Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

Stop The Boats: Prime Minister Sunak And The Uk’S Assertion Of National Sovereignty, Stefanie Allman

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

The British Parliament is in the process of voting on the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill, that would send asylum seekers who arrive in Britain to Rwanda, a country in East Africa. This change would indicate a further distancing of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU) and international law. That said, when viewed in the context of the UK’s support for Ukraine, one can instead see an evolving view of individual national sovereignty.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review on March 4, 2024. The original post can be …

Nobody Understands My Language: An International Human Rights Crisis In U.S. Detention Centers, Kayla He

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

Since 2016 when President Trump was elected, immigration has become a popular and polarizing topic in America. President Trump supported a hardline immigration policy of preventing migrants from entering the country by actively arresting and detaining migrants. Many human rights experts expressed concerns over the human rights violations at the United States-Mexico border as well as in detention centers. For instance, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) published a report describing the lack of medical access and supplies for basic needs at detention centers. The report indicated that oftentimes, migrants were detained without knowing when they would be released, and …

Judicial Ethics: Everyone Can Learn, Tamerick Gilyard

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

The success of international courts, and our domestic courts, depends to a large extent upon the integrity and impartiality of those who decide the cases that come before them. For the institutional integrity of all courts, judicial ethics is of the utmost importance and vital for both the international and domestic courts. Most recently, the United States Supreme Court has come under fire because of the lack of ethical rules to guide or govern the justices’ behavior. The Supreme Court members are granted lifetime appointments, but are not subject to mandatory ethical rules. Alternatively, lower federal court judges do have …

The Need To Speed: The U.S. Interstate And The German Autobahn, Jacob Weinstein

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

Were it not for the Interstate Highway System (IHS), driving to, from, and within regions of the continental United States would be a challenging endeavor. The pavement of the IHS was first laid when President Eisenhower signed the Federal Highway Act of 1954. According to the lore, Eisenhower first envisioned the IHS as a strategic military asset during his reign in Europe as the commander of the Allied Forces. However, in reality, it is slightly more complicated.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review on February 9, 2024. The original post can be accessed …

The Status Of The Icj Case Of Ukraine V. Russia, Anne Harper

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

When Russia launched its full-scale invasion of eastern Ukraine on February 24, 2022, Russia claimed that the use of force in Ukraine was justified since Ukraine was committing genocide. Within a few days, Ukraine filed a petition with the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Ukraine evoked the ICJ’s jurisdiction under Article IX of the Genocide Convention, which provides the ICJ with jurisdiction to resolve “[d]isputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or fulfillment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of a State for genocide or for any of the other acts enumerated in …

The Failure Of Australia's Voice Referendum: A Lost Opportunity For Progress?, Jennifer Grubman

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

On October 14, 2023, Australia held its first constitutional referendum of the twenty-first century. Had the referendum succeeded, a section would have been added to the Australian Constitution not only recognizing First Nations as the “First Peoples of Australia,” but also establishing a body known as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, or the Voice. This was not Australia’s first constitutional referendum concerning First Nations. In 1967, Australians voted in favor of an amendment to the Australian Constitution that granted “state and National parliaments … concurrent power” to legislate for the First Nations. However, unlike the 1967 referendum, the …

Global Brand Protection In Web 3.0: Blockchain Domain Names And New Legal Challenges, Vera Glonina

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

The development of blockchain technologies is changing the world by introducing new systems and opportunities. In particular, blockchain technologies are a key component of so-called Web 3.0, a new generation of the Internet, which incorporates “the idea of a new, decentralized internet built on blockchains, which are distributed ledgers controlled communally by participants.”

This post was originally published on the Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review on January 11, 2024. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Constitutional Constraint: The United States Should Follow In New Zealand’S Gun Reform Footsteps, Jillian Fantuzzi

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” The United States is one of three countries worldwide that provide a constitutional right to bear arms, but the only country where this right is not accompanied by a restrictive condition. Despite the apparent gun crisis that increasingly characterizes the United States, legislators struggle to implement regulation due to the Supreme Court’s classification of the Second Amendment as a right to self-defense. However, where the initial purpose of the Second Amendment was to equip civilians as members of the militia to …

Indigenous Peoples, Land Grabs In Brazil, And The Fight For Official Recognition, Christian Zavardino

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (CICLR) Blog

In recent years, the Indigenous peoples of Brazil have fought a host of legal obstacles to maintain sovereignty over their traditional ancestral lands, in large part owing to the policy imperatives of successive presidential administrations and Congresses that have favored agribusiness interests and commercial development of Brazil’s interior regions at the expense of the Indigenous peoples who live in these areas. The Brazilian Constitution of 1988 guarantees Brazil’s Indigenous peoples legal recognition of their ancestral lands via the “land demarcation” or “official land recognition” process, providing that the federal government shall recognize “their original rights to the lands they traditionally …

Corn War: A Trade Fight Between The United States And Mexico, Ernesto Hernández-López

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

An international fight grows over corn. The United States claims that México’s ban on genetically modified (GMO) corn violates the United StatesMexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). México prohibits GMO corn for human consumption. American arguments focus on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures, covered in Chapter 9 of the USMCA. A trade panel will review these.

This Essay first describes SPS arguments and relevant trade rules. The United States’ complaints emphasize that México’s ban is excessive, is not consistent with international standards, and mishandles risks. Second, the Essay identifies the obstacles American positions face: weak mandates and deference to México. Chapter 9 of …

Masthead - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 7 (2024)

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

"Who Are The Landlords Here?" - Group Rights In The Age Of Populism: Jewish Ownership Of Symbolic And Geographic Space In Israel, Meital Pinto

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The world is witnessing the rise offar-right political parties. In Israel's recent national legislative election, Jewish Power (Otzma Yehudit), a far-right, anti-Arab political party, reached an unprecedented achievement. The party won six seats in the Knesset and its leader, Itamar Ben Gvir was appointed as the Minister of National Security. "Who are the Landlords Here?" was the party's election slogan; it signals that Jews should not only own the state but also its public space. This normative political statement aligns with the dominant attitude towards group rights for the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel. The dominant attitude perceives group rights in …

An Information Flow Model Of Online Mediation: Jeopardizing Privacy And Autonomy In The Shadow Of Innovation, Rachel Ringort, Ayelet Sela

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Online mediation has developed significantly over the past decade, and increasingly so following the COVID-19 pandemic. Online mediation platforms are now integrated into both private and public settings, enabling mediation through diverse means-from videoconferencing software to dedicated platforms that use various procedural and technological tools, including artificial intelligencepowered applications. The digital transformation of the mediation process introduces challenges and opportunities for mediators, parties, and mediation platforms, many of which stem from new digital datahandling practices. This article explores how such digital transformation of mediation impacts the parties' rights to self-determination and privacy. Recognizing that these rights derive from the parties' …

Civil Appeals Mediation Program 2023 Mediation Colloquy "Thinking 101" And Mediation

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 7, Iss. 2

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Chinese Balloon Incident And Partisanism In International Law, Samuli Seppänen

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This Article discusses the implications of the February 2023 Chinese balloon incident for understanding Chinese foreign policy elites' approaches to international law. It argues that the Chinese balloon incident fits the perception of a globally ambitious and activist China. At the same time, the ethically ambiguous context offoreign surveillance flights problematizes the stark dichotomies between authoritarian and liberal approaches to international law. Chinese legal arguments in the Chinese balloon incident followed the Cold War-era playbook of diplomatic exchanges on unauthorized flights in foreign airspace. Moreover, the Chinese commentary on U.S. conduct in the Chinese balloon incident in some ways resembled …

Authoritarian International Law: An Unfinished Research Odyssey, Roda Mushkat

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The concept-rich international legal space has expanded in the past few years by incorporating the notion that there is a distinct form of internationalaw possessing authoritarian traits. This notion stands in contrast with the time-honored mainstream variant which is assumed to have liberal-democratic roots and dispositions. A product of the current decade, authoritarian international law has nevertheless left a palpable mark on international legal theory and is believed to have materially reshaped the international legal landscape. The primary aim of this Article is to summarize the achievements made in analyzing the dimensions of this new concept and its considerable practical …

Rulers, Victims, Educators, Or Partners? Judges' Perception Of Their Relationship With Lawyers, Boaz Shnoor, Eyal Katvan

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Judges oftenface lawyer misbehavior in court. Such misbehavior, and the way judges address it, are pressing issues, which challenge all courts. However, the current literature on the legal profession and legal education lacks a systemic analysis of judges' perceptions of lawyers' behavior in their courtrooms, of the ways in which judges are influenced by lawyers' misbehavior, and of the ways in which they respond to it. This Article fills this gap by empirically analyzing judges' perceptions of lawyers' misbehavior, how it influences judges' work environments, the methods they use to cope with it, and the constraints they face in dealing …

Are Holocaust Denial Laws And Critical Race Theory Bans The Same?, Rob Kahn

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Florida's education rules list Holocaust denial and critical race theory ("CRT") as "theories that distort the past." This is not a fair comparison. Holocaust denial laws and CRT bans are analytically distinguishable. Holocaust denial laws were originally intended to fight hate, and this is the only reason they might be legitimate today. By contrast, CRT bans, for all their well-meaning language aboutprotecting childrenfrom race-based accusations of guilt, intend to silence the past. Indeed, the CRT bans are uncannily similar to the laws used in Turkey to ban discussion of the Armenian Genocide in schools. While one might reject both sets …

Enhancing Fairness And Compassion In Military Disciplinary Proceedings, Rinat Kitai-Sangero

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This Article critically assesses the disciplinary proceedings carried out by judicial officers within the military, shedding light on the absence of crucial procedural guarantees, such as the right to legal representation and an impartial judge. After comparing the Israeli disciplinary proceedings with the Summary Court-Martial system in the United States and considering arguments used to justify the lack of procedural guarantees, the Article emphasizes the emotional distress experienced by soldiers who feel powerless due to power imbalances with their commanders and the severity ofprison sentences they may face. While the Article primarily focuses on the Israeli army, its main arguments …

Reuniting "Active" And "Direct" Participation: The International Criminal Court's Dph Divorce In Lubanga, Josef Danczuk

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Throughout treaty-making processes and turn-of-the-century international criminal tribunal decisions, scholars and judges alike determined that the terms "direct" and "active," when referring to participation in hostilities, were synonymous. However, the International Criminal Court ("ICC'), in interpreting the Rome Statute in the Lubanga case, determined that they were not, creating disparity between interpretations of the same terms within International Criminal Law ("ICL") and the Law of Armed Conflict ("LOAC"). Not only is the ICC's interpretation legally wrong, it is also practically unworkable and distorts the well-established doctrine of DPH as defined in LOAC. Lubanga may have broadened protectionfor child soldiers, but …

Constructing A Taxonomy Of Financial Consumer Protection Policy And Assessing The New Consumer Duty In The United Kingdom's Financial Sector, Iris H-Y Chiu, Wai-Yee Wan

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article critically examines the UK's Consumer Duty, introduced by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), arguing that while it represents a significant step in financial consumer protection, it falls short in addressing welfare outcomes and distributive justice. The Duty focuses on consumer empowerment but neglects key aspects of consumer citizenship, such as access to essential financial services and guarantees of product quality. The article proposes a taxonomy of consumer protection levels to evaluate the Duty's effectiveness and advocates for a more robust framework that prioritizes financial inclusion and long-term consumer welfare.

One Size Does Fit All: A Quasi-Federal Solution To The Euro-Centric Structural Shortcomings Of The Icc, Anivesh Bharadwaj

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article critiques the International Criminal Court's (ICC) centralized structure in The Hague, arguing that it undermines transparency, accessibility, and legitimacy, particularly for victims and witnesses in remote regions. The author proposes a "quasi-federal" framework to decentralize the Court, enabling regional proceedings while maintaining a central Appeals Chamber and Presidency. This restructuring aims to address structural flaws, enhance deterrence, and improve justice delivery by bringing proceedings closer to affected communities.

Lost In Translation: The Limits Of Explainability In Al, Hofit Wasserman-Rozen, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Niva Elkin-Koren

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

As artificial intelligence becomes more prevalent, regulators are increasingly turning to legal measures, like "a right to explanation," to protect against potential risks raised by AI systems. However, are eXplainable AI (XAI) tools-the artificial intelligence tools that provide such explanations-up for the task?

This paper critically examines XAI's potential to facilitate the right to explanation by applying the prism of explanation's role in law to different stakeholders. Inspecting the underlying functions of reason-giving reveals different objectives for each of the stakeholders involved. From the perspective of a decision-subject, reason-giving facilitates due process and acknowledges human agency. From a decision-maker's perspective, …

Farewell To Cultural Superiority: Resolving The Alleged Chinese Misappropriation Of Korean Cultural Heritage Through Unesco's 2005 Convention For The Protection And Promotion Of The Diversity Of Cultural Expressions, Daniel Hyungtae Kim

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Holocaust Denial Legislation In The United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, And The United States: How The Law Presently Addresses The Issue And Proposals For Reform, Madeline Epstein

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the legal frameworks addressing Holocaust denial in the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, and the United States, highlighting the need for more robust legislation to combat Holocaust denial effectively. It argues that while countries like Germany and Austria have stringent laws criminalizing Holocaust denial, jurisdictions like the U.S. and U.K. rely on civil remedies, which may be insufficient. The analysis advocates for adopting legal measures that balance free speech with the protection of historical truth and human dignity.

Taxing Wealth: A Comparative Analysis Of National Wealth Taxes And How A Federal Wealth Tax Can Overcome Administrative Challenges, Jason Nadboy

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note advocates for the implementation of a progressive federal wealth tax in the United States to address wealth inequality and generate revenue for social programs. It argues that while administrative challenges exist, they can be overcome by learning from international examples and implementing robust enforcement mechanisms.

Drug Addiction, Insanity, And Competency: How The Halimi Case Galvanizes A U.S.-Inspired Reform Of France's Criminal Responsibility System, Ruben Attia

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The Halimi case, culminating in a verdict from the Court of Cassation in April 2021, has ignited intense and contentious debates on criminal responsibility, leading to a profound erosion of public trust in the French judicial system. This Note delves into the urgency of addressing the issues presented by Halimi and emphasizes the necessity for innovative approaches within the French legislative framework. Striking a delicate balance between permitting the trial of controversial cases and upholding the age-old moral duty of excluding the mentally insane from guilty verdicts, this Note compares the intricacies of criminal responsibility in France with those in …

Tackling The Thicket: A Comparative Analysis Of Biologic Drugs And Biosimilars In The United States And Abroad, Lauren Cutler

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the legal and regulatory landscape surrounding biologic drugs and biosimilars in the United States and Europe, focusing on patent protections, litigation trends, and the impact of biosimilar competition on drug pricing. It highlights the challenges posed by patent thickets and evergreening strategies employed by brand-name biologic manufacturers, which delay biosimilar market entry and maintain high drug prices. The analysis underscores the differences in regulatory frameworks and market dynamics between the U.S. and Europe, emphasizing the need for policy reforms to enhance competition and affordability in the biologic market.

Always A Suspect: Law Enforcement's Violative Use Of Geofence Warrants And Geolocation Data In Criminal Investigations And Proceedings, Aaron A. Bengart

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note argues that geofence warrants, used by law enforcement to obtain location data from tech companies, pose significant Fourth Amendment concerns. It advocates for U.S. legislation similar to the U.K.'s to balance privacy rights with law enforcement needs, emphasizing the need for checks to prevent abuse and protect citizens from unreasonable searches.