Constitutional Law Commons^™

The Grand Jury As The New Inquisition, Michael E. Tigar, Madeline R. Levy

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Legal Controversy As It Relates To Correctional Institutions - A Prison Administrator's View, Joseph R. Brierley

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Prisoners' Rights And The Correctional Scheme: The Legal Controversy And Problems Of Implementation, Joseph R. Brierley, Victor Rabinowitz, Edmund B. Spaeth Jr., James D. Crawford

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Prisoner's Rights And The Correctional Scheme: The Legal Controversy And Problems Of Implementation - A Symposium - Introduction, Donald W. Dowd

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Chamber V. Maroney: New Dimensions In The Law Of Search And Seizure, Stephen H. Paul

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Secret Foreign Bank Account And Legitimate Alternatives, Charles W. Adams

Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works

The author, a member of the California State Bar and consultant, Euro-Dutch Trust Company, George Town, Grand Cayman, B. W. I., labels the use of the secret foreign bank account "foolish and lazy." He suggests that the taxpayer can reduce his tax bite through tax deferral planning, an area in which legislation has been continued and expanded.

The Role Of Abandonment In The Law Of Search And Seizure: An Application Of Misdirected Emphasis, Edward G. Mascolo

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Prison Reform In The Future - The Trend Toward Expansion Of Prisoners' Rights, Monrad G. Paulsen

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Warrantless Searches And Seizures, Mack Allen Player

Scholarly Works

The fourth amendment to the Constitution has two basic clauses. The first, the reasonableness clause, protects the people against unreasonable searches and seizures. The second, the warrant clause, sets forth conditions under which a warrant may issue. Searches and seizures made pursuant to a warrant are, quite obviously, governed by the commands of the warrant clause. However, the effect of the warrant clause upon searches and seizures made without warrants is not clear from the amendment itself, and the Supreme Court has failed to develop a consistent interpretation of the proper role of that clause.

The Courts' Responsibility For Prison Reform, Edmund B. Spaeth Jr.

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Prisoners' Rights - A Prosecutor's View, James D. Crawford

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Expansion Of Prisoners' Rights, Victor Rabinowitz

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Correctional Institution As A Rehabilitation Center - A Former Inmate's View, Victor Taylor

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Civil Rights--Personal Injury--Intent to Injure Is Not a Prerequisite to Recovery for Police Abuse Under Section 1983

===============================

Constitutional Law--Abortion--Statute Prohibiting Abortion of Unquickened Fetus Violates Mother's Constitutional Right of Privacy

===============================

Constitutional Law--Obscenity--State Statute Allowing Injunction Against Dissemination of Allegedly Obscene Material Prior to Adversary Hearing Not Violative of First Amendment

===============================

Constitutional Law--Right of Privacy--State Statute Requiring Disclosure of All Substantial Financial Interests of Public Officials is Overbroad and an Unconstitutional Invasion of Privacy

===============================

Constitutional Law--Sixth Amendment--Admission of Prior Inconsistent Statements as Substantive Evidence Does Not Violate Right of Confrontation

===============================

Criminal Procedure--Search and Seizure--Warrantless Search of …

Statutory Presumption Of Illegal Importation Of Cocaine Is Unconstitutional., Ricardo D. Palacios

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Assistance In Addition To Counsel For Indigent Defendants: The Need For, The Lack Of, The Right To, Dennis W. Alexander

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Juveniles And Their Right To A Jury Trial, Timothy E. Foley

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Double Jeopardy--Prosecutions By Both A City And A State For An Identical Offense As A Violation Of The Prohibition Against Double Jeopardy--Waller V. State, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth amendment protection against double jeopardy to the states through the fourteenth amendment. Palko was specifically overruled to the extent that it was inconsistent with the Benton decision. Thus, the theories traditionally used to defend prosecutions by both a city and a state for the same offense must be examined to determine whether they are still valid when the fifth amendment's prohibition against double jeopardy is applied to state proceedings. This Recent Development examines the implications of the Benton decision for those theories.

Constitutional Law—Right To Counsel—Alleged Parole Violator Has Right To Counsel At A Parole Revocation Hearing, S. D. Hester

Buffalo Law Review

People ex rel. Combs v. La Vallee, 29 A.D. 2d 128, 286 N.Y.S.2d 600 (4th Dept. 1968), appeal dismissed, 22 N.Y.2d 857, 293 N.Y.S.2d 117 (1968).

Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena

St. Mary's Law Journal

For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proceedings. The goal of the juvenile court movement was to establish systems of education and protection of errant children, rather than deterrence and retribution. To accomplish these results, the juvenile court was shorn of all resemblance to criminal courts. Public hearings were to be avoided and the intervention of counsel was not required, since the juvenile judge represented both the child and the state. However, it became clear that children were receiving the protection of the state because they engaged in criminal conduct and with little …

The Effect Of Mathis On Right To Counsel In Tax Investigations, Norvie L. Lay

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Bail As A Preferred Freedom And The Failures Of New York's Revision, Neil Fabricant

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law—Denial Of Counsel And Failure To Provide Adequate Warnings Regarding Constitutional Rights Have Important Bearing On Confessions Which Are Tested Under The Totality Of Circumstances., Edwin H. Wolf

Buffalo Law Review

Greenwald v. Wisconsin, 390 U.S. 519 (1968).

Journalistic Media And Fair Trial, William M. Ware, Gerard D. Dimarco

Cleveland State Law Review

The rights of an accused to a fair trial, and freedom of the press, both are fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution. Yet these constitutional guarantees, in collision, present one of the most critical current conflicts in the administration of criminal justice. The problem involves what is presently called "prejudicial news reporting" -news which is prejudicial to the right of the defendant to a fair trial. This paper will try to analyze this conflict, hoping to reach some conclusions which will ultimately aid in the administration of justice without abridging the rights of any parties involved.

Police Warning In Drunk Driver Tests, Richard Galex

Cleveland State Law Review

Recently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor vehicle cases in general. The various state courts are now being called upon to decide the extent of its application and, in particular, whether the Miranda mandate controls in misdemeanor proceedings. This article examines the present status of Miranda in relation to drinking driver traffic offenses as interpreted by the various courts, and the necessity of extending the rule to these offenses.

For A Swifter Criminal Appealto Protect The Public As Well As The Accused, Albert V. Bryan

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Marijuana And The Law: The Constitutional Challenges To Marijuana Laws In Light Of The Social Aspects Of Marijuana Use, Mark S. Dichter

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

'Custodial Interrogation' Within The Meaning Of Miranda, Yale Kamisar

Book Chapters

The primary conceptual hurdle confronting the Miranda Court was the "legal reasoning" that any and all police interrogation is unaffected by the privilege against self-incrimination because such interrogation does not involve any kind of judicial process for the taking of testimony; inasmuch as police officers have no legal authority to compel statements of any kind, there is no legal obligation, ran the argument, to which a privilege can apply. See, e.g., the discussion and authorities collected in Kamisar, A Dissent from the Miranda Dissents: Some Comments on the "New" Fifth Amendment and the Old "Voluntariness" Test, 65 MICH. L. REv. …

The Drinking Driver: An Approach To Solving A Problem Of Underestimated Severity, David A. Scholl

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

No abstract provided.