Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (342)
- Courts (333)
- State and Local Government Law (275)
- Legal History (228)
- Jurisprudence (173)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (162)
- Judges (149)
- Law and Politics (137)
- Criminal Law (136)
- Criminal Procedure (131)
- Legislation (123)
- First Amendment (122)
- Law and Society (122)
- President/Executive Department (106)
- Fourteenth Amendment (105)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (72)
- Civil Law (66)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (65)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (60)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (59)
- Human Rights Law (54)
- Fourth Amendment (53)
- Jurisdiction (53)
- Litigation (53)
- Administrative Law (51)
- Law and Gender (51)
- Law and Race (51)
- Civil Procedure (50)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (276)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (234)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (88)
- American University Washington College of Law (74)
- The University of Akron (55)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (51)
- Georgetown University Law Center (50)
- University of Richmond (49)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (48)
- Seattle University School of Law (41)
- Fordham Law School (39)
- New York Law School (39)
- Pepperdine University (38)
- Notre Dame Law School (37)
- Boston University School of Law (34)
- University of Kentucky (26)
- Roger Williams University (23)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (22)
- Columbia Law School (22)
- Cleveland State University (21)
- University of Georgia School of Law (20)
- Florida International University College of Law (19)
- BLR (18)
- University of Maine School of Law (16)
- Wayne State University (16)
- Marquette University Law School (15)
- Pace University (15)
- University of Missouri School of Law (14)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (13)
- St. Mary's University (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (210)
- Michigan Law Review (145)
- Faculty Scholarship (108)
- Articles (74)
- Indiana Law Journal (74)
-
- Scholarly Works (68)
- Faculty Publications (61)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (49)
- American University Law Review (41)
- Seattle University Law Review (39)
- University of Richmond Law Review (39)
- Journal Articles (38)
- Pepperdine Law Review (32)
- Schmooze 'tickets' (30)
- Akron Law Review (25)
- NYLS Law Review (22)
- ConLawNOW (21)
- ExpressO (18)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (18)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (17)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (16)
- Maine Law Review (16)
- Marquette Law Review (15)
- Pace Law Review (13)
- Catholic University Law Review (12)
- All Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Cleveland State Law Review (11)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (11)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (11)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (11)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1411 - 1440 of 1734
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Exporting The American Bill Of Rights: The Lesson From Romania, Ronald D. Rotunda
Exporting The American Bill Of Rights: The Lesson From Romania, Ronald D. Rotunda
Law Faculty Articles and Research
No abstract provided.
Understanding "Rights" And Bills Of Rights, Albert P. Blaustein, Carol Tenney
Understanding "Rights" And Bills Of Rights, Albert P. Blaustein, Carol Tenney
University of Richmond Law Review
Scholars hold that there are forty to fifty distinct human rights. History teaches that they should be constitutionally enshrined. In this modern era when constitution-making is multiplying, drafters of bills of rights must now determine questions of formulation and location. How should these forty to fifty distinct human rights be classified; where in these constitutions should these rights be recited?
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Right-To-Die, Bruce Morton
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Pre-Emption Of Local Law By State Legislature
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Possibly the most unsettling phenomenon in the Supreme Court's 1988 term was Justice White's decision to vote contrary to his own exhaustively stated reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. His unexplained decision to vote against the result of his own analysis lends support to those who argue that law, or at least constitutional law, is fundamentally indeterminate. Proponents of the indeterminacy argument sometimes base their position on the allegedly inescapable inconsistency of decisions made by a multi-member court. There is an answer to the inconsistency argument, but it founders if justices sometimes vote, without explanation, on the basis of …
Toward An Abolitionist Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West
Toward An Abolitionist Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
It is by now an open secret that current interpretations of the meaning of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and of its relevance and mandate for contemporary problems of racial, gender, and economic justice, are deeply and, in a sense, hopelessly conflicted. The conflict, simply stated, is this: to the current Supreme Court, and to a sizeable and influential number of constitutional theorists, the "equal protection of the laws" guaranteed by the Constitution is essentially a guarantee that the categories delineated by legal rules will be "rational" and will be rationally related to legitimate state ends. To …