Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (475)
- Civil Law (466)
- Human Rights Law (460)
- Administrative Law (446)
- Criminal Law (444)
-
- Rule of Law (421)
- Courts (419)
- Business Organizations Law (411)
- Conflict of Laws (411)
- International Trade Law (411)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (410)
- Natural Resources Law (407)
- Energy and Utilities Law (406)
- Election Law (405)
- Agriculture Law (404)
- Internet Law (404)
- Legal Education (404)
- Air and Space Law (401)
- Criminal Procedure (400)
- International Law (203)
- Jurisprudence (146)
- Law and Society (107)
- Commercial Law (73)
- Law and Politics (61)
- Property Law and Real Estate (57)
- European Law (53)
- Legal History (53)
- Contracts (52)
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (372)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (130)
- Seattle University School of Law (30)
- American University Washington College of Law (25)
- Notre Dame Law School (24)
-
- Universitas Padjadjaran (14)
- University of Miami Law School (14)
- Brooklyn Law School (8)
- Fordham Law School (8)
- Columbia Law School (7)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (6)
- Florida International University College of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- UC Law SF (4)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Pace University (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Beirut Arab University (2)
- DePaul University (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- Singapore Management University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Comparative law (5)
- United States (5)
- Human rights (4)
- Human rights violations (4)
- Labour Law (4)
-
- Comparative constitutional law (3)
- ICJ (3)
- International Court of Justice (3)
- International Law (3)
- International law (3)
- Japan (3)
- National security (3)
- Rule of law (3)
- UNCLOS (3)
- AI (2)
- Adjudication (2)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (2)
- America (2)
- Artificial intelligence (2)
- Authoritarian governance (2)
- Authoritarian legality (2)
- Authoritarianism (2)
- Brazil (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Civil law (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Comparative Law (2)
- Compliance (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (372)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (130)
- Seattle University Law Review (30)
- Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law (24)
- Human Rights Brief (14)
-
- Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) (14)
- University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal (6)
- Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (6)
- FIU Law Review (5)
- American University International Law Review (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- UC Law SF International Law Review (4)
- University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (4)
- Washington International Law Journal (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (3)
- Fordham Law Review (3)
- Fordham Law Review Online (3)
- LL.M. Essays & Theses (3)
- Pace International Law Review (3)
- SJD Dissertations (3)
- BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Cybaris® (2)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (2)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (2)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 721 - 725 of 725
Full-Text Articles in Comparative and Foreign Law
Dualisme Tujuan Pembebanan Uang Pengganti: Analisis Putusan Angelina Sondakh Di Berbagai Tingkat Peradilan, Valencia Puspa Novandra Ali, Tamsil .
Dualisme Tujuan Pembebanan Uang Pengganti: Analisis Putusan Angelina Sondakh Di Berbagai Tingkat Peradilan, Valencia Puspa Novandra Ali, Tamsil .
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Studi ini meneliti perbedaan interpretasi dan penerapan hukuman tambahan berupa restitusi (uang pengganti) dalam kasus korupsi melalui analisis komparatif keputusan Angelina Sondakh di pengadilan tingkat pertama, pengadilan banding, pengadilan kasasi, dan pengadilan peninjauan yudisial. Muncul interpretasi ganda antara memandang restitusi sebagai kompensasi atas kerugian keuangan negara dan sebagai mekanisme untuk menyita keuntungan ilegal. Judex facti menolak penerapan restitusi dengan alasan bahwa tidak terjadi kerugian negara dalam kasus suap dan gratifikasi, sementara judex juris di tingkat kasasi menafsirkan restitusi sebagai instrumen pemulihan aset yang ditujukan untuk keuntungan yang diperoleh secara ilegal. Orientasi konseptual yang bertentangan ini menghasilkan perbedaan signifikan dalam penjatuhan …
Kedudukan Putusan Peradilan Etik Sebagai Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara: Studi Kasus Gugatan Hakim Konstitusi Anwar Usman, Satrio Febriyanto
Kedudukan Putusan Peradilan Etik Sebagai Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara: Studi Kasus Gugatan Hakim Konstitusi Anwar Usman, Satrio Febriyanto
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
As an effort to concretize ethics, there is a process of formalizing ethics into a set of rules through a code of ethics. The code of ethics needs institutional enforcement instruments so that it can be effectively applied through ethical trials. Ethical courts, as institutions that adjudicate violations of the code of ethics, have the authority to issue decisions as a follow-up to cases of violations of the code of ethics that they handle. In carrying out its duties, ethical courts use ethical and moral analysis to assess the appropriateness of an action. This analytical approach differs from legal decisions …
Constraining Citizenship: Presidential Threshold In Indonesia’S Judicial Framework, Arfan Yanayir Akbar Sabillilah
Constraining Citizenship: Presidential Threshold In Indonesia’S Judicial Framework, Arfan Yanayir Akbar Sabillilah
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
This research critically evaluates the constitutionality of Indonesia's Presidential Threshold as regulated by Article 222 of Law No. 7/2017, requiring political parties or coalitions to secure 20% of DPR seats or 25% of national valid votes for presidential nominations. The term “Presidential Threshold” follows Constitutional Court jurisprudence, distinguishing it from the election threshold in Article 6A(3) requiring 50%+1 votes to win the presidency and the parliamentary threshold in Article 414 requiring 4% of votes for legislative seat allocation. Through normative legal analysis of Constitutional Court decisions No. 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008, 53/PUU-XV/2017, and 62/PUU-XXII/2024, this study examines 33 judicial reviews from 2017 to …
Justice In Erotic Spaces, Elena L. Cohen
Justice In Erotic Spaces, Elena L. Cohen
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
This Article posits that the concept of "erotic justice" could be used by courts to push back against the current cascade of anti-LGBTQ+ laws and meaningfully improve the lives ofgay and trans people. The beginning of the twenty-first century was widely seen as a time of great progress for LGBTQ+ people, with the legalization of gay marriage in countries across the world seen as the ultimate triumph. Yet there is a strong contemporary movement to re-criminalize the lives of LGBTQ+ people and to remove protections that have been granted by courts. In the U.S., the 2020s have seen an ongoing …
Copyright Eligibility For Ai Works Under United States Law, Roger V. Skalbeck
Copyright Eligibility For Ai Works Under United States Law, Roger V. Skalbeck
Law Faculty Publications
This article examines copyright eligibility for works that incorporate generative AI elements under United States law, explaining that such works may be protected only to the extent they contain human-authored expression. This expression can appear as creative selection, arrangement, editing, or other expressive contributions, while unedited or autonomously generated AI output is not copyrightable. The article highlights how the U.S. Copyright Office’s registration and review system, through disclosure requirements, refusals, and public registration records, creates meaningful evidence about boundaries of copyright protection for AI-assisted works. The article contrasts this U.S. registration framework with other legal systems, including European jurisdictions such …