Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (969)
- Seattle University School of Law (292)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (214)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (207)
- University of Michigan Law School (179)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (175)
- UIC School of Law (100)
- American University Washington College of Law (88)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (82)
- University of Maine School of Law (70)
- BLR (68)
- Roger Williams University (56)
- Florida State University College of Law (52)
- University of Georgia School of Law (48)
- Fordham Law School (46)
- Pepperdine University (42)
- The University of Akron (42)
- Georgetown University Law Center (41)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (41)
- Pace University (40)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (40)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (39)
- West Virginia University (38)
- William & Mary Law School (37)
- Columbia Law School (36)
- Brooklyn Law School (35)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (34)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (31)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (31)
- New York Law School (28)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (287)
- Criminal law (204)
- Criminal Law (179)
- Constitutional law (163)
- Constitution (136)
-
- Fourth Amendment (133)
- Death penalty (130)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (125)
- Supreme Court (124)
- Sixth Amendment (110)
- Due process (108)
- Eighth Amendment (107)
- Evidence (106)
- Fifth Amendment (97)
- Criminal procedure (85)
- Federal (83)
- New York (79)
- Sentencing (79)
- Capital punishment (78)
- Right to counsel (78)
- Criminal Procedure (72)
- Privacy (64)
- Law (62)
- Police (62)
- Due Process (60)
- Fourth amendment (60)
- State (59)
- Defendant (56)
- Punishment (54)
- Criminal (53)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (693)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (253)
- Seattle University Law Review (246)
- Touro Law Review (179)
- Michigan Law Review (131)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (121)
- Supreme Court Case Files (98)
- UIC Law Review (95)
- Cardozo Law Review (75)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (73)
- Maine Law Review (68)
- ExpressO (65)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Articles (50)
- Pepperdine Law Review (41)
- Faculty Publications (40)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (39)
- West Virginia Law Review (38)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (37)
- American University Law Review (36)
- Akron Law Review (34)
- Scholarly Publications (33)
- Fordham Law Review (32)
- Habeas Corpus Committee (30)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (29)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (28)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (27)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (25)
- Buffalo Law Review (23)
- Scholarly Articles (23)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3481 - 3510 of 4033
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Double Jeopardy And The Commonwealth's Right To Writs Of Error In Criminal Cases, Roger D. Scott
Double Jeopardy And The Commonwealth's Right To Writs Of Error In Criminal Cases, Roger D. Scott
University of Richmond Law Review
In the 1986 legislative session, the Virginia General Assembly attempted to produce a constitutional amendment designed to expand the right of Commonwealth's Attorneys to appeal criminal cases. The Virginia Constitution prohibits appeals by the commonwealth in criminal cases in which the accused might be sentenced to death or imprisonment, unless the case involves state revenue. Advocates of an amendment to expand prosecutorial appeals have never fully explained the historical context of the prohibition against such appeals and their complex relationship to other constitutional, statutory, and common law provisions. The subject of prosecutorial appeals involves such fundamental legal issues as former …
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Michigan V. Jackson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Michigan V. Jackson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Bowers V. Hardwick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Bowers V. Hardwick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Thornburgh V. American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Thornburgh V. American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Batson V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Batson V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
California V. Ciraolo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
California V. Ciraolo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
New York V. Class, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Capital Punishment: For Or Against, Jan Gorecki
Capital Punishment: For Or Against, Jan Gorecki
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Death Penalty -- A Debate by Ernest van den Haag and John Conrad
Just And Painful: A Case For The Corporal Punishment Of Criminals, Michigan Law Review
Just And Painful: A Case For The Corporal Punishment Of Criminals, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Just and Painful: A Case for the Corporal Punishment of Criminals by Graeme Newman
Death At Any Cost: A Critique Of The Supreme Court's Recent Retreat From Its Death Penalty Standards, William S. Geimer
Death At Any Cost: A Critique Of The Supreme Court's Recent Retreat From Its Death Penalty Standards, William S. Geimer
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Entrapment, De Lorean And The Undercover Operation: A Constitutional Connection, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 365 (1985), Kevin Hackett O'Neill
Entrapment, De Lorean And The Undercover Operation: A Constitutional Connection, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 365 (1985), Kevin Hackett O'Neill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Washington Search And Seizure Law, Justice Robert F. Utter
Survey Of Washington Search And Seizure Law, Justice Robert F. Utter
Seattle University Law Review
This Survey is designed to assist lawyers and judges who must argue and resolve search and seizure issues in Washington State. The Survey summarizes the controlling state and federal cases on search and seizure law and uses as an additional reference W. LAFAVE, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment (1978). Washington courts are likely to analyze future search and seizure issues under both the fourth amendment and Washington Constitution article I, section 7. The difference in wording between the two provisions is substantial, suggesting different degrees or types of privacy protection. This Survey summarizes the predominant treatment …
Seizing Opportunity, Searching For Theory: Article I, Section 7, George R. Nock
Seizing Opportunity, Searching For Theory: Article I, Section 7, George R. Nock
Seattle University Law Review
Washington case law dealing with searches and seizures has now reached a developmental stage from which it can proceed either haphazardly or along any of several well-defined lines. The purpose of this Article is not to provide a compendium of Washington search-and-seizure cases. Rather, the Article analyzes the more recent (and some of the earlier) cases in which the Washington Supreme Court has interpreted article I, section 7, and suggests several alternative theoretical bases for the further development of Washington constitutional search-and-seizure jurisprudence.
A Constitutional Right To An Appeal: Guarding Against Unacceptable Risks Of Erroneous Conviction, James E. Lobsenz
A Constitutional Right To An Appeal: Guarding Against Unacceptable Risks Of Erroneous Conviction, James E. Lobsenz
Seattle University Law Review
The many consequences of "constitutionalizing" the right to appeal become evident only when one answers certain underlying questions about the nature of an appeal. What are the essential elements of an appeal? Why should we view the criminal defendant's right to appeal as an element of due process of law? Part II of this Article seeks to develop a theoretical due process framework for use in deciding when the right to appeal under article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution has been unconstitutionally abridged or denied. Part III contains an analysis of oral argument as an essential element of …
Executive Targeting Of Congressmen As A Violation Of The Arrest Clause, Anita Bernstein
Executive Targeting Of Congressmen As A Violation Of The Arrest Clause, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Passion is a cogently structured, compel Jingly argued and seductively enthralling masterpiece which, in years to come, will undoubtedly stand out as an inspirational source for many who seek social transformation. Unger's style, in this essay at least, is lucid and inviting. Substantively, Passion demonstrates not only the depth of his penetrating intellect but also his command of an array of' disciplines. Unger's polymathy is all the more impressive when we remember that ours is an era in which idiosyncratic specialization is the norm.
Supreme Court's Treatment Of Open Fields: A Comment On Oliver And Thornton, Barbara Rockhill Edwards
Supreme Court's Treatment Of Open Fields: A Comment On Oliver And Thornton, Barbara Rockhill Edwards
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evitts V. Lucey, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Oregon V. Elstad, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Atascadero State Hospital V. Scanlon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Atascadero State Hospital V. Scanlon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Tennessee V. Garner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Tennessee V. Garner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Sharpe, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Sharpe, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Winston V. Lee, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Hensley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Hensley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
New Jersey V. T.L.O., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
New Jersey V. T.L.O., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Inventory Search And The Arrestee's Privacy Expectation, John M. Wray
The Inventory Search And The Arrestee's Privacy Expectation, John M. Wray
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Confronting Child Victims Of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality Of The Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception, Katrin E. Frank
Confronting Child Victims Of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality Of The Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception, Katrin E. Frank
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment first analyzes Washington’s hearsay exception Act in the light of the principles that form the basis for the hearsay rule and its exceptions. It then examines the effect of the Act on the preexisting hearsay rules. Next, it compares the concept of unavailability as used in the hearsay exceptions with the concept of incompetence; both concepts are then analyzed according to the requirements of the hearsay rules and the confrontation clause. The Comment concludes that the Act is unconstitutional because it permits admission of hearsay of testimonially incompetent children.
Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest: State V. Parris Goes Too Far, James E. Beaver, Cheryl Mccleary
Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest: State V. Parris Goes Too Far, James E. Beaver, Cheryl Mccleary
Seattle University Law Review
This article first demonstrates that courts historically did not trust penal interest statements in general, and that courts were extremely suspicious of any statements by a third party that implicated the defendant. Since Washington adopted Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) verbatim, this article then analyzes the legislative history of the rule. The article concludes that the legislative history favored exclusion of inculpatory statements but that Congress failed to codify the exclusion because of unrelated problems. Finally, the article discusses the confrontation clause problems that arise when inculpatory statements are allowed into evidence. This article argues that the Parris holding should …