Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (542)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (361)
- University of Michigan Law School (324)
- Seattle University School of Law (244)
- University of Colorado Law School (155)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (115)
- UIC School of Law (105)
- Georgetown University Law Center (93)
- Duke Law (81)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (77)
- Pepperdine University (71)
- Notre Dame Law School (66)
- University of Georgia School of Law (66)
- William & Mary Law School (65)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (54)
- Fordham Law School (47)
- University of Richmond (47)
- BLR (41)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (36)
- University of Maine School of Law (35)
- Brooklyn Law School (33)
- American University Washington College of Law (31)
- Roger Williams University (31)
- Cleveland State University (27)
- Brigham Young University Law School (26)
- Cornell University Law School (23)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (23)
- New York Law School (22)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (394)
- Constitution (333)
- Courts (244)
- Federal (216)
- Constitutional law (215)
-
- Constitutional Law (181)
- United States Supreme Court (168)
- New York (167)
- State (140)
- Judicial review (116)
- Due process (114)
- Federal courts (114)
- Congress (113)
- Sixth Amendment (103)
- Separation of powers (102)
- Appellate Division (93)
- Constitutions (91)
- Federalism (91)
- Court of Appeals (81)
- United States (80)
- Judges (78)
- Defendant (77)
- Jurisprudence (76)
- First Amendment (75)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- § 6 (66)
- Jurisdiction (65)
- Court (62)
- Law (57)
- State courts (55)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (413)
- Touro Law Review (346)
- Seattle University Law Review (231)
- Michigan Law Review (168)
- Faculty Scholarship (163)
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Articles (113)
- UIC Law Review (100)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (84)
- Indiana Law Journal (64)
- Pepperdine Law Review (61)
- Cardozo Law Review (60)
- Faculty Publications (53)
- Scholarly Works (47)
- Publications (44)
- Northwestern University Law Review (42)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (41)
- ExpressO (40)
- University of Richmond Law Review (36)
- Supreme Court Case Files (35)
- Journal Articles (34)
- Maine Law Review (34)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (29)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (24)
- BYU Law Review (23)
- Faculty Articles (23)
- Court Briefs (22)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3091 - 3120 of 3518
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carnegie-Mellon University V. Cohill: The United States Supreme Court Upholds The Authority Of Federal Courts To Remand Properly Removed Pendent Jurisdiction Claims, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 389 (1988), William Barrett
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What The Constitution Means By Executive Power, Charles J. Cooper, Orrin Hatch, Eugene V. Rowstow, Michael E. Tigar
What The Constitution Means By Executive Power, Charles J. Cooper, Orrin Hatch, Eugene V. Rowstow, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Are State Courts Enforcing The Fourth Amendment? A Preliminary Study, Craig M. Bradley
Are State Courts Enforcing The Fourth Amendment? A Preliminary Study, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Edwards V. Aguillard: The Lemon Test Yields Bitter Fruit For Traditional Religious Values, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 613 (1988), John R. Russell
Edwards V. Aguillard: The Lemon Test Yields Bitter Fruit For Traditional Religious Values, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 613 (1988), John R. Russell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marriage, Procreation, And The Prisoner: Should Reproductive Alternatives Survive During Incarceration?, Jacqueline B. Deoliveira
Marriage, Procreation, And The Prisoner: Should Reproductive Alternatives Survive During Incarceration?, Jacqueline B. Deoliveira
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Enforcement Provisions Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1866: A Legislative History In Light Of Runyon V. Mccrary, The Review Essay And Comments: Reconstructing Reconstruction, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Enforcement Provisions Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1866: A Legislative History In Light Of Runyon V. Mccrary, The Review Essay And Comments: Reconstructing Reconstruction, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
The purpose of this Comment is to examine the history of the enactment and early enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 from the perspective of the remedies Congress sought to provide to meet the problems that necessitated the legislation. Its main foci are the statute's enforcement provisions and their early implementation, an aspect of the history of the statute that has not been fully considered in relation to section one, the provision that has received the most scholarly attention. The occasion of this study is the Supreme Court's reconsideration of Runyon v. McCrary' in Patterson v. McLean Credit …
Taking The Framers Seriously, William Michael Treanor
Taking The Framers Seriously, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article reviews Taking the Constitution Seriously by Walter Berns (1987).
This review focuses on three of the key historical points that Walter Berns makes: his arguments that the Declaration of Independence is a Lockean document; that the Constitution encapsulates the political philosophy of the Declaration; and that the framers viewed the commercialization of society as a salutary development and were unambivalent champions of the right to property. Examination of these issues suggests that the ideological universe of the framers was far more complex than Berns indicates. While the revolutionary era witnessed a new concern with individual rights and a …
Constitutional Fact Review: An Essential Exception To Anderson V. Bessemer, Ann Zobrosky
Constitutional Fact Review: An Essential Exception To Anderson V. Bessemer, Ann Zobrosky
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Compelling Case Against Robert H. Bork, Stephen Gillers
The Compelling Case Against Robert H. Bork, Stephen Gillers
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Robert H. Bork's Civil Rights Record, Gary B. Born
Robert H. Bork's Civil Rights Record, Gary B. Born
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why The United States Senate Should Not Consent To The Nomination Of Judge Robert H. Bork To Be A Justice Of The Supreme Court, Philip B. Heymann, Fred Wertheimer
Why The United States Senate Should Not Consent To The Nomination Of Judge Robert H. Bork To Be A Justice Of The Supreme Court, Philip B. Heymann, Fred Wertheimer
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Paradox In Bork's Antitrust Paradox, Leonard Orland
The Paradox In Bork's Antitrust Paradox, Leonard Orland
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right Of Revolution: The Development Of The People's Right To Reform Government, Phillip B. Scott
The Right Of Revolution: The Development Of The People's Right To Reform Government, Phillip B. Scott
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dialectical Federalism: A Tribute To The West Virginia Supreme Court Of Appeals, Gene R. Nichol
Dialectical Federalism: A Tribute To The West Virginia Supreme Court Of Appeals, Gene R. Nichol
West Virginia Law Review
Over the course of the past decade, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has become something of a controversial institution. Allegedly seeking to "mold state government in its own image,"' the court has issued decisions restructuring the state property tax assessment and appraisal scheme, overseeing the funding of public education, invalidating a gubernatorial veto, expanding tort claims beyond the umbrella of workers compensation, and ordering emergency care for the homeless. As a result, the high court has, perhaps deservedly, "attained a reputation for dramatic intervention in public policy disputes.” As individual exercises of judicial authority, the court's determinations have …
Procedural Due Process: The Original Understanding, Edward J. Eberle
Procedural Due Process: The Original Understanding, Edward J. Eberle
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Integrating Water Quality Objectives With Traditional Water Rights In California: The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta Case, Ronald B. Robie
Integrating Water Quality Objectives With Traditional Water Rights In California: The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta Case, Ronald B. Robie
Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3)
14 pages (includes 1 map).
The Homestake Project & Water Quality Issues, Tad Foster
The Homestake Project & Water Quality Issues, Tad Foster
Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3)
5 pages (includes 1 map).
Conflicts Between Water Rights Administration And Water Quality Protection, Jan D. Laitos
Conflicts Between Water Rights Administration And Water Quality Protection, Jan D. Laitos
Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3)
43 pages.
Reconciling Large-Scale Water Development And Water Quality Effects, James S. Sanderson
Reconciling Large-Scale Water Development And Water Quality Effects, James S. Sanderson
Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3)
6 pages.
Wetlands Protection: The 404 Program, Patrick A. Parenteau
Wetlands Protection: The 404 Program, Patrick A. Parenteau
Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3)
13 pages.
Includes unsigned annotations by David Getches.
The Clean Water Act, Water Quality, And Water Use, Bruce D. Ray
The Clean Water Act, Water Quality, And Water Use, Bruce D. Ray
Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3)
56 pages.
Includes unsigned annotations by David Getches.