Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- First Amendment (78)
- Courts (71)
- Administrative Law (56)
- Criminal Procedure (49)
- Law and Society (44)
-
- Criminal Law (42)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (40)
- Legislation (40)
- Judges (39)
- Religion Law (35)
- Legal History (34)
- Fourteenth Amendment (33)
- Jurisprudence (33)
- State and Local Government Law (33)
- President/Executive Department (31)
- Evidence (25)
- Law and Politics (24)
- Education Law (20)
- Torts (19)
- Juvenile Law (18)
- Litigation (18)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (17)
- Jurisdiction (17)
- Law and Gender (17)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (16)
- Legal Remedies (16)
- Civil Procedure (15)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (15)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (76)
- First Amendment (59)
- Constitution (38)
- Supreme Court (34)
- Federalism (26)
-
- United States Supreme Court (25)
- Constitutional Law (24)
- California (21)
- Religion (20)
- Due process (19)
- Privacy (19)
- Separation of powers (17)
- Abortion (16)
- Equal protection (16)
- Evidence (15)
- Fourth Amendment (15)
- Congress (14)
- Fourteenth Amendment (14)
- Due process of law (13)
- Fifth Amendment (13)
- Right to counsel (13)
- United States (13)
- Due Process (10)
- Eminent domain (10)
- Freedom of speech (10)
- Legislation (10)
- Separation of Powers (10)
- Speech (10)
- Criminal procedure (9)
- Defendant (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 414
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
A Reluctant Apology For Plessy: A Response To Akhil Amar, Barry P. Mcdonald
A Reluctant Apology For Plessy: A Response To Akhil Amar, Barry P. Mcdonald
Pepperdine Law Review
A response to the article "Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon," by Akhil Amar, published in the November 2011 issue of the "Pepperdine Law Review," is presented. Topics include an examination of Justice Henry Billings Brown's decision in the case, the constitutionality of segregating U.S. citizens by race, and the impact of public opinion on U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Plessy V. Ferguson And The Anti-Canon, Akhil Reed Amar
Plessy V. Ferguson And The Anti-Canon, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, which dealt with the constitutionality of racial segregation in the U.S. Topics include the application of precedent in controversial U.S. Supreme Court cases, when the U.S. Constitution can overrule a court decision, and dissenting judicial opinions.
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Abnormalcy Of Normal Delay, Kimberly Horsley
The Abnormalcy Of Normal Delay, Kimberly Horsley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment, Gaming Advertisements, And Congressional Inconsistency: The Future Of The Commercial Speech Doctrine After Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Ass'n V. United States, Nicholas P. Consula
The First Amendment, Gaming Advertisements, And Congressional Inconsistency: The Future Of The Commercial Speech Doctrine After Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Ass'n V. United States, Nicholas P. Consula
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Breaking The Seal On White-Collar Criminal Search Warrant Materials , David Horan
Breaking The Seal On White-Collar Criminal Search Warrant Materials , David Horan
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Wilson V. Layne: Increasing The Scope Of The Fourth Amendment Right To Privacy, Ashlea Wright
Wilson V. Layne: Increasing The Scope Of The Fourth Amendment Right To Privacy, Ashlea Wright
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Apprendi V. New Jersey, The Scaling Back Of The Sentencing Factor Revolution And The Resurrection Of Criminal Defendant Rights, How Far Is Too Far?, Analisa Swan
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Swing Votes On The Current Supreme Court: The Joint Opinion In Casey And Its Progeny, R. Randall Kelso, Charles D. Kelso
Swing Votes On The Current Supreme Court: The Joint Opinion In Casey And Its Progeny, R. Randall Kelso, Charles D. Kelso
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
International Law As Part Of Our Law: A Constitutional Perspective , Michael D. Ramsey
International Law As Part Of Our Law: A Constitutional Perspective , Michael D. Ramsey
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forgotten Supreme Court Abortion Cases: Drs. Hawker & Hurwitz In The Dock & Defrocked, Roy Lucas
Forgotten Supreme Court Abortion Cases: Drs. Hawker & Hurwitz In The Dock & Defrocked, Roy Lucas
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bartnicki V. Vopper: Another Media Victory Or Ominous Warning Of A Potential Change In Supreme Court First Amendment Jurisprudence?, Jennifer Nichole Hunt
Bartnicki V. Vopper: Another Media Victory Or Ominous Warning Of A Potential Change In Supreme Court First Amendment Jurisprudence?, Jennifer Nichole Hunt
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Land Use Moratoria And Temporary Takings Redefined After Lake Tahoe?, Laura Hurmence Mckaskle
Land Use Moratoria And Temporary Takings Redefined After Lake Tahoe?, Laura Hurmence Mckaskle
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double-Clicking On Fourth Amendment Protection: Encryption Creates A Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy, Sean J. Edgett
Double-Clicking On Fourth Amendment Protection: Encryption Creates A Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy, Sean J. Edgett
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fetal Pain Legislation: Is It Viable?, Teresa Stanton Collett
Fetal Pain Legislation: Is It Viable?, Teresa Stanton Collett
Pepperdine Law Review
Whether a human fetus experiences pain during an abortion has been the subject of heated debate within medical, legal, and political circles for over two decades. In the 1980's President Reagan's statement that "when the lives of the unborn are snuffed out [by abortion], they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing," and the release of a controversial film entitled "The Silent Scream" were merely two of the events that kept this issue in public view. Federal and state legislative efforts to enact "partial birth abortion bans" have reignited public debate over fetal pain." Three years ago, the …
"Indifferent [Towards] Indifference:" Post-Deshaney Accountability For Social Services Agencies When A Child Is Injured Or Killed Under Their Protective Watch, Carolina D. Watts
"Indifferent [Towards] Indifference:" Post-Deshaney Accountability For Social Services Agencies When A Child Is Injured Or Killed Under Their Protective Watch, Carolina D. Watts
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prisoners And Procreation: What Happened Between Goodwin And Gerber?, Rachel Michael Kirkley
Prisoners And Procreation: What Happened Between Goodwin And Gerber?, Rachel Michael Kirkley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rule Of Law For Judges, Thomas M. Reavley
The Rule Of Law For Judges, Thomas M. Reavley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Utah V. Evans: How Census 2000'S "Sampling In Disguise" Fooled The Supreme Court Into Allocating Utah's Seat In The U.S. House Of Representatives To North Carolina, Nathan T. Dwyer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jumping On The Bandwagon: The United States Supreme Court Prohibits The Execution Of Mentally Retarded Persons In Atkins V. Virginia, Lisa Odom
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination: An In-Depth Look At Mckune V. Lile, Heidi Feldman
The Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination: An In-Depth Look At Mckune V. Lile, Heidi Feldman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alabama V. Shelton: One Small Step For Man, One Very Small Step For The Sixth Amendment's Right To Counsel, Joshua S. Stambaugh
Alabama V. Shelton: One Small Step For Man, One Very Small Step For The Sixth Amendment's Right To Counsel, Joshua S. Stambaugh
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ring V. Arizona: The Sixth And Eighth Amendments Collide: Out Of The Wreckage Emerges A Constitutional Safeguard For Capital Defendants, Jason E. Barsanti
Ring V. Arizona: The Sixth And Eighth Amendments Collide: Out Of The Wreckage Emerges A Constitutional Safeguard For Capital Defendants, Jason E. Barsanti
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Asbestos & The Sleeping Constitution, Griffin B. Bell
Asbestos & The Sleeping Constitution, Griffin B. Bell
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is A Written Constitution Necessary?, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
Is A Written Constitution Necessary?, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sell V. United States: Is The Supreme Court Giving A Dose Of Bad Medicine?: The Constitutionality Of The Right To Forcibly Medicate Mentally Ill Defendants For Purposes Of Trial Competence, Dina E. Klepner
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ewing V. California: Upholding California's Three Strikes Law, Robert Clinton Peck
Ewing V. California: Upholding California's Three Strikes Law, Robert Clinton Peck
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Public Use Clause: Constitutional Mandate Or "Hortatory Fluff"?, Gideon Kanner
The Public Use Clause: Constitutional Mandate Or "Hortatory Fluff"?, Gideon Kanner
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preemption And Regulatory Failure, David C. Vladeck
Preemption And Regulatory Failure, David C. Vladeck
Pepperdine Law Review
Daily front-page stories recounting the failure of defibrillators, pacemakers, heart stents and infusion pumps have raised questions about the adequacy of FDA regulation of medical devices. At the same time, lower courts are struggling to apply the Supreme Court's ruling in Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr to determine the preemptive reach of the Medical Device Amendments ("MDA"). This article explores the repercussions of Medtronic and argues that Congress' use of words like "requirements" in regulatory statutes should be seen as references to positive state law only, and should not be read, absent an explicit command by Congress, to subsume state law …