Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

"Legal Jihad": How Islamist Lawfare Tactics Are Targeting Free Speech, Brooke Goldstein, Aaron Eitan Meyer

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Lawfare is usually defined as the use of the law as a weapon of war' or the pursuit of strategic aims through aggressive legal maneuvers.

Remarks Regarding The Iraqi High Tribunal's "Anfal" Trial: Speech Delivered At International Law Weekend, Jennifer Trahan

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

My remarks today will focus on the second trial of the Iraqi High Tribunal (the IHT or Tribunal), the so-called "Anfal" trial.

Comments On The Reforms To The Mexican Energy Laws Of 2008, Antonio Riva Palacio Lavin

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

A strong discussion has taken place in Mexico since the beginning of this millennium concerning the legal reform of the energy sector, particularly the Mexican government's oil company, Petr6leos Mexicanos (Pemex).

A Summary Of Legal System Amalgamation: An Introduction To Judge Patrick L. Robinson's Observations On The Hybrid Nature Of The Rules Of Procedure And Evidence Of The International Criminal Tribunal For The Former Yugoslavia, Jane E. Cross

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

On 14 February 2009, His Excellency Judge Patrick L. Robinson of Jamaica, President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), spoke at the Nova Southeastern University (NSU) Shepard Broad Law Center, for Black History Month.

The United States And International Criminal Tribunals: An Historical Analysis, Harry M. Rhea

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The relationship between the United States and international criminal tribunals has lasted for almost 100 years at least.

Cicero's Beloved Republic: The Insufficiency Of Expanded Humanistic Rhetoric In The Service Of Comparative Law, Richard O. Brooks

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

We are now at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The United States, like Republican Rome two millennia earlier, teeters between becoming an expanded empire, a declining republic, or paradoxically, both.

Legal Limbo: Where Should The Guantanamo Uighurs Be Released?, William L. Tucker

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States shocked the world's conscience and changed the American public's feeling of vulnerability.

Proposals For A Truth Commission And Reparations Program For Victims Of Torture By Us Forces Since 9/11, Morgane Landel

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Since September 11, 2001, the United States has been responsible for well documented cases of torture and ill-treatment as part of its war on terror in Guantanamo, Iraq, Afghanistan and other secret sites.

Universal Jurisdiction And The Case Of Belgium: A Critucal Assessment, Roozbeh (Rudy) B. Baker

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Praised in some quarters as a useful tool for bringing criminal perpetrators to justice, criticized by others as a threat to state sovereignty, universal jurisdiction has certainly emerged as a heated topic within international criminal law.

The International Criminal Court: Former President George W. Bush And World Opinion, Donald D.A Schaefer

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The International Criminal Court (Court or ICC) came into force on July 1, 2002.1

China's Labor Law Evolution: Towards A New Frontier, Monique Garcia

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The People's Republic of China (P.R.C.) is moving towards becoming the biggest economy in the world.

Current United States Credit Default Swap Regulatory Initiatives: A New World Standard Or Just A Ploy?, Nathaniel G. Dutt

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

In recent years, the global financial market has seen an abundant increase in the use of credit derivatives; more specifically, the use of credit default swaps (CDSs).

The Peace Palace The Hague, The Netherlands, The Republic Of Alicanto, The Commonwealth Of Ravisia

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Pursuant to the Joint Notification and Compromis concluded on 30 September 2008, including the Corrections and Clarifications agreed to therein, at Chicago, Illinois, United States of America between the Republic of Alicanto and the Commonwealth of Ravisia (collectively "the Parties"), and in accordance with Article 40(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, the Parties hereby submit to this Court its dispute concerning Operation Provide Shelter and the differences arising between Alicanto and Ravisia

The Peace Palace The Hague, The Netherlands, The Republic Of Alicanto, The Commonwealth Of Ravisia

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The Commonwealth of Ravisia and the Republic of Alicanto have agreed to submit this dispute to the International Court of Justice pursuant to article 40(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice ('Statute') and in accordance with the Compromis notified to the Court on 15 September 2006. Pursuant to article 36(1) of the Statute, the Court has jurisdiction to decide all matters referred to it for decision.

Core Rules Of International Environmental Law, Andrea Laura Mackielo

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

International environmental law has been marked by two contradictory trends.

The Developing Equality Jurisprudence In South Africa, Karthy Govender

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

Apartheid was technically about separateness, but it was fundamentally about inequality. The founding premise of the ideology was to preserve the total hegemony of white South Africans. The liberation organizations opposing the apartheid regime sought to affirm that the country belonged to all those that lived in it. Thus, it is unsurprising that the commitment to equality is one of the founding values of the Constitution and an indelible thread woven throughout the fabric of the Bill of Rights. After some misstatements about certain rights being more important than others, courts have interpreted rights in the Bill of Rights to …

The Universal Declaration And South African Constitutional Law: A Response To Justice Arthur Chaskalson, Peter E. Quint

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

60 Years Of The Basic Law And Its Interpretation: An American Perspective, Peter E. Quint

Faculty Scholarship

In commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the adoption of the German Basic Law (Constitution) , the author discusses certain aspects of the Basic Law, in comparison with the Constitution of the United States, and examines important developments in the jurisprudence if the German Constitutional Court interpreting the Basic Law.

Rethinking The Relationship Between The Wto And International Human Rights, Gao Pengcheng

Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business

No abstract provided.

The Importance Of Teaching Law And The Reinforcement Of The Judiciary System In Haiti, Jomanas Eustache

UC Law SF International Law Review

This article is a reflection on the inseparable binome "Law and Justice." The concepts of Law and Justice are so intertwined that the absence or weakness of either can lead to impunity and finally to a lack of peace in society. Unfortunately, some behavior, misconduct, or practices, are mainly facilitated by the malfunction of the judicial system. This can be seen all too clearly in the situation in Haiti. This article highlights the urgency of the situation and the need for all interested sectors and individuals to act swiftly, legally, and with firmness to ensure and strengthen the basis of …

The Preliminary Reference Procedure Of The Court Of Justice Of The European Communities: A Model For The Icj, Alicia Farrell Miller

UC Law SF International Law Review

When nations fail to observe their international obligations it undermines both respect for and future compliance with international law. In the so-called vicious cycle, the more the law is flouted, the less legitimate it becomes and the less states and individuals feel bound by it. The United States Supreme Court in Medellin recently exemplified this vicious cycle by spurning the authority of the International Court of Justice ("ICJ") and holding that a decision of the ICJ is not self-executing and thus does not constitute binding federal law. In contrast, the Court of Justice of the European Communities (formerly known as …

An Agenda For The Obama Administration On Gender Equality: Lessons From Abroad, Adrien K. Wing, Samuel P. Nielson

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

President Barack Obama came into office with a wealth of good will after winning the historic 2008 presidential election to become the first African-American commander-in-chief. Among the many daunting issues we hope he will tackle is one that Abigail Adams mentioned to her husband John in 1776: remember the ladies. How should our President and his new administration affect social justice for women?

Global Issues In Freedom Of Speech And Religion: Cases And Materials, Leslie Gielow Jacobs, Alan Brownstein

McGeorge School of Law Teaching Materials

Brownstein and Jacobs's Global Issues in Freedom of Speech and Religion: Cases and Materials is a companion volume to existing materials. Designed to assist professors in introducing issues of international and comparative law, this title is ideal for use in educational courses that address:

• The First Amendment
• Law and religion
• Individual rights
• Other topics dealing with free speech and religious liberty

In order to make companion materials understandable and accessible to students as well as to professors who have not taught the materials before, this title:

• Includes case excerpts, helpful background materials, and notes
• Is set out in a structure …

Trade Sanctions, Human Rights And Multinational Corporations: The Eu-Acp Context, Olufemi Amao

UC Law SF International Law Review

This paper examines the human rights dimension of trade agreements between the European Union ("EU") and the African Caribbean and Pacific ("ACP") group of countries and their relevance to the control of multinational corporations ("MNCs"). It notes that even though MNCs are the major beneficiaries of the agreements, they have not been prominent in the discourse. The paper explores the foundation for the inclusion of human rights issues in trade agreements, and argues in favour of their legitimacy. The study contends that human rights clauses in the agreements should be triggered where there are human rights violations in the territory …

Consideration Of The Protection Of Persons In The Event Of Disasters By The International Law Commission, Arnold Pronto

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Recent disasters of epic proportions, such as the Asian Tsunami of 2004, and the accompanying response by the international community, have given rise to renewed interest in the legal aspects of disaster relief activities.

Political Institutions And Judicial Role: An Approach In Context, The Case Of The Colombian Constitutional Court, David Landau, Julián Daniel López-Murcia

Scholarly Publications

Comparative constitutional law scholarship has largely ignored political institutions. It has therefore failed to realize that radical differences in the configuration of political institutions should bear upon the way courts do their jobs. Parting from a case study of the Colombian Constitutional Court, this paper develops a theory of judicial role focused on political context, and particularly on party systems. Colombian parties are unstable and poorly tied to civil society, therefore Congress has difficulty initiating and monitoring the enforcement of policy, as well as checking presidential power. For that reason, the Constitutional Court has responded by taking many of these …

Divided By Common Language: 'Capture' Theories In Gatt/Wto And The Communicative Impasse, Dongsheng Zang

UC Law SF International Law Review

Since the 1999 ministerial conference in Seattle, the WTO has been plagued by a series of collapses in trade negotiations: 2001 in Doha, 2003 in Cancun, 2006 in Hong Kong, and most recently, July 30th, 2008 in Geneva. How to understand the stalemates? What is behind the communicative impasse between the developing countries and the developed countries? This article examines a key conceptual framework in the discourse on trade policy: "capture" theories. It tracks two groups of "capture" theories: first, "capture" theories during the 1980s GATT which set the foundation for the WTO, and second, "capture" theories espoused by developing …

Nation-Building In The Penumbra: Notes From A Liminal State, Monica Eppinger

UC Law SF International Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Critical Guide To The Iraqi High Tribunal's Anfal Judgement: Genocide Against The Kurds, Jennifer Trahan

Michigan Journal of International Law

In the Anfal trial, the Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT or the Tribunal) in Baghdad convicted former Iraqi high officials of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Unlike its predecessor-the Dujail trial-the Anfal trial included the presentation of a high volume of documentary and eye-witness evidence. This evidence clearly revealed the existence of a genocidal campaign by the former Iraqi government and military that eliminated an estimated 182,000 Iraqi Kurds in 1988, as part of the eight-phased "Anfal campaign" (the Anfal). Relying on this and other evidence, judges in the Anfal Trial Chamber explained fairly persuasively how genocide, crimes against …

Writing The Law Of Latin America, Jorge L. Esquirol

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.