Constitutional Law Commons^™

Race Or Party?: How Courts Should Think About Republican Efforts To Make It Harder To Vote In North Carolina And Elsewhere, Richard L. Hasen

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Hungary: An Election In Question, Kim Lane Scheppele

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

The Last Stand: Restricting Voting Rights & Sustaining White Power In Modern America, Desmond S. King, Rogers M. Smith

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

What Became Of Fundamental Rights?: Of Voter Ids And Voting Rights, Carol Nackenoff

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

The Popular Sovereignty Foundations Of The Right To Vote, Franita Tolson

Schmooze 'tickets'

In recent years, courts and commentators have focused on the federalism-based limits on the power of the federal government, with significantly less attention given to similar constraints on state power. It is not surprising, therefore, that both camps have overlooked that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, with their reservation of both rights and power “to the people” contain a popular sovereignty principle that affects the constitutionality of various state election law regulations. This goal of this Article is to reaffirm that the people are, in essence, part of the federalism equation, and not simply as protectors of state power, but …

Are Elections Necessary?, Sanford Levinson

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

The Roberts-Kennedy Court And Post-Political Democracy, Zephyr Teachout

Schmooze 'tickets'

This Essay explores the ideological underpinnings of the modern Supreme Court’s election law decisions, arguing that the Court does not have a strong commitment to federalism or to unfettered debate or to the mistrustful citizen. Instead, the opinions reveal a complacency about corruption and a narrow view of the role of citizens. The Essay is part of a volume on neoliberalism for Law and Contemporary Problems.

Transparent Adjudication: Promoting Democratic Dialogue On Judicial Conceptions Of Politics, Bertrall L. Ross Ii

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

The Idea Of Democracy In The Early Republic, Keith Whittington

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

"Lotteries As An Alternative Selection Method For Representatives", Hélène Landemore

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Why Campaign Finance Matters, Prithviraj Datta

Schmooze 'tickets'

Due to the combination of a host of factors – among them being the Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United v FEC, the not-entirely-unrelated explosion of Super PACs as a political force in electoral politics, and the tremendous increase in the amounts that candidates and parties have been spending in their campaign efforts – the issue of campaign finance has, once again, rise to prominence in scholarly and public debate. Unsurprisingly, given the highly polarized and divisive political environment in which we live, the debate over campaign finance is characterized by a sharp cleavage of opinion …

Compulsory Voting, Howard Schweber

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Abolish Districts, Corinna Barrett Lain

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Citizens Derided: Corporate Politics And Religion In The Roberts Court, Jamin Raskin

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Powers And Rights In Shelby County V. Holder, Corey Brettschneider

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Shelby County V. Holder And Preclearance As Legislative Injunction, Henry L. Chambers

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

The Problem Of Voter Fraud, Michael D. Gilbert

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

American Innovations In Democratic Decision-Making, Leslie Friedman Goldstein

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Toward An Alternative Theory Of Constitutional Design, Emily Zackin, Mila Versteeg

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.

Prisoners And Habeas Privileges Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Lee B. Kovarsky

Faculty Scholarship

The U.S. Reports contain no answer to a million-dollar question: are state prisoners constitutionally entitled to a federal habeas forum? The Supreme Court has consistently ducked the basic constitutional issue, and academic work on the question idles on familiar themes.

The strongest existing argument that state prisoners are constitutionally entitled to a federal habeas forum involves a theory of incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. I provide a new and different account: specifically, that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges and Immunities Clause (“PI Clause”) guarantees a habeas privilege as a feature of national citizenship, and that the corresponding habeas …

Belling The Partisan Cats: Preliminary Thoughts On Identifying And Mending A Dysfunctional Constitutional Order, Mark A. Graber

Faculty Scholarship

This paper sharpens debates over whether the Constitution of the United States and the American constitutional order are presently dysfunctional, the nature of any dysfunctions, and how underlying regime flaws are likely to be corrected. Rather than focusing primarily on constitutional text, this Article explores the dynamic ways in which constitutional processes have influenced and been influenced by the structure of constitutional politics. Constitutional dysfunction is best conceptualized as the failure of a constitutional order rather than as a consequence of a flawed constitutional text, and dysfunction typically occurs when a regime is unable to transition from a dysfunctional constitutional …

Beard And Uber-Beard, Mark A. Graber

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

State Prisoners With Federal Claims In Federal Court: When Can A State Prisoner Overcome Procedural Default?, Megan Raker

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Fouling The First Amendment: Why Colleges Can't, And Shouldn't, Control Student Athletes' Speech On Social Media, Frank D. Lomonte

Journal of Business & Technology Law

No abstract provided.

In The Debt We Trust: The Unconstitutionality Of Defaulting On American Financial Obligations, And The Political Implications Of Their Perpetual Validity, Zachary K. Ostro

Student Articles and Papers

Starting in August 2011, America has undergone a series of fiscal and political crises surrounding the threat of defaulting on the national debt and the need to raise the debt ceiling. These crises have caused tremendous stress and irreparable harm to our financial markets and political system, causing a downgrade in United States debt for the first time in history, forcing drastic budget cuts, and contributing to a sixteen-day government shutdown this past October. What is most unfortunate, however, is that all of this was preventable for the simple reason that, as a matter of constitutional law, defaulting on the …

Woollard V. Gallagher: Normalizing The Fourth Circuit’S Approach To Second Amendment Challenges, William Young Jr.

Maryland Law Review Online

No abstract provided.

Kaley V. United States: Sanctifying Grand Jury Determinations And Marginalizing The Right To Counsel Of Choice, Laura Merkey

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Clapper V. Amnesty International Usa: Allowing The Fisa Amendments Act Of 2008 To Turn "Incidentally" Into "Certainly", Liz Clark Rinehart

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Let Ivf Take Its Course: Reconceiving Procreative Liberty For The Twenty-First Century, Christine E. White

Student Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

Constructing Constitutional Politics: The Reconstruction Strategy For Protecting Rights, Mark A. Graber

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.