Constitutional Law Commons^™

Indor V. Mayor Of The City Of Jerusalem, Dalia Dorner, Asher Grunis, Eliezer Rivlin

Translated Opinions

Facts: The Petitioner requested from the city of Jerusalem a permit to post signs around the city, as required by Section 20 of the 5740/1980 Jerusalem Bylaws (Signage). The signs criticized MK Yossi Sarid, who, according to the Petitioner, had attacked the government’s policy of targeting terror leaders in Nablus]. The proposed signs initially stated “Yossi Sarid is Arafat’s collaborator”. The City denied the permit because of an ostensible violation of the 5725/1965 Slander Act and a breach of public policy. Counsel for the Petitioner subsequently proposed an amendment to the sign, to read “Yossi Sarid is Arafat’s attendant”, but …

Association For Civil Rights In Israel V. Chairman Of The Central Elections Committee For The Sixteenth Knesset, Ayala Procaccia, Izhak Englard, Tova Strasberg-Cohen

Translated Opinions

Facts: During elections for the sixteenth Knesset, Respondent no. 1 disqualified portions of the election propaganda broadcasts of respondents nos. 2 and 3. These portions were disqualified by the Chairman because they included pictures of the Palestinian flag. Petitioner asserted that this disqualification of the portions constituted an infringement of the freedom of speech of respondents nos. 2 and 3, and an infringement of the voters' right to view political messages uncensored. The Attorney-General, as an amicus curae, asserted that petitioner did not have standing to bring his petition, as the injured respondents could have brought the petitions themselves.

Held: …

Herut--The National Jewish Movement V. Cheshin, Eliahu Mazza, Tova Strasberg-Cohen, Aharon Barak

Translated Opinions

Facts: Petitioner attacked the decision of the respondent to disqualify an election commercial it had prepared for broadcast over both radio and television. The jingle included praise for Yasir Arafat and a call for the expulsion of Jews from Jaffa and Ramle. In addition, the television version of the commercial depicted an Israeli flag, flying over the Knesset, as it changed into a Palestinian flag. The Chairman of the Elections Committee disqualified this commercial, reasoning that the jingle caused severe injury to the dignity of the flag and the national anthem. In the context of the petition, respondent also asserted …

Negev Coexistence Forum V. Ministry Of Infrastructure, Eliahu Mazza, Edmond E. Levy, Dalia Dorner

Translated Opinions

Facts: This petition concerns an urgent petition for an interim order. Petitioners request that the State build a bridge over Wadi Hebron in order to enable children to reach the regional public school. The State recognizes the urgent need for erecting a bridge, but claims that it is not possible within the framework of current regional planning laws.

Held: The Supreme Court held that the Basic Law: the Judiciary has a constitutional status superior to ordinary legislation. This superior status is not limited to the Basic Law’s grant of jurisdiction but also applies to its conferral of power to grant …

Faiglin V. Cheshin, Shlomo Levin, Izhak Englard, Edmond E. Levy, Tova Strasberg-Cohen, Ayala Procaccia, Aharon Barak, Eliahu Mazza, Jacob Turkel, Dorit Beinisch, Dalia Dorner, Eliezer Rivlin

Translated Opinions

Facts: Petitioner wished to be a candidate in the elections for the sixteenth Knesset. Petitioner included, with his candidacy application, a “Statement of Agreement” pursuant to section 57(i) of the Knesset Elections Law. Petitioner did not add any additional materials to note that he had been convicted of the criminal offense of incitement and sentenced to six months imprisonment, to be served as community service. Additionally, petitioner did not subject a request “to expunge the disgrace” of his conviction to the Chairman of the Central Elections Committee. In light of these circumstances, petitioners asked the Court to hold that petitioner …

How The Overturn Of The Child Pornography Prevention Act Under Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition Contributes To The Protection Of Children, Emily D. Goldberg

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, which struck down portions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA) as unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The Court ruled that the CPPA's ban on virtual child pornography was overbroad, as it prohibited lawful speech that could have artistic, literary, or scientific value. The decision highlights the tension between protecting children from exploitation and safeguarding free speech, ultimately emphasizing the importance of allowing narratives that confront and address difficult issues like child sexual abuse.

The Control Over The De-Identification Of Data, Benjamin Charkow

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Can Police Track Your Wireless Calls? Call Location Information And Privacy Law, Laurie Thomas Lee

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Dialectic And Revolution: Confronting Kelsen And Gadamer On Legal Interpretation, Hans Lindahl

Cardozo Law Review

This paper examines the general structure and conditions of legal interpretation that arise from confronting Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics with a determinate conception of legal interpretation suggested by Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. The Gadamerian question, "What defines legal interpretation as interpretation?", suggests that Kelsen's reference to legal norms as "schemes of interpretation" must be radicalized: a hermeneutic circularity or dialectic is at work in the law, such that the legal interpretation of reality also changes, to a lesser or greater extent, the principle of interpretation - the legal norm. The Kelsenian question, "What defines interpretation as legal interpretation?", suggests …

Contracts Of Convenience: Preventing Employers From Unilaterally Modifying Promises Made In Employee Handbooks, Brian T. Kohn

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nearest To Legitimacy: Justice White And Strict Rational Basis Scrutiny, Michael Herz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Zonstien V. Judge-Advocate General, Aharon Barak, Dorit Beinisch, Ayala Procaccia

Translated Opinions

Facts: Petitioners are reserve soldiers in the IDF, who refused to serve in the Administered Territories. They were subject to disciplinary proceedings, and were sentenced to their respective punishments. The subject of this petition is the decision of the Minister of Defense not to grant the petitioners an exemption from military reserve service.

Held: The Supreme Court held that exemptions from military service may be granted according to the discretion of the Minister of Defense, pursuant to section 26 of the Defense Service Law (Consolidated Version)-1986. The Court held that the question of granting exemptions to military service based on …

Yassin V. Ben-David, Aharon Barak, Dorit Beinisch, Izhak Englard

Translated Opinions

Facts: In the context of IDF operations against the terrorist infrastructure in areas of the Palestinian Authority (“Operation Defensive Wall”), thousands of suspects were detained. Due to overcrowding, some of these petitioners were transferred to the Kziot detention facility in the Negev region. Most of the detainees were detained pursuant to administrative detention orders. This petition concerns the detention conditions of these detainees.

Held: The Supreme Court held that the presumption of innocence should be applied to the detainees, as they are being held under administrative detention orders, and have neither been tried nor convicted. The Court further held that …

Harris, Ring, And The Future Of Relevant Conduct Sentencing, Kyron J. Huigens

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Folly Of Federalism, Frank B. Cross

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Virtue Of Vagueness In Takings Doctrine, Marc R. Poirier

Cardozo Law Review

In discussions of regulatory takings law, there appears to be an almost universal assumption that its vagueness is a bad thing, a mysterious dysfunction. This article argues that the vagueness in takings doctrine is quite functional and entirely appropriate. Since considerable vagueness turns out to be inevitable, this is just as well. Happily, over time, specific resource use conflicts and transitions sometimes do crystallize out into more predictable forms of law - new rules and customs about specific types of property. Within these specific and limited regimes, we can and should aspire to rules defining the circumstances under which the …

Hamoked V. Commander Of The Idf Forces In The West Bank, Aharon Barak, Dorit Beinisch, Izhak Englard

Translated Opinions

Beginning in September of 2000, there was an increase in Palestinian terrorist activity against the Jewish community in Judea and Samaria, the Gaza Strip, and within Israel itself.  Hundreds were killed and wounded.  In reaction, the army initiated military activities.  Hundreds of Palestinians were killed and wounded.  Terrorist activity intensified in the beginning of 2002.  In March of that year there was an increase of Palestinian terrorist activity.  Approximately one hundred and twenty Israeli civilians were killed and hundreds were wounded.  In response to the terrorist activity, the government decided, on 29.03.2002, to carry out a large-scale military operation.  The …

Barake V. Minister Of Defense, Aharon Barak, Dorit Beinisch, Theodor Or

Translated Opinions

Facts: This petition was submitted during IDF operations against the terrorist infrastructure in the areas of the Palestinian Authority. (“Operation Defensive Wall.”) Petitioners requested that the IDF be ordered to cease checking and removing the bodies of Palestinians that had been killed during the course of warfare in the Jenin refugee camp. Petitioners also requested that the IDF be ordered not to bury those ascertained to be terrorists in the Jordan valley cemetery. Petitioners request that the tasks of identifying and removing the bodies be the responsibility of medical teams and the Red Cross. Petitioners also request that the families …

"Seperation": From Epithet To Constitutional Norm, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

Ajuri V. Idf Commander In West Bank, Aharon Barak, Shlomo Levin, Theodor Or, Eliahu Mazza, Mishael Cheshin, Tova Strasberg-Cohen, Dalia Dorner, Dorit Beinisch, Jacob Turkel

Translated Opinions

Facts: The IDF Commander in Judaea and Samaria made orders requiring three residents of Judaea and Samaria to live, for the next two years, in the Gaza Strip. The orders were approved by the Appeals Board. The three residents of Judaea and Samaria petitioned the High Court of Justice against the orders.

The petitioners argued that the orders were contrary to international law. In particular the petitioners argued that Judaea and Samaria should be regarded as a different belligerent occupation from the one in the Gaza Strip, and therefore the orders amounted to a deportation from one territory to another, …

Yated V. Ministry Of Education, Dalia Dorner, Edmond E. Levy, Theodor Or

Translated Opinions

Facts: The Special Education Law, 1998, provides that the State must provide special education, as per the definition of that term in the statute. Petitioners are the parents of children with special needs who are integrated into the regular educational system. They claim that that State does not provide financial aid to aid them with the expense of educating their children. Petitioners assert that this infringes their children’s fundamental rights, discriminates against them, and violates the provisions of the Special Education law.

Held: The Court held that the right to education is a fundamental right. This right is recognized by …

Productive Silence On Carl Schmitt: Constrained Ignorance Or Concluded Reappraisal? A Reply To Detlev F. Vagts, Carl Schmitt In Context: Reflections On A Symposium, Emanuel Richter

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Adalah -- The Legal Center For Arab Minority Rights In Israel V. City Of Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Aharon Barak, Dalia Dorner, Mishael Cheshin

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]

The subject of the Petition is whether city councils within whose jurisdiction resides an Arab minority have a duty to use the Arabic language – alongside the Hebrew language – in all city signage. The Petitioners maintain that in cities where there is an Arab minority all city signs must include writing in Arabic as well. On the other hand, the Respondents believe that …

Almandi V. Minister Of Defense, Aharon Barak, Dorit Beinisch, Izhak Englard

Translated Opinions

Facts: This petition was submitted during IDF operations against the terrorist infrastructure in the areas of the Palestinian Authority. (“Operation Defensive Wall.”) It concerns the situation in the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, in which armed Palestinians had fortified themselves. In the church compound there were also unarmed Palestinians civilians, as well as clergymen. The clergymen, who were not in the same part of the compound as the Palestinians, received food, though the Palestinians did not. Petitioners requested that food be allowed into the compound. They asserted that preventing food from entering the compound was a violation of international …

Barely Opening, Then Slamming Shut, Science's "Black Box" In Law: A Response To Beecher-Monas's Heuristics, David S. Caudill

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Signs Of The Times: Dale V. Boy Scouts Of America And The Changing Meaning Of Nondiscrimination, Andrew Koppelman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Respecting Pandora's Box, Erica Beecher-Monas

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Concept Of Equality In Civil Procedure, William B. Rubenstein

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Do Attorneys Really Matter? The Empirical And Legal Case For The Right Of Counsel At Bail, Douglas L. Colbert, Ray Paternoster, Shawn Bushway

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Center For The Defense Of The Individual V. Minister Of Defense, Aharon Barak, Dorit Beinisch, Theodor Or

Translated Opinions

Facts: This petition was submitted during IDF operations against the terrorist infrastructure in the areas of the Palestinian Authority. (“Operation Defensive Wall.”) Petitioners argued that respondent was not using the special rescue unit of the IDF Homefront Command to search for all persons that may be buried alive under ruins in the Jenin refugee camp.

Held: The Supreme Court held that both law and morality mandated that the rescue unit enter the Jenin refugee camp. As this unit had entered the camp, as per respondents reply, the goal of the petition had been fulfilled.