Constitutional Law Commons^™

Constitutional Law--Commerce Clause--1966 Amendments To Fair Labor Standards Act Extending Coverage To Employees In State-Operated Schools, Hospitals, And Related Institutions Held Constitutional--Maryland V. Wirtz, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

In 1966, Congress amended the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and for the first time extended the coverage of the minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees in state-operated schools, hospitals, and related institutions. The State of Maryland, joined by twenty-seven other states, brought an action to enjoin enforcement of the amendments insofar as they applied to these state-operated facilities and sought a declaratory judgment ruling the amendments unconstitutional. The states asserted that the amendments were unconstitutional in two respects. First, they contended that the "enterprise" concept of FLSA coverage, which extended the Act to cover all employees of an …

Separation Of Powers In The Australian Constitution, John M. Finnis

Journal Articles

Even those who regret it accept that the founders of the Australian Constitution "beyond question" intended the separation of powers now required by the Boilermakers' Case . This article seeks first to show that the arguments advanced to prove the alleged intention are no more probative -than the draftsman's literary arrangement which has prompted the accepted view of constitutional history; and second, to discuss the proper strategy of approach to the historical record on these matters.

1787: The Grand Convention, By Clinton Rossiter

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Constitutional Rights Of Privacy - "A Sizable Hunk Of Liberty", Frank R. Goldstein

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Constitutional Right Of Association, Charles E. Rice

Journal Articles

It has been accurately observed that we are a nation of joiners. Alexis de Tocqueville, as early as 1835, concluded that "in no country in the world has the principle of association been more successfully used, or more unsparingly applied to a multitude of different objects, than in America." Tocqueville noted the ubiquitous character of American voluntary associations.

In 1958, the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed, for the first time in unmistakable terms, the status of freedom of association as a fundamental right.

The occasion for this affirmation was an attempt by the State of Alabama to oust …

Book Reviews, Ronan E. Degnan, Jerold Israel, Robert F. Drinan S.J.

Vanderbilt Law Review

Cases and Materials on Debtor and Creditor

By Vern Countryman

Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1964. Pp. lxiii, 841. $12.50.

reviewer: Ronan E. Degnan

================================

The Supreme Court on Trial

By Charles S. Hyneman

New York: Atherton Press, 1963. Pp. IX, 308. $6.50.

reviewer: Jerold Israel

=================================

Religion and American Constitutions (1963 Rosenthal Lectures)

By Wilbur G. Katz

Northwestern University Press 1964. Pp. 114. $3.50.

reviewer: Rev. Robert F. Drinan, S.J.

The Powers Of The Michigan Civil Rights Commission, Roger C. Cramton

Michigan Law Review

The thesis of this article is that the Attorney General has misread the language and actions of the constitution-makers. The Michigan Civil Rights Commission is an important and powerful agency of government which has substantial tasks to perform. But it does not possess the exclusive powers envisioned by the Attorney General. Other governmental units-the legislature, the executive, the courts, and the local governments-may continue to play a creative and positive role in fashioning a legal order that accords to every human being in society a reasonable opportunity to realize his potentialities.

Religion And American Constitutions, By Wilber G. Katz, Arthur E. Sutherland

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Book Review, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Scholarship

This review of "The Supreme Court on Trial" by Charles Hyneman, questions why the work’s tackling the age-old issues of the source of judicial review and its constitutionality is particularly novel or unique from other such examinations. Issue is also taken with Brown v. Board of Educaion's dominance of such discussion and the book’s poor treatment of the desegregation cases.

Book Review, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Scholarship

This review champions the editor’s use of Mr. Justice Black’s own opinions in showcasing his emphasis of the emancipating aspects of the Constitution. This work cautions the reader to avoid relying on this compilation as an accurate depiction of the state of the law, especially considering that most of the included opinions are dissents.

Constitutional Uniformity And Equality In State Taxation, Wade J. Newhouse

Michigan Legal Studies Series

The method of approach and arrangement of materials are developed during the course of the monograph. Therefore, it is not necessary to repeat them here. The purpose of the study is twofold. First, it should provide background material for constitutional revision. Second, it should aid counsel and court in deciding cases arising under existing constitutional limitations and state legislatures in drafting tax measures in such a way that pitfalls in existing limitations are avoided. The greater part of this monograph was prepared during a two year period from June 1951 to 1953, while I was a Research Assistant with the …

Film Reviews, Ivan C. Rutledge, John Bauman

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Schwartz: The Supreme Court: Constitutional Revolution In Retrospect, Paul G. Kauper

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Supreme Court: Constitutional Revolution in Retrospect. By Bernard Schwartz.

The Constitution, Civil Liberties And John Marshall Harlan, Florian Bartosic

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Jackson: The Supreme Court In The American System Of Government, Howard M. Downs S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Supreme Court in the American System of Government. By Robert H. Jackson

The Citizen's Obligations Under The Constitution, W. Lewis Roberts

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Crosskey And The Constitution: A Reply To Goebel, Sylvester Petro

Michigan Law Review

The immediate purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the inadequacies of the most embittered of the reviews of Crosskey's book which I have read, "Ex Parte Clio,'' written by Professor Goebel (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "the reviewer"). Demonstrating these things will involve repeated reference to the thesis and the methodology of the book, and comparison of the book with the contentions advanced by the reviewer. The reading will probably be as tedious as the writing has been, but that cannot be helped, for the longer aim of this paper cannot be achieved in any other manner. That aim …

Congress, The Constitution And Crosskey, James A. Durham

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Lawyer, The Constitution And The Modern World, Joseph C. O'Mahoney

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Amending Of The Federal Constitution, Lester Bernhardt Orfield

Michigan Legal Studies Series

MOST treatises on constitutional law dispose of the federal amending clause in summary fashion. The commentators have thought fit to stress chiefly the division of authority between the federal government and the states. They have attached a high degree of significance to the dogma of separation of powers. A great deal of attention has been devoted to the doctrines of judicial review, the supremacy of the Federal Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The taxation and the commerce clauses have come in for their full share of consideration. In recent years extensive studies have been made of the due process …

Los Partidos Políticos En La Constitución Vigente, Antonío Lancis

Mario Diaz Cruz Pamphlets

Universidad de La Habana.

A Lawyer Looks At Liberty, Clarence E. Manion

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Democracy And Constitutional Government, John J. Parker

Indiana Law Journal

Address of Hon. John J. Parker, Judge of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, at the Annual Meeting of the Indiana State Bar Association, Sept. 16, 1938.

Extent To Which Rights Secured By The First Eight Amendments To The Federal Constitution Are Protected Against State Action By The Fourteenth Amendment

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Constitution And Constitutional Tradition, Charles S. Collier

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Amendments--Validity Of Ratification By A State Which Had Previously Rejected, Steve White

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court, The Constitution, And The A.A.A., Robert L. Howard

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Ninth Amendment Of The Federal Constitution, Knowlton H. Kelsey

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

United States Vs. Butler Et Al., Receivers Of Hoosac Mills Corporation, Ernest R. Baltzell

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

"What Constitution Are You Talking About?", William L. Ransom

Indiana Law Journal

Remarks of William L. Ransom, president of the American Bar Association, at the annual luncheon of the Indiana Bar Association, on September 7, 1935.