Comparative and Foreign Law Commons^™

Co-Operation Between Regulators And Law Enforcement: N Regulators And Law Enforcement:, Daniel P. Murphy

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Drawing A Distinction Between Bootleg And Counterfeit Recordings And Implementing A Market Solution Towards Combating Music Piracy In Europe, Clifford A. Congo

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Representing Indigents In Serious Criminal Cases In England's Crown Court: The Advocates' Performance And Incentives, Peter W. Tague

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

While indigent defendants charged with serious criminal offenses can be represented by lawyers in the United States and by barristers and solicitors in England and Wales. Gauging the quality of that help is an important but elusive inquiry. This article has two purposes: to map how the indigent criminal defendant charged with very serious offenses is represented in England's Crown Court, and to examine whether economic incentives can induce the defendant's representatives to perform as expected.

While barristers profess to be skilled advocates, and while many lawyers have likewise extolled the barrister's advocacy, testing the point is extremely difficult. Apart …

Outsider Trading On Confidential Information - A Breach In Search Of A Duty, Roberta S. Karmel

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Decolonising Restoration And Justice, Mark Findlay

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In her paper presented to the Institute of Criminology seminar 'Restorative Justice, Conferencing and the Possibilities of Reform', Kathleen Daly (1998) advocated the exploration of 'spliced justice forms'. By this, Daly recognised the potential of a collaboration 'where an informal restorative justice process was piggybacked on a formal traditional method of prosecuting and sanctioning serious offences' (Daly 1998:10). In advancing this position, Daly recognised the merits of an interrelationship between formal and informal justice. She referred to Roger Matthews view (1998) that formal and informal justice are neither dichotomous nor a matter of choosing one or the other, but of …

Comparative Law Symposium: Is There A European Advantage In Criminal Procedure: Preface, Carl M. Selinger

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Introduction: Adding A Comparative Perspective To American Criminal Procedure Classes, Albert W. Alschuler

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Main-Streaming Comparative Criminal Justice: How To Incorporate Comparative And International Concepts And Materials Into Basic Criminal Law And Procedure Courses, Richard S. Frase

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

European Perspectives On The Accused As A Source Of Testimonial Evidence, Gordon Van Kessel

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The American Adversary System, William T. Pizzi

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Trafficking In Confiscated Cuban Property: Lender Liability Under The Helms-Burton Act And Customary International Law, S. Kern Alexander

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Hard Cases, Carl E. Schneider

Articles

Robert Latimer was born in 1953 on a farm on the prairies of Saskatchewan and grew up to own a 1,280-acre farm. In 1980 he married, and that year Tracy, the first of four children, was born. During her birth, Tracy's brain was terribly damaged by lack of oxygen, and severe cerebral palsy ensued. By 1993 Tracy could laugh, smile, and cry, and she could recognize her parents and her siblings. But she could not understand her own name or even simple words like "yes" and "no." She could not swallow well and would so often vomit her parents kept …

Belgium, Germany, England, Denmark And The United States: The Implementation Of Registration And Castration Laws As Protection Against Habitual Sex Offenders

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

The Prosecution Of Josef Altstoetter Et Al.: Law, Lawyers And Justice In The Third Reich

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Thoughts From Across The Water On Hearsay And Confrontation, Richard D. Friedman

Articles

This article draws on the history of the hearsay rule, and on recent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, to argue that the right to confrontation should be recognised as a basic principle of the law of evidence, and that aspects of the Law Commission's proposals for reform of the hearsay rule, and of the Home Office's proposals for restrictions on the right of cross-examination, are therefore unsatisfactory.

Spain Returns To Trial By Jury, Stephen C. Thaman

All Faculty Scholarship

In 1995, the Spanish Parliament reenacted trial by jury in criminal cases by implementing a mandate of the 1978 post Franco Spanish Constitution. This article discusses the 17 year dispute, following the ratification of the democratic post-Franco Spanish Constitution, on whether Article 25 mandated the reintroduction of lay participation in the criminal trial, and, if so, whether in the form of the classic jury or a continental European style court with lay assessors. This article analyzes the Law on Trial by Jury and its implementation in the first year of trials, and references Spain’s experience with trial by jury in …

The Jury Returns To Continental Europe: Russia And Spain Return To The Classic Jury As A Catalyst In A Move To A More Adversary Form Of Criminal Trial, Stephen C. Thaman

All Faculty Scholarship

This paper briefly compares the provisions of the Russian Jury Law of 1993 and the Spanish Jury Law of 1995 and their application in the first trials, with special attention to the effect of the re-injection of a classic jury. Citations in regard to Russia rely on the author’s exhaustive study of the legislative history of the new Russian Jury Law, its provisions, and its application in the first 114 trials in the years 1993-1994. The Spanish discussion relies on information gathered by the author on the first trials held in Spain since the law went into effect, and delves …

The Judge's Dilemma: Duty Or Conscience?, Robert W. Sweet

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Banking Secrecy Lifted: The Swiss Act To Counter Attacks Launched As A Result Of Their Banks' Actions During World War Ii And Thereafter, Kathryn H. Lamont

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Terror At The Emperor's Birthday Party: An Analysis Of The Hostage-Taking Incident At The Japanese Embassy In Lima, Peru, Dr. Ranee K.L. Panjabi

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Drugs And Corruption In Latin America, Olukonyinsola Ajayi

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Illicit Arms Trafficking, Corruption, And Governance In The Caribbean, Ivelaw L. Griffith

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Within The American Response To Domestic Corruption, Henry H. Rossbacher, Tracy W. Young

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

No abstract provided.

Finding The Truth In An American Criminal Trial: Some Observations, Frank J. Macchiarola

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article critiques the American adversarial criminal trial system, arguing that its focus on procedure and individual rights often hinders the pursuit of truth. While the system is deeply rooted in American cultural values, such as distrust of government and a commitment to individual liberties, its emphasis on adversarial contest rather than truth-seeking leads to inefficiencies and public dissatisfaction. The author highlights the tension between the system's theoretical commitment to justice and its practical limitations, particularly as illustrated by high-profile cases like the O.J. Simpson trial.

America Tries To Come To Terms With Terrorism: The United States Anti-Terrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act Of 1996 V. British Anti-Terrorism Law And International Response, Roberta Smith

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note examines the legal and policy responses to terrorism, focusing on the tension between combating terrorism effectively and safeguarding civil liberties. It critiques the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and comparable international measures, arguing that while these laws aim to address the growing threat of terrorism, they risk infringing on constitutional rights and international cooperation. The analysis highlights the challenges of balancing security concerns with democratic values and the need for coordinated global strategies to counter terrorism.

The Death Penalty: The Usa In World Perspective, Roger Hood

Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Richard B. Lillich's Contributions To United Nations Sanctions Enforcement Law, Paul Conlon

Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

International Human Rights Standards On Sexual Violence Against Women As They Apply To Pornography, Claudia Giunta

LLM Theses and Essays

The United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women was held in Beijing in September 1995, and represented an important step towards the achievement of equality for women. At the Conference, the progress made towards equality was acknowledged, but it was also acknowledged that many goals have not been achieved yet, and that cultural changes of fundamental importance remain to be made. Indeed, in many countries the cultural approach to violence and discrimination against women is quite fatalistic; they believe violence against women cannot be solved by laws. However, this approach overlooks the role played by societies in tolerating practices of …

Waiting For The Verdict On Spain's New Jury System, Stephen C. Thaman

All Faculty Scholarship

This article discusses Spain’s history of trial by jury, focusing on the reinstatement of trial by jury in Spain by the 1995 jury legislation implementing Article 125 of the post-Franco Spanish Constitution. It discusses key provisions of the new Spanish jury law with illustrations from the cases of Otegi and others. It also predicts as to whether the classic jury will acquit itself as a catalyst for criminal justice reform in a Civil Law system such as that of Spain.

The Jury As Catalyst For The Reform Of Criminal Evidentiary Procedure In Continental Europe: The Cases Of Russia And Spain, Stephen C. Thaman

All Faculty Scholarship

This paper focuses on the dialectic between the search for truth, adversarial procedure, and lay participation in the preparation, presentation, and evaluation of evidence in criminal trials. Its primary focus is on the reintroduction of trial by jury in two classic inquisitorial criminal justice systems, Russia (1993) and Spain (1995), as a catalyst in those countries’ move to adversary procedure. It focuses on the effect of the jury system on preparing evidence for trial, the presentation of evidence at trial, and the evaluation of evidence.