decisions. International considerations also may be involved in some cases. These interjurisdictional issues extend to groundwater as well as surface water.
This conference will provide the …
Fsia Retroactivity Subsequent To The Issuance Of The Tate Letter: A Proposed Solution To The Confusion, Michael E. Jansen
Fsia Retroactivity Subsequent To The Issuance Of The Tate Letter: A Proposed Solution To The Confusion, Michael E. Jansen
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
Three recently decided cases discuss the retroactive application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 to pre-1952 claims—Carl Marks & Co. v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Jackson v. People's Republic of China, and Slade v. United States of Mexico. These cases have conclusively established that the FSIA is not to be applied retroactively to pre-1952 events—i.e., to claims arising prior to the issuance of the Tate Letter. They do not resolve the issue of retroactive application of the FSIA to post-1952 events, however, and this issue is currently engulfed in confusion. This Comment attempts to resolve this confusion …