Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of San Diego (2092)
- Seattle University School of Law (206)
- Fordham Law School (49)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (32)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (27)
-
- Penn State Dickinson Law (17)
- American University Washington College of Law (16)
- University of Montana (14)
- New York Law School (12)
- Brooklyn Law School (9)
- BLR (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (5)
- University of Maine School of Law (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Winthrop University (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Association of American Law Schools (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Purdue University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- AB 1807 (84)
- SB 664 (57)
- SB 2044 (55)
- SB 2036 (51)
- AB 1392 (46)
-
- SB 842 (43)
- Agency (37)
- AB 459 (29)
- Administrative law (29)
- Inc. (29)
- AB 2743 (26)
- Regulation (24)
- SB 6 (24)
- AB 1893 (21)
- California Supreme Court (21)
- AB 819 (20)
- SB 10 (20)
- AB 3242 (19)
- California Courts of Appeal (19)
- SB 2101 (19)
- SB 315 (19)
- AB 14 (18)
- AB 2721 (18)
- Elections (17)
- SB 155 (17)
- SB 917 (17)
- United States and California v. City of San Diego (17)
- AB 1596 (16)
- AB 168 (16)
- AB 173 (16)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (2090)
- Seattle University Law Review (193)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (31)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (27)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (17)
-
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (17)
- Fordham Law Review (14)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (13)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (13)
- American Indian Law Journal (9)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Articles & Chapters (6)
- ExpressO (6)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Brooklyn Law Review (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Journal of Legal Studies in Business (4)
- Presentations (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (3)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (3)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (3)
- Ocean and Coastal Law Journal (3)
- Texas A&M Law Review (3)
- United States Department of Homeland Security (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Washington Law Review (3)
- Books (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 451 - 480 of 2566
Full-Text Articles in Agency
Board Of Pharmacy, Stephanie Mendivil, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
Board Of Pharmacy, Stephanie Mendivil, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Board Of Accountancy, Thomas Burke, Debra Jorgensen
California Board Of Accountancy, Thomas Burke, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Committee Of Bar Examiners, Halie Turigliatti, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
Committee Of Bar Examiners, Halie Turigliatti, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Auer Deference Should Be Dead; Long Live Seminole Rock Deference, John B. Meisel
Auer Deference Should Be Dead; Long Live Seminole Rock Deference, John B. Meisel
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
Deference doctrines should be understood in light of the Administrative Procedures Act’s distinction between legislative rules and interpretive rules and should be based on a solid theoretical foundation. Modern Auer deference calls for categorical deference for an agency’s regulatory interpretation of an ambiguous regulation. This is inconsistent with the APA’s characterization of the purpose of an interpretive rule. Properly construed, interpretive rules clarify the meaning of a legal text which should be justified by use of expository reasoning. These rules deserve a lesser form of deference (Skidmore deference), based on an agency’s unique understanding of its own regulations which …
Department Of Insurance, Marie Mcdonald Hulen, Brittany Hodgson, Debra Jorgensen
Department Of Insurance, Marie Mcdonald Hulen, Brittany Hodgson, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Dental Board Of California, Katie Abajian, Debra Jorgensen
Dental Board Of California, Katie Abajian, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Business Oversight, James D. Colleran, R C. Fellmeth
Department Of Business Oversight, James D. Colleran, R C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
The Regulatory Accountability Act Loses Steam But The Trump Executive Order On Alj Selection Upturned 71 Years Of Practice, Jeffrey Lubbers
The Regulatory Accountability Act Loses Steam But The Trump Executive Order On Alj Selection Upturned 71 Years Of Practice, Jeffrey Lubbers
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Crow Indian Tribe V. United States, Hallee Kansman
Crow Indian Tribe V. United States, Hallee Kansman
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The protection status of the Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear continues to elicit debate and find its way into the courtroom. In Crow Indian Tribe v. United States, for the second time in the last decade, a court held the Service’s attempt to delist the Yellowstone Grizzly arbitrary and capricious. Specifically, the court found the Service’s evaluation of remnant populations, recalibration, and genetic health deficient. This case demonstrates the importance in and the resilient motivation behind preserving grizzly bear populations and genetics. As the practice of delisting a species under the Endangered Species Act continues, this case will provide important …
Auer Deference: Doubling Down On Delegation's Defects, Ronald A. Cass
Auer Deference: Doubling Down On Delegation's Defects, Ronald A. Cass
Fordham Law Review
Together with the better-known Chevron deference rule, the doctrine articulated in Auer v. Robbins two decades ago—which makes reasonable administrative constructions of ambiguous administrative rules binding on courts in most circumstances—has become a focal point for concerns about the expanding administrative state. Auer deference, even more than Chevron deference, enlarges administrative authority in ways that are at odds with basic constitutional structures and due process requirements. Objections to Auer have provided cogent reasons for why courts should not grant deference to administrative interpretations merely because an agency’s rule is unclear. The most commonly voiced objections, however, do not explain why …
Home Rules: The Case For Local Administrative Procedure, Casey Adams
Home Rules: The Case For Local Administrative Procedure, Casey Adams
Fordham Law Review
Administrative law is critical to the modern practice of governance. Administrative rules fill the gaps in statutes left open by lawmakers, allow agencies to exercise legislative grants of authority and discretion, and give agencies with subject-matter expertise and frontline experience the opportunity to promulgate detailed standards and requirements in their designated issue areas. Adjudication allows an agency to dispose of matters and disputes formally before it, whether under its rules or another source of law. While agencies at every level of government—federal, state, and local— engage in administrative action, legal scholarship on administrative law is almost exclusively focused on the …
Buffalo Field Campaign V. Zinke, Hallee C. Kansman
Buffalo Field Campaign V. Zinke, Hallee C. Kansman
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Despite years of litigation and legislation, the protection status of bison in and around Yellowstone National Park remains unsettled. Buffalo Field Campaign, a non-profit group, has spent decades spearheading the fight to list the species as either endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Buffalo Field Campaign v. Zinke tests the scope of agency directives and the strictness of the statutory language which guides agency actions.
Western Organization Of Resource Councils V. Zinke, Daniel Brister
Western Organization Of Resource Councils V. Zinke, Daniel Brister
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Due to advances in climate science and an increased understanding of coal’s role as a greenhouse gas, Appellant conservation organizations sued the Secretary of Interior for failing to supplement the 1979 Programmatic EIS for the Federal Coal Management Program. The D.C. Circuit Court held neither NEPA nor the APA required a supplemental EIS and that the court lacked jurisdiction to compel the Secretary to prepare one. Expressing sympathy for the Appellants’ position, the D.C. Circuit took the unusual step of offering advice to future plaintiffs on how they might succeed on similar claims.
Board Of Pharmacy, Mariam J. Saleh, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
Board Of Pharmacy, Mariam J. Saleh, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Veterinary Medical Board, Bryan Yerger, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
Veterinary Medical Board, Bryan Yerger, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Contractors’ State License Board, Mayra Castro, J. D. Fellmeth
Contractors’ State License Board, Mayra Castro, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Public Utilities Commission, Jessica Kirshner, Faye Winkler, R. C. Fellmeth, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
Public Utilities Commission, Jessica Kirshner, Faye Winkler, R. C. Fellmeth, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
California Board Of Accountancy, Anna V. Randall, J. D. Fellmeth
California Board Of Accountancy, Anna V. Randall, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
State Bar Of California, Edith Jimenez, Andrew J. Van Arsdale, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
State Bar Of California, Edith Jimenez, Andrew J. Van Arsdale, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Daniel Ballinger, R. C. Fellmeth, J. D. Fellmeth
Bureau For Private Postsecondary Education, Daniel Ballinger, R. C. Fellmeth, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Insurance, J. D. Fellmeth
Department Of Insurance, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Medical Board Of California, Kayla Watson, J. D. Fellmeth
Medical Board Of California, Kayla Watson, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Managed Health Care, Jennifer Pardue, J. D. Fellmeth
Department Of Managed Health Care, Jennifer Pardue, J. D. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registered Nursing, Ashkan Hayatdavoudi, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
Board Of Registered Nursing, Ashkan Hayatdavoudi, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of A Little Judiciary: A Textual And Constitutional Foundation For Chevron, Terence J. Mccarrick Jr.
In Defense Of A Little Judiciary: A Textual And Constitutional Foundation For Chevron, Terence J. Mccarrick Jr.
San Diego Law Review
This Article hopes to help fill that “important gap in the administrative law literature.” And it proceeds in three parts. Part II offers a brief history of the Chevron doctrine and its discontents. It traces the doctrine’s origin and scope and ends by articulating the textualist and originalist critique of Chevron described above. Part III grapples with that criticism and offers a textualist and originalist defense of Chevron. Section III.A describes the textual footing for Chevron in the APA and argues that Chevron—if not commanded by the APA—does not upset the role it envisions for courts. Section III.B describes the …
Atlantic Richfield Company V. Montana Second Judicial District Court, Molly Kelly
Atlantic Richfield Company V. Montana Second Judicial District Court, Molly Kelly
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Landowners in Opportunity, Montana sought restoration damages from ARCO, Anaconda Copper Mining Company’s successor, to their property from over a century of processing ore at the Anaconda Smelter. ARCO argued that CERCLA preempted and barred any claim for restoration damages. The Montana Supreme Court held: landowners could bring their state common law claims seeking restoration damages; the state district court had subject matter jurisdiction; and landowners’ proposed restoration fund did not challenge EPA’s selected remedy under CERCLA.
National Association Of Manufacturers V. Department Of Defense, Summer L. Carmack
National Association Of Manufacturers V. Department Of Defense, Summer L. Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In an attempt to provide consistency to the interpretation and application of the statutory phrase “waters of the United States,” as used in the Clean Water Act, the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers together passed the WOTUS Rule. Unfortunately, the Rule has created more confusion than clarity, resulting in a number of lawsuits challenging substantive portions of the Rule’s language. National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense did not address those substantive challenges, but instead determined whether those claims challenging the Rule must be filed in federal district courts or federal courts of appeals. In its decision, the …
Mays V. City Of Flint, Michigan, Nathan A. Burke
Mays V. City Of Flint, Michigan, Nathan A. Burke
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In Mays v. City of Flint Michigan, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality employees removed a class action against them in the Michigan state court to federal court under the federal-officer removal statute. This court ruled in favor of the residents of Flint, determining that the federal officer removal statute did not give the federal court jurisdiction over a state agency simply because the agency must follow federal rules. The court held that Michigan Department of Environmental Quality employees could not have been “acting under” the federal government even though the state agency’s enforcement authority could be trumped by the …
The Crime Of Conviction Of John Choon Yoo: The Actual Criminality In The Olc During The Bush Administration, Joseph Lavitt
The Crime Of Conviction Of John Choon Yoo: The Actual Criminality In The Olc During The Bush Administration, Joseph Lavitt
Maine Law Review
At the outset of the administration of President Barack Obama, there is intense debate about whether to prosecute members of the former administration of President George W. Bush. This Article first considers whether officers who were in command and control of the Executive Branch of the government of the United States during the Bush administration can be excused from criminal responsibility on charges of illegal torture, based on their claim to have acted in good faith reliance upon the advice of attorneys employed by the Department of Justice. Focus then turns to the accountability, if any, of those attorneys in …