Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (256)
- University of Michigan Law School (226)
- Universitas Indonesia (127)
- University of Colorado Law School (125)
- UIC School of Law (120)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (99)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (83)
- Georgetown University Law Center (61)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (59)
- Brooklyn Law School (48)
- BLR (42)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (41)
- Pepperdine University (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (28)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- St. John's University School of Law (21)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Fordham Law School (19)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (19)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (15)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (14)
- Columbia Law School (13)
- West Virginia University (13)
- Barry University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (166)
- Congress (142)
- Constitution (123)
- Constitutional Law (113)
- Supreme Court (81)
-
- United States Supreme Court (75)
- Constitutional law (67)
- Federalism (62)
- Separation of powers (61)
- First Amendment (59)
- Statutory interpretation (59)
- Judicial review (52)
- United States (42)
- Due process (41)
- Commerce Clause (38)
- Fifth Amendment (38)
- Jurisprudence (37)
- Law (35)
- Regulation (35)
- History (31)
- Law and Society (30)
- Politics (30)
- Public lands (30)
- Courts (29)
- Public land law (27)
- Constitutionality (26)
- United states constitution (24)
- Colorado (23)
- Discrimination (23)
- Administrative law (22)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Michigan Law Review (141)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (118)
- Faculty Scholarship (64)
-
- Articles (59)
- Touro Law Review (57)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (52)
- Publications (42)
- ExpressO (41)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (37)
- Indiana Law Journal (31)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (28)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- University of Richmond Law Review (20)
- Scholarly Works (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (16)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (15)
- Journal of Law and Policy (14)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (13)
- Journal of Legislation (13)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1291 - 1320 of 1935
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Constitutional Law—Separation Of Powers—Restoring The Constitutional Formula To The Federal Judicial Appointment Process: Taking The Vice Out Of "Advice And Consent", Jason Eric Sharp
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Which One Of You Did It?” Criminal Liability For “Causing Or Allowing” The Death Of A Child, Lissa Griffin
“Which One Of You Did It?” Criminal Liability For “Causing Or Allowing” The Death Of A Child, Lissa Griffin
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
The Needle And The Damage Done: How Hoffman Plastics Promotes Sweatshops And Illegal Immigration And What To Do About It , Jennifer S. Berman
The Needle And The Damage Done: How Hoffman Plastics Promotes Sweatshops And Illegal Immigration And What To Do About It , Jennifer S. Berman
ExpressO
This paper examines the intersection of immigration and labor law as developed in federal law, culminating in the recent Supreme Court case, Hoffman Plastics. Arguing that Hoffman was wrongly decided, the paper further demonstrates that stronger penalties are necessary under the NLRA to deter employer wrongdoing, protect workers’ rights, and slow the proliferation of sweatshops.
The Role Of Purposivism In The Delegation Of Rulemaking Authority To The Courts, Michael Rosensaft
The Role Of Purposivism In The Delegation Of Rulemaking Authority To The Courts, Michael Rosensaft
ExpressO
The courts are often used by Congress as a “political lightning rod,” when Congress cannot decide how to resolve an issue. Congress relies on administrative agencies for their expertise, and it also makes sense for Congress to delegate some rulemaking authority to the courts, relying on a court’s expertise in developing caselaw in an incremental basis. However, this authority should not be lightly implied. A court can tell that Congress has delegated rulemaking authority to it when the purpose of the statute is clear and the text is broadly worded. It thus makes sense in these cases that purposivism should …
The Democratic Public Domain: Reconnecting The Modern First Amendment And The Original Progress Clause (A.K.A. Copyright And Patent Clause), Malla Pollack
ExpressO
If the Progress Clause, a.k.a. the Patent and Copyright Clause, of the U.S. Constitution had been construed when its original meaning was still obvious, United States law would be far different. In this area at least, the Drafters’ Constitution was much less aristocratic than the modern (mis)reading. The original meaning of the Progress Clause, furthermore, should have stimulated a more communitarian First Amendment, the type of First Amendment currently being suggested by leading First Amendment scholars such as Jack Balkin.
Anatomy Of The Federal Litigation: Challenging The Legislature's Actions In The Wake Of Guinn V. Legislature, John C. Eastman
Anatomy Of The Federal Litigation: Challenging The Legislature's Actions In The Wake Of Guinn V. Legislature, John C. Eastman
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Future Of Guinn V. Legislature, Troy L. Atkinson
The Future Of Guinn V. Legislature, Troy L. Atkinson
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tax Legislation And Democratic Discourse: The Rhetoric Of Revenue And Politics, Leo P. Martinez
Tax Legislation And Democratic Discourse: The Rhetoric Of Revenue And Politics, Leo P. Martinez
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Marbury V. Madison As The First Great Administrative Law Decision, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 481 (2004), Thomas W. Merrill
Marbury V. Madison As The First Great Administrative Law Decision, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 481 (2004), Thomas W. Merrill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Leave Policies Trump States Rights: Nevada Department Of Human Resources V. Hibbs And Its Impact Of Sovereign Immunity Jurisprudence, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 599 (2004), Jana L. Tibben
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Domestic Security Enhancement Act Of 2003: A Glimpse Into A Post-Patriot Act Approach To Combating Domestic Terrorism, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2004), Timothy Scahill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remaining Silent: A Right With Consequences, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 649 (2004), Jeffrey D. Waltuck
Remaining Silent: A Right With Consequences, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 649 (2004), Jeffrey D. Waltuck
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Permitted But Not Intended: Boub V. Township Of Wayne, Municipal Tort Immunity In Illinois, And The Right To Local Travel, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 545 (2004), Bruce Epperson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 523 (2004), Mark Tushnet
Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 523 (2004), Mark Tushnet
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Most Rational Branch: Guinn V. Legislature And The Judiciary's Role As Helpful Arbiter Of Conflict, Jeffrey W. Stempel
The Most Rational Branch: Guinn V. Legislature And The Judiciary's Role As Helpful Arbiter Of Conflict, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
When the Nevada Supreme Court decided Guinn v. Legislature, one would have thought from reading the popular press accounts that the court had forcibly displaced the State legislature by means of a violent coup d'etat. Newspaper accounts of the decision referred to it as a usurpation of power in violation of clear constitutional language, belittling the court in language sometimes more appropriate to the baseball bleachers than to serious editorial commentary. Following suit, politicized elements of the citizenry began a recall effort (seemingly unsuccessful as of this writing) directed at the court as well as joining the chorus of criticisms. …
Loose Not The Floodgates, Benjamin J. Cooper
Loose Not The Floodgates, Benjamin J. Cooper
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article examines the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which struck down sodomy laws, arguing that while the ruling was necessary, it raises concerns about the broader regulation of sexual conduct outside marriage. The author contends that such laws, despite rare enforcement, serve societal functions, including protecting marriage and providing moral boundaries that deter harmful behavior, particularly among young people.
Challenging Dissent: The Ontology And Logic Of Lawrence V. Texas, Jami Weinstein, Tobyn Demarco
Challenging Dissent: The Ontology And Logic Of Lawrence V. Texas, Jami Weinstein, Tobyn Demarco
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article examines the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which invalidated a Texas antisodomy statute criminalizing homosexual conduct. The Court held that the statute failed rational basis review and rejected the promotion of majoritarian sexual morality as a legitimate state interest. The decision reflects a broader recognition of the fundamental right to make autonomous, private, consensual, adult sexual choices. The analysis critiques Justice Scalia's dissent, arguing that his fears about the end of morals legislation are unfounded and that laws based solely on moral disapproval lack a rational basis.
Constitutional Law: Beyond The Bounds Of Roe: Does Stenberg V. Carhart Invalidate The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act Of 2003, Scott A. Hodges
Constitutional Law: Beyond The Bounds Of Roe: Does Stenberg V. Carhart Invalidate The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act Of 2003, Scott A. Hodges
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Decisions - 2002 Term, Joel Gora
First Amendment Decisions - 2002 Term, Joel Gora
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Response To State Action And A New Birth Of Freedom, Robin West
Response To State Action And A New Birth Of Freedom, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
I have just a few comments. The first comment is a contribution to the ''analytic" question posed by Professor Black's work and made explicit by Professors Peller and Tushnet's paper. To make the case for the constitutional status of welfare rights, I do not think it is sufficient-although it may well be necessary-to show that the "state action" problem is merely a pseudo-problem, whatever the reason for finding it not to be a problem. I do not agree with one of the claims put forward by Peller and Tushnet,' that Black's perceptive analysis of the state action problem in his …
Rethinking Article I, Section I: From Nondelegation To Exclusive Delegation, Thomas W. Merrill
Rethinking Article I, Section I: From Nondelegation To Exclusive Delegation, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
The first substantive clause of the Constitution – providing that "[all legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress" – is associated with two postulates about the allocation of legislative power. The first is the nondelegation doctrine, which says that Congress may not delegate legislative power. The second is the exclusive delegation doctrine, which says that only Congress may delegate legislative power. This Article explores the textual, historical, and judicial support for these two readings of Article I, Section 1, as well as the practical consequences of starting from one postulate as opposed to the other. The Article …
Progressivist Origins Of The 2003 California Gubernatorial Recall, Kira L. Klatchko
Progressivist Origins Of The 2003 California Gubernatorial Recall, Kira L. Klatchko
ExpressO
Progressivist Origins of the 2003 California Gubernatorial Recall, was written in Sacramento in the midst of the first statewide recall of an elected official in California. The paper explores the nature of the recall procedure and its implementation in the state, and is chiefly an inquiry into the relatedness of the current incarnation and its Progressivist root. It focuses particularly on the recall of Governor Gray Davis, and details how shifting attitudes towards public participation have altered the procedure over time.
Say Cheese: The Constitutionality Of State-Mandated Airtime On Public Broadcasting Stations In Wisconsin, Andrew D. Cotlar
Say Cheese: The Constitutionality Of State-Mandated Airtime On Public Broadcasting Stations In Wisconsin, Andrew D. Cotlar
Federal Communications Law Journal
Last year, the State of Wisconsin passed legislation which would require statechartered public broadcasting television networks to carry political advertising for candidates free of charge. In this article, Andrew Cotlar raises many concerns about the wisdom of such legislation and the impact this trend may have on public broadcasters throughout the nation. The author begins by analyzing the current position of the law on political access requirements, at both federal and state levels, and then argues that the public television stations should continue to be free to exercise substantial editorial discretion. The Article proceeds to critique the Wisconsin statute as …
Telric Vs. Universal Service: A Takings Violation?, Stuart Buck
Telric Vs. Universal Service: A Takings Violation?, Stuart Buck
Federal Communications Law Journal
While the Telecommunications Act of 1996 has had a profound positive impact on many sectors of the communications industry in the United States, local phone companies have recently faced a serious dilemma under a provision of the Act known as TELRIC. In this article, Stuart Buck presents a current analysis of the position of the telephone company and its struggle to meet costs under the TELRIC structure. The author argues that by forcing regional phone operators to grant wholesale pricing to competitors under TELRIC, while simultaneously maintaining Universal Service requirements of reduced-rate phone access to remote customers, the local phone …
Eldred's Aftermath: Tradition, The Copyright Clause, And The Constitutionalization Of Fair Use, Stephen M. Mcjohn
Eldred's Aftermath: Tradition, The Copyright Clause, And The Constitutionalization Of Fair Use, Stephen M. Mcjohn
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Eldred v. Ashcroft offered the Supreme Court broad issues about the scope of Congress's constitutional power to legislate in the area of intellectual property. In 1998, Congress added twenty years to the term of all copyrights, both existing and future copyrights. But for this term extension, works created during the 1920s and 1930s would be entering the public domain. Now such works will remain under copyright until 2018 and beyond. Eldred v. Ashcroft rejected two challenges to the constitutionality of the copyright extension. The first challenge contended that Congress had exceeded its power to grant copyrights for "limited Times" in …
In The Name Of National Security Or Insecurity?: The Potential Indefinite Detention Of Non-Citizen Certified Terrorists In The United States And The United Kingdom In The Aftermath Of September 11, 2001, Dana L. Keith
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Moral Rights, Judicial Review, And Democracy: A Response To Horacio Spector, Laura S. Underkuffler
Moral Rights, Judicial Review, And Democracy: A Response To Horacio Spector, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Mofaz V. Chairman Of The Central Elections Committee For The Sixteenth Knesset, Eliahu Mazza, Jacob Turkel, Aharon Barak, Ayala Procaccia, Dorit Beinisch, Dalia Dorner, Edmond E. Levy, Eliezer Rivlin, Izhak Englard, Shlomo Levin, Tova Strasberg-Cohen
Mofaz V. Chairman Of The Central Elections Committee For The Sixteenth Knesset, Eliahu Mazza, Jacob Turkel, Aharon Barak, Ayala Procaccia, Dorit Beinisch, Dalia Dorner, Edmond E. Levy, Eliezer Rivlin, Izhak Englard, Shlomo Levin, Tova Strasberg-Cohen
Translated Opinions
Facts: Petitioner 1, who served as Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, was included on the list of candidates submitted by petitioner 2 for elections to the Knesset. The Chairman of the Central Elections Committee determined that petitioner was ineligible to present his candidacy. Israeli law provided for a cooling off period—a certain amount of time had to pass from a candidate’s discharge from the army or civil service and the time he presented his candidacy. The Chairman determined that petitioner had not met the requirements of the applicable cooling-off period. Petitioners appealed this decision. They asserted that …
Avoiding Slim Reasoning And Shady Results: A Proposal For Indecency And Obscenity Regulation In Radio And Broadcast Television, Jacob T. Rigney
Avoiding Slim Reasoning And Shady Results: A Proposal For Indecency And Obscenity Regulation In Radio And Broadcast Television, Jacob T. Rigney
Federal Communications Law Journal
This Note explores the relevant law regarding the issue of indecency and obscenity in broadcast, with particular focus on a 2001 Policy Statement released by the FCC. The Author examines the major problems with the regulatory scheme as it now exists, and offers an alternative. The Author concludes by arguing that leaving the subjective decisions regarding indecency to market forces, leaving parents to determine what should or should not be indecent, and leaving the FCC free to pursue obscenity with greater zeal is the most appropriate course of action for the future.