Administrative Law Commons^™

Peranan Negara Dan Hukum Dalam Memberantas Kemiskinan Dengan Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Umum, Yohanes Suhardin

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kedudukan Hukum Sebagai Alat Pembangunan Ekonomi Di Era Reformasi, Afifah Kusumadara

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Plagiarisme Akademik: Perspektif Metode Keilmuan Dan Doktrin Hukum, Jufrina Rizal

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Hukum Pengadaan Barang (Government Procurement) Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, Ade Maman Suherman

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Luar Pengadllan Antar Warga Suku Sasak Dl Pulau Lombok, Idrus Abdullah

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tki Yang Bekerja Di Luar Negeri (Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Sinkronisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangari Penempatan Dan Perlindungan Tki), Lalu Husni

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Hak Cipta Bukan Hanya Copyright, Agus Sardjono

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Anallsis Terhadap Kontroversi Rancangan Peraturan Pemerintah Tentang Tata Cara Intersepsi Yang Sesuai Hukum (Lawful Interception), Edmon Makarim

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Anallsis Hukum Islam Terhadap Praktik Aborsi Bagi Kehamilan Tidak Diharapkan (Ktd) Akibat Perkosaan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan, Titik Triwulan Tutik

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Korporasi Sebagai Pengemban Kewajiban Ham: Suatu Pencarian Legitimasi Dalam Hukum Internasional, Patricia Rinwigati Waagstein

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Indonesia's Position Based On The Australian Asean New Zealand Free Trade Agreement And Its Impact From A Business La W Perspective, Ariawan Gunadi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Constitutional Question (Menyoal Konstltusjonalitas Pasal Tentang Pengemis Kuhp Pasal 504 Ayat (1) Dan (2)), Isrok Isrok

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

The Necessity Of Capacity Building For Indonesia's Effective Utilization Of Wto Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Implementation Of Gait Article Xx For Trade And Environment Issues, Windu Kisworo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Peran Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Ujang Bahar

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Norma Kesusilaan Sebagai Batasan Pornografi Menurut Undang-Undang No. 44 Tahun 2008, Hwian Christianto

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Investigasi Pendek Atas Kesejarahan Teori Hukum, Selaku Disiplin Yang Mengemban Misi Teoretikal Bidang Hukum, Rahadjeng Endah Ks.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Leveraging Citizen Science To Advance Environmental Justice In Climate-Vulnerable Communities Post-Loper Bright, Lauren Valli

Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law

The Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v.

Raimondo removed the judicial obligation to defer to the Environmental

Protection Agency’s statutory interpretations, overturning forty years of

Chevron v. NRDC jurisprudence. Now, generalist judges must

independently evaluate complex scientific data when determining

statutory meaning, creating the risk that well-resourced industry parties

will use their litigation advantages to secure pollution-permissive statutory

interpretations. Without deference to EPA’s technical understanding and

public welfare considerations, environmental litigation outcomes

increasingly depend on which party can most persuasively present

environmental data in court. This interpretation shift widens the

environmental enforcement gap and disproportionately harms historically …

U.S. V. Washington: Considering The Continuing Injunction Of The Boldt Decision, Nicholas Brown

Public Land & Resources Law Review

Judge George Hugo Boldt’s 1974 opinion in United States v. Washington was a landmark decision in the recognition of treaty fishing rights for tribes in western Washington. Not only did it recognize the entitlement to 50% of harvestable yields of fish within the tribes’ usual and accustomed fishing sites, but it also provided a permanent injunction to protect future fishing rights for generations to come. Now, over fifty years since the original “Boldt decision” was made, judges in the Ninth Circuit are debating whether the continued injunction to litigate intertribal disputes over treaty fishing rights is proper. This article considers …

Western Watersheds Project V. Schultz, Cv 22-149-M-Dlc-Kld, 2025 Lx 449507, 2025 Wl 2410283 (D. Mont. Mar. 27, 2025), Luke A. Zagar

Public Land & Resources Law Review

Western Watersheds Project v. Schultz delineates what the Forest Service is required to consider for revising Allotment Management Plans as prescribed by NEPA. Environmental plaintiffs sued, arguing that the Forest Service’s reliance on an older baseline assessment was arbitrary and capricious and that the revised AMP failed to consider major impacts on the grizzly bear population. The District of Montana held that the reliance on an older baseline assessment was acceptable but simultaneously found the AMP to be arbitrary and capricious under the “hard look” standard.

San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper V. Cnty. Of San Luis Obispo, 161 F.4th 590 (9th Cir. 2025), Erika C. Rader

Public Land & Resources Law Review

In San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper v. Cnty. of San Luis Obispo, the Ninth Circuit addressed how to consider a mandatory preliminary injunction for an Endangered Species Act claim when multiple listed species may be affected by the requested relief. The Plaintiffs brought ESA and state law claims to compel the County of San Luis Obispo to change its operation of the Lopez Dam on Arroyo Grande Creek, which they claimed adversely affected South-Central California Coast steelhead trout. The tidewater goby and California red-legged frog, both listed species, are also present in Arroyo Grande Creek. The Ninth Circuit determined the …

Unleashing Consultation: Tohono O’Odham Nation V. Department Of Interior And The Case For Reforming The National Historic Preservation Act, Elizabeth Tobey

Public Land & Resources Law Review

The Ninth Circuit’s 2025 decision in Tohono O’odham Nation v. Department of Interior highlights an ongoing failure by federal land management agencies to consult meaningfully with tribal nations as mandated by the 1966 National Historic Preservation Act. This article argues that the NHPA’s framework for tribal consultation enables federal land management agencies to sidestep meaningful engagement with tribes, undermining both cultural resource protection and the federal Indian trust responsibility. To address these deficiencies—particularly in the context of renewable energy development on federal public lands, directly at issue in Tohono O’odham Nation—this article proposes amendments to the NHPA informed by …

Wilderness Watch V. U.S. Forest Service, No. Cv 23-133-M-Dwm, 2025 Wl 2985292 (D. Mont. Oct. 23, 2025)., Gardner Dee

Public Land & Resources Law Review

This comment argues that the District of Montana’s decision in Wilderness Watch v. U.S. Forest Service correctly applied the Ninth Circuit’s Kofa framework to strike down a multi-agency native trout restoration project in the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness, holding that the Forest Service unlawfully prioritized Yellowstone cutthroat trout conservation over the Wilderness Act’s mandate to preserve wilderness character. Dee further contends that while large wilderness watersheds offer valuable climate refugia for native coldwater fish, watershed-scale restoration projects will continue to conflict with the Act’s prohibitions on motorized and mechanized intrusions so long as agencies rely on helicopter transport and rotenone application at …

Kebijakan Pertanahan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal, Arie S. Hutagalung

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Praktek Pembebanan Dan Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Di Indonesia, Prof. Ny. Arie S. Hutagalung

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Budaya Malu, Budaya Salah, Dan Budaya Hukum, Mura P. Hutagalung

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pembeli Beritikad Baik Dalam Konteks Jual Beli Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Indonesia, Arie S. Hutagalung, Suparjo Sujadi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

High-Caliber Tensions: Implications Of Florida’S Medical Marijuana Program On The Right To Keep And Bear Arms, George Bell, Kate E. Altman

University of Miami Law Review

What is more valuable—the right to protect yourself, or the right to seek medical treatment? Presently, law abiding Floridians must choose between the two. Because the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“ATF”) classifies medical marijuana patients as “unlawful drug users,” Floridians enrolled in the State’s medical marijuana scheme are prohibited from lawfully owning firearms. A lawsuit currently pending before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals seeks to address this constitutional conflict. This Article discusses that lawsuit, the legal framework in which it’s proceeding, and how courts may decide the appropriate balance between such fundamental questions.

What’S The Difference Without Deference: How The Eleventh Circuit Stopped Deferring To The Sentencing Commission And Shaped A New Landscape Of Federal Sentencing, Katherine Howard, Conrad Kahn

University of Miami Law Review

The Sentencing Guidelines shape nearly every federal sentence. Judges must calculate and consider the Guidelines’ recommended range before deciding how long someone goes to prison. For decades, though, courts treated the Sentencing Commission’s commentary about the Guidelines as controlling—even when the guideline’s text was clear and unambiguous.

That changed with United States v. Dupree. Sitting en banc, the Eleventh Circuit held that the Supreme Court’s decision in Kisor v. Wilkie—which limits when courts may defer to an agency’s interpretation of its own rules—applies to the Sentencing Guidelines. After Dupree, courts may not defer to the commentary unless, …

Judgment By The Record: How The Eleventh Circuit Is Shaping Retail Litigation And Regulation, Susan L. Shin, Aubrianna L. Mierow

University of Miami Law Review

The Eleventh Circuit’s 2025 term reinforced a disciplined, text-driven approach to statutory and contractual interpretation and a firm demand for proof: the court vacated an FCC rule that restricted consent beyond what the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) provides. It rejected a constitutional challenge to adjudication by the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) while emphasizing the Attorney General’s supervisory role. It required plaintiffs alleging deception through promotional content to identify the specific communication at issue. It denied standing for credit file inaccuracies absent dissemination or real-world effect. It interpreted standard limitation clauses to preserve direct damages under …

The Circuit Court Interim Docket, Jeffrey Paul Desousa, Casey Witte, Jacob Eisler

University of Miami Law Review

While there has been increased interest in the Supreme Court’s use of emergency applications to decide substantive legal questions on an interim basis (sometimes called, controversially, the “shadow docket,” or sometimes the “emergency docket,” though more aptly labeled the “interim docket”), equivalent practices at the appellate level have largely been overlooked. Yet these practices—the use of stays, injunctions, and similar urgent interventions against trial court rulings—have significant parallels to their Supreme Court counterparts. This Article sheds light on the courts of appeals’ interim practice, with a focus on the Eleventh Circuit. It first reviews the procedures that govern interim practice …