Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (167)
- State and Local Government Law (145)
- Criminal Procedure (107)
- Supreme Court of the United States (85)
- Criminal Law (79)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (50)
- Jurisprudence (47)
- Judges (44)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- First Amendment (32)
- Civil Procedure (27)
- Civil Law (26)
- Evidence (24)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (21)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (20)
- Social Welfare Law (20)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
- Law and Society (13)
- Education Law (12)
- Law and Politics (12)
- Legislation (12)
- Legal History (11)
- Family Law (10)
- Legal Profession (10)
- Election Law (9)
- Environmental Law (8)
- Human Rights Law (8)
- Law and Gender (8)
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (314)
- Michigan Law Review (20)
- Pace Law Review (15)
- Brooklyn Law Review (8)
- Articles (7)
-
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (7)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Library Newsletters/Blog (1)
- Pace Environmental Law Review (1)
- Popular Media (1)
- St. John's Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 394
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
An Illusory Right To Appeal: Substantial Constitutional Questions At The New York Court Of Appeals, Meredith R. Miller
An Illusory Right To Appeal: Substantial Constitutional Questions At The New York Court Of Appeals, Meredith R. Miller
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gallenthin V. Kaur: A Comparative Analysis Of How The New Jersey And New York Courts Approach Judicial Review Of The Exercise Of Eminent Domain For Redevelopment, Ronald K. Chen
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Article explores two explanations for why New Jersey and New York take different approaches to judicial review of exercises of eminent domain. Part I examines the approach of both states and their differing procedures for review of administrative agency determinations. Part II discusses how each states' courts and legislatures define "blight." Part III examines how New York's approach leaves municipal officials and redevelopers free to use the more flexible concept of "underutilization" as a proxy for "blight."
Condemning The Decisions Of The Past: Eminent Domain And Democratic Accountability, Christopher Serkin
Condemning The Decisions Of The Past: Eminent Domain And Democratic Accountability, Christopher Serkin
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Essay argues that there is a seldom-recognized purpose to eminent domain: preserving the ability of elected representatives to respond to the will of the people. The author proposes that eminent domain allows government to depart from the policy choices of administrations which came before and is therefore a tool for acquiring "democratic legitimacy." He explores this theory by examining examples such as breaking up the adult use zones in Times Square and reclaiming New York's waterfront, which had been essentially cut off by highways.
Let There Be Blight: Blight Condemnations In New York After Goldstein And Kaur, Ilya Somin
Let There Be Blight: Blight Condemnations In New York After Goldstein And Kaur, Ilya Somin
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Article analyzes the New York cases of Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp. and Goldstein v. New York State Urban Development Corp. and asserts that the New York Court of Appeals erred in allowing such an expansive definition of "blight" and defining pretextual takings too narrowly. Part I Describes the two cases. Part II explains the concept of blight condemnation and how it was used in the two cases. Part III discusses how the two cases treat the federal constitutional standard for pretextual takings. The Article concludes that eminent domain reform requires a narrower definition of "blight" …
The Use And Abuse Of Blight In Eminent Domain, Martin E. Gold, Lynne B. Sagalyn
The Use And Abuse Of Blight In Eminent Domain, Martin E. Gold, Lynne B. Sagalyn
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Article examines the term "blight" and how it is used in eminent domain cases. Part I discusses the development of the term and how various states define it. Part II lays out a hierarchy which may be used to compare the private benefits on one hand and the public benefits on the other hand in redevelopment projects. In Part III, the Columbia University expansion in Manhattanville is examined, at both the New York Appellate Division and Court of Appeals levels. Part IV discusses how forty-three states redefined blight after the Kelo case. Part V discusses how political and business …
Albany's Dysfunction Denies Due Process, Eric Lane, Laura Seago
Albany's Dysfunction Denies Due Process, Eric Lane, Laura Seago
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Fat People And Fundamental Rights: The Constitutionality Of The New York City Trans-Fat Ban, Katharine Kruk
Of Fat People And Fundamental Rights: The Constitutionality Of The New York City Trans-Fat Ban, Katharine Kruk
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Ascertaining The Burden Of Proof For An Award For Punitive Damages In New York? Consult Your Local Appellate Division, Leon D. Lazer, John R. Higgitt
Ascertaining The Burden Of Proof For An Award For Punitive Damages In New York? Consult Your Local Appellate Division, Leon D. Lazer, John R. Higgitt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Withdrawal: The Roberts Court And The Retreat From Election Law, Ellen D. Katz
Withdrawal: The Roberts Court And The Retreat From Election Law, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
Last Term the Supreme Court handed down four decisions that upheld diverse efforts by state governments to regulate the electoral process. The Court turned back challenges to New York’s method for nominating judicial candidates, Washington’s modified blanket primary system, Indiana’s voter identification requirement, and Alabama’s use of gubernatorial appointment to fill county commission vacancies in Mobile County. Unlike other recent election decisions, these were not close cases. All nine Justices supported the New York holding, while supermajorities voted in favor of the result in the others. This consensus, moreover, emerged even as the Court voted to reverse unanimous decisions by …
Falling To Pieces: New York State Civil Legal Remedies Available To Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, And Transgender Survivors Of Domestic Violence, Sharon Stapel
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Securing A Civil Right To Counsel: The Importance Of Collaborating, Andrew Scherer
Securing A Civil Right To Counsel: The Importance Of Collaborating, Andrew Scherer
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Public Availability Or Practical Obscurity: The Debate Over Public Access To Court Records On The Internet, Arminda Bradford Bepko
Public Availability Or Practical Obscurity: The Debate Over Public Access To Court Records On The Internet, Arminda Bradford Bepko
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Expression In New York State: What Remains Of People Ex Rel. Arcara V. Cloud Books, Inc.?, Jeremy J. Bethel
Freedom Of Expression In New York State: What Remains Of People Ex Rel. Arcara V. Cloud Books, Inc.?, Jeremy J. Bethel
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Note explores the decline of People ex rel. Arcara in New York State jurisprudence over the last decade. It first describes traditional and contemporary methods of testing free expression infringements, including a discussion of federal minimum standards, and protection expansions implemented by the New York Court of Appeals. Next, it describes the effect of federal "secondary effects" jurisprudence upon the People ex rel. Arcara standard, and how that encounter skewed lower court application of that standard for all cases involving "content-neutral" infringement of protected speech. Finally, it examines the illogical consequences of the court of appeals' method of deciding …
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions, Lisa Hill
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions, Lisa Hill
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Kathleen Byrne
Equal Protection, Michele Molfetta
Ex Post Facto, Robert Gingher
Legislative Powers, John Mooney
Legislative Powers, Ivonne Polasky
Public Welfare, Christopher Vatter
Search And Seizure, Carrie Foote
Search And Seizure, Susan Clark
Search And Seizure, Doris Waldmann
Self Incrimination, Dianne K. Leverrier
Takings, Diana Coen
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions, Faith Gurk
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions, Faith Gurk
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Carrie Foote
Due Process, Kimberly Lumpee
Equal Protection, Donna Fiorelli