Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (156)
- Supreme Court of the United States (102)
- Criminal Law (97)
- Property Law and Real Estate (79)
- Courts (68)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (57)
- Evidence (53)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (47)
- Land Use Law (46)
- State and Local Government Law (43)
- Fourth Amendment (38)
- Legislation (38)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (28)
- Administrative Law (27)
- Jurisprudence (26)
- Legal History (26)
- Environmental Law (23)
- Litigation (23)
- First Amendment (18)
- Law and Society (16)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (16)
- Natural Resources Law (14)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (14)
- Environmental Sciences (13)
- Judges (13)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (13)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (13)
- Law and Race (12)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (158)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (54)
- University of Colorado Law School (22)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (18)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (15)
-
- Pepperdine University (13)
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (10)
- Fordham Law School (9)
- The University of Akron (9)
- Cornell University Law School (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (7)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Roger Williams University (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- BLR (5)
- Duke Law (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (4)
- Florida State University College of Law (4)
- Pace University (4)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (4)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (113)
- Touro Law Review (50)
- Articles (32)
- Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Supreme Court Case Files (15)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (10)
- Pepperdine Law Review (9)
- Publications (9)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (9)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- Akron Law Review (7)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (7)
- Indiana Law Journal (7)
- Oklahoma Law Review (7)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Maryland Law Review (6)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (5)
- ExpressO (5)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (5)
- Book Chapters (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (4)
- Florida State University Law Review (4)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (4)
- St. John's Law Review (4)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 468
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Constitutional Law - Due Process Clause - Where New Prosecution Is Initiated For Additional Criminal Activity Not Specified In An Original Indictment, Actual Vindictiveness Is The Proper Standard To Determine Whether Such Prosecutorial Conduct Is Constitutionally Permissible, Peter R. Kahana
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Agins V. City Of Tiburon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Agins V. City Of Tiburon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Apfelbaum, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Apfelbaum, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Roberts V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Roberts V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Arizona V. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law-MISTRIAL DECLARATION-OVER DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION, PROSECUTION MUST DEMONSTRATE HIGH DEGREE OF MANIFEST NECESSITY OR REPROSECUTION WILL BE BARRED
Tsavaris V. Scruggs, 360 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1977), Elizabeth J. Daniels
Tsavaris V. Scruggs, 360 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1977), Elizabeth J. Daniels
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-SELF-INCRIMINATION-FLORIDA SUPREME COURT SIGNALS POSSIBLE RETREAT IN PROTECTION AGAINST COMPULSORY PRODUCTION OF INCRIMINATING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE.
Constitutional Law - Parole Revocation Hearings - Due Process Does Not Require That Federal Parolee Subsequently Convicted And Incarcerated For State Offense Be Given Immediate Parole Revocation Hearing, Charles F. Weyl
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Federalism And A New Equal Protection, Henry Siedzikowski
Federalism And A New Equal Protection, Henry Siedzikowski
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Fifth Amendment - Declaration Of Property As A Historic Landmark Under State Law Is Not A Taking Which Requires Just Compensation Where The Landowner Is Guaranteed A Reasonable Return On His Investment, John J. Ford
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Due Process And Parole Revocation, Michigan Law Review
Due Process And Parole Revocation, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In Morrissey, the Court set the level of due process needed in parole revocations. Specifically, it held that the parolee facing •revocation has a right (a) to receive written notice of the claimed parole violations; (b) to hear the evidence against him; (c) to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing the confrontation); (e) to have a neutral and detached hearing body, members of which need not be judicial officers or lawyers; and (f) to be given …
Designating Areas Unsuitable For Surface Coal Mining, Mark S. Squillace
Designating Areas Unsuitable For Surface Coal Mining, Mark S. Squillace
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Protection Of Private Papers: The Role Of A Hierarchical Fourth Amendment, James A. Mckenna
The Constitutional Protection Of Private Papers: The Role Of A Hierarchical Fourth Amendment, James A. Mckenna
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Taxpayer Rights In Noncustodial Irs Investigations After Beckwith V. United States, Curtis L. Christensen
Taxpayer Rights In Noncustodial Irs Investigations After Beckwith V. United States, Curtis L. Christensen
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The recent Supreme Court decision in Beckwith v. United States, holding that Miranda does not extend to noncustodial tax investigations, has important implications with respect to the News Release doctrine and the involuntary consent grounds considered in motions to suppress evidence. This article will examine Beckwith and its potential significance with respect to these other doctrines, discussing the factors which the IRS and the courts should consider in order to assure fair treatment of taxpayers during investigations.
Potentiality Of Incarceration: A Proposed Standard For The Applicability Of Miranda To Nonfelony Offenses, Mark J. Roberts
Potentiality Of Incarceration: A Proposed Standard For The Applicability Of Miranda To Nonfelony Offenses, Mark J. Roberts
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi
Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Brewer V. Williams--A Hard Look At A Discomfiting Record, Yale Kamisar
Foreword: Brewer V. Williams--A Hard Look At A Discomfiting Record, Yale Kamisar
Articles
In recent decades, few matters have split the Supreme Court, troubled the legal profession, and agitated the public as much as the police interrogation-confession cases. The recent case of Brewer v. Williams3 is as provocative as any, because the Supreme Court there revdrsed the defendant's conviction for the "savage murder of a small child" even though no Justice denied his guilt,4 he was warned of his rights no fewer than five times, 5 and any "interrogation" that might have occurred seemed quite mild.6
Califano V. Goldfarb, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Califano V. Goldfarb, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Legislature's Role In The Taking Issue, Mitchell B. Haigler, Mary M. Mcinerny, Robert M. Rhodes
The Legislature's Role In The Taking Issue, Mitchell B. Haigler, Mary M. Mcinerny, Robert M. Rhodes
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fisher V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Fisher V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Articles
For a long time before Professor Paul Kauper wrote "Judicial Examination of the Accused" in 1932, and for a long time thereafter, the "legal mind" shut out the de facto inquisitorial system that characterized American criminal procedure. Paul Kauper could not look away. He recognized the "naked, ugly facts" (p. 1224) and was determined to do something about them -more than thirty years before Escobedo v. Illinois' or Miranda v. Arizona.2
United States V. Nobles, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Nobles, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Conclusive Presumption Doctrine: Equal Process Or Due Protection?, Michigan Law Review
The Conclusive Presumption Doctrine: Equal Process Or Due Protection?, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In Vlandis v. Kline and United States Department of Agriculture v. Murry, decided during its past term, the Supreme Court invoked the conclusive presumption doctrine to invalidate statutory provisions, that restricted access to certain state and federal government benefits. This term, in Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, the Court used the same rationale to strike down school board rules requiring teachers to take maternity leaves without pay. The essence of the doctrine is as follows: When a statutory provision imposes a burden upon a class of individuals for a particular purpose and certain individuals within the burdened class …
The Fifth Amendment And Compelled Testimony: Practical Problems In The Wake Of Kastigar, E. R. Harding
The Fifth Amendment And Compelled Testimony: Practical Problems In The Wake Of Kastigar, E. R. Harding
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination: Privilege, Immunity, And Comment In Bar Disciplinary Proceedings, Michigan Law Review
Self-Incrimination: Privilege, Immunity, And Comment In Bar Disciplinary Proceedings, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The questions of the extent of an attorney's right to claim the privilege against self-incrimination during bar disciplinary proceedings and of the consequences of the exercise of the privilege has created a sharp division of opinion. The privilege against self-incrimination necessarily involves a conflict between the public's interest in disclosure and the individual's interest in privacy and nondisclosure. However, the conflict is exacerbated when the individual claiming the privilege is entrusted with important public responsibilities.
The Search And Seizure Of Private Papers: Fourth And Fifth Amendment Considerations, Steven H. Shiffrin
The Search And Seizure Of Private Papers: Fourth And Fifth Amendment Considerations, Steven H. Shiffrin
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
There is a recognizable factual distinction between the search and seizure of private papers and the search and seizure of non-documentary items. It is difficult, however, to decide when such a distinction should assume constitutional dimensions. Specifically, are there circumstances under which private papers should be immune from search and seizure? In a 1967 landmark case, Warden v. Hayden, the United States Supreme Court raised doubts concerning the continued validity of decades of settled law on this important issue. Warden's reopening of this problem aroused the curiosity of commentators, spurred new policy arguments in the American Law Institute, divided …
Lefkowitz V. Turley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Lefkowitz V. Turley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Sarno V. Illinois Crime Investigating Commission, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Sarno V. Illinois Crime Investigating Commission, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Zicarelli V. New Jersey State Commission Of Investigation, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Zicarelli V. New Jersey State Commission Of Investigation, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Couch V. United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Couch V. United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Kastigar V. United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Kastigar V. United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.