Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (410)
- University of Michigan Law School (326)
- Seattle University School of Law (252)
- University of Colorado Law School (185)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
-
- UIC School of Law (124)
- University of Kentucky (73)
- Cleveland State University (62)
- Florida State University College of Law (55)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (48)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (41)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (41)
- Roger Williams University (36)
- William & Mary Law School (36)
- Pepperdine University (33)
- Brooklyn Law School (32)
- University of Richmond (30)
- University of Washington School of Law (30)
- University of Georgia School of Law (29)
- West Virginia University (29)
- St. Mary's University (28)
- DePaul University (26)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (25)
- American University Washington College of Law (24)
- Pace University (24)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (23)
- BLR (22)
- Duke Law (22)
- Notre Dame Law School (22)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (275)
- Supreme Court (175)
- Federal (166)
- State (153)
- New York (145)
-
- Constitutional law (125)
- United states constitution (123)
- Federalism (120)
- Constitutional Law (111)
- New york constitution (103)
- Due process (100)
- Appellate Division (94)
- Court of Appeals (82)
- Defendant (68)
- United States (64)
- § 6 (61)
- State constitutions (60)
- United States Supreme Court (60)
- 1990) (58)
- 1991) (56)
- Equal protection (55)
- Court of appeals (52)
- Congress (50)
- 1992) (47)
- California (47)
- Colorado (47)
- § 1 (47)
- First Amendment (45)
- Fourteenth Amendment (45)
- Court (44)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (400)
- Michigan Law Review (257)
- Seattle University Law Review (248)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (113)
-
- Publications (65)
- Faculty Scholarship (64)
- Kentucky Law Journal (62)
- Articles (52)
- Cleveland State Law Review (48)
- Florida State University Law Review (47)
- University of Richmond Law Review (30)
- Northwestern University Law Review (28)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- West Virginia Law Review (28)
- Pepperdine Law Review (27)
- Scholarly Works (27)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (26)
- Washington Law Review (25)
- Indiana Law Journal (24)
- Faculty Publications (22)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (22)
- ExpressO (21)
- Journal Articles (21)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (21)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (21)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Cardozo Law Review (19)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (17)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1891 - 1920 of 2715
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Between Scylla And Charybdis: Growth Management Act Implementation That Avoids Takings And Substantive Due Process Limitations, Jeffrey M. Eustis
Between Scylla And Charybdis: Growth Management Act Implementation That Avoids Takings And Substantive Due Process Limitations, Jeffrey M. Eustis
Seattle University Law Review
This Article begins with an overview of the GMA. It then proceeds with a summary of recent case law under the Takings Clause and substantive due process doctrine. After laying this groundwork, this Article focuses on four particular areas of growth management control and explores how local legislation implementing these areas of control would be analyzed under the Takings Clause and substantive due process. These four areas of land use regulation include: critical area protections, resource land designations, development phasing requirements for concurrency and urban growth areas, and impact fees for public facilities and services. This Article then concludes with …
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Disagreement And Interpretation, Robert F. Nagel
A Defense Of Prostitutes' Self-Organization, Drucilla Cornell
A Defense Of Prostitutes' Self-Organization, Drucilla Cornell
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article advocates for the decriminalization of prostitution as a necessary step toward empowering sex workers to self-organize and improve their working conditions. Drawing on personal experiences as a union organizer in the 1970s, the author highlights the shared struggles of women workers, including prostitutes, under exploitative capitalist systems. The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing prostitutes as workers deserving of labor rights and union representation, rather than viewing them solely as victims. It critiques the exclusion of sex workers from traditional labor organizing and argues that decriminalization would enable them to collectively address their exploitation and deconstruct oppressive conditions.
Peremptory Challenges: Free Strikes No More, H. Patrick Furman
Peremptory Challenges: Free Strikes No More, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Ackerman's Proposal For Popular Constitutional Lawmaking: Can It Realize His Aspirations For Dualist Democracy?, Philip J. Weiser
Ackerman's Proposal For Popular Constitutional Lawmaking: Can It Realize His Aspirations For Dualist Democracy?, Philip J. Weiser
Publications
No abstract provided.
What States Owe Outsiders, Matthew D. Adler
Dashed "Investment-Backed" Expectations: Will The Constitution Protect Property Owners From Excesses In Implementation Of The Growth Management Act?, Elaine Spencer
Seattle University Law Review
Section I briefly discusses the basic principles of takings law as enunciated by prior cases, as well as the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, and the Washington Supreme Court's recent decisions in Sintra, Inc. v. Seattle and Robinson v. Seattle. Although the Lucas decision has received considerable publicity, it advanced the state of the law rather little. The real guidance for future decisions arising out of the GMA will come from earlier United States Supreme Court decisions and the Washington Supreme Court's decisions in Sintra, Robinson, and Lutheran …
Washington Constitution Article 1, Section 7: The Argument For Broader Protection Against Employer Drug Testing, Ken Davis
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will analyze Article 1, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution, the search and seizure provision, and conclude that this provision should be construed to provide greater protection to employees against employer drug testing absent individualized suspicion than the Fourth Amendment does. The scope of this Comment, however, is limited to the rights of state employees with respect to suspicionless drug testing. The rights of federal employees are not included in this analysis because they are protected against suspicionless drug testing only by the Fourth Amendment, not by the analogous Washington provision. Moreover, Article 1, Section 7, like the …
Are Laws Against Assisted Suicide Unconstitutional?, Yale Kamisar
Are Laws Against Assisted Suicide Unconstitutional?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
On 15 February of this year, shortly after the number of people Dr. Jack Kevorkian had helped to commit suicide swelled to fifteen, the Michigan legislature passed a law, effective that very day, making assisted suicide a felony punishable by up to four years in prison. The law, which is automatically repealed six months after a newly established commission on death and dying recommends permanent legislation, prohibits anyone with knowledge that another person intends to commit suicide from "intentionally providing the physical means" by which the other person does so or from "intentionally participat[ing] in a physical act" by which …
Defendants' Brief In The School Finance Case: Mcduffy V. Robertson: An Excerpt And A Summary, Douglas H. Wilkins, Robert H. Blumenthal, Mary Connaughton
Defendants' Brief In The School Finance Case: Mcduffy V. Robertson: An Excerpt And A Summary, Douglas H. Wilkins, Robert H. Blumenthal, Mary Connaughton
Faculty Scholarship
The wisdom of promoting public education in the Commonwealth was recognized by the earliest settlers, the framers of the Constitution, and many subsequent legislatures, officials, educators and citizens. The opinions of the Department, the Secretary of Education, the Governor and various educators, contained in the stipulation, demonstrate that a policy of supporting public education is as important today as ever.2
The implementation of this policy goal by the Legislature and municipalities involves choices that are at the heart of representative government: how much public money to raise, how best to allocate the money among education and the many other …
A Failed Critique Of State Constitutionalism, David Schuman
A Failed Critique Of State Constitutionalism, David Schuman
Michigan Law Review
James A. Gardner begins The Failed Discourse of State Constitutionalism with a story describing "the experience of a great many lawyers in this country." The protagonist is an attorney whose client has an unlawful discrimination claim that for some reason cannot succeed under the U.S. Supreme Court's current equal protection jurisprudence. The attorney decides to present an argument based on her state constitution's equality guarantee, only to discover that the universe of material from which a plausible argument, not to mention a rich discourse, might emerge - existing case law and scholarship, "useful tidbits" of constitutional history and philosophy from …
Legal Interpretation And A Constitutional Case: Home Building & Loan Association V. Blaisdell, Charles A. Bieneman
Legal Interpretation And A Constitutional Case: Home Building & Loan Association V. Blaisdell, Charles A. Bieneman
Michigan Law Review
The approaches of Hughes and Sutherland are but two extremes in constitutional interpretation. Though only two results were possible in the case - either the Act was constitutional or it was not - there are more than two methods by which an interpreter could reach those results. This Note explores possible ways of deciding Blaisdell, using the case as a vehicle for delimiting the boundaries of a positive constitutional command. As a sort of empirical investigation of legal philosophy, the Note examines how various interpretive theories affect an interpreter's approach to the case, and the results these theories might …