Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (427)
- Courts (395)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (189)
- Judges (176)
- State and Local Government Law (175)
-
- First Amendment (161)
- Jurisprudence (146)
- Criminal Procedure (128)
- Law and Philosophy (128)
- Fourteenth Amendment (126)
- Criminal Law (124)
- Legal History (101)
- Law and Politics (89)
- Law and Society (86)
- Legislation (81)
- Fourth Amendment (78)
- Election Law (70)
- Law and Race (70)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (67)
- Administrative Law (54)
- Litigation (53)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (50)
- President/Executive Department (47)
- Civil Procedure (39)
- Education Law (38)
- Jurisdiction (35)
- Civil Law (34)
- Law and Gender (34)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (457)
- Duquesne University (118)
- Georgetown University Law Center (69)
- University of Richmond (56)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (55)
-
- Columbia Law School (53)
- Duke Law (42)
- Pepperdine University (34)
- University of Georgia School of Law (32)
- The University of Akron (29)
- St. John's University School of Law (28)
- New York Law School (27)
- American University Washington College of Law (24)
- Notre Dame Law School (24)
- St. Mary's University (23)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (22)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (19)
- Cleveland State University (18)
- University of Baltimore Law (18)
- Boston University School of Law (16)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (16)
- University of Colorado Law School (14)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (13)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (12)
- Washington University in St. Louis (12)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (11)
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (361)
- Faculty Scholarship (146)
- Hallowed Secularism (116)
- Scholarly Works (89)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (68)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (41)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (37)
- Law Faculty Publications (35)
- Pepperdine Law Review (33)
- Faculty Articles (28)
- Faculty Publications (26)
- Journal Articles (25)
- University of Richmond Law Review (25)
- All Faculty Scholarship (23)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (21)
- NYLS Law Review (18)
- ConLawNOW (14)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (14)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (12)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (12)
- American University Law Review (10)
- Arkansas Law Review (10)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (10)
- Seattle University Law Review (10)
- St. John's Law Review (10)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (9)
- Northwestern University Law Review (9)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (9)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (8)
- Akron Law Review (7)
- Publication Type
Articles 571 - 600 of 1494
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Keynote Speech: A Letter From The Original Cause Lawyer, F. Michael Higginbotham
Keynote Speech: A Letter From The Original Cause Lawyer, F. Michael Higginbotham
All Faculty Scholarship
This symposium speech is a short piece which talks about why there is a need for law students to become cause lawyers, the symposium being: cause lawyers and cause lawyering in the sixty years after Brown v. Board of Education. The writer creates an allegorical scene where he's snowed in in his home during a snowstorm, lightning strikes his computer, and the computer comes to life in the form a message being typed, and "channeled" to him by Thurgood Marshall. The former Justice of the Supreme Court proceeds to state the many reasons why there is still a need for …
The Rebirth Of Federal Takings Review? The Courts’ “Prudential” Answer To Williamson County’S Flawed State Litigation Ripeness Requirement, J. David Breemer
The Rebirth Of Federal Takings Review? The Courts’ “Prudential” Answer To Williamson County’S Flawed State Litigation Ripeness Requirement, J. David Breemer
Touro Law Review
This article reviews recent federal court decisions that have loosened the state litigation ripeness barrier to federal takings review based on its “prudential” character. Part II provides relevant background on Williamson County and the development of the state litigation rule. It explores the logic underlying the rule and the problems it causes in application. Part III reviews the judicial shift away from a jurisdictional understanding of the state litigation rule—under which compliance with the rule is a prerequisite to a court’s power to hear a takings claim—to a prudential view in which application of the state litigation rule lies within …
The Ripeness Game: Why Are We Still Forced To Play?, Michael M. Berger
The Ripeness Game: Why Are We Still Forced To Play?, Michael M. Berger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dred Scott: A Nightmare For The Originalists, Sol Wachtler
Dred Scott: A Nightmare For The Originalists, Sol Wachtler
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Other Civil Rights Decisions In The October 2005 Term: Title Vii, Idea, And Section 1981, Eileen Kaufman
Other Civil Rights Decisions In The October 2005 Term: Title Vii, Idea, And Section 1981, Eileen Kaufman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Other Civil Rights Decisions In The October 2005 Term: Title Vii, Idea, And Section 1981, Leon Friedman
Other Civil Rights Decisions In The October 2005 Term: Title Vii, Idea, And Section 1981, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Susan N. Herman
Criminal Procedure Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Susan N. Herman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Campaign Finance And Political Gerrymandering Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Burt Neuborne
Campaign Finance And Political Gerrymandering Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Burt Neuborne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Joel Gora
First Amendment Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Joel Gora
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Presidential Powers Including Military Tribunals In The October 2005 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Presidential Powers Including Military Tribunals In The October 2005 Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Overview Of The October 2005 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
An Overview Of The October 2005 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - Cubas V. Martinez, Gregory Gillen
Court Of Appeals Of New York - Cubas V. Martinez, Gregory Gillen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - New York Ex Rel. Harkavy V. Consilvio, Sardar Asadullah
Court Of Appeals Of New York - New York Ex Rel. Harkavy V. Consilvio, Sardar Asadullah
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Gajadhar, Joseph Maehr
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Gajadhar, Joseph Maehr
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - People V. Willette, Mark Tsukerman
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - People V. Willette, Mark Tsukerman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - Kings Mall, Llc V. Wenk, Steven Fox
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - Kings Mall, Llc V. Wenk, Steven Fox
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Tale Of Two Minority Groups: Can Two Different Minority Groups Bring A Coalition Suit Under Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, Sara Michaloski
A Tale Of Two Minority Groups: Can Two Different Minority Groups Bring A Coalition Suit Under Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, Sara Michaloski
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federalism And Phantom Economic Rights In Nfib V. Sibelius, Matthew Lindsay
Federalism And Phantom Economic Rights In Nfib V. Sibelius, Matthew Lindsay
All Faculty Scholarship
Few predicted that the constitutional fate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would turn on Congress’ power to lay and collect taxes. Yet in NFIB v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court upheld the centerpiece of the Act — the minimum coverage provision (MCP), commonly known as the “individual mandate” — as a tax. The unexpected basis of the Court’s holding has deflected attention from what may prove to be the decision’s more constitutionally consequential feature: that a majority of the Court agreed that Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause to penalize people who decline to purchase health insurance. …
March 25, 2014: What’S Going To Happen In The Hobby Lobby Case?, Bruce Ledewitz
March 25, 2014: What’S Going To Happen In The Hobby Lobby Case?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What’s Going to Happen in the Hobby Lobby Case?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
One Less Juror: A Defendant's Right To Juror Substitution, Luzan Moore
One Less Juror: A Defendant's Right To Juror Substitution, Luzan Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
"But My Attorney Didn't Tell Me I'D Be Deported!"--The Retroactivity Of Padilla, Tara M. Breslawski
"But My Attorney Didn't Tell Me I'D Be Deported!"--The Retroactivity Of Padilla, Tara M. Breslawski
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are You Satisfied With Your Representation?--The Sixth Amendment Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Dean M. Villani
Are You Satisfied With Your Representation?--The Sixth Amendment Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Dean M. Villani
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Effective But Unreported Application Of Lafler & Frye, Christopher M. Gavin
An Effective But Unreported Application Of Lafler & Frye, Christopher M. Gavin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Choose Your Own Path: A Defendant's Constitutional Right To Legal Representation, Luzan Moore
Choose Your Own Path: A Defendant's Constitutional Right To Legal Representation, Luzan Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taxing Judicial Restraint: How Washington's Supreme Court Misinterpreted Its Role And The Washington State Constitution, Nicholas Carlson
Taxing Judicial Restraint: How Washington's Supreme Court Misinterpreted Its Role And The Washington State Constitution, Nicholas Carlson
Seattle University Law Review
In the realm of constitutional interpretation, the judicial department reigns supreme. League of Education Voters v. State exemplifies the judiciary’s potential abuse of its interpretative role: The Washington Supreme Court misinterpreted its judicial function because it ignored the text of Washington State’s constitution and held a statute unconstitutional. The court, therefore, voided a statute because of judicial volition, not because Washington’s constitution demanded that outcome. This Note challenges the reasoning in League and makes a novel suggestion for Washington State constitutional analysis, an approach that may apply to other states. This Note details a new analytical framework for constitutional analysis …
Transparent Adjudication: Promoting Democratic Dialogue On Judicial Conceptions Of Politics, Bertrall L. Ross Ii
Transparent Adjudication: Promoting Democratic Dialogue On Judicial Conceptions Of Politics, Bertrall L. Ross Ii
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Citizens Derided: Corporate Politics And Religion In The Roberts Court, Jamin Raskin
Citizens Derided: Corporate Politics And Religion In The Roberts Court, Jamin Raskin
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
The Puzzling Persistence Of Dual Federalism, Ernest A. Young
The Puzzling Persistence Of Dual Federalism, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
This essay began life as a response to Sotirios Barber’s essay (soon to be a book) entitled “Defending Dual Federalism: A Self-Defeating Act.” Professor Barber’s essay reflects a widespread tendency to associate any judicially-enforceable principle of federalism with the “dual federalism” regime that dominated our jurisprudence from the Founding down to the New Deal. That regime divided the world into separate and exclusive spheres of federal and state regulatory authority, and it tasked courts with defining and policing the boundary between them. “Dual federalism” largely died, however, in the judicial revolution of 1937, and it generally has not been revived …
The Diversity Feedback Loop, Patrick Shin, Devon Carbado, Mitu Gulati
The Diversity Feedback Loop, Patrick Shin, Devon Carbado, Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
At some point in the near future, the Supreme Court will weigh in on the permissible scope of affirmative action to increase workplace diversity. Undoubtedly, many scholars will argue that if affirmative action is good for colleges and universities, it is good for workplaces as well. One cannot assess whether this “transplant” argument is right without understanding the complex ways in which diversity initiatives at colleges and universities interact with diversity initiatives at work. The university and the workplace are not separate and distinct institutional settings in which diversity is or is not achieved. They are part of an interconnected …
Pursuing Justice For The Child: The Forgotten Women Of In Re Gault, David S. Tanenhaus
Pursuing Justice For The Child: The Forgotten Women Of In Re Gault, David S. Tanenhaus
Scholarly Works
In this article, I first draw on my recent book The Constitutional Rights of Children to introduce the facts of the case and place the case in the larger context of the history of American juvenile justice. I then focus specifically on the role of four remarkable women in the history of this landmark decision: Marjorie Gault, Gerald's mother; Amelia Lewis, Gerald's lawyer; Lorna Lockwood, an Arizona lawyer who became the first woman to serve as the Chief Justice of a State Supreme Court; and Getrude "Traute" Mainzer, who assisted in the litigation of Gerald's case before the U.S. Supreme …