Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Borrowers And Bankruptcy Trustees’ Unsuccessful Attempts To Avoid A Mortgage Under The “Splitting-The-Note” Theory, Alana Friedberg

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In 1993, the mortgage industry created the electronic database Mortgage Electronic Registration System (“MERS”) in order to “track ownership interests in residential mortgages.” MERS “serves as the mortgagee in the land records for loans registered on the MERS System, and is a nominee (or agent) for the owner of the promissory note.” To date, MERS holds title to around 60 million home mortgages, about half of all home mortgages in the United States.

Borrowers and bankruptcy trustees have attempted unsuccessfully to argue a mortgage or deed of trust is void if a third party, such as MERS, was designated …

Professional Fee Enhancements: Determining Whether A Professional Is Entitled To A Fee Enhancement Under Section 330 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Adrianna R. Grancio

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code governs the compensation of a professional person employed under section 327 or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under section 330(a), the court may award a professional “reasonable compensation for actual [and] necessary services.” Section 330 provides a non-exclusive list of factors for a court to consider in determining whether the proposed compensation is reasonable. In addition to these statutory factors, courts also analyze the proposed fee by using two methods utilized in pre-bankruptcy code cases; (1) “Lodestar” method and (2) factors from Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc (the “Johnson Factors”).

The determination of whether the …

Student Loans Can Be Discharged (At Least Partially) In Bankruptcy After All, Carmella Gubbiotti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth debts that are not dischargeable. Among the non-dischargeable debts, which a debtor will still owe after they receive a bankruptcy discharge, are debts from educational loans. As such, these student loan debts may prevent many debtors from receiving a truly fresh start following bankruptcy. Courts historically have approached the undue hardship exception to this rule narrowly, applying it only where the debtor, under the circumstances, could not reap the benefit of her education.

This Article will discuss the various tests courts use to determine whether an educational debt is dischargeable. Part …

An Oversecured Creditor’S Post-Petition Attorneys’ Fees, Governed By State Law Or Federal Law’S 11 U.S.C. 506(B), Charles Lazo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcy, an oversecured creditor is generally entitled to post-petition interest on their underlying claims, and post-petition reasonable fees, costs, or charges provided for under a contract or state statute. Although an oversecured creditor might be entitled to attorneys’ fees under a contract provision or a state statute, bankruptcy courts will review such fees for reasonableness. However, the Bankruptcy Code does not provide what laws govern on the issue of whether fees are reasonable. Currently, there is a three-way split among courts: (1) the majority of courts rule that federal law preempts state law as to the enforceability and …

The Exception To The Automatic Stays: Determining Whether Revenues Are Pledged Special Revenues, Debra March

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code provides two automatic stays in cases under chapter 9. These automatic stays, with limited exceptions, prevent both direct and indirect collection efforts against a municipal debtor. The first automatic stay provided by section 362(a) generally stays all direct collection efforts against the debtor. In addition, section 922(a) provides for an automatic stay that, with limited exception, also stays the commencement and continuation of claims against an officer as inhabitant of a municipal debtor, and the enforcement of a lien on or arising out of taxes or assessments of the municipal debtor. However, section 922(a) imposes a …

Same-Sex Couple Deemed “Spouses” For Purposes Of The Bankruptcy Code, Michael Rich

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code states that a legally married couple may file a joint bankruptcy petition pursuant to section 302(a). However, this right to joint filing is narrowly limited to an “individual that may be a debtor under such chapter and such individual’s spouse.” Generally, courts have rejected joint filings under section 302(a) filed by debtors who are not legally married. For example, a parent and child cannot file a joint bankruptcy petition under section 302(a). Further, a couple that is living together without being legally married may not file a joint petition. The Bankruptcy Code is silent as to …

Deeping Insolvency: A Cause Of Action, A Tool Of Measuring Damages, Or Nothing At All?, Nicholas Santoro

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

“Deepening Insolvency” is a rather new theory of either liability or damages in cases brought by a plaintiff (typically a bankruptcy trustee, litigation trust, or some other party “filling in” for an insolvent corporation, or debtor) against directors, officers, attorneys, or other professionals, based on their dealings with the debtor. “Deepening insolvency” has been defined as “injury to the debtors' corporate property from the fraudulent expansion of corporate debt and prolongation of corporate life.” The theory of deepening insolvency has become a highly debated by attorneys, creditors, and the courts.

The courts, both state and federal, have continued to …

Are Government Creditors Exempt From U.C.C. Article 9 Filing And Perfection Requirements?, Thomas Sica

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”) requires a creditor to perfect its security interests against its collateral in order to recover the creditor’s priority in such collateral. Former versions of the UCC that predate 2001 provided that the Article 9’s perfection requirements did not apply “[t]o a transfer by a government or a governmental unit of the state.” This exception was eliminated from the UCC in 2001. Thirty-two states, however, still have versions of the UCC that contain some version of this exception. Within the states that still enforce this exception for governmental units, there are …

Judicial Estoppel: Essentially Locking In Representations Made During Bankruptcy Proceeding, Sophie Tan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code provides that a debtor is required to file with the bankruptcy, among other things, “a list of [its] creditors,” a “schedule of [its] assets and liabilities,” and “a statement of [its] financial affairs.” With the filing of its schedules, the debtor asserts a position with respect to its assets, liabilities, and financial affairs, which is relied on by the bankruptcy court, the debtor’s creditors, and the other parties in interest. Accordingly, various circuit courts have recognized that “the success of our bankruptcy laws requires a debtor’s full and honest disclosure,” and that there needs to be …

The Irs Can Offset Post-Petition Tax Overpayments Against Pre-Petition Tax Liabilities, Kyle J. Tumsuden

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcy cases, creditors have the powerful right of “setoff,” i.e., the right to “net” or cancel payments. The right to set off usually arises in cases of mutual debt obligations where a debtor owes a debt to a creditor who in turn owes a unilateral debt back to the same debtor. The rationale for the right to setoff it obvious, as it allows the parties to apply their mutual debt obligations against each other, “thereby avoiding the absurdity of making A pay B when B owes A.” In other words, the court will reduce the two competing judgments …

The Continued Growth Of The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality And Its Impact On The Bankruptcy Code’S Avoidance Provisions, Michael Vandermark

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Exceprt)

Over the past several years, ever since the United States Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Limited, the presumption against extraterritoriality has steadily expanded across much of the legal field. In doing so, the presumption has again become the dominant standard in deciding whether Congressional legislation may be used on an extraterritorial basis. This expansion has recently encompassed portions of the Bankruptcy Code, specifically, its avoidance provisions.

The presumption, as noted in detail below, relies on the premise that although the legislature has the authority to regulate beyond the borders of the United States, …

Gifting & The Absolute Priority Rule, Brianna Walsh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The absolute priority rule sets forth a hierarchical scheme for the distribution of proceeds obtained through liquidating the assets of a debtor. The scheme provides that property of an estate shall be distributed to secured creditors, then to administrative and priority unsecured creditors, then to unsecured creditors, and lastly to equity holders. Under Chapter 11, section 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) for a dissenting class of impaired creditors, a plan is “fair and equitable” only if the allowed value of such creditors claims are paid in full, or the holder of any claim or equity that is junior to the dissenting creditors will …

Rules Of Thumb For Intercreditor Agreements, Edward R. Morrison

Faculty Scholarship

Intercreditor agreements frequently restrict the extent to which subordinated creditors can participate in the bankruptcy process by, for example, contesting liens of senior lenders, objecting to a cash collateral motion, or even exercising the right to vote on a plan of reorganization. Because intercreditor agreements can reorder the bargaining environment in bankruptcy, some judges have been unsure about their enforceability. Other judges have not hesitated to enforce the agreements, at least when they do not restrict the voting rights of subordinated creditors. This essay argues that intercreditor agreements are controversial because they pose a trade-off: they reduce bargaining costs (by …

Postdefault Interest Rates In Bankruptcy, David G. Carlson

Articles

This Article shows that as Bankruptcy Code section 506(b) is currently written, postdefault interest rates are prohibited when the default is an “ipso facto event” — a filing for bankruptcy or insolvency as the event of a default. Yet some courts have insisted on postdefault interest in situations reinstating a loan agreement and have been ignoring restrictions on pendency interest to permit oversecured creditors from obtaining penalty rates of interest. This Article argues that those holdings violate section 506(b) and Supreme Court precedent. It begins with an analysis of ipso facto defaults, showing that the Bankruptcy Code prohibits ipso facto …

4th And 205: How A Rush Of Global Comments Blocked The Sec’S First Attempted Punt Of Attorney-Client Privilege Under Sarbanes-Oxley, John Paul Lucci

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is It Law Or Something Else?: A Divided Judiciary In The Application Of Fraudulent Transfer Law Under § 546(E) Of The Bankruptcy Code, Jaclyn Weissgerber

Pace Law Review

In Part I of this Note, I will provide a general overview of leveraged buyouts. The discussion of how and why LBOs are implemented is particularly relevant to the application of fraudulent transfer analysis. In Part II, I will discuss fraudulent transfer law as defined by the Bankruptcy Code. In Part III, I will discuss which transfers within the LBO should be attacked under fraudulent transfer law and why; this section will focus on the various stakes of the parties involved in the leveraged buyout transaction. I will provide an overview of the specific factors that bankruptcy and federal appellate …

How Courts Can Prevent Excess Emitters From Using Bankruptcy As A Forum To Avoid California Ab 32’S Allowance Deductions, Mohammed Tehrani

The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law

This paper identifies bankruptcy as a forum in which entities that exceed their emissions limit might be able to avoid the accompanying allowance deduction. Specifically, an entity might be able to sell its assets free and clear of its allowance deduction liabilities through Section 363 to a new company comprised of the same actors. Part II contrasts which liabilities can be discharged through a Chapter 11 plan and which can be avoided through a free and clear sale under Section 363. Part III analyzes whether allowance deductions could be discharged through a Chapter 11 plan or avoided through a free …

Reconciling The Municipal Pension Problem With Chapter 9'S Automatic Stay: A Case Note On In Re City Of San Bernardino, Michael Simon

The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law

Using In re City of San Bernardino as a springboard, this Note explores both the descriptive and analytic dimensions of a municipality seeking relief from its pension woes within the context of Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. As a descriptive matter, this Note illustrates that municipalities need alternative solutions to address the growing public pension problem besides issuing municipal bonds. Given the structure of certain public defined benefit pension systems, the strategy of issuing municipal bonds to raise cash has substantial disadvantages. In certain contexts, Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a significantly better alternative. Unlike a business …

Federalizing Principles Of Donative Intent And Unanticipated Circumstances, Reid K. Weisbord

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Comment identifies a central tenet of wealth transfer law that should guide federal actors when operating in this area: Wealth transfer law facilitates donative intent by responding to circumstances unanticipated by the donor. Wealth transfer law performs this intent- fulfilling function by supplying opt-outs, presumptions, and default rules to solve problems created by the donor's inability to predict or respond to future events. To illustrate that principle, this Comment will focus on one such rule, disclaimer rights, which refer to a donee's refusal to accept a donative transfer. In "Disclaimers and Federalism," Professor Adam J. Hirsch identifies several settings …

Survey 2014: Bankruptcy + Student Loan Debt Crisis, Brenda Beauchamp, Jason R. Cooper

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ponzi Schemes In Bankruptcy, Honorable Dorothy T. Eisenberg, Nicholas W. Quesenberry

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Secured Credit And Insolvency Law In Argentina And The U.S.: Gaining Insight From A Comparative Perspective, Guillermo A. Moglia Claps, Julian B. Mcdonnell

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Trademarked For Death? A Licensee's Trademark Rights After An Executory Contract Is Rejected In Bankruptcy, Philip L. Lu

Vanderbilt Law Review

In 1872, a young man named Claudio Alvarez Lefebre began manufacturing and selling high-quality rum in Cuba under the brand name "Ron Matusalem." In 1948, as the family-run business prospered, the company registered a trademark and corporate logo in the United States. Upon his death, Lefebre left the business-and the secret formulas for making his rum-to his wife and children. By the early 1960s, Lefebre's wife and children had immigrated to the United States, and they split the rum-making business into two separate corporations. These two distinct entities negotiated an executory contract in the form of a franchise agreement with …

Conflicting Preferences In Business Bankruptcy: The Need For Different Rules In Different Chapters, Brook E. Gotberg

Faculty Publications

The law of preferential transfers permits the trustee of a bankruptcy estate to avoid transfers made by the debtor to a creditor on account of a prior debt in the 90 days leading up to the bankruptcy proceeding. The standard for avoiding these preferential transfers is one of strict liability, on the rationale that preference actions exist to ensure that all general creditors of the bankruptcy estate recover the same proportional amount, regardless of the debtor's intent to favor any one creditor or the creditor's intent to be so favored. But preference law also permits certain exceptions to strict preference …

Non-Dischargeability Of Mixed Student Debt, Jordan Weiss

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Effect Of Air Carrier Restructuring Strategies On Post-Bankruptcy Performance, Harold Dale Townsend

Doctoral Dissertations and Master's Theses

Air carrier bankruptcy is a common occurrence in the aviation industry. However, there is a paucity of research on the topic of air carrier restructuring during the post-bankruptcy period. General restructuring literature has identified four types of actions: operational, financial, managerial, and portfolio. The purpose of this study was to partially fill the large literature gap in the area of air carrier post-bankruptcy performance through theoretical and practical contributions.

A multilevel exploratory factor analysis was conducted to explore whether the same restructuring areas were found in air carrier specific metrics. All four restructuring areas were found in the factor analysis. …

A Public Pensions Bailout: Economics And Law, Terrance O'Reilly

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

In several states, public pension plans are at risk of insolvency within a decade. These risks are significant, and the solutions currently contemplated are likely to fall short of what is necessary to contain the problem. If public pension plans do become insolvent, it seems likely the federal government will bail them out. This Article proposes that the federal government prepare for the prospect of federal financial support of public pension plans by instituting an optional regulatory regime for public pensions. If a state elects not to participate, its public pension plans would be ineligible for federal financial support. In …

Beyond Carve-Outs And Toward Reliance: A Normative Framework For Cross-Border Insolvency Choice Of Law, John A. E. Pottow

Articles

The title of this Article purports to develop a normative framework for cross-border insolvency choice of law. That can be a task of varying scope, so at the outset any pretense of ambition for a wholly new choice of law model should be dispelled. Indeed, at the most generalized level, bankruptcy choice of law theory has already been fully ventilated in the well-rehearsed universalism versus territorialism debates. And it has been settled. The universalists, at least as a normative matter, appear to have won: choice of law, as it is increasingly accepted, should be determined by the debtor's center of …

Moving Beyond Marriage: A Proposed Unit Of Presumed Economic Interdependence For Joint Filing Purposes In Bankruptcy And In Tax, Heather V. Graham

Pace Law Review

In order to promote both equality and efficiency, this Comment proposes that individuals should have the opportunity to file jointly for tax and bankruptcy purposes when they have a relationship predicated upon economic interdependence, as opposed to basing the opportunity to file jointly upon marital status. Part I of this Comment will briefly discuss the history of marriage in the United States. In particular, Part I will discuss the role that the government has had in promoting and regulating marriage and how the treatment of married persons operates to the exclusion of the unmarried. Parts II and III of this …

Bankruptcy, John T. Laney Iii, Daniel Taylor

Mercer Law Review

This Article focuses on bankruptcy opinions issued in 2013 by the Supreme Court of the United States and courts within the Eleventh Circuit. The topics range from the legality of "ghostwriting" to the definition of "defalcation" under section 523(a)(4) of the United States Bankruptcy Code.