Constitutional Law Commons^™

Penry V. Johnson 121 S. Ct. 1910 (2001), Puja Satiani

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Introductory Remarks: The Burden Of Judicial Bypass Proceedings , Ann Shalleck

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Casey Skit: A Pedagogical Tool For Interviewing Young Women And Proceeding Through A Judicial Bypass Hearing , Jamin B. Raskin, Ann Shalleck

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Mother, May I?: Ramifications For Parental Involvement Laws For Minors Seeking Abortion Services , Jennifer Blasdell

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Inapplicability Of Parental Involvement Laws To The Distribution Of Mifepristone (Ru-486) To Minors , Amanda C. Scuder

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Simmons-Harris V. Zelman 234 F.3d 945 (6th Cir. 2000), Elisha Winkler

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Dial-In Testimony, Richard D. Friedman, Bridget Mary Mccormack

Articles

For several hundred years, one of the great glories of the common law system of criminal justice has been the requirement that prosecution witnesses give their testimony in the presence of the accused" face to face," in the time-honored phrase-under oath, subject to cross-examination, and, unless unfeasible, in open court. In the United States, this principle is enshrined in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, which provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him." But now a new way is developing for witnesses for the prosecution …

Popular Sovereignty And The Electoral College, John O. Mcginnis

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Conundrum Of Children, Confrontation, And Hearsay, Richard D. Friedman

Articles

The adjudication of child abuse claims poses an excruciatingly difficult conundrum. The crime is a terrible one, but false convictions are abhorrent. Often the evidence does not support a finding of guilt or innocence with sufficient clarity to allow a decision free of gnawing doubt. In many cases, a large part of the problem is that the prosecution's case depends critically on the statement or testimony of a young child. Even with respect to adult witnesses, the law of hearsay and confrontation is very perplexing, as anyone who has studied American evidentiary law and read Supreme Court opinions on the …

Vouchers And Steering, Vincent A. Blasi

Faculty Scholarship

Does the Establishment Clause require that educational voucher programs not be designed in a manner that encourages parents to choose religious schools over secular alternatives? If there is such an "anti-steering" principle implicit in the First Amendment, how should courts elaborate and enforce it?

In this response, I will compare how Professors Lupu and Tuttle and the Court majority in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the decision last June upholding the Cleveland voucher plan, answer these important questions. I will evaluate their analyses at three levels: (1) basic Establishment Clause values and priorities; (2) doctrinal standard for identifying impermissible favoritism toward …

Incomplete Compensation For Takings, Thomas W. Merrill

Faculty Scholarship

If a tribunal determines that a state actor has expropriated foreign investment property, or, under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), that a state actor has adopted a regulation that is "tantamount to" an expropriation of foreign investment property, then that tribunal must determine the amount of compensation owed. International law has developed methods to determine the size of a compensation award when a state formally expropriates property. But the notion, reflected in Chapter 11 of NAFTA, that states may be required to pay compensation to foreign investors for what are, in effect, regulatory takings, is …

Powers Inherent In Sovereignty: Indians, Aliens, Territories, And The Nineteenth Century Origins Of Plenary Power Over Foreign Affairs, Sarah H. Cleveland

Faculty Scholarship

Does the United States have powers inherent in sovereignty? At least since the 1819 decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, conventional wisdom has held that national government is one of limited, enumerated powers and exercises “only the powers granted to it” by the Constitution and those implied powers “necessary and proper” to the exercise of the delegated powers. All powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states and to the people. In the 1936 decision in United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., however, the Supreme Court asserted that federal authority over foreign relations operated independently …

The Canon Has A History, Richard A. Primus

Reviews

Legal Canons, edited by J. M. Balkin and Sanford Levinson, is a collection of fourteen essays on subjects related to canonicity in law and legal education. Balkin and Levinson have two principal aims. One is to expand the category of things that can be canonical: not just texts, they say, but also arguments, problems, narrative frameworks, and examples invoked in conversation or teaching. In their view, what makes something canonical is its ability to reproduce itself in the minds of successive generations.' If generation after generation of legal academics argues about the countermajoritarian difficulty, then the countermajoritarian difficulty is a …

Solving The Apprendi Puzzle, Kyron Huigens

Articles

No abstract provided.