Courts Commons^™

A “Consistent And Ongoing” Right: The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel At Initial Bail Hearings, Gemma Sunnergren

Cardozo Law Review

Despite the potentially devastating consequences of pretrial incarceration and the complexity of modern bail applications, many individuals charged with crimes across the country are not appointed counsel to guide them through their bail hearings. Traditionally, application of the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel in various pretrial proceedings has been evaluated under the “critical stage” framework, finding defense counsel necessary when a proceeding puts one’s trial rights at risk or is sufficiently trial-like—i.e., adversarial and requiring complex legal arguments. In the absence of a clear Supreme Court ruling, states have been left to conduct their own analysis, with many declining to …

Article Iii's Constraints On The Legislative Power, Elizabeth Beske

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Article III’s heightened concreteness standard for statutory harms takes federal judges deep into legislative terrain, jeopardizing statutory damage provisions and confining Congress to post hoc solutions rather than preemptive strikes. The Supreme Court has insisted that creating a cause of action is a legislative function. At the same time, its recent standing cases instruct lower federal courts to permit suit on statutory injuries only when they find actual harm that bears a tight connection to injuries recognized at common law. This new harm requirement rests uneasily with countless statutes featuring statutory damage provisions that are in place precisely because damages …

Ibu Kota Nusantara Sebagai Daerah Khusus Berdasarkan Desentralisasi Asimetris, Krisna Bagas Purwopangestu, Sri Wahyuningsih

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

This research examines the legal issue concerning the administration of regional government in Nusantara Capital City (IKN) which has been consider by some scholars as demonstrating deviations from the principle of decentralization. This research takes a position contrary to the mainstream legal discourse that argues there is a conceptual deviation in the model of regional governance in IKN. This research is normative legal research employing a conceptual approach and statutory approach with data collected through library research. This research argues that the administration of regional government in IKN does not indicate any deviation from the principle of decentralization. IKN is …

U.S. Trade Law And Policy At A Crossroads, John K. Veroneau

Maine Law Review

The past decade has witnessed significant changes in U.S. international trade policy. In his first presidential term, Donald J. Trump moved the United States away from long-standing policies of lowering trade barriers to facilitate global commerce and replaced them with a more restrictive version not seen since the early twentieth century. President Trump's more trade-restrictive policies were largely extended by his successor, President Joseph R. Biden. The first year of President Trump's second term has indicated a strong desire to restrict imports further in an attempt to create U.S. manufacturing jobs and reduce reliance on Chinese imports. This Article seeks …

Berbagai Masalah Hukum Bersangkutan Dengan Rumah Susun Dan Pemilikan Satuan Rumah Susun, Prof. Boedi Harsono, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Brief Of Amici Curiae Immigration Law Professors In Support Of Respondent, Peter L. Markowitz, Lindsay Nash

Amicus Briefs

Amicus curiae brief submitted by immigration law professors in support of the respondent in Bondi v. Lau before the Supreme Court of the United States. The brief argues that lawful permanent residents returning from travel abroad may not be treated as seeking admission unless they satisfy the statutory criteria set forth in the Immigration and Nationality Act. It further contends that ambiguities in deportation statutes should be resolved in favor of noncitizens under the longstanding immigration rule of lenity.

Brief For Amici Curiae Immigration Law Scholars In Support Of Petitioners-Appellees' Petition For Rehearing En Banc, Lindsay Nash

Amicus Briefs

Amicus curiae brief submitted by immigration law scholars, including Cardozo School of Law Professor Lindsay Nash, in Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi and Covarrubias v. Vergara before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The brief supports rehearing en banc and argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) does not authorize mandatory, no-bond detention of noncitizens apprehended within the interior of the United States. Drawing on statutory text, legislative history, and the historical development of immigration detention, the amici contend that such detention authority has historically been limited to individuals seeking admission at the border.

Welcome To The Trump Administration’S Board Of Immigration Appeals. The Immigrant Always Loses., Jason A. Cade

Scholarly Works

The first 100 opinions in Volume 29 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ precedential decisions—issued at more than three times the historical pace—constitute a project. The Trump Administration has used the Attorney General’s self-referral power and a reconstituted, ideologically aligned Board to engineer a body of precedents that reliably produces one result: removal. This Essay organizes these decisions, cataloged in a full Appendix, into five main categories: (1) narrowing relief for noncitizens alleging persecution; (2) expanding mandatory detention while narrowing discretionary release; (3) maximizing the immigration consequences of criminal history and related grounds while foreclosing the relief mechanisms Congress created …

Does Textualism Constrain Supreme Court Justices?, James J. Brudney, Lawrence Baum

Northwestern University Law Review

A principal justification for textualism is the constraint hypothesis. Conservative Justices and leading textualist scholars contend that—in stark contrast to reliance on legislative history—focus on the ordinary meaning of enacted text leaves little room for the Justices to be policy-oriented or ideological in their interpretations. This Article represents the first systematic study probing the validity of the constraint hypothesis, one that employs both quantitative and qualitative analysis.

The Article examines the Justices’ reliance on interpretive resources in over 660 statutory decisions in the field of labor and employment, decided by the Burger Court, the Rehnquist Court, and the Roberts Court—during …

The Vanishing Enforcer: Consumer Protection In An Era Of Dual Retrenchment, Alisher Juzgenbayev

Northwestern University Law Review

Recent developments, including reductions in the federal workforce, effective suspension of certain enforcement activities, and attempted centralization of independent agency rulemaking in the White House, have significantly weakened administrative agencies. This administrative retrenchment is concerning as private enforcement of a number of consumer protection statutes has been simultaneously curtailed through the Supreme Court’s decisions in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, which dramatically narrowed plaintiffs’ standing. These decisions rely in part on a vision of strong executive authority, positing that broad private standing conflicts with an Article II framework where a politically accountable President faithfully implements laws …

Rethinking Ubuntu Philosophy In Nigeria's Environmental Law: A Pathway To Sustainable Plastic Pollution Regulation, Ndubuisi Augustine Nwafor

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Sea Changes In Sue-And-Settle Policy: The Tides Of Transparency And Expediency, Evan B. Fitzgerald

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Aspek Hukum Dari Wewenang Dan Tanggung Jawab, Dedi Soemardi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Merdeka : Suatu Upaya Dalam Melaksanakan Uud 1945 Secara Murni Dan Konsekuen, Budiman B. Sagala, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perlindungan Terhadap Merk Luar Negeri, Prof. Dr. Mr. Sudargo Gautama

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Bagaimana Membangun Dan Membina Hukum Nasional, Prof. Padmo Wahyono, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Vonis Interlokutor : Suatu Perbandingan Antara Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Dengan Hukum Acara Perdata Belanda, H. Sofyan Mukhtar, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Act Of State Doctrine Dan Teori Imunitas Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hukum Perdata Internasional, Syahmin A.K.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Doktrin Imunitas Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Arbitrasi Icsid Di Indonesia, Budi Lazarusli, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Dwi Abad Konstitusi Amerika Serikat, Prof. Dr. Ismail Suny, S.H. M.Cl.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perkosaan Ditinjau Dari Pandangan Hakim, Bismar Siregar, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Tradisi Hukum Cina : Negara Dan Masyarakat, Erman Radjagukguk, S.H., Ll.M.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Masalah Hubungan Keuangan Pusat Dan Daerah, Oscar Suryaatmadja, M.Asc.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Sistem Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Pada Waktu Sekarang Dan Yang Akan Datang, Drs. Gandhi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Beberapa Catatan Atas Ruu Tentang Susunan Kekuasaan Dan Acara Mahkamah Agung, Muchtar Rosyidi, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Masalah Penyidikan Dan Tindak Pidana Pajak, Ibrahim Idham, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Beberapa Masalah Tentang Tanggung Jawab Ganti Rugi Perdata Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup, N.H.T. Siahaan, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Prospektif Pengaturan Perizinan Usaha Industri Berkaitan Dengan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, Yakob Mohsin, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Beberapa Pandangan Di Sekitar Kredit Luar Negeri Sebagai Alat Pembiayaan, Bochari, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pbb Dan Tatanan Hukum Ekonomi Internasional Yang Baru, M. Said Nisar, S.H., Ll.M.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract