Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

Should An Effective International Criminal Court Have Primacy Or Be Complementary To National Courts? An Analysis Of Concurrent Jurisdiction In The Ad Hoc Tribunals And The Rome Statute, Godwin Yenika Fonye

LLM Theses and Essays

Concurrent criminal jurisdiction depicts a scenario where two or more judicial systems have the legal capacity to investigate, prosecute and punish an accused person for the same criminal acts under their respective, separate jurisdiction. This usually occurs between sovereign states. In the realm of crimes under international law, the distinguishing characteristic is the universal jurisdiction that is conferred on all States to prosecute and punish the perpetrators of such crimes. The "cumulative effect of these different principles of jurisdiction sometimes is to vest multiple states with concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute a given crime. This paper would attempt to analyze the …

Capital Punishment: Corporate Criminal Liability For Gross Violations Of Human Rights, Diane Marie Amann

UC Law SF International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Holding Multinational Corporations Responsible Under International Law, Joel R. Paul

UC Law SF International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Latcrit Theory: Some Preliminary Notes Towards A Transatlantic Dialogue, Elizabeth M. Iglesias

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Economic Restructuring And The European Monetary Union, Juan Luis Millan Pereira

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Constitutional Confluence: American ‘State Action’ Law And The Application Of South Africa’S Socioeconomic Rights Guarantees To Private Actors, Stephen Ellmann

Articles & Chapters

As constitutional protection of human rights expands around the world, the question of whether constitutional rights should protect people not only against state action but also against the conduct of private actors is once again timely. Few nations have so broadly, or so ambiguously, endorsed the application of constitutional guarantees to constrain private conduct (known outside the United States as "horizontality") as South Africa. The constitution approved in 1996 applies fully and without qualification to all "organs of state," and this term is defined in section 239 in potentially very broad terms, notably embracing "any other functionary or institution ... …

The Impact Of Modernization And Development On Muslim Women In Egypt: A Legal Perspective, Mazahir Muhammed Ata El-Sid

LLM Theses and Essays

This study examines the effectiveness of the modernization theory in Egypt, a developing Muslim society. As in the case of other developing societies, Egypt's modernization is uneven. Therefore, I will examine modernization as it relates to Muslim women in Egypt in as far as they vary in their exposure to the modernizing influences of advanced technology. Egypt has experienced a variety of social, judicial, economic, demographic, and political modifications. These changes have greatly affected Muslim women in Egypt and their family life. Not all of the issues underlying modernization will be addressed in this research. Type of family structure and …

Legalize It? -Osp And Peer-To-Peer Network Liability For Online Music Copyright Infringements In The United States And Germany, Christian Nils Jochen Engelhardt

LLM Theses and Essays

It may be useful to explain why a comparative approach was chosen. It is easy and comfortable to get caught up in one's own legal system and not look abroad. It is often difficult enough to understand and apply one’s own laws accurately and the study of a foreign legal system may seem an effort too great. Yet, this reluctance to look beyond the familiar is fatal to legal development and improvement since entirely new ideas are rare in the field of law and the main source of change and new approaches is borrowing from another legal system. If one …

Commentary: International And Comparative Law Perspectives On Internet Patents, Toshiko Takenaka

Articles

The Internet and e-commerce have created a borderless market. Goods and services sold on the Internet are subject to the patent statutes and regulations of all countries in which customers have access. Because the presence or absence of patent protection—or variations in that protection—hinders the movement of goods and services throughout the Internet, it is necessary to harmonize the protection afforded by Internet patents in their early stages of development. Among the three papers, however, only Professor Chiappetta touched upon the problem of compliance with the provisions in TRIPS. None of the papers paid attention to the feasibility of harmonizing …

Globalisation & Legal Theory By William Twining, Caroline Bradley

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

Spotting Money Launderers: A Better Way To Fight Organized Crime?, Diane Marie Amann

Scholarly Works

Money laundering investigations have been much in the news of late. There have been stories that Radil Salinas de Gortari laundered kickbacks from drug traffickers while his brother was President of Mexico. That Ferdinand Marcos stashed nearly half a billion dollars in Swiss banks while he ruled the Philippines. That two of Mexico's largest banks have pleaded guilty to laundering charges stemming from a controversial U.S. sting operation. That the former prime minister of Ukraine pleaded guilty to Swiss charges that he laundered $9 million in stolen funds, even as he faced U.S. charges of laundering $114 million. And, of …

International Human Rights And Domestic Law Focusing On U.S. Law, With Some Reference To Israeli Law, Malvina Halberstam

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article, written by Malvina Halberstam, reflects on the 50th anniversaries of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the Israeli Supreme Court. It highlights the significance of the UDHR in establishing individual rights within international law and compares the protection of these rights in U.S. and Israeli domestic laws. While the U.S. Constitution provides robust protection for many UDHR rights, the article critiques the U.S. for its slow ratification of human rights treaties and the practice of adding reservations, particularly the declaration of treaties as non-self-executing. It also addresses concerns about restrictions on freedom of expression in Israel, …

Table Of Contents

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, The Role Of International Non-Governmental Organizations And The Idea Of International Civil Society, Kenneth Anderson

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Establishment of the Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines was regarded by many international law scholars, international activists, diplomats and international organization personnel as a defining, 'democratizing' change in the way international law is made. By bringing international NGOs - what is often called 'international civil society' - into the diplomatic and international law-making process, many believe that the Ottawa Convention represented both a democratization of, and a new source of legitimacy for, international law, in part because it was presumably made 'from below'. This article sharply questions whether the Ottawa Convention and the process leading up to it represents and real …

Unidentified Orbital Debris: The Case For A Market-Share Liability Regime, Mark J. Sundahl

UC Law SF International Law Review

As the volume of debris in the planet's orbit continues to grow, the risks and costs associated with orbital collisions are taking their toll on the space industry. The United Nations Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects seeks to address this modern day tragedy of the commons, yet it applies only to large, identifiable pieces of orbital debris. As most debris consists of small fragments, the source of which cannot be identified, the U.N. Convention is limited in its effect.

This Note addresses the problem of assigning liability for harm caused by unidentified orbital debris. It …

Wye River Memorandum: A Transition To Final Peace, Justus R. Weiner

UC Law SF International Law Review

After a lengthy impasse in the peace process between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, a series of several agreements designed to foster peace led to the Wye River Memorandum. This agreement, negotiated in conjunction with President Clinton, established concrete steps for each side to take in reaching lasting peace. This Article analyzes the Wye River Memorandum in the context of the legal and political controversies surrounding its adoption and implementation. Additionally, this Article includes a postscript that addresses the recent Al-Aqsa Intifada.

The Civil Enforcement Of Human Rights Norms In Domestic Courts, Beth Van Schaack

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

This Article will attempt to make the case for the domestic civil action in defense of international human rights in the face of a potential threat to such litigation.

Human Rights Accountability: Congress, Federalism And International Law, Beth Stephens

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

While regularly seeking to apply international human rights norms tojudge the behavior of other governments, the United States has vehemently rejected efforts to apply such rules to United States domestic behavior.

Evolving Human Rights Norms Around Sexuality, Kristen L. Walker

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

International human rights law has only very recently begun to address issues of sexual identity.

Introductory Remarks-Alien Tort Claims Act, Charles Curlett

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Good morning ladies and gentlemen, and welcome. We are fortunate to have with us today a distinguished panel of professors and practitioners who will be speaking about various aspects of current Alien Tort Claims Act' (ATCA) litigation. Before I introduce them, I thought we might begin with the language of the Statute itself

Pinning Guilt On Pinochet, Alfred P. Rubin

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Britain's Highest Court has decided that a treaty requires the British to honor a Spanish request for the extradition of General Augusto Pinochet Ugarte, Chile's strong man from 1973 until he "retired" with a rank of "Senator for Life" in Chile.

International Human Rights, International Humanitarian Law, And Environmental Security: Can The International Criminal Court Bridge The Gaps?, Mark A. Drumbl

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

Human rights law has evolved considerably over the past half-century. Much of this evolution has occurred at the international level.

Terrorism On Trial: The Lockerbie Criminal Proceedings, Michael P. Scharf

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

On December 21, 1998, a bomb exploded in the cargo hold of Pan Am Flight 103 killing all 259 passengers and crew, as well as eleven residents of the town of Lockerbie where the wreckage of the Bowing 747 crashed 31,000 feet below.

International Law Antinomies And Contradictions Of An Era Of Historical Transition: Retrospective On The Nato Armed Intervention In Kosovo, Edward Mcwhinney

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

We live today in an era of historical transition. The 20th century really ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.

Groups Protected By The Genocide Convention: Conflicting Interpretations From The International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda, William A. Schabas

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide' protects "national, ethnical, racial and religious" groups from intentional physical destruction.

Human Rights Environment And Development In South Asia, Ali M. Qazilbash

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The fundamental importance of the issue of Human Rights and the environment to any society is deeply appreciated today.

The Jurisdiction Of The International Criminal Court Over Nationals Of Non-Party States (Conference Remarks), Madeline Morris

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The Rome Treaty for an International Criminal Court (ICC) provides for the establishment of an international court with jurisdiction over genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

Five Theoretical Themes In The World Trade Organization Adjudicatory System, Raj Bhala

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

I am not sure about the poetic tastes of my distinguished colleagues on the panel.

The Guatemalan Historical Clarification Commisiion Finds Genocide, Jan Perlin

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

On December 29, 1996 the Guatemalan government and the Unidad Revolucionaria Nacional Guatemalteca (URNG), signed peace accords bringing an end to thirty-four years of internal armed conflict.

Self-Determination After Kosovo And East Timor, Valerie Epps

ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law

The concept of self-determination presents a useful example of how change comes about in legal norms, particularly in the international arena.