Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (454)
- Seattle University School of Law (197)
- University of Michigan Law School (102)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (48)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (27)
-
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (25)
- Florida State University College of Law (21)
- William & Mary Law School (21)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (20)
- UIC School of Law (17)
- University of Colorado Law School (17)
- Columbia Law School (16)
- Duke Law (15)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (14)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (13)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (13)
- Brooklyn Law School (11)
- Cornell University Law School (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11)
- Notre Dame Law School (11)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (10)
- University of Georgia School of Law (10)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- Cleveland State University (8)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (8)
- Washington University in St. Louis (8)
- Keyword
-
- Elections (75)
- Supreme Court (70)
- Voting Rights Act (56)
- Voting (54)
- Voting rights (54)
-
- Election law (51)
- Shelby County v. Holder (51)
- Right to vote (49)
- Discrimination (47)
- Democracy (46)
- Constitution (44)
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Gerrymandering (39)
- Constitutional law (38)
- VRA (37)
- Civil rights (36)
- Disenfranchisement (35)
- Race (35)
- Election (32)
- Berkeley (31)
- Fifteenth Amendment (31)
- Racial discrimination (31)
- Racism (31)
- Touro (31)
- First Amendment (29)
- Campaign finance (28)
- Election Law (28)
- Preclearance (28)
- Congress (27)
- Redistricting (27)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (448)
- Seattle University Law Review (190)
- Michigan Law Review (71)
- Faculty Scholarship (48)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (34)
-
- Journal Articles (23)
- Articles (21)
- Schmooze 'tickets' (21)
- Publications (17)
- UIC Law Review (17)
- Florida State University Law Review (14)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (14)
- Touro Law Review (13)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (13)
- Faculty Publications (12)
- Oklahoma Law Review (12)
- Northwestern University Law Review (11)
- SAIPAR Case Review (11)
- Scholarly Works (10)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (10)
- Supreme Court Case Files (9)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (8)
- Catholic University Law Review (7)
- Lewis & Clark Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Scholarly Publications (7)
- Cleveland State Law Review (6)
- Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi (6)
- Pace Law Review (6)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1021 - 1050 of 1332
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
The Popular Sovereignty Foundations Of The Right To Vote, Franita Tolson
The Popular Sovereignty Foundations Of The Right To Vote, Franita Tolson
Schmooze 'tickets'
In recent years, courts and commentators have focused on the federalism-based limits on the power of the federal government, with significantly less attention given to similar constraints on state power. It is not surprising, therefore, that both camps have overlooked that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, with their reservation of both rights and power “to the people” contain a popular sovereignty principle that affects the constitutionality of various state election law regulations. This goal of this Article is to reaffirm that the people are, in essence, part of the federalism equation, and not simply as protectors of state power, but …
Are Elections Necessary?, Sanford Levinson
The Roberts-Kennedy Court And Post-Political Democracy, Zephyr Teachout
The Roberts-Kennedy Court And Post-Political Democracy, Zephyr Teachout
Schmooze 'tickets'
This Essay explores the ideological underpinnings of the modern Supreme Court’s election law decisions, arguing that the Court does not have a strong commitment to federalism or to unfettered debate or to the mistrustful citizen. Instead, the opinions reveal a complacency about corruption and a narrow view of the role of citizens. The Essay is part of a volume on neoliberalism for Law and Contemporary Problems.
Transparent Adjudication: Promoting Democratic Dialogue On Judicial Conceptions Of Politics, Bertrall L. Ross Ii
Transparent Adjudication: Promoting Democratic Dialogue On Judicial Conceptions Of Politics, Bertrall L. Ross Ii
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
The Idea Of Democracy In The Early Republic, Keith Whittington
The Idea Of Democracy In The Early Republic, Keith Whittington
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
"Lotteries As An Alternative Selection Method For Representatives", Hélène Landemore
"Lotteries As An Alternative Selection Method For Representatives", Hélène Landemore
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Why Campaign Finance Matters, Prithviraj Datta
Why Campaign Finance Matters, Prithviraj Datta
Schmooze 'tickets'
Due to the combination of a host of factors – among them being the Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United v FEC, the not-entirely-unrelated explosion of Super PACs as a political force in electoral politics, and the tremendous increase in the amounts that candidates and parties have been spending in their campaign efforts – the issue of campaign finance has, once again, rise to prominence in scholarly and public debate. Unsurprisingly, given the highly polarized and divisive political environment in which we live, the debate over campaign finance is characterized by a sharp cleavage of opinion …
Compulsory Voting, Howard Schweber
Abolish Districts, Corinna Barrett Lain
Citizens Derided: Corporate Politics And Religion In The Roberts Court, Jamin Raskin
Citizens Derided: Corporate Politics And Religion In The Roberts Court, Jamin Raskin
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Powers And Rights In Shelby County V. Holder, Corey Brettschneider
Powers And Rights In Shelby County V. Holder, Corey Brettschneider
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Shelby County V. Holder And Preclearance As Legislative Injunction, Henry L. Chambers
Shelby County V. Holder And Preclearance As Legislative Injunction, Henry L. Chambers
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
The Problem Of Voter Fraud, Michael D. Gilbert
The Problem Of Voter Fraud, Michael D. Gilbert
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Toward An Alternative Theory Of Constitutional Design, Emily Zackin, Mila Versteeg
Toward An Alternative Theory Of Constitutional Design, Emily Zackin, Mila Versteeg
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Rethinking The Right To Vote Under State Constitutions, Michael T. Morley
Rethinking The Right To Vote Under State Constitutions, Michael T. Morley
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
The Right To Vote Under State Constitutions, Joshua A. Douglas
The Right To Vote Under State Constitutions, Joshua A. Douglas
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This Article provides the first comprehensive look at state constitutional provisions explicitly granting the right to vote. We hear that the right to vote is "fundamental," the "essence of a democratic society," and "preservative of all rights." But courts and scholars are still searching for a solution to the puzzle of how best to protect voting rights, especially because the U.S. Supreme Court has underenforced the right to vote. The answer, however, is right in front of us: state constitutions. Virtually every state constitution includes direct, explicit language granting the right to vote, as contrasted with the U.S. Constitution, which …
Democratic Capital: A Voting Rights Surge In Washington Could Strengthen The Constitution For Everyone, Jamin B. Raskin
Democratic Capital: A Voting Rights Surge In Washington Could Strengthen The Constitution For Everyone, Jamin B. Raskin
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Three Questions For The Right To Vote Amendment, Richard Briffault
Three Questions For The Right To Vote Amendment, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
Should the United States Constitution be amended to guarantee the right to vote? To the average citizen – and probably many lawyers – this almost certainly would be taken as an absurd question. Most people probably assume that the right to vote is, at least in principle, already guaranteed by the Constitution even if our practices fall short of our ideals. But, in fact, although the Constitution frequently refers to the “right … to vote” – and the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence has long treated voting as a fundamental right – the right to vote per se is nowhere guaranteed. A …
Voting Rights Law And Policy In Transition, Guy-Uriel E. Charles, Luis E. Fuentes-Rohwer
Voting Rights Law And Policy In Transition, Guy-Uriel E. Charles, Luis E. Fuentes-Rohwer
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Election Law's Lochnerian Turn, Ellen D. Katz
Election Law's Lochnerian Turn, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
This panel has been asked to consider whether "the Constitution [is] responsible for electoral dysfunction."' My answer is no. The electoral process undeniably falls well short of our aspirations, but it strikes me that we should look to the Supreme Court for an accounting before blaming the Constitution for the deeply unsatisfactory condition in which we find ourselves.
The Incompatible Treatment Of Majorities In Election Law And Deliberative Democracy, James A. Gardner
The Incompatible Treatment Of Majorities In Election Law And Deliberative Democracy, James A. Gardner
Journal Articles
Deliberative democracy offers a distinctive and appealing conception of political life, but is it one that might be called into service to guide actual reform of existing election law? This possibility seems remote because election law and deliberative democracy are built around different priorities and theoretical premises. A foundational area of disagreement lies in the treatment of majorities. Election law is structured, at both the legislative and constitutional levels, so as to privilege majorities and systematically to magnify their power, whereas deliberative democracy aims at privileging minorities (or at least de-privileging majorities). The main purpose of the election law now …
State Session Freeze Laws—Potential Solution Or Unconstitutional Restriction?, Dru Swaim
State Session Freeze Laws—Potential Solution Or Unconstitutional Restriction?, Dru Swaim
Seattle University Law Review
Since the Citizens United decision in 2010 reduced Congress’s ability to constitutionally regulate money in elections, proponents of campaign finance reform have looked for alternative ways to achieve the goals of greater transparency and reduce the amount of money spent in federal elections. In the three years since Citizens United, the amount of money spent in federal campaigns has increased exponentially. In fact, the total amount of money spent in federal elections has nearly doubled since 2000. Citizens United represents a serious blow to the traditional methods used to restrict the amount of money in politics: limitations on the amounts …
Democracy And The Right To Vote: Rethinking Democratic Rights Under The Charter, Yasmin Dawood
Democracy And The Right To Vote: Rethinking Democratic Rights Under The Charter, Yasmin Dawood
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
This article addresses the Supreme Court of Canada’s theory of democracy and the right to vote. After setting forth the Court’s general approach to democracy, I develop a new conceptual framework for the Court’s approach to democratic rights. First, I argue that the Court has adopted a “bundle of democratic rights” approach to the right to vote. By this I mean that the Court has interpreted the right to vote as consisting of multiple democratic rights, each of which is concerned with a particular facet of democratic governance. Second, I claim that the democratic rights recognized by the Court are …
The "Nixon Sabotage": The Political Origins Of The Equal Protection Challenge To The Voting Rights Act, Danieli Evans
The "Nixon Sabotage": The Political Origins Of The Equal Protection Challenge To The Voting Rights Act, Danieli Evans
Articles
Critics of the Voting Rights Act argue that the anti-discrimination law requires states to engage in unconstitutional discrimination, as state decisionmakers must be conscious of race in order to ensure that voting policies do not weaken minority representation. This argument relies on the idea that subjective racial motivation is the essence of unconstitutional discrimination (even if benevolent, or to promote racial inclusion). The conventional understanding among constitutional scholars is that this “search for the bigoted decisionmaker” developed in employment and housing discrimination decisions between 1976 and 1979. Previous accounts have not recognized the role that the 1971 school desegregation decision …
Defining Corruption And Constitutionalizing Democracy, Deborah Hellman
Defining Corruption And Constitutionalizing Democracy, Deborah Hellman
Michigan Law Review
The central front in the battle over campaign finance laws is the definition of corruption. The Supreme Court has allowed restrictions on the giving and spending of money in connection with elections only when they serve to avoid corruption or the appearance of corruption. The constitutionality of such laws, therefore, depends on how the Court defines corruption. Over the years, campaign finance cases have conceived of corruption in both broad and narrow terms, with the most recent cases defining it especially narrowly. While supporters and critics of campaign finance laws have argued for and against these different formulations, both sides …
Section 501(C)(4) Advocacy Organizations: Political Candidate-Related And Other Partisan Activities In Furtherance Of The Social Welfare, Terence Dougherty
Section 501(C)(4) Advocacy Organizations: Political Candidate-Related And Other Partisan Activities In Furtherance Of The Social Welfare, Terence Dougherty
Seattle University Law Review
In the wake of the 2012 presidential election, tax and political law lawyers are left with a number of unanswered questions concerning the political activities of tax-exempt organizations. Despite the importance of these questions, there are striking gaps in the authority of federal tax law governing the conduct of political candidate and other partisan-related activities by tax-exempt organizations. Assuming activities in furtherance of partisan interests are activities that support private interests, I consider what this authority may tell us about the permissibility of Section 501(c)(4) organizations engaging in partisan political activities and having as a constitutive purpose a partisan political …
Bush V. Gore: What Happened, And What Does The Supreme Court's New Equal Protection Standard Mean For State Election Officials?, Michael Louis Newman
Bush V. Gore: What Happened, And What Does The Supreme Court's New Equal Protection Standard Mean For State Election Officials?, Michael Louis Newman
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Post Citizen United: The Lack Of Political Accountability And Rise Of Voter Suppression In A Time Of Newly Defined Corruption, Hannah S. Fullerton
Post Citizen United: The Lack Of Political Accountability And Rise Of Voter Suppression In A Time Of Newly Defined Corruption, Hannah S. Fullerton
Scripps Senior Theses
In 2010, our definition of democracy in America was drastically changed by the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC. The Court ruled that under the First Amendment, corporations have the right to free speech. The decision removed the final ban on corporations, which prohibited corporate money used for direct advocacy. The consequences of this have been tremendous. The decision has allowed for the creation and rise of Super PACs and political active nonprofits. As a result, Super PACs and nonprofits now act as “shadow campaigns”. Outside groups have the ability to engage in voter suppression tactics without politically hurting …
Buying A Judicial Seat For Appeal: Caperton V. A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc., Is Right Out Of A John Grisham Novel, Richard Gillespie
Buying A Judicial Seat For Appeal: Caperton V. A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc., Is Right Out Of A John Grisham Novel, Richard Gillespie
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Circumventing The Electoral College: Why The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact Survives Constitutional Scrutiny Under The Compact Clause, Michael Brody
Legislation and Policy Brief
It’s Election Night 2016. Brian Williams stands by at NBC, waiting to give the first returns of the night. “Kentucky to Christie,” Williams triumphantly announces to kick off the evening’s festivities. Kentucky turns flush red on NBC’s virtual election map. Williams continues: “Maryland to Clinton.” Now comes the hard part for Williams. Clinton won Maryland by an incredible two-to-one margin. NBC viewers intently watch the map, expecting to see the Old Line State turn blue. Instead, Maryland sits idly in its static grey color. This election has something new.
Confused NBC viewers keep watching, waiting for Williams to provide an …