Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Constitutional Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 211 - 240 of 560

Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law

Contract, Race, And Freedom Of Labor In The Constitutional Law Of "Involuntary Servitude", James G. Pope Feb 2011

Contract, Race, And Freedom Of Labor In The Constitutional Law Of "Involuntary Servitude", James G. Pope

Schmooze 'tickets'

The Supreme Court has yet to adopt and apply a standard for assessing labor rights claims under the involuntary servitude clause. This article suggests that one may be found in the leading decision of Pollock v. Williams (1944), which contains the Court’s most thorough discussion of the interpretive issues. Under Pollock, a claimed right should be protected if it is necessary to provide workers with the “power below” and employers the “incentive above” to prevent “a harsh overlordship or unwholesome conditions of work.” Although this is not the only conceivable standard, it does fit well with the text, history, and …


The Enduring Legacy Of The Thirteenth Amendment, Robert J. Kaczorowski Feb 2011

The Enduring Legacy Of The Thirteenth Amendment, Robert J. Kaczorowski

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.


James Ashley And The Thirteenth Amendment, Rebecca E. Zietlow Feb 2011

James Ashley And The Thirteenth Amendment, Rebecca E. Zietlow

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.


A Grievance Based Interpretation Of The Thirteenth Amendment, Lea Vandervelde Feb 2011

A Grievance Based Interpretation Of The Thirteenth Amendment, Lea Vandervelde

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.


The Reconstruction Power, Jack M. Balkin Feb 2011

The Reconstruction Power, Jack M. Balkin

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.


Slavery And The Phenomenology Of Torture, Sanford Levinson Feb 2011

Slavery And The Phenomenology Of Torture, Sanford Levinson

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, And The Thirteenth Amendment, Michael Les Benedict Feb 2011

Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, And The Thirteenth Amendment, Michael Les Benedict

Schmooze 'tickets'

No abstract provided.


Money Talks But It Isn't Speech, Deborah Hellman Jan 2011

Money Talks But It Isn't Speech, Deborah Hellman

Faculty Scholarship

This Article challenges the central premise of our campaign finance law, namely that restrictions on giving and spending money constitute restrictions on speech and thus can only be justified by compelling governmental interests. This claim has become so embedded in constitutional doctrine that in the most recent Supreme Court case in this area, Citizens United v. FEC, the majority asserts it without discussion or argument. This claim is often defended on the grounds that money is important or necessary for speech. While money surely facilitates speech, money also facilitates the exercise of many other constitutional rights. By looking at these …


Money And Rights, Deborah Hellman Jan 2011

Money And Rights, Deborah Hellman

Faculty Scholarship

This chapter looks at when constitutionally protected rights are interpreted by courts to include a concomitant right to spend money to effectuate the underlying right and when they are not. It concludes that there are two strands in our constitutional law: the Integral Strand, in which a right includes the right to spend money and the Blocked Strand, in which it does not.


Who's In Charge? Does The President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions?, Robert V. Percival Jan 2011

Who's In Charge? Does The President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions?, Robert V. Percival

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


From Racial Discrimination To Separate But Equal: The Common Law Impact Of The Thirteenth Amendment, David S. Bogen Jan 2011

From Racial Discrimination To Separate But Equal: The Common Law Impact Of The Thirteenth Amendment, David S. Bogen

Faculty Scholarship

Many forces produced the shift in the United States from the acceptance of slavery and racial inequality to the doctrine of separate but equal. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery and authorized legislation to enforce that abolition, but these well-known direct effects are only part of the story. This paper examines the Amendment’s indirect impact on racial discrimination – furthering a standard of equality in public relationships without threatening the existing racial separation. The Amendment is evidence of a change in values that justified overturning prior decisions, and abolition created a new context for legislation and common law decisions. It reinforced …


Prosecution Without Representation, Douglas L. Colbert Jan 2011

Prosecution Without Representation, Douglas L. Colbert

Faculty Scholarship

Nearly 50 years after the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright established indigent defendants' constitutional right to counsel, poor people throughout the country still remain without a lawyer when first appearing before a judicial officer who determines pretrial liberty or bail. Absent counsel, low-income defendants unable to afford bail remain in jail for periods ranging from 3-70 days until assigned counsel appears in-court. Examining Walter Rothgery's wrongful prosecution, the article includes a national survey that informs readers about the limited right to counsel at the initial appearance and the extent of delay in each of the 50 states. …


Money And Rights, Deborah Hellman Jan 2011

Money And Rights, Deborah Hellman

Faculty Scholarship

This article looks at when constitutionally protected rights are interpreted by courts to include a concomitant right to spend money to effectuate the underlying right and when they are not. It concludes that there are two strands in our constitutional law: the Integral Strand, in which a right includes the right to spend money and the Blocked Strand, in which it does not.


Constitutional Democracy, Human Dignity, And Entrenched Evil, Mark A. Graber Jan 2011

Constitutional Democracy, Human Dignity, And Entrenched Evil, Mark A. Graber

Faculty Scholarship

The following essay pays tribute to Sandy Levinson's thoughts on constitutional compromises by paying tribute to the thoughts on constitutional compromises by our common mentor, Walter Murphy. Rather than directly engage in a dialogue with Compromise and Constitutionalism, the analysis below joins the preexisting dalogue between Professors Levinson and Murphy on how to construct a decent polity among people who have deep disputes over what constitutes political decency. Walter Murphy is unfortunately largely known to legal audiences only through the work of such outstanding mentees as Sandy Levinson, Jim Fleming, Christopher Eisgruber, Andrew Koppelman, Jennifer Nedelsky, and Robert George. Walter …


Plus Or Minus One: The Thirteenth And Fourteenth Amendments, Mark A. Graber Jan 2011

Plus Or Minus One: The Thirteenth And Fourteenth Amendments, Mark A. Graber

Faculty Scholarship

The consensus that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Thirteenth Amendment has come under sharp criticism in recent years. Several new works suggest that the Thirteenth Amendment, properly interpreted, protects some substantive rights not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Some of this scholarship is undoubtedly motivated by an effort to avoid hostile Supreme Court precedents. Nevertheless, more seems to be going on than mere litigation strategy. Scholars detected different rights and regime principles in the Thirteenth Amendment than they find in the Fourteenth Amendment. The 2011 Maryland Constitutional Law Schoomze, to which this is an introduction, provided an opportunity for law …


Habeas Verité, Lee B. Kovarsky Jan 2011

Habeas Verité, Lee B. Kovarsky

Faculty Scholarship

Three recent books from varied academic disciplines demonstrate that habeas is as much about power as it is about liberty - the power of some judges over other magistrates, the power of the judiciary over coordinagte governing institutions, and the power of dominant political coalitions ovefr the opposition.


"Displaced By A Force To Which They Yielded And Could Not Resist": A Historical And Legal Analysis Of Mayor And City Counsel Of Baltimore V. Charles Howard Et. Al, Matthew Kent Jan 2011

"Displaced By A Force To Which They Yielded And Could Not Resist": A Historical And Legal Analysis Of Mayor And City Counsel Of Baltimore V. Charles Howard Et. Al, Matthew Kent

Legal History Publications

The experience of the Baltimore Police Commissioners is instructive in understanding the state of affairs in Baltimore during the Civil War era. The removal of the commissioners by the Union Army and the subsequent civil trial, The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Charles Howard, provides a window through which one may examine the historical, legal and political circumstances of the time. The legal status of the commissioners also sheds light on modern legal doctrine related to the detention of American citizens as “enemy combatants” without the benefit of certain constitutional guarantees. By analyzing the Howard case with a …


Child, Please – Stop The Anti-Queer School Bullycides: A Modest Proposal To Hoist Social Conservatives By Their Own “God, Guns, And Gays” Petard, David Groshoff Jan 2011

Child, Please – Stop The Anti-Queer School Bullycides: A Modest Proposal To Hoist Social Conservatives By Their Own “God, Guns, And Gays” Petard, David Groshoff

University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class

No abstract provided.


Salazar V. Buono: A Missed Opportunity To Clarify The Reasonable Observer Test, Sumahn Das Jan 2011

Salazar V. Buono: A Missed Opportunity To Clarify The Reasonable Observer Test, Sumahn Das

University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class

No abstract provided.


Education As A Counterterrorism Tool And The Curious Case Of The Texas School Book Resolution, Diane Webber Jan 2011

Education As A Counterterrorism Tool And The Curious Case Of The Texas School Book Resolution, Diane Webber

University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class

No abstract provided.


Arizona V. Gant: Missing An Opportunity To Banish Bright Lines From The Court’S Vehicular Search Incident To Arrest Jurisprudence, Jack Blum Jan 2011

Arizona V. Gant: Missing An Opportunity To Banish Bright Lines From The Court’S Vehicular Search Incident To Arrest Jurisprudence, Jack Blum

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Thirteenth Amendment, Interest Convergence, And The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery, William M. Carter Jr. Jan 2011

The Thirteenth Amendment, Interest Convergence, And The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery, William M. Carter Jr.

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Limitations On Land Use Controls, Environmental Regulations And Governmental Exactions (2011 Edition), Garrett Power Jan 2011

Constitutional Limitations On Land Use Controls, Environmental Regulations And Governmental Exactions (2011 Edition), Garrett Power

Faculty Scholarship

This electronic book is published in a searchable PDF format as a part of the E-scholarship Repository of the University of Maryland School of Law. It is an “open content” casebook intended for classroom use in courses in Land Use Control, Environmental Law and Constitutional Law. It consists of cases carefully selected from the two hundred years of American constitutional history which address the clash between public sovereignty and private property. It considers both the personal right to liberty and the personal right in property. The text consists of non-copyrighted material and readers are free to use it or re-mix …


What’S Different About The Thirteenth Amendment, And Why Does It Matter?, James Gray Pope Jan 2011

What’S Different About The Thirteenth Amendment, And Why Does It Matter?, James Gray Pope

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Thirteenth Amendment And The Meaning Of Familial Bonds, Julie Novkov Jan 2011

The Thirteenth Amendment And The Meaning Of Familial Bonds, Julie Novkov

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Conclusion: The Political Thirteenth Amendment, Rebecca E. Zietlow Jan 2011

Conclusion: The Political Thirteenth Amendment, Rebecca E. Zietlow

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Right To Refuse: Should Prison Inmates Be Allowed To Discontinue Treatment For Incurable, Noncommunicable Medical Conditions?, Daniel R. H. Mendelsohn Jan 2011

The Right To Refuse: Should Prison Inmates Be Allowed To Discontinue Treatment For Incurable, Noncommunicable Medical Conditions?, Daniel R. H. Mendelsohn

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


Full-Body Scanners: Tsa's New "Optional" System For Airport Searches, Stuart A. Hindman Jan 2011

Full-Body Scanners: Tsa's New "Optional" System For Airport Searches, Stuart A. Hindman

Student Articles and Papers

While the world of commercial air transportation has seen major improvements in many technologies over the last decade, nothing has caused a stir quite like the implementation of full-body scanners (FBS) as a one of the first lines of defense in aviation security at U.S. airports.  FBS and “enhanced” pat-downs have been the source of much debate and scrutiny among passengers, flight crews, privacy rights groups, and federal authorities in charge of airport screening.  The paper begins with a general overview of the law as it pertains to airport searches and privacy rights.  In Part II, the technology behind the …


Original Habeas Redux, Lee B. Kovarsky Jan 2011

Original Habeas Redux, Lee B. Kovarsky

Faculty Scholarship

This article explores what is perhaps the Supreme Court’s most exotic appellate power— its authority to issue (inaptly-named) “original” writs of habeas corpus. Although I have been working on Original Habeas Redux for some time, the Troy Davis case has recently thrust this topic into the national spotlight. In Davis (2009), the Supreme Court exercised, for the first time in over forty years, its power to transfer an original habeas petition to a district court for merits adjudication. Having collected and tabulated two decades of new data, I argue that Davis is not a blip in an otherwise constant state …


Independent Newspapers, Inc. V. Brodie: Maryland's Precarious Balance Between Internet Defamation And The Right To Eanonymity, Bryce Donohue Jan 2011

Independent Newspapers, Inc. V. Brodie: Maryland's Precarious Balance Between Internet Defamation And The Right To Eanonymity, Bryce Donohue

Journal of Business & Technology Law

No abstract provided.