Constitutional Law Commons^™

None Of The Laws But One, Neil S. Siegel

Faculty Scholarship

This Symposium contribution explores differences in how congressional Republicans responded to Medicare and how they responded to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Given the narrowness of the constitutional challenges to the ACA that congressional Republicans promoted and the many federal taxes, expenditures, and regulations that they support, this Article rejects the suggestion that today's Republicans in Congress generally possess a narrow view of the constitutional scope of federal power. The Article instead argues that congressional Republicans then and now-and the two parties in Congress today-fracture less over the constitutional expanse of congressional authority and more over the …

Is There A Federal Definitions Power?, Ernest A. Young

Faculty Scholarship

Although the Supreme Court decided United States v. Windsor on equal protection grounds, that case also raised important and recurring questions about federal power. In particular, defenders of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) argued that Congress may always define the terms used in federal statutes, even if its definition concerns a matter reserved to the States. As the DOMA illustrates, federal definitions concerning reserved matters that depart from state law may impose significant burdens on state governments and private citizens alike. This Article argues that there is no general, freestanding federal definitions power and that sometimes—as with marriage—federal law …

Gun Rights Talk, Joseph Blocher

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Is Nigeria A Secular State? Law, Human Rights And Religion In Context, Osita Nnamani Ogbu

The Transnational Human Rights Review

Nigeria is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious state. The two major religions in the country are Islam and Christianity. Adherents of these two major religions take divergent positions on the question of the secularity of the Nigerian state. While most Christians argue for separation of the Nigerian state from religion, most Muslims advocate the fusion of religion, the state and the law. To many of them, the Sharia ought to govern the totality of the life of a Muslim from cradle to grave. For instance, the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Alhaji Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, maintained that any call …

Nuance, Technology, And The Fourth Amendment: A Response To Predictive Policing And Reasonable Suspicion, Fabio Arcila Jr.

Scholarly Works

In an engaging critique, Professor Arcila finds that Professor Ferguson is correct in that predictive policing will likely be incorporated into Fourth Amendment law and that it will alter reasonable suspicion determinations. But Professor Arcila also argues that the potential incorporation of predictive policing reflects a larger deficiency in our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and that it should not be adopted because it fails to adequately consider and respect a broader range of protected interests.

The Constitutionality Of Prolonged Administrative Segregation For Inmates Who Have Received Sex Reassignment Surgery, Eric T. Fleischaker

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In 2012, a Massachusetts district court judge issued a controversial decision in Kosilek v. Spencer when he ordered the state to pay for a transgender inmate's sex reassignment surgery. The court ruled that denying sex reassignment surgery to an inmate with Gender Identity Disorder is a violation of the Eighth Amendment. However, the court did not answer the question of where to place the inmate after the surgery. That decision was left up to the prison administrators.

The court utilized a five-step Eighth Amendment test to determine when an inmate has a constitutional right to medical services or care and …

Clapper V. Amnesty International Usa: Allowing The Fisa Amendments Act Of 2008 To Turn "Incidentally" Into "Certainly", Liz Clark Rinehart

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dog Sniffs, Technology, And The Mythical Constitutional Right To Criminal Privacy, Kenneth J. Melilli

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Suppose the government was capable of detecting criminal conduct by some method or device that would not reveal any information concerning lawful items or activities. Could the acquisition of such information under these circumstances constitute an "unreasonable search" under the Fourth Amendment?

This scenario is not merely hypothetical. The most prominent reality in which this question arises involves specially trained dogs, which, using their superior sense of smell, can alert to the presence of illegal drugs. Most dramatically, suppose that such a specially trained dog ("drug dog"), from a location outside a home, alerts to the presence of illegal drugs …

From Spectacle To Speech: The First Amendment And Film Censorship From 1915-1952, Jessica J. Hwang

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Through the lenses of both history and the law, this Note examines the parallel transformation of the First Amendment and the medium of film. When the Supreme Court first addressed the censorship of moving pictures in 1915, the Court unanimously rejected film as mere "spectacle" unworthy of constitutional protection. However, in 1952, the Court revisited the same issue and unanimously overturned its prior decision-moving pictures were now protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The reversal ended an era of censorship and marked a new understanding of both speech and film in the law. Neither a fortuitous nor an inevitable …

A Private Sector Solution To A Public Problem, Chris Molina

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Over two centuries after the Bill of Rights was enacted, the Supreme Court finally resolved the controversy surrounding the meaning of the Second Amendment in the landmark case, District of Columbia v. Heller. Specifically, the Court held that the Second Amendment protected an individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. In reaching this decision, the Court determined that the Amendment's prefatory clause, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," did not limit the scope of the right to bear arms for militia purposes. Although the …

In Re C.P.: The Ohio Supreme Court's Expansion Of Roper V. Simmons And Graham V. Florida To The Realm Of Juvenile Sex Offender Registration, Ben Blumenthal

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In the landmark 2012 Ohio Supreme Court case In re C.P., the court held the statute mandating a minor's automatic lifetime registration as a sex offender constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eight Amendment and Ohio's own constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Additionally, the court found automatic registration ran afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

In re C.P. raises several critical questions. Chief amongst them is whether categorical principles enunciated in Roper v. Simmons and Graham v. Florida should even apply to juvenile sex-offender registration schemes. This question is highly relevant because an …

The New Flat Tax: A Modest Proposal For A Constitutionally Apportioned Wealth Tax, John T. Plecnik

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

"Eat the poor children," proposes Jonathan Swift. "Nay," protests Occupy Wall Street, "Eat the rich!" This Article does not propose eating the rich with draconically high taxes. However, the United States has experienced years of multibillion dollar deficits. Many liberals have proposed a European-style value added tax or VAT to balance the budget. Many conservatives have proposed a "fair" or flat tax. Like the Devil, regressive consumption taxes go by many names. Whether they know it or not, liberals and conservatives are proposing essentially the same thing-a federal sales tax, which disproportionately impacts the poor and middle class. This Article …

Analyzing The Constitutional Implications Of The Department Of Veterans Affairs' Process To Determine Incompetency: Is The Federal Government Violating The Second Amendment And Due Process, Joshua Flynn-Brown

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Over the past decade the Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA") quietly reported hundreds of thousands of veterans to the National Instant Criminal Background Check list. Placement on the list prevents veterans from obtaining firearms from federal firearms licensees, effectively precluding exercise of the fundamental right to own a firearm. As of June 1, 2012, there were 153,298 names on the list with a shocking 99.3% of them from the VA. The VA is overreporting veterans by utilizing a very low financial incompetence standard: Once it determines that a veteran requires a fiduciary to administer benefit payments, the VA reports that …

The U.S. Supreme Court's Failure To Fix Plea Bargaining: The Impact Of Lafler And Frye, Cynthia Alkon

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Virtually every criminal conviction in the United States is the result of a guilty plea, not a jury trial. Yet it was not until 2012, in the companion cases of Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, that the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a defendant's constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining. Legal commentators suggested that these cases were "the single greatest revolution in the criminal justice process since Gideon v. Wainwright." But will things really improve for defendants in the wake of Lafler and Frye? The simple answer is: "No." Lafler and Frye will not bring …

Bring Your Own Devices: A Cautionary Tale For Public Employees During Investigatory Searches, Julie Chow

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The advancement of technology-specifically in the form of electronic communication devices-has given rise to a new phenomenon known as "Bring Your Own Device," or "BYOD," whereby employees use their personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, laptops and tablets, for work purposes. While this growing trend may be beneficial to employers and employees, it raises potential problems, especially in the area of employee privacy for those who work in state and local government. The extension of BYOD practices to public employers and government agencies raises Fourth Amendment concerns regarding whether employers may search these employee-owned devices for work purposes in the …

Passwords Please: Rethinking The Constitutional Right To Informational Privacy In The Context Of Social Media, Sara E. Stratton

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Much attention has been placed on social media privacy in the workplace. There have been several reports of public employers directing job applicants during their interview to divulge their username and password to allow the government to review the applicant's social media activity as part of a background check. This Note contends that the practice of public employers requiring applicants to provide their social media login information violates the constitutional right to informational privacy. With increasing access to the Internet and the popularity of social media, personal information on the Internet is becoming more accessible than ever before. Although the …

The New Jim Crow - Recovering The Progressive Origins Of Mass Incarceration, Anders Walker

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

This Article revisits the claim that mass incarceration constitutes a new form of racial segregation, or Jim Crow. Drawing from historical sources, it demonstrates that proponents of the analogy miss an important commonality between the "new" and "old" Jim Crows, namely the debt that each owe to progressive and/or liberal politics. In a manner that scholars like Michelle Alexander forget, both racial segregation and mass incarceration owe their existence in part to discourses of reform aimed at promoting black interests, albeit with perverse results. Recognizing the aspirational origins of such systems helps to better explain how they came into being, …

On War And Peace In Cyberspace - Security, Privacy, Jurisdiction, Lothar Determann, Karl T. Guttenberg

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The public debate surrounding Edward Snowden's revelations about NSA spying, and government surveillance in times of war and peace more generally, has been passionate and unfocused. This Article takes a look at the legal background and current reform proposals. First, it puts the recent international and domestic outrage regarding the NSA's programs into the context of other countries' intelligence gathering, sharing and cooperation practices. Next, it recalls the purposes of espionage and the legality of spying under international law as well as under national laws from the perspective of the spying and spied-upon government. It then proceeds to assess the …

Incoherent And Indefensible: An Interdisciplinary Critique Of The Supreme Court's Void-For-Vagueness Doctrine, Ryan Mccarl

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The Supreme Court's "void-for-vagueness" (or simply "vagueness") doctrine, rooted in the substantive due process guarantee of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, is occasionally used to strike down statutes that "fail to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute" and "encourage arbitrary and erratic arrests and convictions."

This Article first argues that the doctrine contains no unique element that separates it from other substantive due process principles. Then, the Article briefly discusses the concept of vagueness as understood by linguists and philosophers working outside the legal community. Finally, the Article concludes …

Probability, Confidence, And The Constitutionality Of Summary Judgment, Luke Meier

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Professor Suja Thomas has famously asserted that summary judgment violates the Seventh Amendment guarantee of a right to a jury trial in civil cases. Most commentators and courts, however, continue to believe that summary judgment is constitutional and that the Supreme Court in Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. United States resolved this issue.

This Article argues that this entire debate is misguided. The current debate has proceeded under the assumption that every summary judgment raises identical Seventh Amendment concerns. The reality, however, is more complex. This Article distinguishes between the concepts of probability and confidence, both of which can be …

The Story Of Prudential Standing, S. Todd Brown

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Prudential standing, it seems, is the latest target in the Roberts Court's effort to "bring some discipline" to jurisdictional and pseudo-jurisdictional concepts. During the Court's last two terms, it issued a unanimous opinion that excised the zone of interests test from prudential standing doctrine (Lexmark), two unanimous opinions that questioned federal courts' prudential discretion to decline jurisdiction (Lexmark and Driehaus), and a bitterly divided opinion in which the classification of a standing principle as prudential or constitutional was decisive (Windsor). Moreover, in Lexmark, the Court suggested that the third party standing principle may not be properly classified as prudential standing …

Using Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act To Fight Voter Supression Tactics After Shelby County V. Holder Without A New Section 4(B) Formula, Jessica Cassella

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In 2012, the state of Texas attempted to require residents to present photo identification when casting a ballot. The United States Department of Justice objected to the implementation of this law under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because data showed that this law would disproportionately impact Hispanic voters in Texas. Data revealed that Hispanic voters were 46.5% more likely than non-Hispanic voters to lack the identification that would be required to vote. Also, the data showed that Hispanic voters were more likely than non-Hispanic voters to encounter barriers when attempting to get the proper documentation, including disproportionately lacking …

Did The Sixteenth Amendment Ever Matter? Does It Matter Today?, Erik M. Jensen

Faculty Publications

This article, prepared for a symposium on the centennial of the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment, argues that the Amendment was legally and politically necessary in 1913, if there was going to be a modern income tax, and that it remains significant today. The Amendment provides that “taxes on incomes” need not be apportioned among the states on the basis of population, as would otherwise be required for direct taxes. An apportioned income tax would be an absurdity, and, if there were no Amendment, Congress could not enact an unapportioned tax on income from property, the sort of tax that …

Bringing In The Sheaves: Home Grown Wheat, Weed, And Limits On The Commerce Clause, M. Reed Hopper

Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law

No abstract provided.

How An Environmental Commerce Clause Challenge Presaged The Decision Of Chief Justice Roberts In Nfib V. Sebelius, M. Reed Hopper

Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law

No abstract provided.

The Dormant Commerce Clause, The Twenty-First Amendment, And A Freer Wine Market: Why Kentucky Must Wine-Down Its Protectionist Laws Restricting The Direct Shipment Of Wine From Out-Of-State Wineries, Aubrey K. Vaughan

Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law

No abstract provided.

The Decline Of Legal Classicism And The Evolution Of New Deal Constitutionalism, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2051 (2014), Samuel R. Olken

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

This Article explores how some of the salient characteristics of classical legal thought influenced the evolution of the Supreme Court's constitutional jurisprudence during the New Deal era. It focuses upon the Court's jurisprudence of economic liberty in the context of substantive due process. Though a similar pattern of evolution occurred in the Court's Commerce Clause jurisprudence, examination of this area of constitutional development is beyond the scope of this Article. Part I provides an overview of legal classicism and its influence upon late nineteenth and early twentieth-century constitutional law. The next Part examines the paradox of legal classicism and its …

When Counsel Abandonment Forecloses Post-Conviction Relief: An Argument For Applying The Doctrine Of Cause And Prejudice To The Aedpa Statute Of Limitations, Katherine I. Puzone

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Parallel Justice: Creating Causes Of Action For Mandatory Mediation, Marie A. Failinger

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The American common law system should adopt court-connected mandatory mediation as a parallel system of justice for some cases that are currently not justiciable, such as wrongs caused by constitutionally protected behavior. As evidence that such a system is practical, this Article describes systemic and ethical parallels between court-connected mediation and the rise of the equity courts in medieval England, demonstrating that there are no insurmountable practical objections to the creation of “mediation-only” causes of action. The Article then explores the constitutional concerns surrounding the idea of “mandatory mediation-only” causes of action, using constitutional hate speech and invasion of privacy …

After The Tiers: Windsor, Congressional Power To Enforce Equal Protection, And The Challenge Of Pointillist Constitutionalism, William D. Araiza

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.