Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (426)
- Courts (395)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (189)
- Judges (176)
- State and Local Government Law (175)
-
- First Amendment (161)
- Jurisprudence (146)
- Criminal Procedure (128)
- Law and Philosophy (128)
- Fourteenth Amendment (126)
- Criminal Law (124)
- Legal History (101)
- Law and Politics (89)
- Law and Society (86)
- Legislation (81)
- Fourth Amendment (78)
- Election Law (70)
- Law and Race (70)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (67)
- Administrative Law (54)
- Litigation (53)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (50)
- President/Executive Department (47)
- Civil Procedure (39)
- Education Law (38)
- Jurisdiction (35)
- Civil Law (34)
- Law and Gender (34)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (457)
- Duquesne University (118)
- Georgetown University Law Center (69)
- University of Richmond (56)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (55)
-
- Columbia Law School (53)
- Duke Law (42)
- Pepperdine University (34)
- University of Georgia School of Law (32)
- The University of Akron (29)
- St. John's University School of Law (28)
- New York Law School (27)
- American University Washington College of Law (24)
- Notre Dame Law School (23)
- St. Mary's University (23)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (22)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (19)
- Cleveland State University (18)
- University of Baltimore Law (18)
- Boston University School of Law (16)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (16)
- University of Colorado Law School (14)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (13)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (12)
- Washington University in St. Louis (12)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (11)
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (361)
- Faculty Scholarship (146)
- Hallowed Secularism (116)
- Scholarly Works (89)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (68)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (41)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (37)
- Law Faculty Publications (35)
- Pepperdine Law Review (33)
- Faculty Articles (28)
- Faculty Publications (26)
- University of Richmond Law Review (25)
- Journal Articles (24)
- All Faculty Scholarship (23)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (21)
- NYLS Law Review (18)
- ConLawNOW (14)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (14)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (12)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (12)
- American University Law Review (10)
- Arkansas Law Review (10)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (10)
- Seattle University Law Review (10)
- St. John's Law Review (10)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (9)
- Northwestern University Law Review (9)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (9)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (8)
- Akron Law Review (7)
- Publication Type
Articles 1291 - 1320 of 1493
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Comptroller And Attorney-General
Law Enforcement And Other Officers
When “Special Needs” Meet Probable Cause: Denying The Devil Benefit Of Law, Gerald S. Reamey
When “Special Needs” Meet Probable Cause: Denying The Devil Benefit Of Law, Gerald S. Reamey
Faculty Articles
Removing laws to pursue the lawbreaker may be well intentioned, but the result is that society is susceptible to the evils those laws protect against. The traditional Fourth Amendment safeguards--probable cause and warrants--have been abandoned due to the development of a reasonableness standard because of the presence of “special needs” that were used to justify searches. The adoption of this alternative approach to Fourth Amendment interpretation was signalled by the truly landmark case of Terry v. Ohio.
By adopting the “reasonableness” analysis, the Supreme Court altered the impact of the exclusionary rule without directly modifying the rule. After Griffin v. …
A Matter Of "Governing' Importance": Providing Business Defamation And Product Disparagement Defendants Full First Amendment Protection, Lisa Magee Arent
A Matter Of "Governing' Importance": Providing Business Defamation And Product Disparagement Defendants Full First Amendment Protection, Lisa Magee Arent
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Content Of Appropriation Bills
Election And Term Of City And County Officers
Gift Or Loan Of Property Or Credit Of Local Subdivisions Prohibited
Gift Or Loan Of Property Or Credit Of Local Subdivisions Prohibited
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Law Enforcement And Other Officers
Law Enforcement And Other Officers
Preemption Of Local Law By State Legislature
Treaty-Based Rights And Remedies Of Individuals, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Treaty-Based Rights And Remedies Of Individuals, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Treaties are frequently described as contracts between nations. As instruments of international law, they establish obligations with which international law requires the parties to comply. In the United States, treaties also have the status of law in the domestic legal system. The Supremacy Clause declares treaties to be the "supreme Law of the Land" and instructs the courts to give them effect. The status of treaties as law in two distinct legal orders has given rise to unusual conceptual problems. In recent years, it has produced confusion among the courts regarding the enforceability of treaties in the courts by individuals. …
The "Gag Rule" Revisited: Physicians As Abortion Gatekeepers, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
The "Gag Rule" Revisited: Physicians As Abortion Gatekeepers, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
To the surprise of many and the dismay of some, the U.S. Supreme Court took it upon itself last term to proclaim a national compromise on the question of abortion. The Court's announced truce, an elaboration on Justice O'Connor's "undue burden" idea, is pragmatic in design but unlikely to prove stable in practice. The three justices who spoke for the Court disparaged Roe with reluctant praise, then upheld its outer shell on the ground that social expectations and the need to sustain the appearance of the rule of law made it impolitic to do otherwise. This awkward doctrinal invention seems …