Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (542)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (361)
- University of Michigan Law School (324)
- Seattle University School of Law (244)
- University of Colorado Law School (155)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (115)
- UIC School of Law (105)
- Georgetown University Law Center (93)
- Duke Law (81)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (77)
- Pepperdine University (71)
- Notre Dame Law School (66)
- University of Georgia School of Law (66)
- William & Mary Law School (65)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (54)
- Fordham Law School (47)
- University of Richmond (47)
- BLR (41)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (36)
- University of Maine School of Law (35)
- Brooklyn Law School (33)
- American University Washington College of Law (31)
- Roger Williams University (31)
- Cleveland State University (27)
- Brigham Young University Law School (26)
- Cornell University Law School (23)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (23)
- New York Law School (22)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (394)
- Constitution (333)
- Courts (244)
- Federal (216)
- Constitutional law (214)
-
- Constitutional Law (182)
- United States Supreme Court (168)
- New York (167)
- State (140)
- Judicial review (116)
- Due process (114)
- Federal courts (114)
- Congress (112)
- Sixth Amendment (103)
- Separation of powers (102)
- Appellate Division (93)
- Constitutions (91)
- Federalism (91)
- Court of Appeals (81)
- United States (80)
- Judges (79)
- Defendant (77)
- Jurisprudence (76)
- First Amendment (75)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- § 6 (66)
- Jurisdiction (65)
- Court (62)
- Law (57)
- State courts (55)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (413)
- Touro Law Review (346)
- Seattle University Law Review (231)
- Michigan Law Review (168)
- Faculty Scholarship (163)
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Articles (113)
- UIC Law Review (100)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (84)
- Indiana Law Journal (64)
- Pepperdine Law Review (61)
- Cardozo Law Review (60)
- Faculty Publications (53)
- Scholarly Works (47)
- Publications (44)
- Northwestern University Law Review (42)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (41)
- ExpressO (40)
- University of Richmond Law Review (36)
- Supreme Court Case Files (35)
- Journal Articles (34)
- Maine Law Review (34)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (29)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (24)
- BYU Law Review (23)
- Faculty Articles (23)
- Court Briefs (22)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3301 - 3330 of 3517
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Congressional Control Of Administrative Regulation: A Study Of Legislative Vetoes, Harold H. Bruff, Ernest Gellhorn
Congressional Control Of Administrative Regulation: A Study Of Legislative Vetoes, Harold H. Bruff, Ernest Gellhorn
Publications
Several administrative programs contain provisions allowing Congress to veto agency rules, and there is now a bill before Congress to extend this veto power to all agency rulemaking. In this Article, Professor Bruff and Dean Gellhorn analyze the histories of five federal programs subject to the legislative veto to determine the effect of the veto on the rulemaking process and on the relationships between the branches of government. Extrapolating from this practical experience, they suggest that a general legislative veto is unlikely to increase the overall efficiency of the administrative process, may impede the achievement of reasoned decisionmaking based on …
Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench
Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench
Michigan Law Review
The first section of this article considers the power of state courts to hear federal cases. Since it is now well established that state courts have the constitutional power to adjudicate federal causes of action if Congress so desires, the significant questions concern the method by which the judiciary is to decipher congressional intent. Although the courts have no difficulty where Congress has explicitly addressed the issue of state court jurisdiction, problems do arise in situations where Congress has remained silent on the question. The first section critically examines the traditional criteria employed by the courts for determining congressional intent …
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Standing, Mootness, And Federal Rule 23—Balancing Perspectives, Mary Kay Kane
Standing, Mootness, And Federal Rule 23—Balancing Perspectives, Mary Kay Kane
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Law Making And Administration, Roger C. Cramton
Judicial Law Making And Administration, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection And Criminal Sentencing: Legal And Policy Considerations, Mark Berger
Equal Protection And Criminal Sentencing: Legal And Policy Considerations, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts, Injunctions, Declaratory Judgments, And State Law: The Supreme Court Has Finally Fashioned A Workable Abstention Doctrine, Clair E. Dickinson
Federal Courts, Injunctions, Declaratory Judgments, And State Law: The Supreme Court Has Finally Fashioned A Workable Abstention Doctrine, Clair E. Dickinson
Cleveland State Law Review
The American judicial system is founded on several policies which act as guideposts for the courts. Among these is the policy that states should be as free from federal control as possible. At the opposite end of the spectrum is the view that federal courts have a duty to protect individuals from violations of their constitutional rights. These policies meet, and seemingly clash, when a plaintiff enters a federal court either to request a declaratory judgment that a state statute is unconstitutional or to seek an injunction against the enforcement of the statute. The balancing of these competing interests has …
Judicial Review: Its Influence Abroad, Donald P. Kommers
Judicial Review: Its Influence Abroad, Donald P. Kommers
Journal Articles
The doctrine of judicial review, having been nourished in a legal culture and socio-political environment favorable to its growth, is America’s most distinctive contribution to constitutional government. Judicial review as historically practiced in the United States was duly recorded abroad, with varying degrees of influence and acceptability. During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the influence of judicial review was most conspicuous in Latin America, where it was adopted as an articulate principle of numerous national constitutions, while most European nations consciously rejected it as incompatible with the prevailing theory of separation of powers. Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, although marginally …
Franks V. Bowman Transportation Co. Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Franks V. Bowman Transportation Co. Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Buckley V. Valeo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Washington V. Davis, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Washington V. Davis, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Pennsylvania V. New Jersey, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Pennsylvania V. New Jersey, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Massachusetts Board Of Retirement V. Murgia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Massachusetts Board Of Retirement V. Murgia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Cappaert V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Cappaert V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Contribution To An Explication Of The Activity Of The Warren Majority Of The Supreme Court, Mitchell Franklin
Contribution To An Explication Of The Activity Of The Warren Majority Of The Supreme Court, Mitchell Franklin
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comparative Judicial Review And Constitutional Politics, Donald P. Kommers
Comparative Judicial Review And Constitutional Politics, Donald P. Kommers
Journal Articles
Donald P. Kommers reviews Richard D. Baker's Judicial Review in Mexico: A Study of the Amparo Suit (Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 1971); B. L. Strayer's Judicial Review of Legislation in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968); Heinz Laufer's Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und politischer Prozess (Tiibingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck ], 1968); Mauro Cappelletti's Judicial Review in the Contemporary World (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1971); Edward McWhinney's Judicial Review (4th ed.) (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969); Richard E. Johnston's The Effect of Judicial Review on Federal-State Relations in Australia, Canada, and the United States (Baton Rouge: Louisiana …
Stanton V. Stanton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Stanton V. Stanton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Nixon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Nixon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
White V. Regester, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
A Proposed New Judicial Article For West Virginia, Thornton G. Berry Jr.
A Proposed New Judicial Article For West Virginia, Thornton G. Berry Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts - Declaratory Judgment - A Federal Court May Grant Declaratory Relief From A State Statute Allegedly Unconstitutional As Applied If State Prosecution Is Threatened, But Not Pending, Rachel Wolkin
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
This comparison of United States v. Nixon and the Pentagon Papers case finds the greatest similarity and significance shared by the two cases was the anti-climactic nature of their conclusions. While both cases concerned constitutional questions of the highest order, centered around the scope of the executive power, both cases were drawn on such narrow grounds that there was hardly any effect on constitutional law doctrine.
The Use Of In Camera Hearings In Ruling On The Informer Privilege, Ronald E. Levine
The Use Of In Camera Hearings In Ruling On The Informer Privilege, Ronald E. Levine
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The thesis of this article is that most of the problems of defining the scope of the privilege in a particular case are due to the paucity of information available to the trial judge who must rule on the issue. Furthermore, many of the formulas presently used are conceptually and functionally inadequate. Both of these problems can be solved by the use of in camera hearings, for such proceedings not only will provide the trial judge with sufficient information to make a fair and rational decision, but will also alleviate the present necessity to rule only on the basis of …
Abortion: The Court Decides A Non-Case, Joseph O'Meara
Abortion: The Court Decides A Non-Case, Joseph O'Meara
Journal Articles
It took the Supreme Court 105 years to discover that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees a personal right of privacy that invalidates state statutes forbidding abortion except to save the mother's life. As Mr. Justice Rehnquist pointed out, in a dissent that no member of the Court attempted to answer, at least thirty-six states had such anti-abortion statutes when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. None was attacked on the ground that they offended the newly adopted amendment. The only conclusion possible from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the …