Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (154)
- UIC School of Law (140)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (126)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (92)
- University of Michigan Law School (85)
- BLR (71)
- American University Washington College of Law (65)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (56)
- University of Colorado Law School (54)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (43)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (39)
- University of Georgia School of Law (36)
- Duke Law (35)
- Brooklyn Law School (34)
- Pepperdine University (33)
- Notre Dame Law School (32)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (29)
- Liberty University (27)
- Fordham Law School (26)
- The University of Akron (26)
- Barry University School of Law (25)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (24)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (24)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (22)
- Cleveland State University (21)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (21)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (20)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (297)
- Constitutional Law (198)
- Constitutional law (190)
- Constitution (173)
- Supreme Court (146)
-
- First Amendment (83)
- Judicial review (67)
- United States Supreme Court (61)
- Originalism (60)
- Judges (57)
- Federal (56)
- State (56)
- Federalism (53)
- Courts (52)
- Constitutional interpretation (51)
- New York (47)
- Fourteenth Amendment (46)
- Due process (43)
- Law (41)
- Legal History (41)
- Legislation (41)
- Separation of powers (41)
- Law and Society (40)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (36)
- Defendant (34)
- Court of Appeals (31)
- Interpretation (31)
- 1990) (30)
- Equal protection (30)
- Textualism (30)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- UIC Law Review (138)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Faculty Scholarship (119)
- Touro Law Review (108)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (94)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (90)
- ExpressO (69)
- Michigan Law Review (64)
- Publications (54)
- Articles (47)
- Northwestern University Law Review (45)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (43)
- American University Law Review (31)
- Scholarly Works (31)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Akron Law Review (25)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (24)
- Barry Law Review (21)
- Arkansas Law Review (20)
- Working Paper Series (19)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (18)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (17)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (17)
- Brooklyn Law Review (16)
- Catholic University Law Review (16)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Journal Articles (15)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1711 - 1740 of 2125
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Cracking The Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, And Self-Sufficiency, Martha Albertson Fineman
Cracking The Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, And Self-Sufficiency, Martha Albertson Fineman
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Foreward, Adrienne D. Davis, Joan C. Williams
Foreward, Adrienne D. Davis, Joan C. Williams
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Travelers, Reasoned Textualism, And The New Jurisprudence Of Erisa Preemption, Edward A. Zelinsky
Travelers, Reasoned Textualism, And The New Jurisprudence Of Erisa Preemption, Edward A. Zelinsky
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Much Fuel To Add To The Fire Of Genius? Some Questions About The Repair/Reconstruction Distinction In Patent Law , Arthur J. Gajarsa, Evelyn Mary Aswad, Joseph S. Cianfrani
How Much Fuel To Add To The Fire Of Genius? Some Questions About The Repair/Reconstruction Distinction In Patent Law , Arthur J. Gajarsa, Evelyn Mary Aswad, Joseph S. Cianfrani
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Democracy-Forcing Constitution, Neal Devins
The Democracy-Forcing Constitution, Neal Devins
Michigan Law Review
During my freshman year in college, I was told not to judge a book by its cover. The book in question - Lolita; the cover suggested something quite salacious. My professor explained that a soldier, who had purchased Lolita to work out some of the kinks of military life, found himself tossing the book out, proclaiming in disgust "Literature!" Well, I cannot claim precisely the same reaction to Cass Sunstein's One Case at a Time (my expectations were lower than the soldier's). Nevertheless, for those expecting a lefty defense of judicial restraint, One Case at a Time is not your …
Follow A Rule/Follow A Rhythm: Sharing Practice In A Gitano Quarter In Jerez, Andalucia, Susan G. Drummond, Jean-Marc Sellen
Follow A Rule/Follow A Rhythm: Sharing Practice In A Gitano Quarter In Jerez, Andalucia, Susan G. Drummond, Jean-Marc Sellen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appendix: Biographies Of Participants , American University Law Review
Appendix: Biographies Of Participants , American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Progressive Constitutionalism Possible?, Robin West
Is Progressive Constitutionalism Possible?, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Progressivism is in part a particular moral and political response to the sadness of lesser lives, lives unnecessarily diminished by economic, psychic and physical insecurity in the midst of a society or world that offers plenty. This insecurity is unjust and should end; the suffering should be alleviated, and those lives should be enriched. To do so must be one of the goals of a morally just or justifiable state. Not all suffering and not all lesser lives, of course, give rise to such a response. The suffering attendant to accident, disease, war and happenstance is neither entirely chargeable to …
Transcript: Responses To The Debate On Whether Congress Must End The Disenfranchisement Of The District Of Columbia , American University Law Review
Transcript: Responses To The Debate On Whether Congress Must End The Disenfranchisement Of The District Of Columbia , American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Benjamin Cardozo On The Supreme Court, Andrew L. Kaufman
Benjamin Cardozo On The Supreme Court, Andrew L. Kaufman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transcript: Welcome Address, American University Law Review
Transcript: Welcome Address, American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transcript: What Makes The District An Anomaly? , American University Law Review
Transcript: What Makes The District An Anomaly? , American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transcript: Must Congress End The Disenfranchisement Of The District Of Columbia? A Constitutional Debate , American University Law Review
Transcript: Must Congress End The Disenfranchisement Of The District Of Columbia? A Constitutional Debate , American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transcript: The Nature Of The American Constitution: Is There A Constitutional Right To Vote And Be Represented? , American University Law Review
Transcript: The Nature Of The American Constitution: Is There A Constitutional Right To Vote And Be Represented? , American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transcript: Keynote Address , American University Law Review
Transcript: Keynote Address , American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supermajority Rules As A Constitutional Solution, John O. Mcginnis, Michael B. Rappaport
Supermajority Rules As A Constitutional Solution, John O. Mcginnis, Michael B. Rappaport
Articles
No abstract provided.
From Enemies Of The Crown To Regional Telephone Companies: Bills Of Attainder Reappraised, Michael L. Landsman
From Enemies Of The Crown To Regional Telephone Companies: Bills Of Attainder Reappraised, Michael L. Landsman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Too Much (Legislation) Is Never Enough: Utilizing A Court's Equity Power To Enjoin Lawful Firearm Sales, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1225 (1999), Edward G. Renner
Too Much (Legislation) Is Never Enough: Utilizing A Court's Equity Power To Enjoin Lawful Firearm Sales, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1225 (1999), Edward G. Renner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Understanding The Limits Of Power: Judicial Restraint In General Jurisdiction Court Systems, Justice Philip A. Talmadge
Understanding The Limits Of Power: Judicial Restraint In General Jurisdiction Court Systems, Justice Philip A. Talmadge
Seattle University Law Review
This Article draws on my legislative and judicial background to focus both on the tendency of the courts to exceed their core constitutional role and the implications of such judicial activism. This article contend that modern courts of general jurisdiction are too often embroiled in sociopolitical controversies best left to the political branches of government. Part I addresses the concept of judicial restraint in our constitutional system and the need to define the core powers of the judicial branch of government. Part II discusses principles of judicial restraint in the federal courts. Part III, using the example of Washington State …
Licensed To Steal: Has Sovereign Immunity Gone Too Far, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 779 (1999), Sulaiman M. Qazi
Licensed To Steal: Has Sovereign Immunity Gone Too Far, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 779 (1999), Sulaiman M. Qazi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Spending Clause? - (Or The President's Paramour): An Examination Of The Views Of Hamilton, Madison, And Story On Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Of The United States Constitution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (1999), Jeffrey T. Renz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Boggs V. Boggs: Creating Real-Life Cinderellas, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1999), Heather J. Rose
Boggs V. Boggs: Creating Real-Life Cinderellas, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1999), Heather J. Rose
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
When To Hear The Hearsay: A Proposal For A New Rule Of Evidence Designed To Protect The Constitutional Right Of The Criminally Accused To Confront The Witnesses Against Her, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1287 (1999), Scott A. Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Vertical Separation Of Powers, Victoria Nourse
The Vertical Separation Of Powers, Victoria Nourse
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Standard understandings of the separation of powers begin with the concept of function. The author argues that function alone cannot predict important changes in structural incentives and thus serves as a poor proxy for assessing real risks to governmental structure. To illustrate this point, the article returns to proposals considered at the Constitutional Convention and considers difficult contemporary cases such as Morrison v. Olson, Clinton v. Jones, and the Supreme Court's more recent federalism decisions. In each instance, function appears to steer us wrong because it fails to understand separation of powers questions as ones of structural incentive …
Agency, Equality, And Antidiscrimination Law , Tracy E. Higgins, Laura A. Rosenbury
Agency, Equality, And Antidiscrimination Law , Tracy E. Higgins, Laura A. Rosenbury
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court increasingly has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as a mandate for the state to treat citizens as if they were equal-as a limitation on the state's ability to draw distinctions on the basis of characteristics such as race and, to a lesser extent, gender. In the context of race, the Court has struck down not only race-specific policies designed to harm the historically oppressed, but race conscious policies designed to foster racial equality. Although in theory the Court has left open the possibility that benign uses of race may be constitutional under some set of facts, in …
Delegation As A Danger To Liberty, Nadine Strossen
Delegation As A Danger To Liberty, Nadine Strossen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Praise Of The Efficiency Of Decentralized Traditions And Their Preconditions, John O. Mcginnis
In Praise Of The Efficiency Of Decentralized Traditions And Their Preconditions, John O. Mcginnis
Articles
No abstract provided.