Agency Commons^™

Center For Biological Diversity V. Jewell, Lowell J. Chandler

Public Land & Resources Law Review

The ESA protects threatened or endangered species, and species likely to become threatened or endangered within the foreseeable future, throughout all or a significant portion of their range. In Center for Biological Diversity v. Jewell, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona overturned a Fish and Wildlife Service policy defining the significant portion of range language in the ESA. The policy interpretation limited ESA protections to apply only when a species faced risk of extinction throughout its entire range. The court deemed this policy impermissible because it effectively rendered the significant portion of range language meaningless. …

Pit River Tribe V. Bureau Of Land Management, 793 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2015), Kathryn S. Ore

Public Land & Resources Law Review

In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explained the correct application of the zone of interests test and further solidified the importance of proper NEPA and NHPA analysis in geothermal leasing. The court reaffirmed that the BLM and the Forest Service must conduct additional cultural and environmental analysis when granting lease extensions under the Geothermal Steam Act. Furthermore, it rejected the BLM’s decision to grant forty-year lease continuations to unproven geothermal leases by treating them as a unit rather than individually.

High Country Conservation Advocates V. United States Forest Service, 52 F. Supp. 3d 1174 (D. Colo. 2014), Kathryn S. Ore

Public Land & Resources Law Review

High Country Conservation Advocates v. United States Forest Service concerns the United States Forest Service’s and the Bureau of Land Management’s authorizations of on-the-ground mining exploration activities in the Sunset Roadless Area of western Colorado. The United States District Court for the District of Colorado’s holding has far-reaching consequences for federal agencies’ analysis and disclosure of impacts on the climate under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). In addition to bolstering the Plaintiffs’ recent successes at establishing legal standing to challenge federal agencies’ disclosures and analyses of impacts on the climate under NEPA, High Country is the first case to …

The History And Future Of Genetically Modified Crops: Frankenfoods, Superweeds, And The Developing World, Brooke Glass-O'Shea

Journal of Food Law & Policy

In a 1992 letter to the New York Times, a man named Paul Lewis referred to genetically modified (GM) crops as "Frankenfood," and wryly suggested it might be "time to gather the villagers, light some torches and head to the castle." Little did Lewis know that his neologism would become the rallying cry for activists around the world protesting the dangers of genetic engineering. The environmental activist group Greenpeace made great use of the "Frankenfood" epithet in their anti-GM campaigns of the 1990s, though they have since backed away from the word and the hardline stance it represents. But genetically …

Splitting Scales: Conflicting National And Regional Attempts To Manage Commercial Aquaculture In The Exclusive Economic Zone, Brandee Ketchum

Journal of Food Law & Policy

Like other environmental resources subject to public use, various interest groups struggle over joint management of scarce fisheries resources. Further, differing goals for resource management, such as financial goals versus conservation goals, frequently pit regional groups against one another. In some cases, regional interests may conflict with overall national interests. As goes the water and the air, so go the fish.

A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp

ExpressO

The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.

Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp

ExpressO

This brief comment suggests where the anti-eminent domain movement might be heading next.

Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp

ExpressO

Capture theory--in which private purpose is substituted for government purpose--sheds light on a technique which is coming into greater use post-Kelo v. New London. That case affirmed that eminent domain use need only be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose. Capture theory focuses litigators' attention on "government purpose." That is a question of fact for the trier of fact. This article shows how to use civil discovery in order to show the Court that private purpose has been substituted for government purpose. If it has, the eminent domain use fails, because the use does not meet minimum scrutiny. This …

Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor

ExpressO

No abstract provided.

Agenda: A Cartography Of Governance: Exploring The Province Of Environmental Ngos, University Of Colorado Boulder. School Of Law, University Of Colorado Boulder. Environmental Program, University Of Tulsa. National Energy-Environment Law & Policy Institute, University Of Colorado Boulder. United Government Of Graduate Students

A Cartography of Governance: Exploring the Province of Environmental NGOs (April 7-8)

Presented by: the Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy on April 7 & 8, 2001. Symposium director: Lakshman D. Guruswamy.

Co-sponsored by: University of Colorado School of Law, University of Colorado Environmental Program, University of Tulsa National Energy-Environment Law and Policy Institute, University of Colorado United Government of Graduate Students.

The papers and edited proceedings of the conference will be published in a special symposium issue of the Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy (CJIELP).

"The first objective of the Symposium was to understand and explore the growing importance of nongovernmental actors, and delineate the manner …

Air Resources Board, H. Biggs, J. D. Fellmeth

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Water Resources Control Board, A. Selvidge, B. Vahle

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Coastal Commission, L. Blundell, M. Stump

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, P. Negley, J. Nguyen

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Department Of Pesticide Regulation, S. Frank, E. D'Angelo Weichel

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Fish And Game Commission, L. Baker, G. Silva

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Forestry, K. Carlin, G. Durant, J. D. Fellmeth

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Air Resources Board, R. Moore

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Fish And Game Commission, M. Brenot, C. Putnam

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Coastal Commission, P. Dennehy, K. Thompson

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Forestry, M. Felsen, M. Brenot, J. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Water Resources Control Board, L. Blaney, T. Kemp

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Water Resources Control Board, L. Blaney, T. Kemp

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Forestry, M. Felsen, M. Brenot, C. Putnam

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Air Resources Board, R. Moore

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Coastal Commission, P. Dennehy, K. Thompson

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Fish And Game Commission, M. Brenot, C. Putnam

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Air Resources Board, J. Collins, R. Moore

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, J. D. Bournazian, J. Brysk

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Coastal Commission, P. Dennehy, K. Thompson

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.