Constitutional Law Commons^™

The Place Of Policy In International Law, Elihu Lauterpacht

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

The Place Of Policy In International Law, Oscar Schachter

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

The Dmca: A Modern Version Of The Licensing Act Of 1662, L. Ray Patterson

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Copyright Term Extensions, The Public Domain And Intertextuality Intertwined, Ashley Packard

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Eldred V. Reno: An Example Of The Law Of Unintended Consequences, L. Ray Patterson

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Uncertainty And Unpredictability In Patent Litigation: The Time Is Ripe For A Consistent Claim Construction Methodology, Gretchen Ann Bender

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Phantom Trademarks: Good Law Or Chain Rattling? The Negative Effects Of Strict Interpretation Of The Lanham Act In The International Flavors And Fragrances Decision, James E. Carlson

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Defining The Patent And Copyright Term: Term Limits And The Intellectual Property Clause, Edward C. Walterscheid

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Prostitution Policy: Legalization, Decriminalization And The Nordic Model, Ane Mathieson, Easton Branam, Anya Noble

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Don’T Risk It; Wait Until She’S Sober, Patrick John White

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Let’S Talk About Sex: A Call For Guardianship Reform In Washington State, Sage Graves

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Living Under The Boot: Militarization And Peaceful Protest, Charlotte Guerra

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Let’S Invest In People, Not Prisons: How Washington State Should Address Its Ex-Offender Unemployment Rate, Sara Taboada

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

His Feminist Facade: The Neoliberal Co-Option Of The Feminist Movement, Anjilee Dodge, Myani Gilbert

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

In Her Words: Recognizing And Preventing Abusive Litigation Against Domestic Violence Survivors, David Ward

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Persistence And Resistance: Women’S Leadership And Ending Gender-Based Violence In Guatemala, Serena Cosgrove, Kristi Lee

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Compulsory Vaccination Laws Are Constitutional, Erwin Chemerinsky, Michele Goodwin

Northwestern University Law Review

A measles epidemic in California, that then spread to other states, focused national attention on the many children who have been vaccinated against communicable diseases. This Essay focuses on the constitutional issues concerning compulsory vaccination laws and argues that every state should require compulsory vaccination of all children, unless there is a medical reason why the child should not be vaccinated. There should be no exception to the compulsory vaccination requirement on account of the parents’ religion or conscience, or for any reason other than medical necessity. The government’s interest in protecting children and preventing the spread of communicable disease …

Making Sense Of Sovereignty: A Historical Understanding Of Personal Jurisdiction From Pennoyer To Nicastro, Kyle Voils

Northwestern University Law Review

How can we make sense of sovereignty’s role in Supreme Court personal jurisdiction doctrine? The Supreme Court has once again raised this question with its plurality decision in J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, which endorsed a personal jurisdiction doctrine based on sovereign authority of forum states. Scholarly reaction to Nicastro has largely been negative, as scholars argue both that, descriptively, sovereignty considerations have long not played a role in personal jurisdiction, and that, normatively, such considerations ought not play a role in personal jurisdiction. This Note concerns only the former contention, that sovereignty’s role in personal jurisdiction largely …

April 23, 2016: The Democrats Are Wrong About Money, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Democrats are Wrong About Money“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Gavish V. Knesset, Miriam Naor, Yoram Danziger, Elyakim Rubinstein, Uzi Vogelman, Daphne Barak-Erez, Esther Hayut, Neal Hendel

Translated Opinions

Section 4 of the Retirement Age Law, 5764-2004 (hereinafter: the Law) provides that "the age at which an employee can be required to retire because of age is 67 for a man and for a woman". The petitioners challenged the validity of section 4 of the Law, and the hearin focused on the question of whether that statutory provision is constitutional.

The High Court of Justice (per President Naor, Deputy President Rubinstein and Justices Danziger, Vogelman, Barak-Erez, Hayut and Hendel concurring) dismissed the petition, holding:

The Court applies judicial review of the Knesset's primary legislation with restraint and caution. …

Grupo Fasma V. The Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct. Of The State Of Nv, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 29 (Apr. 21, 2016), Kristen Matteoni

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Merely because service of process complies with the Hague Convention does not necessarily mean that it complies with constitutional Due Process. Here, the district court failed to conduct adequate fact-finding necessary to determine whether service of process complied with constitutional Due Process. Accordingly, the Court issued a writ of prohibition instructing the district court to vacate its order denying Grupo’s motion to quash so that an evidentiary hearing may be held on the matter.

The Internet Tax Freedom Act: Necessary Protection Or Deferral Of The Problem?, Timothy Fallaw

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Of Mice And 'Manimal': The Patent & Trademark Office's Latest Stance Against Patent Protection For Human-Based Inventions, James P. Daniel

Georgia Journal of Law & Technology

No abstract provided.

Mauna Kea Anaina Hou V. Board Of Land And Natural Resources, Wesley J. Furlong

Public Land & Resources Law Review

Native Hawaiians and the scientific community have been pitted against each other in a decades-long culture war over the construction of observatories and telescopes on sacred landscapes. In Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, the Hawai’i Supreme Court handed a victory to Native Hawaiian culture and rights by halting the construction of a new telescope on Mauna Kea. The decision must be read cautiously, however, as it is firmly rooted in the strict application of procedural due process.

April 18, 2016: Ted Cruz On The Second Or Third Ballot, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Ted Cruz on the Second or Third Ballot“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Mahajna V. State, Elyakim Rubinstein, Anat Baron, Salim Joubran

Translated Opinions

The Applicant, the leader of the Northern Faction of the Islamic Movement in Israel, was acquitted by the Magistrates Court of the offense of inciting racism, but was convicted of the offense of inciting violence. The Applicant was accused of the offenses due to a sermon he gave in 2007 to an audience of approximately one thousand people near Jerusalem. The court imposed a sixteen-month sentence upon the Applicant, eight months of which were custodial. Appeals were filed against the judgment by both of the parties. The District Court convicted the Applicant of the offense of inciting racism. The Applicant …

Pro-Constitutional Representation: Comparing The Role Obligations Of Judges And Elected Representatives In Constitutional Democracy, Vicki C. Jackson

William & Mary Law Review

The role of elected representatives in a constitutional democracy deserves more attention than it typically receives in law schools. Just as judges have a set of role obligations, which are widely discussed and debated, so, too, do representatives. Their obligations, however, are far less widely discussed in normative terms. Understandable reasons for this neglect exist, due to institutional differences between legislatures and courts, law schools' long-standing focus on courts, and the intensely competing demands on elected officials; but these factors do not justify the degree of silence on the normative obligations of representatives. This Essay seeks to introduce and defend …

Friendly Precedent, Anthony Niblett, Albert H. Yoon

William & Mary Law Review

This Article explores which legal precedents judges choose to support their decisions.When describing the legal landscape in a written opinion, which precedent do judges gravitate toward? We examine the idea that judges are more likely to cite “friendly” precedent. A friendly precedent, here, is one that was delivered by Supreme Court Justices who have similar political preferences to the lower court judges delivering the opinion. In this Article, we test whether a federal Court of Appeals panel is more likely to engage with binding Supreme Court precedent when the political flavor of that precedent is aligned with the political composition …

Premodern Constitutionalism, Martin H. Redish, Matthew Heins

William & Mary Law Review

The traditional concept of American constitutionalism has long been a basic assumption not subject to tremendous examination. For generations, scholars have understood our Constitution to be the byproduct of a revolutionary war fought for representation and a foundinggeneration concernedwith preventingtyranny in any form. The traditional understandingof American constitutionalism thus consists of two elements: the underlyingprinciple of skeptical optimism, which can be found in the historical context within which the Framers gathered to draft the Constitution, and the political apparatus effectuating that idea— countermajoritarian constraint set against majoritarian power— which reveals itself through reverse engineeringfrom the structural Constitution.

Over the last …

Hamad V. Gates And The Continuing Interpretation Of Boumediene: A Note On 732 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2013), Paul Blenz

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

A particularly prevalent type of claims in post-Boumediene cases are Bivens claims by detainees. One such case is Hamad v. Gates. Hamad represents a typical claim made by such detainees, and is the focus of this note. In Hamad, the Ninth Circuit held that a statute that had previously thought to be entirely overruled by Boumediene actually survived. This statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(e), stemmed from years of back-and-forth debate between the Supreme Court and Congress. The result of this conflict is still unsettled. The main issue is whether the Court’s primary concern in overruling the jurisdiction-stripping statutes of Congress …