Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (413)
- Seattle University School of Law (192)
- University of Michigan Law School (90)
- University of Georgia School of Law (86)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (53)
-
- UIC School of Law (27)
- University of Washington School of Law (26)
- BLR (20)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (20)
- Brooklyn Law School (17)
- Columbia Law School (14)
- Cornell University Law School (13)
- Pepperdine University (13)
- Duke Law (11)
- University of San Diego (11)
- American University Washington College of Law (10)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (10)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (10)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (8)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- Florida State University College of Law (5)
- Pace University (5)
- Singapore Management University (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (56)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (28)
- International Law (26)
- Judges (23)
- England (22)
-
- International Court of Justice (19)
- Comparative law (18)
- Constitutional Law (18)
- ICJ (18)
- Judicial review (16)
- European Union (15)
- Jurisdiction (15)
- Trials (15)
- United States (15)
- China (14)
- Comparative Law (14)
- France (14)
- Juries (14)
- Law (14)
- United Nations (13)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- Law and Society (12)
- Germany (11)
- History (11)
- Human Rights Law (11)
- Arbitration (10)
- Canada (10)
- Constitution (10)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (10)
- Federalism (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (410)
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (76)
- Michigan Law Review (40)
- Articles (24)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (23)
- Washington International Law Journal (23)
- UIC Law Review (21)
- ExpressO (20)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (18)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (17)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (13)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (12)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (11)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (10)
- Journal Articles (9)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (9)
- San Diego International Law Journal (9)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (8)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (8)
- Cardozo Law Review (7)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (6)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (6)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (6)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (5)
- Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design (5)
- LLM Theses and Essays (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 1081 - 1110 of 1175
Full-Text Articles in Comparative and Foreign Law
The Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures And The French Experience, Florence Sophie Boreil
The Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures And The French Experience, Florence Sophie Boreil
LLM Theses and Essays
Under the American approach to criminal justice, freedom of the individual is of the utmost importance. The American criminal justice system reflects a distrust of abuse of power and an emphasis on protection of personal freedom. However, the French take a contrary approach; under French law, freedom is achieved through the State. This paper examines the protection of individuals’ rights in American and French criminal procedure. Focus will be given to tracking the police investigatory powers in each country through searches and seizures, and the impact that those powers have on individuals’ rights. This paper will assert that the police …
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Incoming Drug Calls And Performative Words: They're Not Just Talking About It, Baron Parke!, Christopher B. Mueller
Incoming Drug Calls And Performative Words: They're Not Just Talking About It, Baron Parke!, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Strong Criticism Of The American System Of Trial By Jury, Yale Kamisar
Articles
I grieve for my country to say that the administration of the criminal law in all the states in the Union (there may be one or two exceptions) is a disgrace to our civilization.
French And American Judicial Opinions, Michael Wells
French And American Judicial Opinions, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
In this Article, I examine the foundations of American judicial form, in particular the proposition that powerful instrumental considerations support the issuance of reasoned opinions. This project proceeds from the belief that the form of judicial opinions deserves serious scholarly attention despite the broad consensus about its value, because it frames the terms of debate on every issue courts confront. My analysis is built on the view that critical insights into the nature of one's own legal system can be gleaned only by "understand[ing] what [one's] system is not," a task that requires putting aside the internal perspective of a …
International Environmental Dispute Resolution: The Dispute Between Slovakia And Hungary Concerning Construction Of The Gabcikovo And Nagymaros Dams, Paul Williams
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Juduicial Power & Illusion: The Republic Of China's Council Of Grand Justices And Constitutional Interpretation, F. Fraser Mendel
Juduicial Power & Illusion: The Republic Of China's Council Of Grand Justices And Constitutional Interpretation, F. Fraser Mendel
Washington International Law Journal
The Republic of China underwent a rapid political transformation from an authoritarian nation to a democratic state which required change at every level of the government. The ROC's Council of Grand Justices has contributed to this period of reform through a number of constitutional interpretations which have resulted in greater individual liberties and further restrictions on government actions. This has been accomplished even though the Council operates against substantive and procedural limitations on its powers. A review of these Council interpretations from the past decade reveals that the Council has made steady inroads towards fulfilling its role as the supreme …
The Tribunal In Albania, John Paul Jones
The Tribunal In Albania, John Paul Jones
Law Faculty Publications
Professor Jones explains and critiques "The Organization of Justice and the Constitutional Court," the1992 amendments to Albania's provisional constitution that established the nation's post-revolution judicial system.
Federalism: An Architecture For Freedom, Siegfried Wiessner
Federalism: An Architecture For Freedom, Siegfried Wiessner
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The article presents federalism as a flexible and effective system for organizing power, emphasizing its relevance in promoting freedom and managing diversity. It argues that federalism, while often misunderstood, offers a viable framework for structuring governance in diverse and restructured communities, particularly in the context of the New Europe.
Judicial Forging Of A Political Weapon: The Impact Of The Cold War On The Law Of Contempt, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 3 (1993), Melvin B. Lewis
Judicial Forging Of A Political Weapon: The Impact Of The Cold War On The Law Of Contempt, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 3 (1993), Melvin B. Lewis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
South Korea: Implementation And Application Of Human Rights Covenants, Suk Tae Lee
South Korea: Implementation And Application Of Human Rights Covenants, Suk Tae Lee
Michigan Journal of International Law
Under article 40 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the State Party undertakes to submit reports on the measures it has adopted which give effect to the rights recognized in the ICCPR and demonstrate the progress it has made in granting its citizens the enjoyment of those rights. The report was examined by the HRC in July 1992 and will be discussed in Part I of this article. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) also requires State Parties to submit reports, but the initial report of the South Korean government has not …
The Rule Of Law In An Emerging World Order, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 715 (1993), William Webster
The Rule Of Law In An Emerging World Order, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 715 (1993), William Webster
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Original Intent: The Judicial Uses Of History And Constitutional Interpretation In Australia And The United States, Stephen A. James
Original Intent: The Judicial Uses Of History And Constitutional Interpretation In Australia And The United States, Stephen A. James
In the Public Interest
No abstract provided.
International Human Rights Law In United States Courts: A Comparative Perspective, Anne Bayefsky, Joan Fitzpatrick
International Human Rights Law In United States Courts: A Comparative Perspective, Anne Bayefsky, Joan Fitzpatrick
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article will catalogue the various contexts in which United States courts have agreed or refused to follow international human rights law, treating separately the larger number of cases concerning customary norms, the relatively small group of cases relating to human rights treaties, and the cases in which international norms are referenced without regard to their status as binding law. In each of these sections we will analyze areas of confusion, disagreement, or under-development in international legal doctrine that impede the productive use of human rights norms by domestic courts. We will also compare the approaches of United States courts …
Judicial Review Of The Compensation Law In Hungary, Peter Paczolay
Judicial Review Of The Compensation Law In Hungary, Peter Paczolay
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article analyzes the Hungarian Constitutional Court's decisions regarding a specific problem of property rights, namely the Compensation Law. It does not attempt to examine the details of broad subjects such as property rights or privatization.
A Bitter Inheritance: East German Real Property And The Supreme Constitutional Court's "Land Reform" Decision Of April 23, 1991, Jonathan J. Doyle
A Bitter Inheritance: East German Real Property And The Supreme Constitutional Court's "Land Reform" Decision Of April 23, 1991, Jonathan J. Doyle
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article briefly examines the principal expropriatory measures undertaken between 1945 and 1989, the agreements between the two German governments relating thereto, and the divisive constitutional issues raised by this fusion of two antithetical legal systems in the area of property law. The text concludes with an analysis of the German Supreme Court's "Land Reform" decision and the juridical controversy surrounding it.
The New East European Constitutional Courts, Herman Schwartz
The New East European Constitutional Courts, Herman Schwartz
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article will describe some aspects of the different tribunals in Russia, Hungary, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, and Romania, and will compare them with each other and with the U.S. Supreme Court. The first part will begin by explaining a few basic differences between the American and Continental systems of judicial review, and will then describe the functions of the new East European constitutional courts. The second part will use the decisions of the new Russian Constitutional Court to illustrate the new courts' exercise of authority, and will summarize the recent activities of a few other new constitutional courts.
National Socialism And The Rule Of Law, Donald P. Kommers
National Socialism And The Rule Of Law, Donald P. Kommers
Journal Articles
Ingo Muller's book, originally published in 1987 as Furchtbare Juristen: Die unbewaltigte Vergangenheit unserer Justiz (literally "Dreadful Jurists: The Remorseless Past of Our Judiciary"), describes the moral collapse of the German legal profession and its role in facilitating the construction and maintenance of the Nazi regime. Gracefully translated by Deborah Lucas Schneider, Hitler's Justice seeks, first, to show how legal professionals betrayed their trust as lawyers, prosecutors, and judges and, second, to assess the degree to which Germany in the postwar period reformed its legal system, purged the judiciary of former Nazis, and rededicated itself to the rule of law. …
An Emerging Conception Of Fundamental Rights In Contemporary Russia, Mary Holland
An Emerging Conception Of Fundamental Rights In Contemporary Russia, Mary Holland
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The article explores the emergence of a new conception of fundamental rights in post-Soviet Russia, marking a significant shift from a totalitarian regime to a more democratic, rule-of-law-based system. This transformation is evident through the adoption of key legal documents: the Declaration of Rights and Freedoms, the Conception of Judicial Reform, and the Law on the Constitutional Court. These reforms reflect a rejection of the Soviet legal tradition, alignment with international human rights standards, and a re-emergence of pre-revolutionary Russian legal ideals. The article argues that these developments signify a fundamental change in the Russian legal framework, emphasizing individual rights …
Legal Rhetoric Under Stress: The Example Of Vichy, Richard H. Weisberg
Legal Rhetoric Under Stress: The Example Of Vichy, Richard H. Weisberg
Cardozo Law Review
The article examines the complicity of the Vichy legal system in the persecution of Jews during World War II, arguing that French lawyers and judges actively contributed to Nazi objectives through legalistic rhetoric and formalism. By focusing on individual cases and interpretive debates, the legal profession avoided addressing the moral and ethical implications of their actions, enabling the enforcement of oppressive policies. The analysis critiques the failure of legal professionalism and the dangers of prioritizing formalism over human rights.
Comparative American Judicial Systems, Jeffrey A. Parness
Comparative American Judicial Systems, Jeffrey A. Parness
University of Richmond Law Review
Far too often when we discuss American courts and their judicial systems, we take little note of the significant differences in the ways in which cases are handled and law is practiced. We probably contemplate the dichotomy between trial and appellate courts; between rural and urban courts; between general and special jurisdiction courts; between state and federal courts; between courts with elected and selected judges; and between civil and criminal courts. We also surely contemplate the differences in attitudes, work habits, ideology, staff and the like which separate individual judges, and we inevitably contemplate the divergent judicial approaches to the …
The Italian Constitutional Court And The Relationship Between The Italian Legal System And The European Community, Mart Cartabia
The Italian Constitutional Court And The Relationship Between The Italian Legal System And The European Community, Mart Cartabia
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article will address how it has been possible that the same Court, interpreting the same Constitution and facing the same problems, has come to such contradictory conclusions, and will assess the impact of such conclusions on the institutional relationship between the EC and Italy.
Civil Procedure Reform In Japan, Takeshi Kojima
Civil Procedure Reform In Japan, Takeshi Kojima
Michigan Journal of International Law
Delay in court has been a problem common in all eras, both ancient and modern, and to all systems of law, Western and Eastern alike. In Japan, however, the problem is arguably more acute. The average delay between filing and judgment for cases that require at least a minimum level of proof-taking or an evidentiary hearing is 27 months. This deplorable reality has recently led to renewed efforts to tackle the problem of delay in Japan. Two groups that have been particularly important in this effort are two local bar associations and the Tokyo and Osaka district courts. The First …
Opinion Of The Supreme People's Court On Questions Concerning The Implementation Of The General Principles Of Civil Law Of The People's Republic Of China (Translation), Whitmore Gray, Henry R. Zheng
Opinion Of The Supreme People's Court On Questions Concerning The Implementation Of The General Principles Of Civil Law Of The People's Republic Of China (Translation), Whitmore Gray, Henry R. Zheng
Articles
The General Principles of Civil Law of the People's Republic of China ("General Principles") came into force on January 1, 1987. We now issue the following Opinion concerning issues encountered when implementing the General Principles
Law, Change, And Litigation: A Critical Examination Of An Empirical Research Tradition, Frank W. Munger
Law, Change, And Litigation: A Critical Examination Of An Empirical Research Tradition, Frank W. Munger
Articles & Chapters
This article examines the theory and empirical methods of recent studies of law and litigation. It argues that the recent interest in longitudinal studies of trial court dockets proceeds from a deeply rooted functionalist theoretical tradition in empirical work on courts. Functionalist theory, through its sophisticated application in the work of James Willard Hurst, is described as the direct or indirect source of theory for longitudinal litigation studies. Though there are many reasons for suspecting that fuctionalist theory is inadequate, it has seldom been rejected through proper empirical testing of its hypotheses. The theory, often poorly conceptualized, is discussed here …
The American Advantage: The Value Of Inefficient Litigation, Samuel R. Gross
The American Advantage: The Value Of Inefficient Litigation, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
In a recent article, The German Advantage in Civil Procedure,1 Professor John Langbein claims that the German system of civil litigation is superior to the American; in an earlier article he makes a parallel claim about German criminal procedure.2 Roughly, Professor Langbein argues that by comparison to the German process, American litigation is overly complex, expensive, slow, and unpredictable - in short, inefficient.3 Professor Langbein is not the first and will not be the last to criticize American legal institutions in these terms, but he expresses this criticism particularly well: he is concise and concrete, he describes American practice by …
Apartheid And The South African Judiciary, Lawrence G. Baxter
Apartheid And The South African Judiciary, Lawrence G. Baxter
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Government By Judges: An Historical Re-View, Michael Henry Davis
A Government By Judges: An Historical Re-View, Michael Henry Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
In 1921, Edouard Lambert, a professor of law at Lyon specializing in comparative studies and founder of an Institute of Comparative Law there, published a book, Le Gouvernement des judges et la lutte contra la legislation sociale aux Etats-Unis, thus singlehandedly creating the phrase, a "government of judges", to denote a truly unconstrained system of judicial review which could not be limited even by constitutional amendment. The phrase quickly entered the parlance of French public law and even that of popular culture, deriving much of its force, no doubt, from the historical French aversion to a strong judiciary, eventually becoming …
Conscience And The Law: The English Criminal Jury, Robert C. Palmer
Conscience And The Law: The English Criminal Jury, Robert C. Palmer
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Verdict According to Conscience by Thomas Andrew Green
The Law/Politics Distinction, The French Conseil Constitutionnel, And The U.S. Supreme Court, Michael H. Davis
The Law/Politics Distinction, The French Conseil Constitutionnel, And The U.S. Supreme Court, Michael H. Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
A dispute burns across the landscape of French constitutional law regarding the juridical nature of the French constitutional "Supreme Court", the Conseil constitutionnel: is it a court? Both French and American scholars have claimed that, despite superficial similarities between the U.S. Supreme Court and the French Conseil constitutionnel, the American system of judicial review "can have no counterpart in the French system", that French legal and political theory is inconstistent with an effective supreme court, that there is "no possibility" that the French and American systems could surmount this "major difference", and that the Conseil is simply not a "true …