Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (547)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (361)
- University of Michigan Law School (324)
- Seattle University School of Law (244)
- University of Colorado Law School (155)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (115)
- UIC School of Law (105)
- Georgetown University Law Center (93)
- Duke Law (81)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (77)
- Pepperdine University (71)
- Notre Dame Law School (66)
- University of Georgia School of Law (66)
- William & Mary Law School (65)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (54)
- Fordham Law School (47)
- University of Richmond (47)
- BLR (41)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (36)
- University of Maine School of Law (35)
- American University Washington College of Law (34)
- Brooklyn Law School (33)
- Roger Williams University (31)
- Cleveland State University (27)
- Brigham Young University Law School (26)
- Cornell University Law School (23)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (23)
- New York Law School (22)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (395)
- Constitution (333)
- Courts (244)
- Constitutional law (216)
- Federal (216)
-
- Constitutional Law (181)
- United States Supreme Court (168)
- New York (167)
- State (140)
- Judicial review (116)
- Congress (114)
- Due process (114)
- Federal courts (114)
- Sixth Amendment (103)
- Separation of powers (102)
- Appellate Division (93)
- Constitutions (91)
- Federalism (91)
- Court of Appeals (81)
- United States (80)
- Judges (78)
- Defendant (77)
- Jurisprudence (76)
- First Amendment (75)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- § 6 (66)
- Jurisdiction (65)
- Court (62)
- Law (57)
- Fourteenth Amendment (55)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (418)
- Touro Law Review (346)
- Seattle University Law Review (231)
- Michigan Law Review (168)
- Faculty Scholarship (163)
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Articles (113)
- UIC Law Review (100)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (84)
- Indiana Law Journal (64)
- Pepperdine Law Review (61)
- Cardozo Law Review (60)
- Faculty Publications (53)
- Scholarly Works (47)
- Publications (44)
- Northwestern University Law Review (42)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (41)
- ExpressO (40)
- University of Richmond Law Review (36)
- Supreme Court Case Files (35)
- Journal Articles (34)
- Maine Law Review (34)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (29)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- Faculty Articles (24)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (24)
- BYU Law Review (23)
- Court Briefs (22)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2671 - 2700 of 3527
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Act Or Not? That Is The Question: Self-Incrimination And The Sole Proprietor, Raymond G. Keenan
To Act Or Not? That Is The Question: Self-Incrimination And The Sole Proprietor, Raymond G. Keenan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy—Civil Forfeitures And Criminal Punishment: Who Determines What Punishments Fit The Crime, Barbara A. Mack
Double Jeopardy—Civil Forfeitures And Criminal Punishment: Who Determines What Punishments Fit The Crime, Barbara A. Mack
Seattle University Law Review
This Article will attempt to distill from this confusion a meaningful double jeopardy policy, applicable to parallel civil and criminal proceedings, that takes into account the history of double jeopardy, recent changes in statutory law, and the contemporary chaotic state of parallel civil and criminal proceedings. Under current law, double jeopardy protects against three abuses: (1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense. This Article will show that the multiple punishments prong has little basis in law, other than reliance …
The Denial Of A State Constitutional Right To Bail In Juvenile Proceedings: The Need For Reassessment In Washington State, Kathleen A. Baldi
The Denial Of A State Constitutional Right To Bail In Juvenile Proceedings: The Need For Reassessment In Washington State, Kathleen A. Baldi
Seattle University Law Review
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that "[a]ll persons charged with crimes shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident, or the presumption great." Despite seemingly unequivocal language that this constitutional provision is applicable to "all persons," the Washington Supreme Court, in Estes v. Hopp, declared that juveniles do not have a constitutional right to bail. The Estes court engaged in little constitutional analysis, but instead, reasoned that juvenile proceedings are civil in nature and that article 1, section 20 applies only in criminal proceedings. Central to the Estes …
“Attitudinal” Decision Making In The Federal Courts: A Study Of Constitutional Self Representation Claims, John R. Quinn
“Attitudinal” Decision Making In The Federal Courts: A Study Of Constitutional Self Representation Claims, John R. Quinn
Scholarly Works
This Article reports on the performance of a study based on and inspired by Segal and Spaeth's work. It examines the possible attitudinal bases of the entire corpus (over 100 cases) of federal district court decisions involving constitutional self-representation claims. As explained in greater detail below, this area of jurisprudence was selected for study because decisions often are dependent upon the exercise of judicial discretion-Segal and Spaeth's attitudinal factors. This study both elucidates the attitudinal methods of Segal and Spaeth and "proves" an exception to the attitudinal model hypothesized by Segal and Spaeth. That exception is the salience of doctrine …
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Double Jeopardy Implications Of In Rem Forfeiture Of Crime-Related Property: The Gradual Realization Of A Constitutional Violation, Andrew L. Subin
The Double Jeopardy Implications Of In Rem Forfeiture Of Crime-Related Property: The Gradual Realization Of A Constitutional Violation, Andrew L. Subin
Seattle University Law Review
Over the past decade, the government has escalated its "war on drugs." Although the "war" has not decreased drug use or limited the availability of drugs on the street, the government continues to sacrifice the constitutional rights of its citizens in an effort to escalate the hostility. Since the "zero tolerance" policy of the Reagan Administration, the government has relied heavily on the forfeiture of property related to drug crimes as a tool to deter and punish the illegal distribution of drugs. The federal forfeiture statute, 21 U.S.C. § 881, allows the government to seize any property used to facilitate …